[Bug 532633] Re: [light-theme] please revert the order of the window controls back to "menu:minimize, maximize, close"

2010-03-16 Thread scholli
I am agree with that decision what Canonical took. I noticed I am faster with the left-option (mouseway) and it's really nice looking. Why I didn't noticed it before? But true, it's really better. Now we know too that it was made for a special reason... so I am ignoring all words against and hope t

[Bug 532633] Re: [light-theme] please revert the order of the window controls back to "menu:minimize, maximize, close"

2010-03-16 Thread scholli
#150: Ubuntu is Ubuntu. It isn't a Mac-OS and it isn't a Windows-OS. It hasn't to be similiar with any Operating Systems like Android, Win, Mac, BeOs, ... The most Peoples comes from Windows and if it isn't the same they will return to Windows is a bad and old argument. If I install another OS I k

[Bug 532633] Re: [light-theme] please revert the order of the window controls back to "menu:minimize, maximize, close"

2010-03-17 Thread scholli
What really sad is, is the fact that peoples won't changes. For example in my country (Germany) there are many peoples they don't like changes in customs... they don't like new versions of programs or new versions of an OS. For that reason still are many peoples who still uses Windows XP and Int

[Bug 532633] Re: [light-theme] please revert the order of the window controls back to "menu:minimize, maximize, close"

2010-03-17 Thread scholli
# 158: I thought only loud; but my opinion is without analytic base and yes, for many peoples it's relevant, probably, and I have to respect it. Sorry for speaking loud my emotions and thinkings at that moment. -- [light-theme] please revert the order of the window controls back to "menu:minimiz

[Bug 532633] Re: [light-theme] please revert the order of the window controls back to "menu:minimize, maximize, close"

2010-03-17 Thread scholli
@fewt you're doing really play the surprised? McDonalds... you can let suggestions, feedbacks, reclamations. You go there to enjoy your hamburger, but you can't enter in the kitchen and fry your own hamburgers. You are not a kitchen-employee of that company. The same Canonical's product Ubuntu. The

[Bug 532633] Re: [light-theme] please revert the order of the window controls back to "menu:minimize, maximize, close"

2010-03-18 Thread scholli
This thread would be shorter, better and more serious for the design team if we 'switch of' "emotions" finally. # 194 is a back to topic and has interesting points. The design team needs good points and facts for take good decisions. Stay by topic is the most helpful thing that we can do. One sol

[Bug 532633] Re: [light-theme] please revert the order of the window controls back to "menu:minimize, maximize, close"

2010-03-18 Thread scholli
Off-Topic... who cares now! @ Mark: Lucid Lynx is frightening good and nice-looking. Microsoft will spend you another travel to the space for free; better said to the moon, because they wish you out of the planet earth after the release surely! Hold the course ... Bug [1]. :D -- [light-theme] p

[Bug 532633] Re: [light-theme] please revert the order of the window controls back to "menu:minimize, maximize, close"

2010-03-18 Thread scholli
@ Atel Apsfej: +1 But publish ideas and inventions soon in form of mock-up's can be copied by the concurrence and the "Joker"-Card is played before it could dig hurtful. Better believe to Shuttleworth and let him play the poker-game without rush him show his cards. I believe in his abilities, you

[Bug 532633] Re: [light-theme] please revert the order of the window controls back to "menu:minimize, maximize, close"

2010-03-18 Thread scholli
@ Atel Apsfej: Wow. I am baffled about your ability to write and think. Here are writing many genius, but not all here have your ability to say it clear, with good arguments (points) and the cruel reality without being offensive, arrogant or simply unrespectful. I saw you are member here since

[Bug 532633] Re: [light-theme] please revert the order of the window controls back to "menu:minimize, maximize, close"

2010-03-19 Thread scholli
I hear alway touchscreens as argument. But it's a funny argument in my eyes. The pick-up'ed Icons on the panel, switch off - button on the panel, control-buttons (right or left), hide windows-applet, ... all is too small for that feature. Honestly it needs a different Desktop- Interface like the Ub

[Bug 532633] Re: [light-theme] please revert the order of the window controls back to "menu:minimize, maximize, close"

