Another workaround for ubuntu-settings package would be to mark the
/lib/netplan/00-network-manager-all.yaml file as a "conffile", e.g. in
debian/ubuntu-settings.conffiles
This way modifications would be ignored by debsums. But it might have
side-effects of asking the user on upgrade to accept/rej
I am unable to reproduce the issue with a multipass "mpqemubr0"
interface, as described in the bug description. It just modifies the
"ipv4.ignore-auto-routes" setting correctly for me in a clean Jammy LXD
container. So I suppose there might be something else on @RO1's system
that causes side effect
Exactly, this directory and file needs to be created locally to
implement/try the workaround.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083129
Title:
[Lenovo Ubuntu 22.0
The ipv4.route-metric bug has been handled in LP: #2076172 and is
included in Netplan v1.1 which is currently pending in noble-proposed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
The netplan.io 0.107 autopkgtest are now also back to green, especially
when run with those triggers:
netplan.io/0.107.1-3ubuntu0.22.04.2 – upgrade to 0.107 to provide any veth tests
systemd/249.11-0ubuntu3.14 – for tunneling fixes from bug 2037667
network-manager/1.36.6-0ubuntu2.1 – for veth fixe
I tested network-manager 1.36.6-0ubuntu2.1 from jammy-proposed and can
confirm things are working as expected.
root@j:~# apt -t jammy-proposed install network-manager
root@j:~# netplan set --origin-hint=50-cloud-init
network.renderer=NetworkManager
root@j:~# netplan apply
WARNING:root:Cannot call
This is now pending SRU review:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jammy/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=network-
manager
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is sub
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu Jammy)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Lukas Märdian (slyon)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2032824
Title:
Veth pa
** Description changed:
[ Impact ]
- * Network Manager 1.36 has a bug that prevents it to activate veth pairs.
- * The problem was found in the Netplan's CI with the new support for veths
in Netplan v0.107.
+ * Network Manager 1.36 has a bug that prevents it to activate veth pairs.
+ * T
Could you try putting a systemd override for NetworkManager.service,
delaying its startup a little bit, to see if that helps to mitigate the
race condition?
E.g.:
$ cat /etc/systemd/system/NetworkManager.service.d/override.conf
[Service]
ExecStartPre=/usr/bin/sleep 3
--
You received this bug no
Looking into the attached sosreport, I can see
"/etc/netplan/00-installer-config (copy).yaml" in addition to
"/etc/netplan700-installer-config.yaml". What's the matter of that
"(copy)" file? Is it needed?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is
** Also affects: network-manager (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-ma
Thanks for the additional logs, those are very curious..
"""
Sep 5 05:55:40 MonacoSIT4 NetworkManager[3448]: [1725530140.8548]
keyfile: load:
"/run/NetworkManager/system-connections/netplan-ens5f1np1.nmconnection": failed
to load connection: cannot access file: No such file or directory
"""
"
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Lukas Märdian (slyon)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2089930
Title:
NetworMana
All autopkgtest failures from comment #3 were resolved by retry.
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-noble
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-noble
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to lp-s
** Changed in: gobject-introspection (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gobject-introspection in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080965
Title:
[MIR] architecture-properties
I've discussed this more with the Foundations team. Even though being a
development package this seems to be valuable in general, not just as a
libglib2.0-dev dependency.
So let's get it promoted, instead of "Extra-Exclude" all the long-tail
of libglib2.0-dev.
I've subscribed ~foundations-bugs, a
I've tested network-manager 1.46.0-1ubuntu2.2 from noble-proposed and
can confirm the Jammy -> Noble upgrade is working as intended.
I re-triggered a bunch of the tmpfail (/unknown) autopkgtest from above.
$ lxc launch ubuntu-daily:jammy jj-nm-np
Creating jj-nm-np
Starting jj-nm-np
** Summary changed:
- wifi setting causes networkmanager crash
+ wifi setting causes networkmanager crash, due to macaddress: "stable-ssid
** Summary changed:
- wifi setting causes networkmanager crash, due to macaddress: "stable-ssid
+ wifi setting causes networkmanager crash, due to macaddress
src/core/settings/nm-settings-utils.c:103 is a nm_assert_not_reached()
in function "nm_sett_util_storages_add_take()"?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2088459
Tit
autopkgtest tests fixed by retry
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2084731
Title:
Not report 6 GHz capability correctly
Status in OEM Priority Project:
New
Sta
After a fresh Ubuntu 22.04.5 Desktop default installation, I changed the
apt sources to Noble, incl. apt-pinning for noble-proposed and executed
a "sudo apt dist-upgrade", that included the upgrade to network-
manager/noble-proposed 1.46.0-1ubuntu2.2.
