** Also affects: chromium-browser (Ubuntu Lunar)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: chromium-browser (Ubuntu Lunar)
Importance: Undecided => Low
** Changed in: chromium-browser (Ubuntu Lunar)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Nathan Teodosio (nteodosio)
** Patch added: "l
** Also affects: chromium-browser (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: chromium-browser (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: chromium-browser (Ubuntu Mantic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: c
This bug was fixed in the package chromium-browser - 2:1snap1-0ubuntu1
---
chromium-browser (2:1snap1-0ubuntu1) noble; urgency=low
* Modify the version scheme of the package (LP: #2007702). Epoch bumped to 2.
Since this is a package that install the Chromium snap, there is no po
I have uploaded this and unsubscribed ubuntu-sponsors. Please feel free
to resubscribe if you have anything else that needs to be sponsored.
** Changed in: chromium-browser (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Thanks for the background, let's use 2:1snap1-0ubuntu1 then.
** Patch added: "chromium.diff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/2007702/+attachment/5718905/+files/chromium.diff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, wh
One argument for having 'ubuntu' in the version usually is that it will
prevent the autosync job to override the revision (in case Debian would
also bump their epoch to 2 and have a version higher) but having the
package added to the sync blocklist would achieve the same result.
Either way seems fi
Hi Lukas, thanks for having a look!
> But I wonder if we should rather change the version number to
> "2:1snap1-0ubuntu1", in order to use a similar format as we have on
> Firefox (LP: #1892724)? What do you think?
So, my hunch reaction to that scheme is "god, are all those numbers
really meanin
Thank you for this suggestion.
Even though bumping the epoch is a very big hammer, it sounds very sensible to
me.
The patch is looking mostly good, too.
But I wonder if we should rather change the version number to
"2:1snap1-0ubuntu1", in order to use a similar format as we have on
Firefox (LP: #
The attachment "chromium.diff" seems to be a debdiff. The ubuntu-
sponsors team has been subscribed to the bug report so that they can
review and hopefully sponsor the debdiff. If the attachment isn't a
patch, please remove the "patch" flag from the attachment, remove the
"patch" tag, and if you
I'm proposing changing the version number from 1:85.0.4183.83-0ubuntu3
to 2:1+snap, similar to what Firefox does.
** Description changed:
For Ubuntu >= Focal the transitional debs are frozen at the version
number 1:85...
- This might make one think[1] that it will install a critically outd
10 matches
Mail list logo
