This bug was fixed in the package mesa - 10.3.0-0ubuntu2
---
mesa (10.3.0-0ubuntu2) utopic; urgency=medium
* Add depends on libgl1-mesa-dri to some packages.
- libgl1-mesa-glx, libegl1-mesa and libgbm1 depend on the dri
files to be installed, even for swrast support. (LP:
ScottK: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2014/09/24/%23ubuntu-release.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1364003
Title:
[FFE] mesa 10.3
Status in “mesa” package in Ubuntu:
F
Hey,
It is my opinion the autopkgtests themselves were broken, but I've added
explicit depends in mesa to always force libgl1-mesa-dri to be installed
when libgl1-mesa-dri, libegl1-mesa or libgbm1 are installed.
This allows the tests to run correctly again, and presumably fixes the
armhf tests to
On Friday, September 26, 2014 12:35:59 you wrote:
> This broke autopkgtests of some packages; see bug #1374131.
Doesn't this pretty well establish there's undue risk with going forward with
10.3 this late in the cycle? Also, I don't see where the FFe was approved, so
I'm not sure why this got u
This broke autopkgtests of some packages; see bug #1374131.
This is likely to be removed from utopic-proposed for now to allow other
packages to keep transitioning to utopic.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu
** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1364003
Title:
[FFE] mesa 10.3
Status in “mesa” package in Ubuntu:
Fix
I've done some more testing just in case, and it looks like there are no
regressions on llvmpipe on 32-bits or 64-bits, only new tests passing.
I've also done a comparison of 32-bits llvmpipe against 64-bits, and it
looks like there's probably a small issue on the teximage-colors with
GL_UNSIGNED_
Depending on the problems I might be able to fix them myself. I would
also like to note that at least with nouveau I haven't encountered any
yet.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 14:59:33 you wrote:
> I tested today with Plasma 4 and Plasma 5 images and the problems I
> found seem to be unrelated to the mesa update. I also tested on a
> machine with Plasma 4 and AMD hardware and the mesa update also seemed
> to go smooth. I'd still rather th
I tested today with Plasma 4 and Plasma 5 images and the problems I
found seem to be unrelated to the mesa update. I also tested on a
machine with Plasma 4 and AMD hardware and the mesa update also seemed
to go smooth. I'd still rather this did not happen due to unforseen
issues we've had from si
No idea, but it seems those bugs are probably just bugs in kde5, since I
don't hit them with 10.3 on amd64/i386, but I can reproduce something
similar with the kde5 ppa, without updating mesa.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed
Which intel driver is meant in the spreadsheet?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1364003
Title:
[FFE] mesa 10.3
Status in “mesa” package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
09:25 < Riddell> I've made a testing matrix, will try to fill it in during beta
2 tests today and tomorrow
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1KchGJ6d50Knx9hGS7MvSRKhId-yBMOpPpUoihKHyJm0/edit?usp=sharing
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Des
Rescinding my +1 unless the above can get heavier testing on a few
different cards, as per IRC.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1364003
Title:
[FFE] mesa 10.3
Status in “
On Monday, September 22, 2014 16:38:20 you wrote:
> Testing it just now some problems have occured which I can't definately
> say are due to the update but I haven't seem them before. Windows
> stopped accepting keys when I did the dist-upgrade to the new packages.
> After a reboot the Window Mana
I'm against this I'm afraid, we have a history of these late mesa
updates causing problems. We can't adequately test it in both KWin 4
and KWin 5 on all the graphics cards in the time left before the
release. Upstream says he has not tested mesa 10.3 and won't be able to
fix problems in KWin 4.
Testing it just now some problems have occured which I can't definately
say are due to the update but I haven't seem them before. Windows
stopped accepting keys when I did the dist-upgrade to the new packages.
After a reboot the Window Manager Settings -> Desktop Effects dialog
appears frozen when
+1 from me, please also pull http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-
dev/2014-August/064711.html if you haven't already.
Might want to wait on Riddell's okay, if he has time to test, but if
not, I wouldn't block on it either, as you did some basic KDE testing
yourself.
--
You received this b
Got it in ppa:canonical-x/x-staging
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1364003
Title:
[FFE] mesa 10.3
Status in “mesa” package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
Impact to
How can I test this?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1364003
Title:
[FFE] mesa 10.3
Status in “mesa” package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
Impact to ubuntu:
** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1364003
Title:
[FFE] mesa 10.3
Status in “mesa” package in Ubuntu:
New
Bu
updating mesa allows us to demote llvm 3.4, so +1 from me on this
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1364003
Title:
[FFE] mesa 10.3
Status in “mesa” package in Ubuntu:
New
22 matches
Mail list logo