lukas@lukas-Standard-PC-Q35-ICH9-2
; & set_col_name(lp,2,"money")
Model name:
= FULL LOG
lukas@abaconcy:lp-solve-gu((importer/import/5.5.2.5-2ubuntu0.1-0-g7eea68a))$
gcc -o demo.out /usr/share/doc/lp-solve/examples/demo.c
/usr/lib/lp_solve/liblpsolve55.so -I /usr/include/lpsolve/
lukas@abaconcy:lp-solv
** Changed in: gobject-introspection (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Lukas Märdian (slyon)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gobject-introspection in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080965
Title:
[
** Tags added: update-excuse
** Also affects: gobject-introspection (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gobject-introspection in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208
see also bug #2083893
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-settings in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078759
Title:
Ability to use comments in YAML generated by Netplan
Status in OEM Priority Project:
Con
To be backported to Noble via LP: #2077011
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2084234
Title:
wifi setting causes networkmanager crash
Status in netplan.io package
Unfortunately, the underlying libyaml does not support parsing or
emitting comments, so we'd need to come up with some custom solution for
Netplan: https://github.com/yaml/libyaml/issues/42
Still, comment #5 holds true.
** Bug watch added: github.com/yaml/libyaml/issues #42
https://github.com/
In NetworkManager there exists the "connection.multi-connect" setting,
to allow a connection profile to be applied to multiple interfaces.
Netplan can currently control it through its
"networkmanager.passthrough" setting, e.g.:
network:
version: 2
renderer: NetworkManager
ethernets:
all
** Also affects: wpa (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2084553
Title:
system cannot to connect to wpa2-enterp
** Description changed:
- Network Manager 1.36 has a bug that prevents it to activate veth pairs.
- The problem was found in the Netplan's CI with the new support for veths
- in Netplan (because we run the tests on Jammy).
+ [ Impact ]
+
+ * Network Manager 1.36 has a bug that prevents it to act
The changes landed in upstream NetworkManager between 1.39.10-dev and
1.41.8-dev all of which is included in Noble.
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscrib
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2033259
Title:
[SRU] NetworkManager trigge
I've uploaded network-manager 1.46.0-1ubuntu2.2 into the Noble UNAPPROVED queue
for SRU review:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/noble/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=network-manager
I'm bundling this with the pending SRU for 1.46.0-1ubuntu2.1 (LP:
#2084731)
--
You received this bug notification be
FTR: I've just uploaded a bundled SRU for network-manager
1.46.0-1ubuntu2.2, containing the changes from this bug report and
additionally the changes from bug #2033259
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubu
** Description changed:
+ [ Impact ]
+
+ * Context: Running a dist-upgrade from Jammy to Noble.
+ * Starting with Noble (Mantic actually), NetworkManager integrates with
Netplan as a backend and calls 'netplan generate' at different stages, e.g.
when migrating old /etc/NetworkManager/sytem-co
Recent version of Netplan (v1.1.1-1++) make use of dh-python and
${python3:Depends} substvars (LP: #2077011), so there's nothing to be
fixed there.
NetworkManager pulling in (old) Netplan on dist-upgrade happens only on
dist-upgrades to Noble, so there's nothing to be fixed in NM on Jammy.
** Cha
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2084234
Title:
wifi setting causes networkmanager cr
Will be fixed in 1.1.1-1
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2084234
Title:
wifi set
I cherry-picked the fixes from 5.5.2.5-2ubuntu1 (old Oracular) and
uploaded it into the Noble queue.
** Changed in: lp-solve (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to lp-solve in Ubu
Public bug reported:
[ Impact ]
In order to help developers with profiling, Ubuntu enabled frame-pointers for
packages in the main archive.
https://ubuntu.com/blog/ubuntu-performance-engineering-with-frame-
pointers-by-default
lp-solve was missed due to the packaging issues. These have been fix
There's another duplicate case of supporting comments in YAML generated
by Netplan. This time in /etc/netplan/ instead of /usr/lib/netplan/ (LP:
#2083920)
** Summary changed:
- debsums: changed file /lib/netplan/00-network-manager-all.yaml (from
ubuntu-settings package)
+ Ability to use comments
** Summary changed:
- wifi setting cause networkmanager crushed
+ wifi setting causes networkmanager crash
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2084234
Title:
wifi
On Ubuntu Noble and above, libnetplan is providing a stable 1.0 API and
also using the stable Python API, so a dependency on a specific python
version is not needed anymore. python3-netplan is shipping this file
instead: /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/netplan/_netplan_cffi.abi3.so
This PR is shipp
I'd suggest going with something like this in Jammy, to make sure
netplan.io, python3-netplan and libnetplan1 are upgraded prior to
network-manager triggering the Netplan integration, calling "netplan
generate".
```diff
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index a82f4c0c..25651a34 100644
-
Thanks for the update of the description [Impact].
I've fixed the version string inside the .symbols file and uploaded your
patch for SRU review.
