*** Bug 162100 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1844453
Title:
[upstream] Access to the Google remote account does no
Could you try this:
- please uninstall any LO version you got
- upgrade to Ubuntu 23.10 (or 22.04 if you want to stick to LTS)
- install LO version from
https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/ppa to have recent LO version
- rename your LO directory profile (see
https://wiki.documentfo
(In reply to Eric from comment #31)
> How are you running version 24.2.0.0 of LibreOffice? I thought 7.6.2.x was
> the latest?
Yes 7.6.2 is the last non dev and non beta release.
Now there are alpha versions (master branch which corresponds nowadays to
"24.2") here:
https://dev-builds.libreoffice
*** Bug 139088 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1844453
Title:
[upstream] Access to the Google remote account does no
(In reply to Leyan from comment #16)
> ...
> It is probably not very hard for someone familiar with the code, but I am
> not sure how to go about it, hence the question.
Indeed, I should have taken a look at git history, I would have seen
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=c1
(In reply to Leyan from comment #14)
> The bug is still present in version: 7.1.0.0.alpha1+
>
> I had a look, it is due to the "sort by X value" being done in the view part
> (in VDataSeries::doSortByXValues()) without updating the model data, while
> the tooltip text is generated by lcl_getDataPo
*** Bug 136672 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1844453
Title:
[upstream] Access to the Google remote account does no
(In reply to Bruce Sobey from comment #8)
> Created attachment 155789 [details]
> File to Demonstrate problem with Basic Macro to Solve to target
On Win10 with master sources updated today, I don't reproduce this.
Indeed, when opening the file and accepting macros, "Insert 10 lines" button
doesn'
It might be a dup of tdf#121963 which has just been fixed with
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=e8720057aa0f4e612000d68f6de682f3afb8a1ea
It should be present in daily build in 24/48h, to retest.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Pac
Adding traces in some functions of the quoted commit, I noticed this block was
repeted infinitely:
OverlayObject::getOverlayObjectPrimitive2DSequence
OverlayObject::getOverlayObjectPrimitive2DSequence
ViewObjectContact::getPrimitive2DSequence
ViewObjectContact::getGridOffset
ViewObjectContact::get
Created attachment 155290
perf flamegraph
On pc Debian x86-64 with master sources updated 2 days ago, I retrieved
a Flamegraph.
Perhaps it may help.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
Thank you for your feedback, I could reproduce this.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1478258
Title:
BASE: tab order in form initially inactive
Status in LibreOffic
Sorry for this dumb question but how to set order on a control?
(right click/control doesn't make appear any "tab order")
"Activation Order" just shows the fields and allow to move up or down them.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscr
I increase the importance of this since even if it's not a crash:
- it's a regression
- it's not a corner case
- there's no clear error or warning messages on UI to indicate there's a problem
Matus/Lionel: any advance on this one?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
*** Bug 86036 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1373928
Title:
Numeric values are "not" shown and displayed as "0"
St
I put it back at NEW since I got no more questions. Sorry for the delay
to respond.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/894763
Title:
[Upstream] Duplex options do not p
Created attachment 105706
bt at random
On pc Debian x86-64 with master sources updated today, I could reproduce
this.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401003
Title:
Michael: I attached a bt at random. I can retrieve others if needed but
it could be a infinite recursive loop. One for you?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401003
Tit
Thank you ign_christian for your feedback. Great (in a way) you could
reproduce it too :)
Just some notes.
Searching "Sort by X Values" with keyId language gives this:
https://translations.documentfoundation.org/fr/translate/#search=CFYgL&sfields=source,target,notes
=> tp_ChartType.ui
http://open
bSortByXValues brings there:
http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/chart2/source/view/main/ChartView.cxx#784
Searching about how is defined data point gives this:
STR_TIP_DATAPOINT which leads there:
http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/chart2/source/controller/dialogs/ObjectNameProvider.
On pc Debian x86-64 with master sources updated yesterday, I could
reproduce this.
If I create from the file attached a new graphic, I could reproduce too the
problem.