2010-03-19 Thread scholli
# 281: Really the minority? I had understand in a post before that 99.9% are happy with it and 0.1% unhappy... they come here in search of shout loud somewhere! and let a comment. :-) ... Well, maybe I am only saturated a little bit with the 280 comments: yes, not, anger, off-topic, chantage, idea

[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-03-22 Thread scholli
Aigars that is the wonderful thing that all is left. The start-menu on the panel. The windows with their control-buttons, the menu, the toolbar-icons, most important bookmarks, tabs, ... Wow, it's really faster work with it. I never clicked bad, because I look quickly and target well... like alway

[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-03-22 Thread scholli
@ Aigars "Moving such dangerous button as 'Close' into the mix increases it even more as you will want to be REALLY careful not to close your window by accident." This should be the reason why the ’Close’-button is in the third place... for ’no’ clicking by accident. "... there are many elements

[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-03-23 Thread scholli
fraid to do what they think to do and give Ubuntu a new, nice and recognize face. respectfully Scholli -- [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which

[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-03-23 Thread scholli
"Well... never user a touchpad? Or a >5 years old mouse? Ask your elderly about their gesture precision too... Gesture precision has nothing to do with the left or right side But it does! Cann't you see that?" I have to admit that this is probably a negative point from this change. The rest of

[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-03-24 Thread scholli
Peoples are thinking what that new feature can be in 10.10!? And I found this idea in a forum (mock-up made by tawk): http://media.ubuntuusers.de/forum/attachments/2410878/hybrid-leiste.png So the motto is "Change" we have to tolerate new stuffs and the decisions behind that (if you can't accept)

[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-03-24 Thread scholli
@ Weare: But the close-button on the Firefox-tabs and Google-Chrome (Chromium) -tabs are on the right. Like the close-button in the control-buttons-bar on the Metacity; it's on the right, too. Where is the inconsistency, please? It's on the left, but it isn't a Mac-Clone, because the order is diff

[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-03-24 Thread scholli
I am out of here, too. I see the bug is in progress now - so the developers has collected enough datas. Let's see how the final decision will be. :-) -- [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532633 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-03-24 Thread scholli
In my opinion the most are more nightmares than value arguments. I am tester and since Alpha 3 I am using Lucid with all default from home. Than the new Brand come and I had the buttons left. I was surprised, but I gave it a change. Till today I haven't noticed any contra- productivity, inconsisten

[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-03-24 Thread scholli
Clicking on the menu?! (I saw it in the linked forum). But what bad precision, really. wow. The distance is far enough. If the control- buttons haves finally hover- and pushing-functionality you see clear! you are over the buttons and not over the menu. Have it all near together (menu, toolbar-butt

[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-03-25 Thread scholli
Data form User Scholli: (male, 35 years, right-hand) 1. Mouse-position: Before the change I had the buttons always on the right. The mouse was generally on the right side. But actions like save, open etc. let me moving the mouse from right to left and back again - automaticly. Now after ~ 2

[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-03-26 Thread scholli
@ Pyramid Technologies What a nonsense. In what relations you can put together the Vista-fail with the buttons? 1. you are sure the majority want it? You want it. Peoples who didn't tried it for a long period will say firstly "no". But this statement is generally not fair. 2. this is a fair poi

[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-03-27 Thread scholli
"Don't change things for the sake of change, or to differentiate. Make changes because they make improvements. (as I said before, no one would just changes the order of throttle and brake in a car, without a very good reason)" I think differentiate is important. Every OS should have his own iden

[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-03-27 Thread scholli
Besides... I saw in the Ubuntu-Forum in Germany that the Threat about the new button-placing is poor in visits and comments. The Offtopic- Lucid-Threat are many voices that peoples loves the new look and way. I don't thing that the whole world is against that. And who's against, can change the opin

[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-03-27 Thread scholli
@ Bernhard: Wow, true. This was a really good idea what they did with the Metacity- update. If Grandma likes it on the right, so she can switching in a simple the theme... "Dust" for example. ;) I thing it's a good compromise - like it. This could calm the most of the present inscribers here in th

