Hope this email finds you well! Been thinking of you lately. Please let
me know when you get this, I'd like to ask you something. Stay safe and
healthy,
Jim
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.la
Thank you that is helpful information.
On Wednesday, March 29, 2017 12:50 AM, Timo Aaltonen
wrote:
15.04 is long obsolete (support ended over a year ago), so there's
probably no flash player updates to it anymore. Upgrade or reinstall.
not an X bug anyway
** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu)
Public bug reported:
When I first set up ubuntu I was able to look at youtube videos, but
then they just stopped running. I have no real idea why.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 15.04
Package: xorg 1:7.7+7ubuntu4
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.19.0-82.90-generic 3.19.8-ckt22
Uname: Linux
Pushed as commit 121a1bad334459f66f78bfca6df53dc841cf97f8.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libx11 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/518056
Title:
cedilla appears as accented c (ć instead of ç) when typing 'c
S
A git patch would be welcome, but we at least need a signoff line for
the patch.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libx11 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/518056
Title:
cedilla appears as accented c (ć instead o
> The desired behavior is that the key followed by the c key
> results in ccedilla, while keeping the original behavior for other letters.
It already does in the pt_BR.UTF-8 locale.
The compose file for pt_BR.UTF-8 includes the en_US.UTF-8 file and then
overrides some of the sequences, including
I just realized that this bug was reported *before* google changed the
http handling, so the bug reporter might have been experiencing a
different problem. Nevertheless, the problem exists now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribe
This is due to this bug:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=735311
Basically, google changed the way http requests are handled. There is a
patch available for 3.10, which should work for ubuntu 14.04, here:
https://bug735311.bugzilla-
attachments.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=284624
Debi
It looks like the bug I linked to above in comment #3 might be a
duplicate of a different bug in evolution-data-server. Google has
changed the way it handles http authentication, breaking online accounts
functionality.
evolution-data-server bug:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=735311
I just wanted to add that I have been experiencing this bug in several
distros, each with their own version of goa. Email works fine, but the
calendar component has issues:
Debian Wheezy (goa 3.4.2): I get a password prompt twice when I log in, but
after that authentication is successful
Ubuntu
Bug is not fixed with nvidia-343.13.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to compiz in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1072206
Title:
[nvidia] Window content is black or transparent
Status in Compiz:
Confirmed
Status
This bug is still present for me. (up-to-date 14.04, nvidia-331, gtx 770
4gb)
If I minimize a window and then switch to it with alt-tab, it will come
up black *every time*.
However, I found out today that if I disable *just* the un-minimize
animation using unity-tweak-tool, the problem goes away.
> Current kernels have KEY_MICMUTE==248, i. e. X.org should be
> perfectly able to recognize this. Apparently this was done in
> 2011 already.
248 is the first linux kernel value which X cannot handle.
The mapping is +8, so 248 ⟹ 256, which does not fix in 8 bits.
(The first 8 are reserved – fro
Most of the information I have about xfa has come from the itext list.
An example of the type of info posted there:
http://support.itextpdf.com/node/134
If there is new info since 2011/12 I’d be interested to know.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packa
It looks like the xfa situation isn’t as dire as I’d been led to
understand.
OTOH, I’m not entirely certain that the licence text in the preface of
the pdf referenced in comment #9 is GPL-compatible. Or even DFSG-
compatible.
In any case (unless Albert things otherwise), it probably should not b
> "b" == bugzilla-daemon writes:
> James, can you define the deficiencies in the spec linked from comment #9 so
> that we can understand which parts of XFA still need to be documented?
For starters www.xfa.org does not exist. And xfa.org does not have an A
or record.
-JimC
--
You r
Adobe would have to document XFA forms before this even could be
addressed.
The most up to date info I could find on that front is:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XFA#Standardization
As long as Adobe keeps XFA forms proprietary they are not potable and
livecycle and acroread are the only way t
The renderings I get from evince (master, with poppler master and
cairo master), ghostscript (9.05 and master) and mupdf (master) all
match the png you posted as attachment #62423.
I looked at the document after running it though:
:; mupdfclean -d -a Abschlussarbeit.pdf Abschlussarbeit.pdfc
to
gsd-media-keys-manager.c.rej :
--- plugins/media-keys/gsd-media-keys-manager.c 2012-04-14 11:13:20.0
+0400
+++ plugins/media-keys/gsd-media-keys-manager.c 2012-04-14 11:20:07.772836587
+0400
@@ -142,6 +144,8 @@
NotifyNotification *volume_notification;
NotifyNotification
I'm using Debian Wheezy, but I tried it on Ubuntu's 3.2.2 source package
and it failed with the same error.
I tried unpacking the package and using patch -p1 <
52_brightness_in_hardware.patch, and that didn't work.
I tried putting it in the debian/patches directory and using dpkg-buildpackage,
b
Patch didn't work for me. What gnome-settings-daemon version did you
work on? (3.2.2 here)
$ patch -p1 < ../52_brightness_in_hardware.patch
patching file data/org.gnome.settings-daemon.plugins.power.gschema.xml.in.in
patching file plugins/media-keys/gsd-media-keys-manager.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at
Thanks. I'll test this out as soon as I find time to.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/527157
Title:
Brightness controls skips Levels.
Status in Gnome Sett
Dmitriy: Yes it is a dirty hack :) I don't know of any other
applications that would increment the backlight up and down, and GNOME's
ability to set the brightness to a specific percentage (without going
through steps inbetween) *should* still be functional with it...although
even the unpatched g
Please note that the above patch is ONLY for those encountering this
problem and should definitely be used ONLY on an individual basis. It
will break backlight control for everyone else using GNOME 3.2.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is
This patch is for GNOME 3.2 that permanently disables gnome-settings-
deamon's ability to step-up and step-down the backlight. For those who
still can't get the correct brightness steps, this is a workaround. It
works perfectly on my Lenovo Thinkpad x220.
I'm not usually a code hacker or patcher
25 matches
Mail list logo
