[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1802208]

(In reply to Stephan Bergmann from comment #11) > It would have been useful to document exactly what failed. At least with > java-latest-openjdk-headless-13.0.0.33-1.rolling.fc31.x86_64, the > testurlcheck program in configure.ac reports "false", but (when you convert > the corresponding AC_MSG_ER

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1802208]

(In reply to Jan-Marek Glogowski from comment #0) > When OpenJDK tried to enforce stricter class path URL checks without > previous announcement, things started to break left and right. This included > failing LibreOffice JUnitTest checks, since the dependency classpath in our > generated Jars does

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1802208]

(In reply to Alex Thurgood from comment #8) > Would this bug also affect use of Oracle OpenJDK 12 when trying to call an > external hsqldb.jar, e.g. when a user has what is known as a split database > (no embedded hsqldb) ? If so, then it would be a regression for those users. Hard to tell without

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1802208]

(In reply to Andreas Säger from comment #6) > Is this the reason why > https://adoptopenjdk.net is not recognized as a valid JDK? That should work with "Support AdoptOpenJDK" (and its backports to the various release branches, see there). (And if you ha

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1822839]

(In reply to Commit Notification from comment #9) > Stephan Bergmann committed a patch related to this issue. > It has been pushed to "master": > > https://git.libreoffice.org/core/+/ > 3d27b2fa9c5a03f78e5145377402f8a88e3da1be%5E%21 > > tdf#124503: Support JRE installations with unknown java.vend

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1822839]

(Comment 4 notwithstanding, it would nevertheless be useful if distros like Debian and Ubuntu wouldn't start to rename java.vendor strings from the well-known Oracle to something else.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libr

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1822839]

This knowledge about java.vendor strings encoded in a javavendors.xml is unfortunately at the heart of how module jvmfwk works internally. I'm looking into changing that at least for current master (towards LO 6.3), so that jvmfwk assumes that a JRE with a java.vendor not listed in javavendors.xml

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1483914]

(In reply to Björn Michaelsen from comment #9) > @Stephan: Given the above, how about killing the constraint in officecfg > altogether now? yes, done with "Clean up documentation of SymbolStyle prop"

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1506544]

(In reply to Björn Michaelsen from comment #9) > @Stephan: Given the above, how about killing the constraint in officecfg > altogether now? yes, done with "Clean up documentation of SymbolStyle prop"

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1070963]

(In reply to Björn Michaelsen from comment #68) > Scoping this bug clearly only on the missing deps for KDE thanks to the > excellent summary in comment 59. ...which has become moot with "Remove smb

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1214352]

(In reply to Björn Michaelsen from comment #68) > Scoping this bug clearly only on the missing deps for KDE thanks to the > excellent summary in comment 59. ...which has become moot with "Remove smb

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1253620]

(In reply to Björn Michaelsen from comment #68) > Scoping this bug clearly only on the missing deps for KDE thanks to the > excellent summary in comment 59. ...which has become moot with "Remove smb

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1214352]

(In reply to comment #41) > @Stephan Bergmann: I found why builds with --enable-gnome-vfs won't work > under KDE. It's because there is a check for GNOME desktop at > http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/desktop/source/app/appinit.cxx#86. > Removing that check solves the problem. Is it OK to j

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1214352]

(In reply to comment #30) > Problem still exists, it seems, for me. Using Fedora 19 x64 this time, and > the RPMs from the LibreOffice site. Version 4.1.3. What problem exactly still exists? Also, do you have the gnome-vfs2-smb package installed, see comment 20? -- You received this bug notif

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1214352]

(In reply to comment #35) > (In reply to comment #34) > > What problem exactly still exists? > @Stephan Bergmann: Bryan Berndt explained his problem at comment 19. Ah, right. So /if/ he doesn't have gnome-vfs2-smb package installed, his findings in comment 30 would be consistent with my findings

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1070963]

(In reply to comment #11) > possible another fallout from fdo bug 67527? Sounds very much like "Libreoffice locks up when opening Microsoft Office file over SMB share," where LO locks up when it is called with a /run/user/*/gvfs/smb-share:... pa

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1214352]

[Please note bug 49776 comment 6 about the two different kinds of LO builds involved, the --enable-gnome-vfs and --enable-gio kinds.] (In reply to comment #26) > @Stephan Bergmann: Just tried to install gnome-vfs2-smb on Fedora 19 as you > suggested, but in my case it didn't help. LO 4.1.0.4 from

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 156381]

The fix broke JunitTest_sc_unoapi, so I unfortunately had to revert it for now with "Revert 'fdo#37341 dix unending loop in calc with Goal Seek.'" -- You received this bug notification because you a

