[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1011564]

2012-06-13 Thread Erack
(In reply to comment #5) Well, yes, but it should work to export the full range that is supported by the target format and truncate the extraneous rows that are only attributed. Or am I missing something? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which i

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1011564]

2012-06-13 Thread Erack
Thinking this over, the expected behavior might be that extraneous attributed-only rows are ignored in this case. Import of xls 97 already handles that by expanding the attributed range. Actually LibO 3.4 treated this differently and did not show the message on export. -- You received this bug no

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 996596]

2012-06-07 Thread Erack
Please don't change the Version field to newer, it indicates in which version the problem was first perceived. Andrej, it seems your problem is a different one, as you indicated it worked for versions <3.5.3 it sounds pretty much like bug 49639, please check if release 3.5.4 fixes that for you. -

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 235602]

2012-01-04 Thread Erack
This is not related to bug 42261 or bug 44383. The problem originates from how conditional formats are implemented, one conditional can be applied to multiple cells, when moved around they behave like named ranges and relative references are not updated but applied to the then current position ins