Launchpad has imported 10 comments from the remote bug at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806236.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment
will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about
Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at
https://hel
I just had LibreOffice 3.5.7.2 Build ID: 350m1(Build:2) crash on me
with a document. The crash report said that bug 1067907 was the bug.
That bug says it is a duplicate of this bug. As such, I'm attaching the
relevant document here.
It's a docx that I opened in Abiword and then saved as a Abiword
** Changed in: boost1.49 (Debian)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017125
Title:
[SRU quantal] boost::unordered_multimap<>::erase
Fixed in boost instead.
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Quantal)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017125
Title:
[SRU quantal] boos
** Changed in: boost
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017125
Title:
[SRU quantal] boost::unordered_multimap<>::erase(iterator, it
This bug was fixed in the package boost1.49 - 1.49.0-3.1ubuntu1.1
---
boost1.49 (1.49.0-3.1ubuntu1.1) quantal; urgency=low
* SRU/cherrypick fix for boost unordered (LP: #1017125)
-- Bjoern MichaelsenThu, 08 Nov 2012
02:02:20 +0100
--
You received this bug notification becaus
This bug was fixed in the package boost-mpi-source1.49 -
1.49.0-3.1ubuntu1.1
---
boost-mpi-source1.49 (1.49.0-3.1ubuntu1.1) quantal-proposed; urgency=low
* Backport fix for boost unordered (the mpi/universe portion of the patch).
LP: #1017125.
-- Bjoern MichaelsenWed, 14 No
SRU released to updates.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017125
Title:
[SRU quantal] boost::unordered_multimap<>::erase(iterator, iterator)
broken in boost1.49
The verification of this Stable Release Update has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a regression
after installing the -proposed package, the test doesnt segfault anymore
for me on amd64 ...
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
htt
** Changed in: boost1.49 (Debian)
Status: Unknown => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017125
Title:
[SRU quantal] boost::unordered_multimap<>::erase(iter
** Branch linked: lp:~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/quantal/boost1.49/quantal-
proposed
** Branch linked: lp:~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/quantal/boost-mpi-
source1.49/quantal-proposed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in U
Launchpad has imported 3 comments from the remote bug at
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442522.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment
will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about
Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at
https://help.lau
Hello Björn, or anyone else affected,
Accepted boost-mpi-source1.49 into quantal-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boost-
mpi-source1.49/1.49.0-3.1ubuntu1.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing t
Hello Björn, or anyone else affected,
Accepted boost1.49 into quantal-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boost1.49/1.49.0-3.1ubuntu1.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
h
** Changed in: gcc-4.7 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Matthias Klose (doko) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017125
Title:
[SRU quantal] boost::unordered_m
boost1.49_1.49.0-3.1ubuntu1.1 and boost-mpi-
source1.49_1.49.0-3.1ubuntu1.1 for quantal SRU prepared for pickup.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017125
Title:
[SRU
adding minimal debdiff for mpi
** Patch added: "quantal backport minimal mpi debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1017125/+attachment/3433176/+files/mpi.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscri
Do not accept boost1.49 without a matching boost-mpi-source1.49.
Otherwise the mpi package will become uninstallable with the sru.
** Also affects: boost-mpi-source1.49 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: boost-mpi-source1.49 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Rele
** Bug watch added: Gentoo Bugzilla #442522
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442522
** Also affects: boost1.49 (Gentoo Linux) via
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442522
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
Humbly assigning to doko for consideration as a quantal SRU.
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Quantal)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Matthias Klose (doko)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://
Humbly assigning to doko for consideration as a quantal SRU.
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #692868
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692868
** Also affects: boost1.49 (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692868
Importance: Unknown
S
please find attached the minimal debdiff to review far SRU to quantal.
Package is available for pickup on chinstrap too.
** Description changed:
+ [Impact]
+
+ * possible root cause of bug 1067907 and essentially ever other client using
boost::unordered
+ * bug 1067907 alone has ~50 reported
** Patch added: "quantal backport minimal diff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.7/+bug/1017125/+attachment/3429097/+files/quantal_minimal.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
h
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/boost1.49
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017125
Title:
boost::unordered_multimap<>::erase(iterator, iterator) broken on
quantal
Sta
This bug was fixed in the package boost1.49 - 1.49.0-3.1ubuntu4
---
boost1.49 (1.49.0-3.1ubuntu4) raring; urgency=low
* backport fix for boost unordered (LP: #1017125)
-- Bjoern MichaelsenThu, 08 Nov 2012
02:02:20 +0100
** Changed in: boost1.49 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirm
** Also affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu Quantal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: gcc-4.7 (Ubuntu Quantal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: boost1.49 (Ubuntu Quantal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: boost1.49 (Ubuntu
Subscribing ~ubuntu-sponsors.