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 156381]

excerpt from workdir/*/JunitTest/sc_unoapi/done.log: > checking: [sc.ScModelObj::com::sun::star::sheet::XGoalSeek] is iface: > [com.sun.star.sheet.XGoalSeek] testcode: [ifc.sheet._XGoalSeek] > LOG> Execute: seekGoal() > LOG> Goal Result: 16.0 Divergence: 0.0 > LOG> Goal Result: 9.0 Divergence

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1069757]

(In reply to comment #36) > I just posted that I was still experiencing this bug, when using 4.0.2 RC2 > (as downloaded from the Pre-Releases sections of libreoffice.org). > > Testing again with a locally built copy from the git repo at tag > libreoffice-4.0.2.2 I find that load and save are in f

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1069757]

The description of this issue sounds very much like "Libreoffice causing errors when SAVING files by gvfs-mount (Samba)." However, there are two alternative ways LO can access gvfs, either via the "gvfs UCP" (when the LO build is configured --en

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1069757]

(In reply to comment #25) > And for those people (if any) who experienced this with generic builds, this > would mean that a similar problem to the one fixed for the gio UCP now is > also present in the gvfs UCP. I'm going to investigate that. Turned out the gvfs UCP was plagued by similar issues

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1069757]

...and to libreoffice-4-0-2 as , in case we're brave enough. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1069757 Title: [Upstream] Lib

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1069757]

The status for the gio UCP fix is: * Fixed in libreoffice-3-6 towards LO 3.6.6 as "rhbz#895690: Make GIO UCP less brittle, so saving docs works again." * Fixed in libreoffice-4-0-2

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1017125]

(In reply to comment #26) > Reopening, finally found the root cause of this it seems and LibreOffice is > not > really innocent. Just for the record, it more looks like a problem of boost than of LibreOffice to me (though the commit that happens to fix it is fine in and of itself anyway, of cours

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 950071]

(In reply to comment #69) > Stephan Bergmann committed a patch related to this issue. > It has been pushed to "libreoffice-3-5": > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=fcac9e82d3233d85a6da11bd716a7dc357d5eed2&g=libreoffice-3-5 > > fdo#46074 fdo#49948 Ignore corrupted items in

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 950071]

*** Bug 49948 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/950071 Title: LibreOffice Recent documents list is always empty Statu

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 950071]

(In reply to comment #62) > I removed the file registrymodifications.xcu and I still have nothing in > Recent > Documents after opening and closing a few documents. David, where exactly was that file located? (If you are running on Linux, you likely have different directories ~/.libreoffice/3/us

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 950071]

The various, legitimate complaints here that LO should self-heal its blocked Recent Documents list made me have another look at the code, and indeed the above master commit (comment 58) should make a broken Recent Documents list work again without any manual intervention (old entries will still be

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 950071]

*** Bug 48528 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/950071 Title: LibreOffice Recent documents list is always empty Statu

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 950071]

(In reply to comment #54) > This all very well for Linux but what about Windows? I too have LibreOffice > 3.5.2.2 , Build ID: 281b639-6baa1d3-ef66a77-d866f25-f36d45f. But I don't have > a folder ~/.config/libreoffice/3/user. The installation in Windows creates > ... > \LibreOffice\3\user\config

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 950071]

(In reply to comment #49) > (In reply to comment #48) > > Removing ~/.config/libreoffice/3/user > > causes the Recent Documents to begin working again. > > but is a pain in the arse as you loose all plugins and extensions and > presumably all other user data as well. See comment 13 how to resurre

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 950071]

*** Bug 48255 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/950071 Title: LibreOffice Recent documents list is always empty Statu

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 950071]

The problem mentioned in comment 41 is now covered by bug 48528, so I am closing this bug again. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/950071 Title: LibreOffice Recent do

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 950071]

(In reply to comment #41) > removing ~/.config/libreoffice/3/user did not solve the problem for me... > nothing changed (except that I had to reconfigure my dictionnaries) Just to be sure: You need to both remove the user directory *and* update to at least LO 3.5.1. -- You received this bug not

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 950071]

*** Bug 47968 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/950071 Title: LibreOffice Recent documents list is always empty Statu

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 950071]

*** Bug 47672 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/950071 Title: LibreOffice Recent documents list is always empty Statu

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 950071]

*** Bug 47506 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/950071 Title: LibreOffice Recent documents list is always empty Statu

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 686028]

Fixed as "Confine JDBC driver to thread-affine apartment for Java 6 performance." >From