[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1059069] Re: Installing wine1.4 on amd-64 removes debhelper/gettext/lintian

2013-02-28 Thread Daniel Hartwig
** Also affects: wine1.4 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: lintian (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid ** Changed in: gettext (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid ** Changed in: debhelper (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You rec

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1059069] Re: Installing wine1.4 on amd-64 removes debhelper/gettext/lintian

2013-02-28 Thread Daniel Hartwig
This is almost certainly due to multi-arch issues in wine1.4. See bug 954029 and others. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gettext in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1059069 Title: Installing wine1.4 on amd-64 re

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 954029] Re: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with "gettext:any", "gettext-base:any", or are not required/useful at all

2013-04-22 Thread Daniel Hartwig
Scott, any chance of an SRU? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gettext in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 Title: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with "gettext:any", "gettext-base

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1077639] Re: Text repaint problems in Emacs

2013-04-22 Thread Daniel Hartwig
** Package changed: emacs-defaults (Ubuntu) => emacs24 (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to nvidia-graphics-drivers in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1077639 Title: Text repaint problems in Emacs Status in

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1078116] Re: Traditional emacs color configuration no longer works since 12.04

2013-04-22 Thread Daniel Hartwig
** Package changed: emacs-defaults (Ubuntu) => emacs23 (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to emacs23 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1078116 Title: Traditional emacs color configuration no longer works sin

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 882825] Re: Does not save the configuration file under ~/.config/

2013-04-26 Thread Daniel Hartwig
** Changed in: adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => New ** Changed in: bash (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => New ** Changed in: dbus (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => New ** Changed in: gegl (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => New ** Changed in: gnome-games (Ubuntu)

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1123710] Re: wine1.4:i386 not installable on raring amd64

2013-02-15 Thread Daniel Hartwig
> I'm beginning to think I need to make some automated > tests for an elaborate series of multi-arch edge cases. Hi Scott Seems that wine is bringing a lot of these m-a issues to your desk :-) Hopefully this: > winetricks is actually arch: all now will be sufficient to avoid immediately having

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 905055] Re: Package needs to be Multi-Arch enabled so Multi-Arch packages can depend on it

2013-02-15 Thread Daniel Hartwig
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #700683 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700683 ** Also affects: cabextract (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700683 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification becaus

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 905055] Re: Package needs to be Multi-Arch enabled so Multi-Arch packages can depend on it

2013-02-15 Thread Daniel Hartwig
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #700684 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700684 ** Also affects: msttcorefonts (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700684 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification bec

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1123710] Re: wine1.4:i386 not installable on raring amd64

2013-02-17 Thread Daniel Hartwig
> This is in fact a bug in apt as well. A fresh install of 64-bit raring will > try to pull in gnome-exe-thumbnailer:i386, which in turn will ask for > icoutils:i386, which will then conflict: > libunity-webapps0 : Depends: unity-webapps-service but it is not going to be > installed > > Rather th

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1090574] Re: package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

2013-02-18 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1082291 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1082291 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1082291 package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch -- You received this bug notification beca

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1082814] Re: package gettext-base 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext-base:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

2013-02-18 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1082291 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1082291 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1082291 package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch -- You received this bug notification beca

Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 1123710] Re: wine1.4:i386 not installable on raring amd64

2013-02-18 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 19 February 2013 03:54, Scott Ritchie wrote: > I agree with the sentiment about apt, however I thought it was the > current case that if a recommended (same-arch) package isn't available > in the archive, it does get simply ignored. Quite right, for ‘install’ and ‘dist-upgrade’ at least. Curi

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1123710] Re: wine1.4:i386 not installable on raring amd64

2013-02-18 Thread Daniel Hartwig
Output from a failed install with ‘-oDebug::pkgProblemResolver=1’ is appreciated. The Debian wine packaging is substantially different. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to xdg-utils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 743956] Re: Incorrect icon dimension of '22x22/sensors-applet-gpu.png'

2012-12-31 Thread Daniel Hartwig
** Package changed: hicolor-icon-theme (Ubuntu) => sensors-applet (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to hicolor-icon-theme in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743956 Title: Incorrect icon dimension of '22x22/s

