(In reply to Henrik Skupin [:whimboo][⌚️UTC+1] from comment #81)
> (In reply to Sylvestre Ledru [:Sylvestre] from comment #80)
> > SIGTERM is now handled thanks to bug 1837907
>
> Bug 1837907 was only about Linux. Reading through the comments I can see that
> we may already support this on Window
(In reply to Sylvestre Ledru [:Sylvestre] from comment #80)
> SIGTERM is now handled thanks to bug 1837907
Bug 1837907 was only about Linux. Reading through the comments I can see
that we may already support this on Windows, but does that also include
MacOS?
--
You received this bug notification
I don't use Linux anymore so I cannot respond to the question.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297143
Title:
Xorg eats processor cycles while waiting for slow Internet
St
Comment on attachment 8963553
Bug 336193 - P2: Use a second SIGTERM in killPid() to ensure parent process is
killed.
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/232486/#review237940
Harnesses built on top of Marionette client as test runner will use
SIGKILL to force killing the browser process. It is only
With the removal of the Quit warning dialog on OS X this bug is kinda
annoying because shortcuts to close tabs and the browser itself are
directly beneath each other. It happens so often for me that I
accidentally close the whole browser when I'm trying to close a tab.
With a lot of tabs open it ta
Interesting that this bug is still marked as unconfirmed. I can clearly
see it myself on my laptop running Ubuntu 14.04. It's not that clear to
me yet when it directly starts but it might have something to do with
hibernation. When it occurs the CPU load of Xorg and compiz is raising
up to 60% and
Hi Vruiz, and thanks for your report. Given that your issue related to a
specific pdf file, please file a new bug and if possible attach the PDF
to the bug. Devs can then have a look at. This particular bug has been
fixed a while ago. Thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are
Then I think we should have at least a moztrap test for now to cover
that. Maybe we can collect different URLs in that test which were known
to cause problems in printing.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
Can this be tested by an automated test?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1315020
Title:
PDF.js prints blank pages
Status in The Mozilla Firefox Browser:
Fix Released
Verified fixed with with Fennec 7.0a1 (20110620)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/263661
Title:
Black Line appears next to gif and png images
Status in The Mozilla Fire
Is there anything we could do here to get this fixed for at least
Firefox 26 or 27?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1160569
Title:
[regression] GLib-CRITICAL **: g_slic
Patrick, need-info is still valid. You didn't answer my question from
comment 35. I hope you will do it at some point! Thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1194841
Tit
(In reply to Vlad [QA] from comment #85)
> If the target milestone set for this bug is mozilla 10, in order to verify
> this bug, it's enough if I update from an older nightly build to the latest
> one and check that no add-ons are missing or I have to follow some
> additional steps? (the same appl
(In reply to Adam Williamson from comment #79)
> The (first) workaround link above is no use because the information has been
> removed from the page and replaced with an instruction to update to 7.0.1.
About which workaround link you are talking? Can you please tell us the
comment number or the U
(In reply to a_geek from comment #77)
> installs and upgrades). Any suggestions for components etc., please?
Same product and component as this bug, please.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to thunderbird in Ubuntu.
https://b
Also can we get someone from the China team to verify the fix? Also for
partner builds I would kinda like to see a confirmation that everything
is ok. Carsten?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to thunderbird in Ubuntu.
https:/
(In reply to Chimel from comment #50)
> It would be great if you could create a test add-on that users can update
> locally to try and repro this type of bug, instead of relying on actual
> add-ons that may or may not have been updated.
I have created an extension which demonstrates that and will
Because both websites have been issued new certificates meanwhile. Which
means they are no valid testcases anymore.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to thunderbird in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/838322
Title:
Re
This bug needs to be verified against all the branches marked above as
fixed. The Verified state is also for trunk and not 6.0.2 as what you
have used for testing. Please test at least across 3.6.22 build 2, 6.0.2
build 2, and 7.0b4#2.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a membe
This is a kinda rough method to get rid of the problem. Especially for
users who switch between different versions of Firefox, i.e testing
purposes. Those would always have to install the language pack again and
again when using the same profile.
DaveT, do you have some ideas re comment 3?
--
Yo
20 matches
Mail list logo
