I am seeing this with 64-bit 14.04.5 (even though 'grheard' did not have
this problem with 14.04) using OpenVPN via the network manager. Seems to
happen independently of DHCP renewals as several were logged before this
last bit:
Feb 23 19:31:03 paul-ubuntu dhclient: DHCPREQUEST of 192.168.1.100 on
Public bug reported:
I noticed that Firefox is keeping site-specific information even after
using the 'Clear Recent History' option. For example, with a new firefox
profile (e.g. start a guest session) go to www.youtube.com and view some
video, then look in the location:
~/.mozilla/firefox//stora
Same problem as Ferdinand, scanner not recognised by xsane when on USB 3
port (but seen by lsusb) but worked when put on USB 2.
One USB3:
$ lsusb
Bus 009 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
Bus 008 Device 001: ID 1d6
Similar problem with 12.04 x64 system, shows it with "Error: The status
of this extension is unknown"
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nlpsolver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1309985
Title:
nlpsolver doesnt
Seeing this with a fresh 12.04.4 64-bit installation using ATI graphics.
Seems to be triggered by "changing user" and it frequently breaks VM
operations. Typical syslog entry looks like this:
Apr 29 14:26:59 john-desktop rtkit-daemon[2183]: Successfully made thread 23506
of process 23506 (n/a) ow
I agree with Jean-Daniel, this is something that must be adressed. While
you now see any graphical log-in using 'who' and it lists users both at
"tty7" etc, for graphical log-in, and as "pts/2" etc for terminal log-
in, only the termianl sessions are seen with the "last" command.
That worked corre
So is anyone addressing the issue of power button function at the log-in
screen?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915382
Title:
ACPI events to shutdown/reboot don't gene
Found the power button issue is already open as bug #915382
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1027805
Title:
logins are not recorded in wtmp
Status in Light Display Mana
There should be no requirement to log-in in order to shut the machine
down if you have physical access, the power button should initiate this
in an orderly manner (warning/prompting as required).
Basically, if the person at the power button wants to, they can hold the
button in for 5 sec and power
@Sebastien Apologies for the apparent hijacking of this bug, opening a
new report for that subject.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1027805
Title:
logins are not record
Realised this is separate issue so opening new bug for it as #1071728
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to unity-greeter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/986289
Title:
lightdm shutdown opens a window without focus
Public bug reported:
Following on from the issue of bug #986289 to more general issue about
the design of the unity greeter and how a person, in particular a newer
user, with only keyboard-like access can make proper use of the
computer.
There is an underlying issue of poor "discoverability" here
OK, I just discovered that the up & down arrow keys cycle the user
accounts, but they do not cycle the log-in method! For that you need to
use the tab key!
How do you get access to the accessibility drop-down menu on the to bar?
Same for the keyboard/language selection?
Also why no 'F1' for help
There is still an underlying issue of "discover-ability" here and it
fails, in my view, to be acceptable for a disabled user:
(1) Why does the tab key not cycle to the shutdown menu? Where exactly
will a user, faced with the log-in screen, find out that the 'F10' key
opens that menu?
(2) The ta
Really, no logging or blocking of failed log-in attempts? Did no one
learn from computing history?
Also another failing of lightdm is it fails to respond to the power
button, even if you have set it under Gnome, etc, to do an orderly shut-
down. There have been times when a keyboard/mouse problem
Sorry about that.
I am still seeing the problem with an up-to-date 12.04 system and my bug
#1029048 was marked as a duplicate of this one, so I presumed it was still a
significant unresolved issue. I guess it is a case of the previous bug-fix not
being released yet.
--
You received this bug no
I am not sure this bug should be considered a low priority, given that
it breaks core utilities such as 'who', 'users', 'top', and similar by
fooling them in to saying there is no one else logged in (which might
result in a remote reboot being initiated while a user is on the normal
keyboard/video/
Just to add to this bug discussion my observation in bug #627648 that
the about:support setting for user-modified parameters do not appear to
change in any when you alter the global paper size, which may be related
to why this is continually reset on version 'upgrades'. This trait makes
the lack of
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 10910 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/10910
In fact, if I use the 'Copy all to clipboard' option to save a text file with
the paper size as A4 and as US Letter, diff finds no differences. So basically
the user's preference for this is not being saved in
Looking at the modified preferences shown by about:support I don't see anything
that appears to be the global page size.
There are various printer-specific settings, but as this problem occurs with
all printers it is clearly a program-wide problem and not a printer-specific
one.
--
You receive
Incidentally my setting is LANG="en_GB.utf8" so it is still an issue and
not fixed, as per comment 73 in the above link.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to thunderbird in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/627648
Title:
Looks like this has been known about, but nothing useful done to really
fix it, for 10 YEARS now:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147419
** Bug watch added: Mozilla Bugzilla #147419
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147419
--
You received this bug notification becaus
This bug is STILL not fixed in 10.04 with Firefox 14.0.1
Is this related to bug #627648 that applies to both Firefox and Thunderbird and
why, after 8 YEARS is this still an issue for the majority of the world that
use A4 paper and not US Letter?
