(In reply to Jan-Marek Glogowski from comment #34)
> This is the typical chicken-egg problem: LO's SVG rasterizer / icons broken
> => default to PNG. Everybody uses PNG (and some complain about blocky icons
> in HiDPI) => nobody fixes the LO's SVG rasterizer / icons. Some more
> background info is
Ok,time for an update here too :)
I use SVG-Icons quite a long time now, and for me those always look better than
the png versions. I just did an comparison, and the png-version really looks
terrible on an high-dpi monitor with 175% scale.
As far as I remember, SVG primarily was an issue on Linu
Ok,time for an update here too :)
I use SVG-Icons quite a long time now, and for me those always look better than
the png versions. I just did an comparison, and the png-version really looks
terrible on an high-dpi monitor with 175% scale.
As far as I remember, SVG primarily was an issue on Linu
I did some comparisons between png and svg and Stuart is right, up to
150% the png looks better then the svg. But over 150% scale, the svg
looks dramatically better then the png. So can't we male SVG default
when scale-factor is over 150%?
Sure we can say: "you can switch it manually in Preference
Thanks for the explanation :)
That sounds not so bad, but LibO really should offer the same "steps" as
the Host-OS (in my case Windows) does, that means 25% steps, not only
50% steps on Windows. Otherwise the Icons look to small or to big on
175% Scale for example. And not only the Icons itself, a
5 matches
Mail list logo