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1025184] Re: Trigger high-color-icon-theme takes minutes with every install

2013-01-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
> Is there a way how i can run this trigger in some kind of > debug mode for having logging messages? The trigger executes only one command, you can invoke it manually without --quiet to see if it behaves similar: # gtk-update-icon-cache --force --quiet /usr/share/icons/hicolor (and/or gtk-updat

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1025184] Re: Trigger high-color-icon-theme takes minutes with every install

2013-01-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
The delay here might not be due to any bug at all. Reassigned to gtk+ packages for their maintainers to determine. Florian, which version of libgtk2.0-bin and libgtk-3-bin are you using? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to g

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 271246] Re: debconf: DbDriver "config": /var/cache/debconf/config.dat is locked by another process: Resource temporarily unavailable

2012-12-07 Thread Daniel Hartwig
Please demonstrate how this is caused by a bug in aptitude. ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to pidgin in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/271246

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 954029] Re: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with "gettext:any", "gettext-base:any", or are not required/useful at all

2012-10-30 Thread Daniel Hartwig
> I am double-checking with > upstream now though. Appreciated. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gettext in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 Title: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be

Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 954029] Re: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with "gettext:any", "gettext-base:any", or are not required/useful at all

2012-10-31 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 1 November 2012 10:23, Scott Ritchie wrote: > Upstream says even libgettext isn't needed at runtime, apparently -- > Wine only needs to build the translations into the windows format, and > then just uses those. I'm prepping an SRU. Makes sense. The Debian packaging does not contain any expl

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1195568] [NEW] glib2.0 2.37.3-1ubuntu1: invalid changelog entry format

2013-06-27 Thread Daniel Hartwig
Public bug reported: The changelog entry for 2.37.3-1ubuntu1 is unterminated [1], flowing in to the next entry for the unreleased debian changes. The following does not conform to changelog format as defined by debian-policy [2]: glib2.0 (2.37.3-1ubuntu1) saucy; urgency=low * Resynchronise on

Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 1195568] [NEW] glib2.0 2.37.3-1ubuntu1: invalid changelog entry format

2013-06-28 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 28 June 2013 16:17, Iain Lane wrote: > I'm guessing you got that from the changes file (or Launchpad's view of > it)? Those aren't quite the same as Debian changelogs, although > obviously they are parsed from them. > Yes, from Launchpad. I see. Ok. -- You received this bug notification be

Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 1123710] Re: wine1.4:i386 not installable on raring amd64

2013-05-14 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 14 May 2013 16:12, Daniel <1123...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > ** Attachment added: "As of 2013-05-14, this is what I still get when trying > to install wine with current package database (apt-get update)" > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/winetricks/+bug/1123710/+attachment/36

Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 1123710] Re: wine1.4:i386 not installable on raring amd64

2013-05-15 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 15 May 2013 20:02, Daniel <1123...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > The following packages have unmet dependencies: >wine1.4 : Depends: wine1.4-i386 (= 1.4.1-0ubuntu5) but it is not > installable > So you probably want to enable i386 repositories to use wine: $ sudo dpkg --add-architecture

Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 1123710] Re: wine1.4:i386 not installable on raring amd64

2013-05-15 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 15 May 2013 22:22, Daniel <1123...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: >> sudo dpkg --add-architecture i386 > Is this the way that each Ubuntu user should go? I never saw this > command before and I think it should not be necessary for > packages from the universe repository. > Usually it is not require

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1174509] Re: Ubuntu 13.04 is saying that gnibbles is not installed but it is

2013-04-30 Thread Daniel Hartwig
** Changed in: software-center (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to software-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1174509 Title: Ubuntu 13.04 is saying that gnibbles is not

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 369696] Re: package gedit-plugins 2.26.1-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-03-13 Thread Daniel Hartwig
> My problem is now fixed. I will try and explain what happened. > > I had a broken soft link that was preventing me from doing > the updates. (as you can see in the term.log) Changing symlinks in /usr/bin is user error. The ValueError from the log is a safety check against such a user error. No

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 819842] Re: Commands in the background are terminated after closing the terminal

