Thomas, the bug did re-occur? Or do you refer to the not fixed version
of session-installer?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1190097
Title:
Nautilus tries but fails to
Which file do you want to open? Can you provide more information about
it?
** Also affects: sessioninstaller (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: sessioninstaller (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a mem
Fix the detection of the client application in sessioninstaller
** Changed in: sessioninstaller
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: sessioninstaller (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: totem (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
** Changed in: rhythmbo
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to system-config-printer in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1116503
Title:
Problems installing package signature from
Systemd's logind introduced a new DBus interface to inhibit shutdown or
suspend.
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/inhibit
We would need support in unity.
** Also affects: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: unity (Ubuntu)
Importance
I close bug for aptdaemon since I don't see how we could improve the
situation from the daemon side.
The transaction is in the STATUS_WAITING_LOCK state. INMHO software-
center should raise the visibility of this state e.g. by showing a
persistent in-window notification if the transaction is in th
** Package changed: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) => jockey (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to jockey in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/986729
Title:
Erro ao Instalar Drivers FGLRX
Status in “jockey” package in Ubu
The "cleanest" solution would be to use aptdaemon for the daily updates
and in synaptic. But especially the later one would require a little bit
of work.
Since synaptic runs in the user session and aptdaemon doesn't it isn't
the job of aptdameon to notify the user. Sending Synaptic to the front
d
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Assignee: shaun gad (hellokeltyhere) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: software-center (Ubuntu)
Assignee: shaun gad (hellokeltyhere) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 659438 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/659438
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 659438
Installation/Removal fails because of package which could not be located
(failure in apt.Cache.required_download)
--
You received this bug notificati
The bug should be fixed in Precise
** Changed in: aptdaemon
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: cheese (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to cheese in Ubuntu.
ht
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 659438 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/659438
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 682870
everytime i want to install a package or app this message occurs and
everything crashes: "an unhandable error occured: There seems to be a
programming er
I don't get this error anymore.
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/835330
Title:
apport should not report Sys
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to software-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/981124
Title:
software-center crashed with TypeError i
The above branch also handles the case if there isn't any authentication
manager running in the user's session.
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to
I already worked on a branch to add handling of authentication errors,
see the linked branch. Perhaps as an SRU?
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification becau
** Branch linked: lp:~aptdaemon-developers/aptdaemon/fail-on-no-auth
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to software-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/972710
Title:
Cancel an installation (deny to give the pass
** Package changed: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) => telepathy-gabble (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to telepathy-gabble in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979167
Title:
telepathy-gabble crashed with SIGSEGV in
tp
** Branch linked: lp:~aptdaemon-developers/aptdaemon/fix-cannot-locate-
file
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to software-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/981896
Title:
packages in "unable to locate pkgfile
I just managed to reproduce the error on Oneiric by duing a kill -9 of
dpkg during the debconf prompt of apt-get install ms-ttfcorefonts-
installer
The corresponding entry in /var/lib/dpkg/status:
Package: ttf-mscorefonts-installer
Status: install reinstreq half-installed
Priority: optional
Secti
Public bug reported:
Software-center only shows an error dialog for the
ERROR_INVALID_PACKAGE_FILE and ERROR_UNAUTHENTICATED_PACKAGE errors. All
other ones are ignored. It seems that in rev 2689 a wrong if statement
was introduced.
** Affects: software-center (Ubuntu)
Importance: High
** Also affects: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** No longer affects: aptdaemon (Ubuntu Natty)
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscrib
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to software-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
** Package changed: sessioninstaller (Ubuntu) => pygobject (Ubuntu)
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to pygobject in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/904825
Title:
session-installer
** Changed in: sessioninstaller (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/958575
Title:
session-installer crashed with org.freedesktop.DBus.