(ign_christian: had you checked "Sort by X Values"?)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
*** Bug 82965 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1357700
Title:
package libreoffice-base 1:4.3.0-0ubuntu1 failed to ins
More wondering about this, the problem is different since it doesn't happen on
Linux.
So I put it this one back to SOLVED and reopen the wrong dup.
Sorry for the noise.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to openoffice.org in Ub
4.2.6 is ok but 4.3.0.4 and master sources updated some days ago fail with same
symptoms
-> Regression here
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to openoffice.org in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433563
Title:
[Upstr
*** Bug 82038 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to openoffice.org in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433563
Title:
[Upstream] Base Report "E-Mail as PDF" gives error in
Øystein Hermansen: could you be more specific? Do you reproduce the initial
problem, I mean with the error popup
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=53886 ?
If not, could you submit a new bug by using this link
https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/bug/ ?
Also, for the test, could you
Created attachment 103650
bts
After having put a break on SetPrecision, I retrieved differents bts showing 2
tests:
1) Varchar => Numeric (where precision isn't changed) which call 2 times
SetPrecision()
2) Numeric => Real (where precision changed) which call 3 times SetPrecision()
(because _pT
Forgot to say I was looking "precision" because of this line of the same file:
1422 if( pLength )
1423 pLength->SetText( OUString::number(pFieldDescr->GetPrecision())
);
See
http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/dbaccess/source/ui/control/FieldDescControl.cxx#1422
--
You r
On pc Debian x86-64 with master sources updated today, I could reproduce
this.
After a gdb session, it seems the problem is here:
224 if ( _pType->aCreateParams.isEmpty() )
225 {
226 SetPrecision(_pType->nPrecision);
227 SetScale(_pType->nMin
If we suppose_pType->aCreateParams.isEmpty() is useful, here's a naive patch:
diff --git a/dbaccess/source/ui/tabledesign/FieldDescriptions.cxx
b/dbaccess/source/ui/tabledesign/FieldDescriptions.cxx
index 65fb772..d3495a8 100644
--- a/dbaccess/source/ui/tabledesign/FieldDescriptions.cxx
+++ b/dbac
Gerrit review:
4.3: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/9997
4.2: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/9998
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to openoffice.org in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433563
Title:
[Upstream] Base Re
I didn't succeed with other cases by using fragments but replacing
"com.sun.star.sdb.TextReportDesign" by "com.sun.star.text.TextDocument"
makes the 3 sendings ok (ODT, Windows, PDF).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to openof
Created attachment 101944
bt
On pc Debian x86-64 with master sources updated today, I could reproduce
this.
I noticed that if I change
933 else if ( !xReportDefinition.is() )
934 xModule->setIdentifier( "com.sun.star.sdb.TextReportDesign"
);
by
933 else if
I confirm send File > Send > Email as PDF works after having created
writer_report_pdf_Export.xcu in filter/source/config/fragments/filters
by putting + "make filters && make postprocess" + brand new profile
Should I keep on this way for other cases?
--
You received this bug notification because
Sorry, I had forgot this one.
There's a fix on master and 4.3, waiting for review in 4.2
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 80327 ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
Thank you Christopher for your feedback.
Caolán/Michael: I noticed that in the file
vcl/source/filter/jpeg/JpegReader.cxx, if the 2 following checks are removed,
the image displays:
236 sal_uInt64 nSize = aSize.Width();
237 nSize *= aSize.Height();
238 /*
239 if (nSiz
May
http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/sw/source/filter/ww8/ww8par.cxx#5563
be an example to follow?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192056
Title:
[Upstream]
Just for information, here is a link about RC4 CryptoAPI Encrypted Summary
Stream used for
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd943321%28v=office.12%29.aspx
(link given by this:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd909022%28v=office.12%29.aspx and so
for Powerpoint files)
--
You rece
*** Bug 72552 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192056
Title:
[Upstream] [hardy] Cannot Open password-encrypted MS Off
On pc Debian x86-64 with master sources updated today, I reproduce the hang.
So I put it at NEW.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401003
Title:
[upstream] Writer han
Hans: Thank you for your feedback. I'm not sure to have well understood your
last comment.
1) Do you mean you found duplex option + been able to print in duplex?
