[Desktop-packages] [Bug 744812]

2013-02-27 Thread Akiro
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~tagoh/fontconfig/commit/?h=bz38737 This repo contains the initial patch to propose a fix of this issue. I didn't implement anything about CMap this time. because dealing with it in fontconfig may be overkill. applications who wants to use this feature should knows ab

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1054204]

2013-02-28 Thread Akiro
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~tagoh/fontconfig/commit/?h=bz38737 This repo contains the initial patch to propose a fix of this issue. I didn't implement anything about CMap this time. because dealing with it in fontconfig may be overkill. applications who wants to use this feature should knows ab

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1177995]

2013-05-25 Thread Akiro
Well, the problem being related to web fonts has been already fixed. no need to revert features at all. I'm keeping this open because I want to have a new logic or API for web fonts rather than relying on undocumented/unintentional behavior. -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1177995]

2013-05-25 Thread Akiro
Were you suggesting to use FT_Stream instead? other than that, giving an empty string as a filename to deal with an on-memory font looks not good to me at least though. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to fontconfig in Ubuntu.

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1054204]

2013-03-21 Thread Akiro
I'll merge this change into master shortly if there are no objections. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to fontconfig in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1054204 Title: Libreoffice chooses incorrect font weight Stat

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1054204]

2013-03-21 Thread Akiro
committed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to fontconfig in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1054204 Title: Libreoffice chooses incorrect font weight Status in Fontconfig - Font Configuration Library: Fix Release

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 744812]

2013-03-23 Thread Akiro
I'll merge this change into master shortly if there are no objections. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to fontconfig in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/744812 Title: FontConfig/Qt stack choke on Ubuntu Medium font

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 744812]

2013-03-23 Thread Akiro
committed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to fontconfig in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/744812 Title: FontConfig/Qt stack choke on Ubuntu Medium font meta-data (No medium in Inkscape and too bold in Qt apps)

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1153188]

2013-03-23 Thread Akiro
Well, "Urdu Nastaliq Unicode" seems added by Mandriva guy at c26344ecfc1d3b85671f5d948a10d5cc27c21c2f. you may need to talk to him about this change perhaps. FWIW this is correct metadata for Urdu Nastaliq Unicode: Pattern has 19 elts (size 32) family: "Urdu Nastaliq Unicode"(s) f

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1325230]

2014-10-09 Thread Akiro
revert the change in git. thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to fontconfig in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1325230 Title: evince does not display ligatures Status in Fontconfig - Font Configuration Library

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 792471]

2012-02-23 Thread Akiro
Fixed in 8c58dc27. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to language-selector in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/792471 Title: Change default Korean font to ttf-nanum Status in Fontconfig - Font Configuration Library:

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 190848]

2012-03-13 Thread Akiro
Is it maybe a good idea to have is_set and not_set for compare attribute? none Even though it may be hard to determine which one (no-sub-pixel, sub- pixel-{bgr,rgb,vbgr,vrgb}) is better for. I guess this kind of config is never enabled by default and should simply leave it to the desktop p

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 792471]

2012-02-06 Thread Akiro
just for reference on this moving: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.devel.discuss/13090 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to language-selector in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/792471 Title: Change defa

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 190848]

2012-03-15 Thread Akiro
(In reply to comment #5) > Adding "set" and "not_set" comparisons sounds sensible to make things clearer, > but I don't think the "all" behavior is a bug. the behavior of qual="all" itself isn't a problem. I just think either of cases should be checked with qual="all" compare="not_eq" even if the

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 190848]

2012-03-15 Thread Akiro
(In reply to comment #2) > qual="all" can actually already be used to test that a value is not set > because > it always returns true when there are no values to test. i.e. All zero values > match. Hmm, that sounds like a bug though. IMHO we should drop such config entirely instead of ignoring t

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 105900]

2012-04-27 Thread Akiro
the proposed patch: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~tagoh/fontconfig/commit/?h=bz27765 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105900 Title: [Upstream] Bold, Italics, and Bold

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 105900]

2012-04-27 Thread Akiro
updated a bit to add *lang object to the pattern like the original behavior. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105900 Title: [Upstream] Bold, Italics, and Bold Italic

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 105900]

2012-04-27 Thread Akiro
I guess we should change the code for FcFontList() too. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105900 Title: [Upstream] Bold, Italics, and Bold Italics not in English on F

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 105900]

2012-04-27 Thread Akiro
committed with 7587d1c9. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105900 Title: [Upstream] Bold, Italics, and Bold Italics not in English on Fonts menu Status in LibreOff

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 105900]

2012-04-27 Thread Akiro
updated fclist.c too: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~tagoh/fontconfig/commit/?h=bz27765 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105900 Title: [Upstream] Bold, Italics, and Bo

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 105900]

2012-04-27 Thread Akiro
The patch will change the behavior compared to current one. particularly with: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~tagoh/fontconfig/tree/src/fcdefault.c?h=bz27765#n196 http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~tagoh/fontconfig/tree/src/fclist.c?h=bz27765#n382 the result on LANG=ja_JP say will looks like: (On fontconf