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jammy/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=libmbim
I'm also unsubscribing ~ubuntu-sponsors again.
** Changed in: libmbim (Ubu
** Tags added: sru-next
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
** Also affects: network-manager (Ubu
see bug #2083836
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2033259
Title:
netplan.script crashed with AttributeError in __getitem__():
/usr/bin/python3: undefined symbo
To clarify on comment #4: The debdiff is a backport of
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mobile-
broadband/libmbim/-/commit/482fc42a9059d3e7ef7102d850f46155911949ae
I confirmed that this commit is included as of upstream release v1.31.2,
therefore included in Noble+.
** Also affects: libmbim (Ubuntu
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080489
Title:
Network Manager stops functioning on
** Also affects: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags added: foundations-todo
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu Oracular)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu Oracular)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You receiv
** Tags removed: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2019940
Title:
Directly manipulating NetworkManager keyfiles
Status in augeas package in Ubun
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2032824
Title:
Veth pairs fail activation on Jammy
Stat
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2032824
Title:
Veth pairs fail activation on Jammy
Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu:
** Tags added: fr-8841
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2032824
Title:
Veth pairs fail activation on Jammy
Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu:
New
St
I wonder if Netplan should modify files in /usr/lib/netplan/ at all?
Yes, it needs to read those files, to get a full view of the
configuration. But writing should probably be limited to /run/ and
/etc/netplan/ ...
** Also affects: ubuntu-settings (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: N
It's now in updates:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/2074197
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager-applet
Public bug reported:
gnome-remote-desktop uses software rendering by default, which is
incredible slow on some hardwares. If the user is added to the video and
render group, graphics acceleration is used. These groups are not in the
default, so I think it would make sense to add them.
ProblemType
see also bug #2071652
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: network-manager-applet (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager-ap
** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager-applet in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077515
Title:
Network Manager applet sh
You filed the bug report against NetworkManager. But the "up.d" hook is
called differently in NM, see https://netplan.io/faq#use-pre-up-post-up-
etc-hook-scripts
If this is about /etc/network/if-up.d then it should be targeted towards
the "ifupdown" package. I'm adding a corresponding bug task.
*
Arguably, the "/usr/lib/netplan/00-network-manager-all.yaml" should be
shipped by the network-manager package, instead of ubuntu-settings...
The community flavors using Calamares, might be covered by this PR:
https://github.com/calamares/calamares/pull/2284
** Also affects: ubuntu-settings (Ubunt
Thanks! The rebased patches do still apply cleanly and build fine.
- I fixed the Mantic debdiff SRU version "2:21.1.7-3ubuntu3" ->
"2:21.1.7-3ubuntu2.10"
- I fixed the Jammy debdiff d/changelog to reference this bug report
Re-sponsoring for Mantic & Jammy and unsubcribing ~ubuntu-sponsors.
--
** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055012
Title:
When I upgraded from 22.04 to 24.04
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045096
Title:
Error in network definition: Invalid MAC ad
** Tags removed: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to hplip in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2028054
Title:
[MIR] python-rlpycairo
Status in hplip package in Ubuntu:
Confirmed
Status in python-r
LGTM and matches upstream changes. Build OK. We'd also want this for
Mantic, before backporting to Jammy. The patch is simple enough that I
did that for you!
- Noble: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/2:21.1.11-2ubuntu2
- Mantic:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/mantic/+queue?queue_sta
** Also affects: xorg-server (Ubuntu Mantic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xorg-server in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056331
Title:
[SRU] fix suspend/resume whe
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libvpx in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058930
Title:
Missing in i386 Packages index
Status in libvpx package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Bug d
https://github.com/canonical/netplan/pull/447
** Changed in: netplan
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055148
Title:
Net
A fix was deployed (cowboyed) to the autopkgtest-cloud today.
** Changed in: libvpx (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libvpx in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058930
T
Actually, this seems to be an issue of the source package not being
pulled from -proposed, as I can install the binaries just fine in a LXD
container:
root@nn:~# dpkg --add-architecture i386
root@nn:~# apt update
[...]
root@nn:~# apt install libvpx9:i386
Reading package lists... Done
Building depe
** Description changed:
- The new version of libvpx 1.14 seems to be missing in
- http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/noble-
- proposed/main/binary-i386/Packages.xz, while it's still available in
- http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/noble-
- proposed/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz.
-
- Grep
Public bug reported:
The new version of libvpx 1.14 seems not to be published to
http://ftpmaster.internal on i386 only.
This leads to the autopkgtest trigger "libvpx/1.14.0-1ubuntu1", not having any
effect on i386:
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/libvpx/noble/i386
** Affects: libvpx (U
** Tags added: fr-7190
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055148
Title:
NetworkManager connections with an explicit DoT (DNS over TLS) are not
supported with Ne
We should land a fix keeping the full string in
networkmanager.passthrough and additionaly work on a proper upstream
solution, as suggested by Danilo in comment #4, introducing new settings
as a longer term solution.