For SRU, please fill out the template in the bug description as per
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#SRU_Bug_Template
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https:
The attached branch with the backported fix seems to indeed fix the
testcase. Can someone pick this up and sponsor it? I would also suggest
SRUing it to quantal as it possibly fixes bug 1067907.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribe
** Branch linked: lp:~bjoern-michaelsen/+junk/boost1.49-lp1017125
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017125
Title:
boost::unordered_multimap<>::erase(iterator, iterat
Claimed upstream to be fixed with
https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/80894.
@doko: Since
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1067907
likely is caused by the same root cause, is it possible to backport that
fix, so that the next LibreOffice SRU is fixed with this?
--
** Changed in: boost
Status: Unknown => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017125
Title:
boost::unordered_multimap<>::erase(iterator, iterator) broken on
** Bug watch added: Boost Trac #7618
http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/7618
** Also affects: boost via
http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/7618
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is
forgot to say that the testcase has the same behaviour for 4.6 and 4.7
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017125
Title:
boost::unordered_multimap<>::erase(iterator, i
using std::unordered_map in c++11 mode instead of the boost version does
work, so I don't see what can/should be fixed on the GCC side. Is there
now a boost upstream report as suggested earlier?
** Changed in: gcc-4.7 (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Invalid
--
You received this bug notificat
This bug was fixed in the package libreoffice - 1:3.6.0~rc4-0ubuntu3
---
libreoffice (1:3.6.0~rc4-0ubuntu3) quantal-proposed; urgency=low
* backport patch to evade fdo#51324 (LP: #1017125)
* pure white progress bar is better for now (LP: #1026059)
* reenable subsequentcheck
*
** Changed in: gcc-4.7 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Matthias Klose (doko)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017125
Title:
boost::unordered_multimap<>::era
Marking triaged for gcc now that we have a test case.
** Changed in: gcc-4.7 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: gcc-4.7 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libre
Walking through the powers of 2 and then bisecting, it seems it is
stable up to 12 elements and with 13 it begins to fall apart.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/101712
note: the crash happens on destruction of the map, not while iterating
curiously.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017125
Title:
boost::unordered_multimap<>::erase(
Reproduction scenario: Note that the rand() stuff is needed, a sequence of 500
subsequent entries does not cut it (hash collisions needed to trigger the bug
maybe?).
Compile with gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.7.1-6ubuntu1) 4.7.1 and:
g++ -I/usr/include lp1017125.cxx && ./a.out
on quantal and it crashes he
(In reply to comment #26)
> Reopening, finally found the root cause of this it seems and LibreOffice is
> not
> really innocent.
Just for the record, it more looks like a problem of boost than of
LibreOffice to me (though the commit that happens to fix it is fine in
and of itself anyway, of cours
Patched around with:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-openoffice/libreoffice.git;a=commitdiff;h=576f40c827638e002752fee256c1f67b7b493007
in Ubuntu packaging. Upstreamed and backported to 3.6 upstream as:
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/373/
However I could not reproduce this in a simple
Bjoern Michaelsen committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "libreoffice-3-6":
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=861e55bd889d9f5f5b37724b3615e9355e2d5c15&g=libreoffice-3-6
fdo#51324 lp#1017125 rhbz#806236 rhbz#823272: erase on invalid iterators
It will
tested again with internal boost 1.44 on quantal: 167 interations
without a problem so far. so closing as "not our bug" again, but still
would welcome the patch below to be integrated to 3.6 as it might help
and cant hurt.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
commited to master, waiting for review at:
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/373/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017125
Title:
boost::unordered_multimap<>::erase
Reopening, finally found the root cause of this it seems and LibreOffice
is not really innocent. At:
http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/sd/source/ui/toolpanel/TaskPaneFocusManager.cxx#229
we are generating an equal_range on an unsorted container, just to
delete those in the next line. As e
No, there is no upstream bug at boost about that that I know of yet. I
see if I get to providing a minimal testcase.
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to li
Also, is there any bug report with boost upstream for this?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017125
Title:
boost::unordered_multimap<>::erase(iterator, iterator) br
Bjoern, we definitely should not be including two copies of boost in
main to work around this bug. Can you provide a minimal test case
showing the problem with the boost code, so we can work on getting that
fixed?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages
As per upstream bug:
Building LibreOffice with its internal boost version (1.44) evades the bug on
quantal. It works fine with boost 1.48 on precise, so its a regression.
Using internal boost for LibreOffice is workaround, but not a good one:
- there was a hickup in the build with 1.44 (I had to r
** Changed in: boost1.49 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: boost1.49 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
As per:
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/373/
boost::unordered_map<>::erase(iterator, iterator) is broken in
boost-1.49/gcc-4.7 on quantal (and likely too on gcc-4.6).