[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-03-27 Thread scholli
@ Scaine What you think it's spam from me are only my intents for opening the mind, see the stuff from another angle (point) and show that most of the arguments don't haves the gravity they looks like at first moment. This threat is a meeting form "I am against it"-folk and I am in mission to giv

[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-03-27 Thread scholli
No Pietro. The custom-themes haves now the possibility to do their themes with the control-buttons on the left or the right (look down). The rest of the themes have it on the right, because they was made for it and they looks better this way. --- index.theme [Desktop Entry] Type=X-GNOME-Metat

[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-03-27 Thread scholli
28 minutes of shorter mouseways with the control-buttons left. I do my usual work with the new adopt habits.?field.comment=28 minutes of shorter mouseways with the control-buttons left. I do my usual work with the new adopt habits. ** Attachment added: "IOGraphica (Scholli) - 28 minutes (fr

[Bug 328575] Re: Cannot start gnome-terminal bcause of gconf error

2009-04-16 Thread Scholli
Can put somebody this bug as medium-importance? It's a very nerving bug! Thx -- Cannot start gnome-terminal bcause of gconf error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328575 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs m

[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-03-29 Thread scholli
I have the good impression that Lucid will be a big success. It's the beautifulest and full with great features (Ubuntu's Indicator-Applets, Music-Store, Software-Center, ...) Distro far and wide in the Linux- World. Since Karmic I love the good progress Ubuntu is going. Even Windows 7 looks now wo

[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-03-29 Thread scholli
After Mark S. clear statement we got here only comments of peoples they can't stop crying. It's so, because they know that Mark S. is here and is reading the comments. I hope that this exploitation will stop now and we will get here ***only*** clear datas from the key-peoples. Thanks. -- [Master]

[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-03-30 Thread scholli
Steve it's a nice work you did. But is IOGraphica do the same with the heats, is more exactly (continuous and not every 5 seconds) and show the ways you did with the mouse. But in the end it's maybe a good script for a long time data collect. So I think it's great, too. Thanks. Maybe a notice with

[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-03-30 Thread scholli
@ last inscribers: right click on screen - click on "change appearance and background" - choose the theme-tab - choose a theme like "Dust" ... have fun with right. Ambiance and Radiance have a unique good look with left. I am associating Ubuntu with left - max,min,close now. Would be sad to los

[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-03-30 Thread scholli
Work with Windows @ work and work with Ubuntu @ home it's not stringent necessary to put them on the right. I have to respect that it's confusing for some peoples, mostly for elder persons, okay. At other side there are many peoples in the world who can handle it easily. They say maybe, like me:

[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-03-30 Thread scholli
Wrong Pyramid. Microsoft will include a new feature, because it's really better and if they are unsure the will insert a option for redo this change to old habits. The same happens here. We have a change, but you are always free to redo it if you wish it. The mistakes of Microsoft are that they mad

[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-03-30 Thread scholli
@ Webster: " + - X " ... " ^ v X " ... " [ ] _ X " is obviously the same and the most used symbols I saw over the last years in Windows-decorations in gnome-look.org for example. "^" means simply: up - bigger - grow "v" means oviously: down - small - minimize The next is the design-issue...

[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-03-31 Thread scholli
@ Piramid :) I will link out here. I don't wont have here a only 3-man-threat. We have a completely different way to see the stuff. I respect it, but it's not mine. bye -- [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532633 You received this bug notif

[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-04-01 Thread scholli
not a own face finally, but surely a good marketing-gag :) The light-theme fits to the modern Icons very well and the hardest bugs has gone... now it's only fine-tuning. The new Indicators on Panel and only the better Software-Center makes Ubuntu to the best choose for the next generation-folks.