2012-09-19 Thread Daniel Hartwig
> The same problem appears in LXTerminal too. Maybe a > shared component is affected by this problem. FYI the shared component in this case is the shell (usually /usr/bin/bash or similar) which is run by these terminal programs. Processes started by a shell are (typically) terminated when that sh

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 819842] Re: Commands in the background are terminated after closing the terminal

2012-09-19 Thread Daniel Hartwig
Comment #1 is correct. This is the intended behaviour of the system. When you start a process it is always as a child of another, usually some session. Graphically, you log in to a desktop session. When you start gnome-terminal you are beginning a separate shell session and any programs started

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 819842] Re: Commands in the background are terminated after closing the terminal

2012-09-19 Thread Daniel Hartwig
Bug #376147 tracks the issue of gnome-terminal not warning that closing the terminal will terminate background processes. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/819842 Ti

Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 819842] Re: Commands in the background are terminated after closing the terminal

2012-09-20 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 20 September 2012 18:29, Sworddragon <819...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Are you sure that this is the correct behavior? Yes. > Some time before I have > opened this ticket it worked like expected: If I have started an > application in the background I could close the terminal without closing

Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 819842] Re: Commands in the background are terminated after closing the terminal

2012-09-20 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 20 September 2012 19:17, Sworddragon <819...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > I don't know it but with nohup the process will be a direct child of > init after closing the terminal. If so then do not use nohup for this purpose. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Des

Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 819842] Re: Commands in the background are terminated after closing the terminal

2012-09-20 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 20 September 2012 19:48, Sworddragon <819...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > So there is no difference for me. My mistake then. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/819

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1044561] Re: package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1006016 package gettext-base 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext-base:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch ** This bug has been marked a duplicate

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1040842] Re: package gettext-base 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext-base:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1006016 package gettext-base 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext-base:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch ** This bug has been marked a duplicate

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1006016] Re: package gettext-base 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext-base:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 954029 package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch -- You received this bug notification because

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1005848] Re: package gettext-base 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext-base:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 954029 package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch -- You received this bug notification because

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1006687] Re: wine install, package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 954029 package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch -- You received this bug notification because

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1001905] Re: package gettext-base 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: gettext-base:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 954029 package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch -- You received this bug notification because

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1010086] Re: package gettext-base 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext-base:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 954029 package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch -- You received this bug notification because

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1032127] Re: package gettext-base 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext-base:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1006016 package gettext-base 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext-base:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch ** This bug has been marked a duplicate

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1016011] Re: Software center didn't install Wine

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1006016 package gettext-base 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext-base:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch ** This bug has been marked a duplicate

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1009203] Re: package gettext-base 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext-base:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 954029 package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch -- You received this bug notification because

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1012366] Re: package gettext-base 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext-base:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1012345 package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 95

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1012345] Re: package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 954029 package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch -- You received this bug notification because

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1012359] Re: package gettext-base 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext-base:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1012345 package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 95

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1039685] Re: package libapt-pkg4.12 0.8.16~exp12ubuntu10.3 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/locale/sk/LC_MESSAGES/libapt-pkg4.12.mo' is different from the same file on t

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
This is [1] affecting multiple packages and fixed in gettext 0.18.1.1-8. The fix should be SRU to Precise and all affected packages will need to be rebuilt. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=671257 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #669985 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1039685] Re: package libapt-pkg4.12 0.8.16~exp12ubuntu10.3 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/locale/sk/LC_MESSAGES/libapt-pkg4.12.mo' is different from the same file on t

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
See also bug #924628 which has similar symptoms but is already addressed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gettext in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039685 Title: package libapt-pkg4.12 0.8.16~exp12ubuntu10.3 f

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1014431] Re: Trying to update, no window control on the top (ie minimize close), left control key won't work (right ctrl key still does), stuck in 640x480, I'm running a 64bit

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 954029 package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch -- You received this bug notification because

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1039685] Re: package libapt-pkg4.12 0.8.16~exp12ubuntu10.3 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/locale/sk/LC_MESSAGES/libapt-pkg4.12.mo' is different from the same file on t