2) What other scenario did you expect?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is su
On pc Debian x86-64 with 4.1 sources updated 1 week ago, I see a duplex options
in Print dialog.
- File/Print
- Properties
- Duplex
Hans: could you give a try to a recent version? (last one is 4.1.3)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is su
Created attachment 89025
duplex screenshot
I attached a screenshot. The problem I have is it's always grayed, but
that's another story.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
Hans: seeing your first screenshot, could you then click on
"Eigenschaften"?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/894763
Title:
[Upstream] Duplex options do not print du
Alexander: with 4.1 sources updated 1 week ago (so must be quite equivalent to
4.1.3), I noticed the option "Print automatically inserted blank pages".
For me, it's unchecked by default.
- File/Print
- second tab "LibreOffice Writer"
- last check option in "Pages" category
Could you give a new tr
Miklos: one for you?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248263
Title:
soffice.bin crashed with SIGSEGV in shared_count()
Status in LibreOffice Productivity Suite:
Created attachment 88938
console + bt
On pc Debian x86-64 with master sources updated today, I reproduced the crash.
I attached console logs + bt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchp
Knuth: just to bring some extra info, "target:4.2.0" in "Whiteboard"
part means it's fixed on 4.2.0 (see
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Whiteboard#Releases)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffi
Abdulaziz: I propose you to keep on the discussion you began on dev mailing
list: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/crash-in-master-td4070134.html
here.
So, here the information you brought:
-you work under linux Ubuntu.
-you built from source (last git pull in 13 Aug)
-new LO profile.
Coul
I nominate "Bug 49708 - EDITING FILESAVE Setting primary key was silently
ignored" because :
- the possibility to add a primary key via UI is indeed broken
- there's no error message
- it's quite an old bug
If it's too much broken perhaps it would be better to remove this option
completely.
--
On pc Debian x86-64 with master sources updated today and brand new LO profile,
the example given by Björn "=RATE(50,35,-250)" gives
Err:508
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
Andis: as indicated in Whiteboard, the bug is fixed from 4.0.4 version.
Don't hesitate to reopen if it's still there with 4.0.4
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1022640
Bjoern/Christopher: ok I had missed 3.5 part last time and I see that
it's reproduceable in 3.6 too. Sorry for the noise.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to openoffice.org in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251427
Ti
I tried to reproduce this on:
- Debian x86-64 with 3.6 sources updated today.
- Win7 64, with 3.6.4.3
In both cases, I haven't reproduced the behaviour described in comment1.
Of course, I had to undo twice, since there were 2 actions to undo.
Perhaps I missed something but could someone give a try
Michael: Vulcain did a lot of tests and is keeping on right now with newer
versions.
Do you have any idea how to dig about this to understand why sometimes it
works, sometimes it doesn't? We don't succeed in finding the discriminant
element.
--
You received this bug notification because you ar
Created attachment 71587
config.log bzipped2
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1022640
Title:
[Upstream] VIEWING: Comments are not readable (shown in white over
yel
On pc Debian x86-64 with 3.6 sources updated some days ago, I don't
reproduce this.
1) I retrieved first attachment, opened it, the comment was written on black on
light yellow, so ok.
2) I changed a cell, saved in xls, reopen the file, same behaviour
On Win7 64 with 3.6.4.3, idem.
Antonio, Vul
Romano: I won't have much time tonight so I can't test right now your bug.
Could you give a try to LO 3.6.3 prerelease
http://www.libreoffice.org/download/pre-releases/ ?
BTW, the comment you quoted is from a core dev. Of course, everybody can make a
mistake but could you explain why it could be
Rainer: we need a Q/A expert here, any idea?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to openoffice.org in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/626827
Title:
[Upstream] Saving to .doc format copies first page header onto all
o
I must recognize I didn't understand your last comment. Certainly because I
don't use Ubuntu, global menu, lo-menubar... I'm just on Debian testing with
Gnome.
So let it drop.
What about the profile part of my previous comment, did you test?
