I have verified by running manual tests on a docker image of 23.04 and
23.10 after manually installing the packages as downloaded from
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qpdf by verifying that I could
reproduce the bug, then install the updated libqpdf package, then
verifying that the bug wa
All, thanks for pushing this through. To be clear, I agree with all the
points that it would have been better if we could have included the
extra tests, but I'm glad you agree with my analysis about the cost vs.
benefit. I will find some time to test in the next few days. I can do
the manual test f
The tests include binary files. Unless something has changed, I can't
create a quilt patch that modifies a binary file. The qpdf test suite is
full of PDF files, and PDF files are binary files, even when they are
hand-created, as many of mine are. This makes including tests in patches
challenging.
> This is great, but is this test suite run as part of the package build
and publication process in Ubuntu? If not, how could we arrange to run
the test suite against the Ubuntu build of the package that includes
this patch to ensure that we aren't regressing unaffected users in
providing this upda
I've gone as far as I think I can, but I can do additional steps if
needed. I have not tagged this or uploaded anything anywhere. Please let
me know if I can/should take any additional steps to get this approved
and processed as an SRU.
** Summary changed:
- qpdf: data loss bug affecting versions
Public bug reported:
Notes:
* I am the upstream author and debian maintainer for qpdf.
* This bug has been fixed in debian unstable and testing with version 11.6.3,
but because 24.04 is not yet open, it has not synced. This should not block
fixing 23.04 and 22.04. I have uploaded 11.6.3 to my p
** Patch added: "qpdf-11.5.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qpdf/+bug/2039804/+attachment/5711202/+files/qpdf-11.5.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to qpdf in Ubuntu.
https:/
Public bug reported:
I'm not sure whether a feature freeze exception is required to sync
11.3.0 given that it was uploaded just before feature freeze. In any
case, 11.3.0 has a couple of bug fixes, one very localized feature
enhancement (whose implementation doesn't touch any existing code), and
s
Public bug reported:
qpdf 10.6.3 is in debian unstable with no blockers other than age. It is
a bug-fix only release. The two code-facing changes are fix to allow
correct handling of PDF 2.0 native UTF-8 strings and a fix to appearance
stream generation when "0 Tf" appears in "/DA".
** Affects: q
Thanks for the clarification. What is the last date for uploading 10.6.3
before final freeze? There is one small bug fix on main for appearance
stream generation that I might want to release, but I'll wait and see if
anything else shows up.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
All regressions have been resolved now, and it seems to me like it's
going to automatically migrate, but I'm not sure whether we missed the
window to do so without a freeze exception. As far as I can see, the
freeze date was February 19. I think the pikepdf upload that resolved
the (false) regressi
It helps. Thanks. I just released 10.6.2, and pikepdf 5.0 is also being
released hopefully today to get the two back in sync. Hopefully no
further manual action will be required.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to qpdf in Ubu
There will definitely be a 10.6.2 in the next day or two.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to qpdf in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960924
Title:
qpdf 10.6.1 not syncing?
Status in qpdf package in Ubuntu:
New
Public bug reported:
I'm noticing that qpdf-10.6.1 is not syncing from Debian even though, as
far as I can see, automatic sync freeze has not yet happened. There are
some major changes in 10.6 that I would really like to get into Ubuntu
because they include transitional code to help users migrate
Makes sense. Hopefully ubuntu is looking either at only the supported
architectures or only the ones that it uses itself. In the former case,
looks like everything's built but mips64el which appears to be building
now, so hopefully it's not much longer. If I'm lucky, 10.2.0 and 10.3.0
won't make it
Thanks. I don't know if there's a way for me to know when your utility
can find it. I wait until I get the email from debian that the package
has been accepted before posting this, but apparently that's not quite
enough. Eventually debian will release, Ubuntu will release, and
automatic syncs will
Public bug reported:
10.3.1 includes a very small but important fix to a bug that would cause
qpdf 10.3.0 to reject certain valid files when splitting pages. I also
added a check for exceptions that will make future bugs of this type (if
any) just generate warnings instead of blocking the whole op
This is a bug-fix release. It contains only two changes: correction of a
very old bug (from 2.3.0 released in 2011) involving references to
replaced objects and a more significant series of fixes to the form
field enhancements in 10.2.0, which turned out to be incorrect and were
creating PDF files
Public bug reported:
Sorry to do this again so soon, but I released qpdf 10.3.0 and uploaded
to debian experimental. I have gotten the email from debian indicating
that the package has been accepted, and it is visible on qa.debian.org,
so hopefully it's "there" for purposes of doing the sync. If n
Great, thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to qpdf in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916658
Title:
please sync qpdf 10.2.0-1 from debian experimental
Status in qpdf package in Ubuntu:
Fix Committed
Bug de
I just uploaded it. I can ask again in a couple of days. I'll put a
reminder for tomorrow to check status.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to qpdf in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916658
Title:
please sync qpdf
Public bug reported:
Since debian is in freeze, I uploaded qpdf-10.2.0-1 to experimental. I
know unstable syncs automatically to Ubuntu, but I'm not sure I have to
request a sync from experimental or if this is the way to do it. In any
case, it would be great if we can pull qpdf-10.2.0-1 from expe
I think this bug can be closed now, right?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to cups-filters in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1564249
Title:
Cannot print a PDF with AcroForms using fit-to-page
Status in cups-filte
qpdf 8.0.2 is released, on github and sourceforge, and uploaded to
debian unstable. It should be visible momentarily.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to qpdf in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1753621
Title:
Featur
As far as I know, 8.0.0 contains everything Sahil and Pranjal need. I
have finalized 8.0.2 and am building the releases now. It takes over an
hour because of that other OS that some people run. I should have 8.0.2
in debian within a few hours.
