It is a bit annoying.
If we want the ability to install such packages before first boot, we'd
need a way to run snapd in the target system.
Otherwise, the option is probably to install packages on first boot,
like we do with snaps.
I suspect listing the packages in autoinstall.user-data.packages
** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057996
Title:
ubuntu-24.04 version: cmd-curthooks/:Fail:Inst
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~ogayot/ubuntu-seeds/+git/ubuntu-seeds/+merge/463200
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057996
Title:
ubuntu-
The last two autopkgtest runs in the infrastructure are green despite
the trigger and they both show:
258s Unpacking wpasupplicant (2:2.10-21) ...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to wpa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
After further analysis, it looks like the trigger=wpa/2:2.10-21 highly
increases the likeliness of the error to occur.
At this point, I do not think that there is any regression in wpa
2:2.10-21 compared to 2:2.10-20. The changeset is minimal. OTOH I think
the trigger=wpa/... alters the order of e
Added wpa as affected so this bug can show in the proposed migrations
report.
** Also affects: wpa (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags added: update-excuse
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to wpa in
** Tags added: proposed-migration
** Tags removed: proposed-migration
** Tags added: update-excuse
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to cracklib2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045290
Title:
cracklib2 FTBFS aga
Adding debdiff.
The package is uploaded to the following PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~ogayot/+archive/ubuntu/noble-proposed/
** Changed in: cracklib2 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Patch added: "1-2.9.6-5build2__2.9.6-5ubuntu1.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/
Public bug reported:
Build against Python 3.12 is red. The build-time test-suite uses the
obsolete function unittest.TestCase.assertEquals - which was dropped
from Python 3.12.
...E
==
ERROR: test_simple_combinations
(te
Hello,
I'm adding gnome-initial-setup and for now I'm marking invalid for
subiquity, since it happens on first boot.
Thanks,
Olivier
** Also affects: gnome-initial-setup (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: subiquity
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received
Public bug reported:
The `ubuntu-drivers list-oem` command can be used to list OEM meta-
packages, which is great.
However, there seems to be no way to install listed OEM meta-packages without
also pulling all the applicable third-party drivers - which is something that
we want in subiquity.
`u
I was able to run a ubiquity jammy install on certified hardware
(actually not on certified hardware but using umockdev to simulate
certified hardware) using a jammy daily build. Looks all green to me.
** Tags removed: verification-needed-jammy verification-needed-lunar
** Tags added: verificatio
I successfully ran the testing described in the test plan 1.
All tests are green and I only had one observation:
* on lunar, `ubuntu-drivers install --no-oem` has the same behavior
before and after the patch. This came to me as a surprise, but on
hindsight, this is expected because OEM meta-packag
Package for jammy is available in PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~ogayot/+archive/ubuntu/jammy-proposed (with ~ppa1
suffix)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-drivers-common in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/19664
Adding debdiff for lunar.
Package is available in PPA
https://launchpad.net/~ogayot/+archive/ubuntu/lunar-proposed (with ~ppa1
suffix)
** Patch added: "1-lunar-0.9.7.1__0.9.7.1.1.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-drivers-common/+bug/1966413/+attachment/5680186/+files/1
** Patch added: "1-jammy-0.9.6.2~0.22.04.3__0.9.6.2~0.22.04.4.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-drivers-common/+bug/1966413/+attachment/5680187/+files/1-jammy-0.9.6.2~0.22.04.3__0.9.6.2~0.22.04.4.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Summary changed:
- --no-oem option is broken
+ [SRU] --no-oem option is broken
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-drivers-common in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1966413
Title:
[SRU] --no-oem option is
** Description changed:
+ [Impact]
+ * ubuntu-drivers supports the --no-oem option, which is meant to filter-out
the OEM metapackages when running on certified hardware.
+
+ * When ubuntu-drivers is invoked with --no-oem as a global option (i.e.,
`ubuntu-drivers --no-oem list` or `ubuntu-driver
We might need to use this option in subiquity and it indeed seems
broken.
There are actually two possible usages:
$ ubuntu-drivers --no-oem install => which results in an exception
$ ubuntu-drivers install --no-oem => which does not result in an exception
but ignores the option
I've ope
Hello and thank you for your bug report,
Marking invalid for subiquity since there is nothing we can do from the
installer's standpoint. Adding ubuntu-meta (which is the source package
for ubuntu-desktop).
Thanks,
Olivier
** Also affects: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Stat
Jurgen, could you please send us the link to the discussion with
LibreOffice upstream? Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to fontconfig in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1969709
Title:
libreoffice font select
** Description changed:
Steps to reproduce:
1. Have Ubuntu 21.04 installed
2. Launch terminal
3a. Execute some command, select this command to copy it, then paste command
3b. Paste some command from clipboard to terminal
Expected result:
* pasted command is not highlighted and is
** Changed in: plymouth (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to plymouth in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959373
Title:
Please merge plymouth 0.9.5+git20211018-1 (main) fro
Apologies for the confusion. I was not using a fresh Impish install.
I just did a clean install and graphical-session.target is reported as active.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-session in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.laun
24 matches
Mail list logo