--
You received this bug notification because you are
ok, thank you for your feedback so put it back to "REOPENED". I'm a bit
stuck here :-(
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to openoffice.org in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/626827
Title:
[Upstream] Saving to .doc fo
Ian~G:
do you have lo-menubar package installed? If yes, could you uninstall it and
try again?
Could you also test after having renamed your LO profile?(see
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/UserProfile)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which
On pc Debian x86-64 with 3.5 sources updated yesterday and a brand new
LO profile, I don't reproduce the crash.
Taking a look at the bt, it could be fixed.
Christopher/bfoman: could you give a try to 3.5.6 and/or 3.6.2 and tell if you
still reproduce the problem?
--
You received this bug notifi
Created attachment 66752
valgrind logs
On pc Debian x86-64 with master sources updated today, I still reproduce the
problem.
So I tried to retrieve a valgrind log but I don't know if it contains the crash.
I noticed the line 14601:
==10034== Address 0x21b86020 is 8 bytes after a block of size
Created attachment 66752
valgrind logs
On pc Debian x86-64 with master sources updated today, I still reproduce the
problem.
So I tried to retrieve a valgrind log but I don't know if it contains the crash.
I noticed the line 14601:
==10034== Address 0x21b86020 is 8 bytes after a block of size
On pc Debian x86-64 with master sources updated today, I still reproduce
this behaviour.
Michael: any idea about this or perhaps some code pointer if it can be
an easyhack (for a dev of course! :-))
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subs
Just missed "read-only" option to check, sorry.
I reproduce it now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/790354
Title:
[Upstream] Cannot open OLE object when the documen
I tested on Seven with LO 3.4.4, it works.
Could you uninstall completely LO with cleaning registry (for example
with ccleaner which is free) + delete (or backup) your profile then
install again LO ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is sub
It works directly with double primary click.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/790354
Title:
[Upstream] Cannot open OLE object when the document is opened in read-
Created attachment 65741
bt + console logs on master sources
On pc Debian x86-64 with master sources (future 3.7) updated today.
I reproduced the problem by following the Rainer's process (comment 23).
I noticed a log:
warn:legacy.tools:18086:1:/home/julien/compile-libreoffice/libo/svx/source/svd
Created attachment 65741
bt + console logs on master sources
On pc Debian x86-64 with master sources (future 3.7) updated today.
I reproduced the problem by following the Rainer's process (comment 23).
I noticed a log:
warn:legacy.tools:18086:1:/home/julien/compile-libreoffice/libo/svx/source/svd
(In reply to comment #5)
...
> As far as knowing whether this bug is fixed in any further release, I did
> download and install LO dev 3.5 for Ububtu, and it was still there. I have
> also installed Beta 2 of Ubuntu 12.04 (which has LO version 3.5.1.2) on a USB
> stick and have found the bug in th
On pc Debian x86-64, with 3.5 branch, I didn't reproduce this behaviour.
I selected "E-Mail as PDF" and it launched Icedove.
The weird thing is I expected it to try to launch Evolution since Iceweasel
tries to open mailto link with Evolution.
Anyway, do you reproduce this behaviour with 3.5.1 ? (
Could you try a newer version 3.4.5 or 3.5.0 and tell if you reproduce this
problem ?
FYI, there won't be any 3.3.X LO version.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/789891
I didn't reprodce the problem with master (future 3.6) updated today and 3.5
branch updated 1 or 2 days ago (so not exactly 3.5.0 rc3).
In both cases, i can open the inner Document.
I'm on pc Debian x86-64.
Danilo: Do you still reproduce the problem with last version ?
--
You received this bug
I changed version since I reproduce it also on master.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/917342
Title:
[Upstream] soffice.bin crashed with SIGSEGV in unlink_nodes()
Created attachment 56595
Bt with symbols on master
I reproduced this problem with master (updated today) on pc Debian x86-64.
I checked the size of m_aOrderedLines and m_aLines, they both equal to 36.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is su
I confirm this with 3.4.4 on Debian testing. x86-32
I tested by letting Evolution by default (sensible-ooomua in options of Base).
Send Email works but not Send Email as PDF whereas it works well on Writer.
No error messages in console, no exception throwed in gdb during the test of
sending.
--
78 matches
Mail list logo