--
You received this bug notification because you are
Acknowledged. I will try to get 8.0.2 out today and will update this
ticket when uploaded.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to qpdf in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1753621
Title:
FeatureFreeze exception
Status i
Public bug reported:
I am requesting an exception to the FeatureFreeze for Ubuntu 18.04 LTS.
I would like qpdf 8.0.1 to be synced from debian.
I am the upstream author of qpdf and the debian maintainer. I released
8.0.0 with the explicit goal of beating the 18.04 feature freeze. It was
released a
Public bug reported:
If possible, please sync qpdf 7.1.0-1 from debian unstable for Ubuntu
8.04. This is binary compatible with 7.0.0, which is currently in
Ubuntu. I thought this happened automatically, so forgive me if this
report is superfluous. qpdf 7.1.0 has been in debian unstable for a week
The latest version of qpdf in github is able to process the attached
file now. When 7.0.0 is released later this summer, it should be able to
handle this file and many with similar errors. Thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscri
I'll have to study it. Sorry, I have been quite starved for time to work
on qpdf. I would like to fix this, but I can't commit to a timeframe.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to qpdf in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
If I'm reading this correctly, it looks like there's no short-term
change to qpdf required. Is that correct? I'm thinking doing this type
of flatting in qpdf is probably out of scope, but in any case, I
wouldn't have time to work on it any time soon. I haven't studied
interactive forms enough to kn
https://github.com/qpdf/qpdf/issues/45
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to qpdf in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1397413
Title:
QPDF: Exception: operation for Name object attempted on object of
wrong type
Statu
Having qpdf able to treat strings as names would be a pretty small
enhancement and would probably improve its ability to handle a whole
category of broken files. I'll try to work this in for the next update.
Thanks for providing this detailed summary of the problem. Very helpful.
--
You received
Does your problem happen with 5.1.2-3?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to qpdf in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1397413
Title:
QPDF: Exception: operation for Name object attempted on object of
wrong type
Statu
Sorry for the long delay. I have uploaded 5.1.2-3 to experimental.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to qpdf in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1397413
Title:
QPDF: Exception: operation for Name object attempted on o
Debian is in freeze, but I could upload to experimental and ubuntu could
sync from there if that works.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to qpdf in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1397413
Title:
QPDF: Exception: ope
Before I commit this for real, I need to create a test case, but this
seems to be a correct fix.
** Patch added: "page.diff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qpdf/+bug/1397413/+attachment/4272366/+files/page.diff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desk
The problem is that the root object of the pages tree does not have a
/Type key in its dictionary. The PDF spec says that /Type is required
and must be /Pages for the root.
qpdf could and should handle this particular type of damage or could at
least give a better error message for it, but that's
I haven't tried it myself, but qpdf has few dependencies, and the ones
it has are pretty stable, and qpdf itself is binary compatible between
5.1.1 and 5.1.2. My guess is that you if grabbed the libqpdf13 package
from Vivid and tried installing it in trusty, it would most likely work
fine.
--
You
I have just uploaded 5.1.2-2 to debian unstable. You should be able to
sync with that version to get a fix.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to cups-filters in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1392048
Title:
File not
This is sufficient to fix the problem, I believe. I will pushing a
commit with this change to github shortly after I finish ChangeLog
updates, etc. I also created a test cases that calls qpdf --show-pages
on a file that has a page with no content. I haven't tested in the
context of printing, but I
I guess getPageContents should just return an empty vector in that case
and the documentation should specify that an empty vector might be
returned. This is already the case if /Contents is literally an empty
array. Thanks for the triage.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a me
The qpdfview program is not related to qpdf. They just have an
unfortunate similarity in their names.
There was a bug in qpdf that could cause loss of form data in some
cases, but this bug was fixed in qpdf 5.0.0. I don't remember whether
4.2.0 had the fix in it, but I don't think it did.
Using
Public bug reported:
(I am the debian maintainer of tiff)
I just uploaded 4.0.3-7 with a dependency on dh-autoreconf. Hopefully
this will allow you to eliminate the delta on this package and go back
to matching the version in debian.
** Affects: tiff (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
44 matches
Mail list logo