Seriously, what is happening here?
--
You receive
I also looked at the Windows version in a VM and it has no page size
preference option, I presume as it is written to always take the
selected printer's choice. So this is probably a Linux-only bug (though
I can't rule out MacOS since I don't have a Mac to try)/
--
You received this bug notificat
Do you know where they store the page size setting?
Also is there any (easy) way to force apt-get or similar to 'upgrade' a package
to see what is happening?
I wonder if the package comes with a default config file that is clobbering the
user-configured file?
--
You received this bug notificati
Unfortunately (1) moving some machines to 12.04 is not an acceptable option due
to the vast differences in user interface, and (2) it is still not right (as
far as I can tell) with 12.04 as a recently installed test system when set up
for UK preferences with an OKI network printer set for A4, bo
This is still a problem for me.
$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS
Release:10.04
$ apt-cache policy thunderbird
thunderbird:
Installed: 14.0+build1-0ubuntu0.10.04.1
Candidate: 14.0+build1-0ubuntu0.10.04.1
Version table:
*** 14.0+build1-0ubuntu0.10.04.1 0
5
This bug also causes me problems with machines I support. The default
should *always* be the system-wide settings that Ubuntu honour, and at
the very least it should not reset during an 'upgrade'. This 'reset to
US paper size' arrogance is a major irritation and causes problems for
users who print
Looks like it was probably indexing, as reported here:
https://getsatisfaction.com/mozilla_messaging/topics/thunderbird_indexing_hogs_the_cpu
CPU load is now normal, and remaind so after re-start, but seems the
"Activity Manager" window is volatile so there is no log of what it was
originally doi
Maybe it is indexing or something? The old version told you that (bottom
- left status bar?) but this one is just saying "No messages to
download" although there seems to be a lot of disk activity.
However, that is still no excuse for polling the time at sub-millisecond
intervals!
--
You receive
Public bug reported:
Running Ubuntu 10.04 LTS 32-bit and today I got the upgrade from
Thunderbird 3.6.X to 11.0.1 and noticed it is using a stupid amount of
CPU time when apparently idle. On my quad-core AMD machine it is taking
typically 30-50% CPU when doing nothing, and this is much the same wh
Yes, it has:
[{"location":"/usr/share/ubufox/extensions","addons":[{"id":"{d10d0bf8-f5b5-c8b4-a8b2-2b9879e08c5d}","mtime":1326088947000},{"id":"{3d7eb24f-2740-49df-8937-200b1cc08f8a}","mtime":1326122353000}],"mtime":1327923707000}]
But there is no location '/usr/share/ubufox/extensions' on my sys
Yes, I have "ubufox transitional dummy package 0.9.3-0ubuntu0.10.04.3"
installed, which I guess is what comes up as "Ubuntu Firefox
modifications" in the Tools->Addons->Extensions pane.
Incidentally, is there any way to copy/paste text from the
Tools->Addons->Extensions pane?
It appears as if the
We now have Firefox 9.0.1 which is good, but why is the system-wide
installed versions of AdblockPlus and Flashblock still on incompatible
versions?
Of course, firefox then tries to update the versions and fails, as it
can't do that locally for system-wide packages.
Can we have these packages upd
I see the status for adblock is "fix released" but my package manager,
even when updated just now, still showing the old version.
Is this released only for the 'proposed' updates? If so, why proceed
with the main release of the firefox update when the matching packages
are not yet ready?
** Attac
Forgot to add, using 10.04 64-bit LTS.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/904594
Title:
Tracking bug for Firefox 9 transition in Lucid/Maverick
Status in “adblock-plus” p
A much easier work-around for most cases is the attached script that
runs 'pkill firefox'.
Save it to your desktop, check its contents are not malicious (you
always do that, right?) and change permissions to be executable.
Then if you get the warning about not being able to re-start firefox,
just
I also see it on my PC (32-bit 10.04, nvidea graphics) but it is not
always showing the plugin module running. One time this morning after it
happened I got this:
paul@paul-ubuntu:~$ ps -Af | grep firefox
paul 29536 1 1 19:39 ?00:01:13
/usr/lib/firefox-3.6.23/firefox-bin
paul
The reason for my annoyance is not the community that has worked on
this, after all there is a patch (even if not completely working?) but
that cananonical has done nothing to push this out to users, not even as
'proposed' for testing.
And it is not just things like the music player, that you migh
It is now almost a month after "status: Unknown → Fix Released" was
reported for this bug.
This still has not been fixed in the 10.04 LTS version.
Can anyone tell me when it will be fixed?
Can anyone tell me what the "support" in "Long Term Support" version is
supposed to mean? Does anyone car
I am using 10.04 LTS with the "proposed" updates, but it is not fixed
for me yet.
When you say "status: Unknown → Fix Released", how long until it appears
in the LTS updates?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in U
41 matches
Mail list logo