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
** Attachment added: "06-msgfmt-default-little-endian" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gettext/+bug/1039685/+attachment/3363497/+files/06-msgfmt-default-little-endian ** Summary changed: - package libapt-pkg4.12 0.8.16~exp12ubuntu10.3 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/locale/

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1039685] Re: gettext: msgfmt output format prevents multiarch migration [affecting apt in precise; fixed in sid, quantal]

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
Scratch that. Since the archs involved are i386 and amd64 this is probably just bug #924628 again. ** No longer affects: gettext (Ubuntu) ** No longer affects: gettext ** Summary changed: - gettext: msgfmt output format prevents multiarch migration [affecting apt in precise; fixed in sid, qu

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1003556] Re: package libcdparanoia0 3.10.2+debian-10ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/doc/libcdparanoia0/README.gz' is different from the same file on the system

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 871083 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871083 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 871083 gzip -9n sometimes generates a different output file on different architectures -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Des

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 871083] Re: gzip -9n sometimes generates a different output file on different architectures

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
** Also affects: cdparanoia (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to cdparanoia in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871083 Title: gzip -9n sometimes generates a differe

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 989166] Re: package libappindicator0.1-cil 0.4.92-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 974934 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/974934 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 974934 package libappindicator0.1-cil 0.4.92-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured -- You received th

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 937133] Re: package libgtk2.0-0 2.24.10-0ubuntu1 [modified: usr/share/doc/libgtk2.0-0/changelog.gz] failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/doc/libgtk2.0-0/changelog.gz' is dif

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 899316 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/899316 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 899316 package gtk2-engines-pixbuf 2.24.8-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/doc/gtk2-engines-pixbuf/NEWS.gz' is different from the same file o

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 948863] Re: package libsoup2.4-1 2.37.90-0ubuntu1 [modified: usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/NEWS.gz usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to install/upgrade: libso

2012-10-02 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 948001 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948001 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 948001 package libsoup2.4-1 2.37.90-0ubuntu1 [modified: usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/NEWS.gz usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to install/

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 971985] Re: package libsoup2.4-1 2.38.0-1 [modified: usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/changelog.Debian.g

2012-10-02 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 948001 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948001 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 948001 package libsoup2.4-1 2.37.90-0ubuntu1 [modified: usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/NEWS.gz usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to install/

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 973309] Re: package libsoup2.4-1 2.38.0-1 [modified: usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to install/upgrade: libsoup2.4-1:amd64 2.38.0-1 cannot be configured

2012-10-02 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 948001 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948001 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 948001 package libsoup2.4-1 2.37.90-0ubuntu1 [modified: usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/NEWS.gz usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to install/

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 986448] Re: package libsoup2.4-1 2.38.0-1 [modified: usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to install/upgrade: libsoup2.4-1:amd64 2.38.0-1 cannot be configured

2012-10-02 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 948001 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948001 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 948001 package libsoup2.4-1 2.37.90-0ubuntu1 [modified: usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/NEWS.gz usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to install/

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 991519] Re: package libsoup2.4-1 2.38.0-1 [modified: usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to install/upgrade: libsoup2.4-1:amd64 2.38.0-1 cannot be configured

2012-10-02 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 948001 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948001 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 986448 package libsoup2.4-1 2.38.0-1 [modified: usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to install/upgrade: libsoup2.4-1:amd64 2.38.0-1 cannot be

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1037390] Re: package libgail18 2.24.10-0ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: './usr/share/doc/libgail18/changelog.gz' is different from the same file on the system

2012-10-02 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 871083 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871083 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 871083 gzip -9n sometimes generates a different output file on different architectures -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Des

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 871083] Re: gzip -9n sometimes generates a different output file on different architectures

2012-10-02 Thread Daniel Hartwig
** No longer affects: cdparanoia (Ubuntu) ** No longer affects: cdparanoia (Ubuntu Precise) ** No longer affects: cdparanoia (Ubuntu Oneiric) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to cdparanoia in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.n

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 899316] Re: package gtk2-engines-pixbuf 2.24.8-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/doc/gtk2-engines-pixbuf/NEWS.gz' is different from the same file on the system

2012-10-02 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 871083 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871083 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 871083 gzip -9n sometimes generates a different output file on different architectures -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Des