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/973370
Title:
"Aptdaemon Software Management Service" inappropriately descri
** Package changed: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) => software-center (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: software-center (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to software-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to software-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
The dialog is part of software-center:
ui.gtk3.dialogs.DetailsMessageDialog
** Package changed: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) => software-center (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to software-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.laun
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to software-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875119
Title:
Handle a broken cache better in the apt(dae
Paolo Sammicheli schrieb:
>volevo dire *incapacità* di rhytmbox...
>
>--
>You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to
>sessioninstaller in Ubuntu.
>https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/958259
>
>Title:
> Rhythmbox plugin installer can't find the needed mp3 plugin
>
>To manage no
Paolo Sammicheli schrieb:
>volevo dire *incapacità* di rhytmbox...
>
>--
>You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to
>sessioninstaller in Ubuntu.
>https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/958259
>
>Title:
> Rhythmbox plugin installer can't find the needed mp3 plugin
>
>To manage no
Chris, Boris: Are you using Precise?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gtk+3.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/840942
Title:
set_size_request is ignored [update-manager details is one line]
Status in “aptdaemo
** Patch added: "fix_dialog_sizes.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/840942/+attachment/2614532/+files/fix_dialog_sizes.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gtk+3.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs
Some time ago I wrote a small guide on how to write aptdaemon plugins:
http://packages.python.org/aptdaemon/plugins.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to language-selector in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396414
So we could only check for newly installed packages. This operation
takes an half second on my system (reusing the opened apt cache from
aptdaemon)
installs = transaction.packages[PKGS_INSTALL] +
transaction.depends[PKGS_INSTALL]
cls = CheckLanguageSupport()
cls.getMissingPackages(packages=instal
I started to work on a threading branch which would provide the base for
this. Michael also sees an use case in splitting updates into smaller
transactions.
** Branch linked: lp:~aptdaemon-developers/aptdaemon/threading
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Pa
Why doesn't the language pack depend on the corresponding thunderbird
locale? Since thunderbird is shipped by default, the localisation should
also be available by default.
The distribution upgrade is also not handled by aptdaemon.
I fear that if we check if all relevant translation packages are
Delete the file /var/lib/apt/lists/in.archive.ubuntu
.com_ubuntu_dists_natty_main_binary-i386_Packages and update the package
cache.
"sudo apt-get update" or "aptdcon --refresh"
** Also affects: update-manager (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: software-center
We could also check the terminal output and changes to the status fd and
adding a timeout. Would be the easiest option.
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification be
We could add a terminal widget :) Just kidding.
** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you
** Changed in: gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gtk+3.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/840942
Previously aptdaemon supported a feature called future cache. It allowed
you to show the changes of a new action after all queued transactions
would have been applied. So s-c could have used the size/download
properties from aptdaemon instead of calculating them itself. So I close
the bug for s-c.
The set_size_request is ignored in the case of the downloads list and
the changes in the confirmation dialog.
** Also affects: gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Summary changed:
- update-manager details is one line
+ set_size_request is ignored [update-manager detai
Should we check if the cache has been updated in the last 24 hours? If
this is the case we could show an alternative error message suggesting
to re-updating the list. But we could also perfrom an update-cache
operation automatically by aptdaemon.
** Changed in: aptdaemon
Status: Confirmed =
** Branch linked: lp:~aptdaemon-developers/aptdaemon/non-blocking-
lintian
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to software-center in Ubuntu.
https://bug
Could please provide more details about what happens if you want to
remove python-aptdaemon-gtk? Any error messages?
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
--
You received this bug notification because
Since this bug has a nicer summary I marked the old bug as a duplicate
of this one. Thanks.
Actually unity should check the ActiveTransactions property of aptdaemon
before shutting down, since the transaction can continue even if the
client is arround anymore.
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 842799 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/842799
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 842799
Software installation doesn't block session exit
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscrib
We could extract the to be downloaded packages during simulate and
download them in the background. Since the download cache (archives) is
locked during every operation we would have to add a secondary cache.
Seems to get quite complicated. We would also have to deal with enabling
additional reposi
50 matches
Mail list logo