** Summary changed:
- LibreOffice crash in
xmloff.Impress.XMLContentImporter::com::sun::star::document::XImporter
+ boost::un
** Changed in: df-libreoffice
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017125
Title:
LibreOffice crash in
xmloff.Impress.XMLContentI
So, I did some painful research on this:
On Ubuntu precise (build and run) the bug is not there.
On Ubuntu quantal with gcc 4.7 the bug is there even after fixing the
ABI incompatibility.
On Ubuntu precise with LibreOffice packages build on quantal (sticking
to quantal versions of non-LibreOffi
So - IMHO this is not a libreoffice bug :-) and should be closed
NOTOURBUG ...
Of course, if we can add a configure check to catch systems that are
compiled with an older version of libstdc++ or somesuch that'd be great
- we could prolly compile a small file that did some sizeof() checks in
config
Seems we are dodging the bullet for now:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-07/msg00024.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017125
Title:
LibreOffice crash in
xml
So, I did some painful research on this:
On Ubuntu precise (build and run) the bug is not there.
On Ubuntu quantal with gcc 4.7 the bug is there even after fixing the
ABI incompatibility.
On Ubuntu precise with LibreOffice packages build on quantal (sticking
to quantal versions of non-LibreOffi
attaching up-to-date stacktrace on quantal.
this=0xa0
doesnt look quite right, so I assume the "wrong" std::list having done
its thing unharmed (and thereby corrupting the memory) and this only
being the fallout.
** Attachment added: "stacktrace.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+sourc
yes, this will affect endusers as it hits on closing an impress doc.
as for reproducibility: yes, this is a heisenbug to make things interesting.
with looping the unoapi test, it can be reproduced after a few iterations.
Maybe a race condition, or something other funky?
As said above I can repro
just rechecked on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS precise: 1282 full runs of
xmloff_unoapi without one hickup. So yeah, something did creep in cxx0x
compiled stuff in Ubuntu 12.10 quantal in one/any of our deps. The fun
is to find out what.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Deskt
oh, great. Just had this on a pure gcc 4.6 build.
Since I have not ever seen this on LibreOffice 3.5, I am assuming this
to be a regression.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
we have similar crashes in rhbz for LO 3.5 Fedora packages,
though i think we closed them as they were not reproducible.
the 3.5 packages are for Fedora 17, which uses GCC 4.7.
so it seems this doesn't just affect tests, but real users also.
--
You received this bug notification because you are
meh, saw the crasher again. But that might not be our (LibreOffice) error, but
one of the system packages (or our packages having their own build like libwp*)
using the crappy and useless CXX0X ABI (useless as it is even incompatible with
itself between 4.6 and 4.7 might continue to do so).
So w
\o/
Yep, that seems to be the root cause.
Brutally forcing CXX0X off with:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-openoffice/libreoffice.git;a=blob;f=patches/trying-to-force-CXX0X-off-for-ABI-incompatibility.diff;h=1fa52e078613a9125ba43823e0a68c2d6085aab5;hb=4d4f4d6035b67dc42d21bb705d3da6570f9f2c
Possibly related:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2012-June/035310.html
also note that I didnt recompile all build deps with 4.6 on quantal.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://b
Hmmm, seeems Im too stupid to read .spec files:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=libreoffice.git;a=blob;f=libreoffice.spec;h=e53252babd085b6621b37fbc0d6a51825069427f;hb=refs/heads/f17
has a BuildRequires boost-devel but no --with-system-libs or
--with-system-boost, so I dont know if you are
removing gcc-4.7 -- has been reproduced on a pure 4.6 build.
** No longer affects: gcc-4.7 (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017125
Title:
LibreOffice cras
Created attachment 63452
stacktrace after applying patch
patch does not seem to help, see attached stacktrace.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017125
Title:
Libre
Created attachment 63427
possible fix
I cannot reproduce it here, but the attached patch might help
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017125
Title:
LibreOffice cras
I can *not* reporduce this with Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-5ubuntu2 on Ubuntu
Quantal, but with Ubuntu/Linaro 4.7.0-13ubuntu1 on Ubuntu Quantal
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
Launchpad has imported 12 comments from the remote bug at
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51324.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment
will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about
Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at
https://hel
Just to give some early warning to the gcc team -- this might be a bug
in LibreOffice just as well as in gcc itself. No trouble with gcc-4.6
though.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
Public bug reported:
subsequentcheck sometimes crashes in
xmloff.Impress.XMLContentImporter::com::sun::star::document::XImporter
Testcode:
http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/qadevOOo/tests/java/ifc/document/_XImporter.java
against service:
http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/qadevOOo
74 matches
Mail list logo