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 899482] Re: package gtk2-engines-pixbuf 2.24.8-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/doc/gtk2-engines-pixbuf/NEWS.gz' is different from the same file on the system

2012-10-02 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 871083 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871083 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 899316 package gtk2-engines-pixbuf 2.24.8-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/doc/gtk2-engines-pixbuf/NEWS.gz' is different from the same file on t

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 899706] Re: package gtk2-engines-pixbuf 2.24.8-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/doc/gtk2-engines-pixbuf/NEWS.gz' is different from the same file on the system

2012-10-02 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 871083 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871083 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 899316 package gtk2-engines-pixbuf 2.24.8-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/doc/gtk2-engines-pixbuf/NEWS.gz' is different from the same file on t

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 937133] Re: package libgtk2.0-0 2.24.10-0ubuntu1 [modified: usr/share/doc/libgtk2.0-0/changelog.gz] failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/doc/libgtk2.0-0/changelog.gz' is dif

2012-10-02 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 871083 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871083 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 899316 package gtk2-engines-pixbuf 2.24.8-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/doc/gtk2-engines-pixbuf/NEWS.gz' is different from the same file on t

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1063481] Re: Conflict with gettext-base:i386, who is needed by wine

2012-10-07 Thread Daniel Hartwig
> There are conflicts with: > - gettext and gettext:i386 > - gettext-base and gettext-base:i386 Please provide the output from apt/dpkg showing the actual error. Is it the same error as bug #954029? ** Changed in: gettext (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notif

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 954029] Re: package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

2012-10-07 Thread Daniel Hartwig
** Also affects: wine1.4 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gettext in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 Title: package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 954029] Re: package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

2012-10-08 Thread Daniel Hartwig
Almost all duplicates here have wine1.4 packages involved. Binary packages wine1.4-i386 and wine1.4-amd64 both have “Recommends: gettext”, which is Multi-Arch: allowed. As a result the system attempts to install both gettext:i386 and gettext:amd64, which is not allowed. The wine1.4 packages shoul

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 954029] Re: package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

2012-10-08 Thread Daniel Hartwig
> install both gettext:i386 and gettext:amd64, which is not allowed. The > wine1.4 packages should *consider* whether they actually use the package > gettext … -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gettext in Ubuntu. https://bu

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 954029] Re: package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

2012-10-08 Thread Daniel Hartwig
At this point the issue is invalid for gettext. This actual cause is other packages declaring inappropriate relationships with gettext. See previous comment. ** Changed in: gettext (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of De

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1063481] Re: Conflict with gettext-base:i386, who is needed by wine

2012-10-08 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 > Please provide the output from apt/dpkg showing the actual error. Is it > the same error as bug #954029? Never mind. That bug (and it's duplicates) all involve wine1.4 packages, so this is definitely a dup

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 954029] Re: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with "gettext:any" or are not required/useful

2012-10-08 Thread Daniel Hartwig
At least one report here (bug #977078) features playonlinux which depends on gettext-base. That report also contains the wine1.4 packages which are problematic, though since playonlinux is arch: all and appears to be using gettext-base for it's shell script support the dependency in playonlinux co

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 954029] Re: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with "gettext:any", "gettext-base:any", or are not required/useful at all

2012-10-08 Thread Daniel Hartwig
Structure of gettext packaging in Debian is currently being discussed , and it is likely this will no longer be an issue for playonlinux. The wine1.4 recommends still needs to be examined. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #683751 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 954029] Re: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with "gettext:any", "gettext-base:any", or are not required/useful at all

2012-10-08 Thread Daniel Hartwig
** No longer affects: playonlinux (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gettext in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 Title: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with "gettext:any",

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1071566] Re: delete button does not delete anything in aptitude

2012-10-26 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1071565 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1071565 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1071565 delete button does not delete anything -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to g

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 954029] Re: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with "gettext:any", "gettext-base:any", or are not required/useful at all

2012-10-26 Thread Daniel Hartwig
Recently brought up on debian-devel@ [1]. Wine maintainers, your “Recommends: gettext” is most likely incorrect. Please attend to this issue. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/10/msg00410.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which