** Changed in: netplan
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: netplan
I
This will be part of 1.0-1
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045096
Title:
Error in netwo
Public bug reported:
The intention of the previous avahi-autoipd integration was that on a
connection that does have dhcp configured, it will fall back to IPV4LL
if dhcp is unavailable.
This integration was recently dropped (and I think it never worked as intended
in the first place):
https://co
I confirmed the patch matches the upstream changes and builds find. I
see the bug description ([Test] section) was updated to mention pairing
of 7 audio and 2 non-audio devices. That pairing test needs to be re-run
with the final binaries, once they are build in the archive, as per the
usual SRU pr
This patch seems to resolve the situation locally.
For now I'll only go with the changes to tests/integration/base.py,
though. As that should be enough to avoid test failures, while the
service units shouldn't change (besides being re-generated 1:1).
I want to better understand what's going on ex
This is related:
https://github.com/canonical/netplan/commit/da6f776dd7e33050124fe2990b715db92c1ddee3
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to wpa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048388
Title:
Test suite often fails
Public bug reported:
From: https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/blog-netplan-developer-
diaries/35932/11
Hi all,
NetworkManager connections with an explicit DoT (DNS over TLS)
configuration are not supported with Netplan, but NetworkManager does
feed back the DoT DNS info with server address and Serve
** Changed in: netplan
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045096
Title:
Error in network definition: Invalid MAC addre
** Changed in: netplan
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045096
Title:
Error in network definition: Invalid MAC address 'ra
** Also affects: wsl-pro-service (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: wsl-pro-service (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Lukas Märdian (slyon)
Status: New
** Also affects: wsl-pro-service (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Upstream fix landed in:
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/-/commit/7f2a32fa11d580ee65a0458f438018de12b6ae84
** Summary changed:
- FTBFS when rebuilding 1.44 with GCC-14
+ FTBFS when rebuilding 1.44 with glib2-2.79.1
--
You received this bug notification because you ar
Fixed in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-
manager/1.45.90-1ubuntu1
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https:
** Summary changed:
- FTBFS when rebuilding 1.44
+ FTBFS when rebuilding 1.44 with GCC-14
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2052959
Title:
FTBFS when rebuilding
Public bug reported:
FTBFS due to test failure after an unrelated autopkgtest change was
uploaded (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-
manager/1.44.2-7ubuntu2).
ok 7 /config/warnings
PASS: src/core/tests/config/test-config 7 /config/warnings
# (src/core/tests/config/test-config.c:1107)
(In reply to Jacob Garby from comment #816)
> (In reply to Lukas from comment #814)
> > (In reply to Jacob Garby from comment #813)
> > > I have a "Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16", and several days ago, out of
> nowhere,
> > > the speaker started working
(In reply to Jacob Garby from comment #813)
> I have a "Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16", and several days ago, out of nowhere,
> the speaker started working. I have no idea how -- I did not change anything
> manually. I suspect it's a new kernel version that did it.
>
> I'm on Arch Linux, and I can't re
Hey, I have a Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 with Fedora Workstation 39 installed.
Kernel Verion: Linux 6.6.11-200.fc39.x86_64
alsa-lib version: alsa-lib-1.2.10-3.fc39.x86_64
I installed alsa-tools and went into hdajackretask to see what is going
on. Then I noticed that my System is telling me that I have
IMO the wpasupplicant trigger is a red herring, as we see the same
failure on a trigger=system/255... test case:
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-
noble/noble/s390x/n/netplan.io/20240104_111341_511f7@/log.gz
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desk
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to wpa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048388
Title:
Test suite often fails with "systemd units changed without reload" on
s390x
Status in netplan:
Invalid
Status in netplan.
Another option/idea I'd like to provide here is the migration script
used by NetworkManager [1], to transfer NM keyfiles from
/etc/NetworkManager/system-conncetions/ into /etc/netplan. This script
is automatically run on package upgrade of NetworkManager. I understand
this does not exactly fit the
Reducing to "Medium", as I don't think we can hit this situation through
the Netplan-everywhere integration, but manual steps (wrong YAML config)
must be involved in reaching this state.
We're working on a fix here:
https://github.com/canonical/netplan/pull/427
** Changed in: netplan
Importanc
@vanillaoerba How did you end up in that situation? Did you modify
/etc/netplan/90-NM-X.yaml manually?
Those special values for the MAC address should have been handled by the
networkmanager.passthrough.cloned-mac-address=random setting for you..
--
You received this bug notification because
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046158
Title:
Updating wireguard-peer.allowed-ips
** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags added: fr-6121
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045096
Title:
Error in
1 - 100 of 433 matches
Mail list logo
