On my system (Linux Mint Cinnamon), the icons do not differ between
maximised and non-maximised state - except that, irritatingly, the
hovered-over version of the maximise icon is *very dark* when the window
is maximised.
I wonder whether the poster means 'low contrast (grey and white) when
*the w
I am afraid that I do not understand the explanation for why this
oddity-cum-inconvenience - and minor resource drainer? - will not be
rectified.
Why should Firefox ship with a language installed that most users will
never use? Is there not a fairly simple way around this? If there is
not, should
a better system monitor, why not include it, as
> the default, in Mint?
>
> It just has become a standard to use many of the default Gnome
> applications/tools. I use ksysguard but it wouldn't be a good default
> program because it is KDE application and thus has lots of depende
Thanks for all that. About Ubuntu: there is a limit to how many bug
trackers I will create accounts for. I am user, not a developer. And even
if this networking problem (in its wider version, whereby one needs special
software and fiddly config to make auto mounted shares work properly) owes
to Ubu
** Also affects: nemo (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/130997
Title:
Non-Linux hidden files like Thumbs.db should b
5 matches
Mail list logo