[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-04-01 Thread scholli
@ Pyramid: :-D Radical decisions from a heart-broken man. I look forward... send me a postcard if I was right. Cheers PD: Don't forget "sudo"; better is the partition-manager from the new Live-CD. ;) -- [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/53

[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-04-01 Thread scholli
@ pYramid: I didn't win, so my argument about unique has gone. I liked the initial 'order' more, because IT was so unique and you had to think a little bit before you want close the windows really! ... meanwhile you looked for the red point. Your last comment was "sweet". "Dude, what is written o

[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-04-01 Thread scholli
# 588 ... and it's not Piko, but Pako -- [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list d

[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-04-02 Thread scholli
Slowly, slowly. I am not a IT-Specialist, but even me I know that every new Version has to been 'patched' before it's going out. It's always a lot of work and always the same thing. Before it goes out it have to be tested (... but in Alpha and Beta I'm not always sure they do :). And now I come to

[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-04-03 Thread scholli
@ Jeff: "A "minor" change that hardly affected me at all, it's had a 100% negative (sometimes violent) reaction from 20 users I've polled." I don't understand!? You updated to Lucid "Beta1" in your company? It's still not for productive work. In the final you will have the option for putting them

[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-04-03 Thread scholli
@ Jeff: (Data and Gnome3) See my data if you got accustomed to work with the buttons on left #489. I let the mouse, if I am working in the center and left. You will notice shorter mouseways simply, because all important actions happens on the left-side. About Gnome3: All is important is on the

[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-04-07 Thread scholli
"(in case anyone asks: Why am I still posting here if I've moved to Debian? Well, I'm in the lifeboat just watching the Titanic sink is all.)" distrowatch.com It's rising ... after publishing Lucid, it still will growing. No Titanic here! Why? Because Ubuntu is cleaning up the ***old*** dust and

[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-04-07 Thread scholli
mouth (sorry) @Bob Yes with Windows... My first Computer was an Amiga and it was different. It was bad? Nop! You will wonder the quick you can change customs. ,) -- [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532633 You received this bug notificatio

[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-04-07 Thread scholli
I still not sure about the order. The big points of the initial-order was: 1. unique - own face 2. consistence with the close-buttons in the tabs for example (right side) 3. you have to look a second for it (search for it a little bit) before closing ... time for thinking: "you want close really!

[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-04-13 Thread scholli
In a LTS for custom peoples to use them left - show them that Ubuntu have a new Brand with a new design (CHANGE). Top-Arguments for left are: - Gnome 3 (Commando-Bar and Activity are on the left) - new feature arrives in the perfect 10 (10.10) - shorter mouseways after a short training - it looks

[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-04-13 Thread scholli
sudo gedit /usr/share/themes/Ambiance/index.theme sudo gedit /usr/share/themes/Radiance/index.theme 1. ButtonLayout=close,minimize,maximize: (default) 2. ButtonLayout=close,minimize,maximize:menu(my setting) 3. ButtonLayout=:maximize,minimize,close (I want it on right

[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-04-14 Thread scholli
@ Paul Sladen: Thank you for your professional correction. -- [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in ubuntu. -- deskt

[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-04-14 Thread scholli
@ bt90: No I think it isn't a good idea. At moment it would be cool, but if the new feature (10.10) will be included we have a problem... you can't reach the new feature-stuff. ,) A button or a ratio-button for change the side is easier to realize and would be a solution for everybody. For me it'

[Bug 441905] Re: strange behaivor by clicking buttons

2009-10-05 Thread scholli
Thanks for everybody. This was solved fast and the usability is muc better now. Thanks -- strange behaivor by clicking buttons https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441905 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gtk+2.0 in ubuntu.

[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-04-24 Thread scholli
I say "yes"... and I see that always more and more peoples are agreed with left. -- [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity

[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-04-25 Thread scholli
I did updates since Beta1 and I don't have this feature what is shown in the attached screenshot. But now I see that it exists and probably I have to do a fresh install with the final release for get it working finally. But seeing that, everything should be fine now, for everybody!? ** Attachment

[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-04-30 Thread scholli
In Germany the feedback about the new LTS is very very positve. Most of the users, not Alpha- Beta-testers are surrprised about the fast, very fast booting and exited about the new and modern Design. Only a low percent in the forums etc. (~ 2-5%) is worry about the new Design or about the position

[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-05-02 Thread scholli
Avetik Topchyan wrote: >IMHO, that has to be configured through GUI, like other settings, and not a >through a terminal command. Why make life harder >than it should be?.. "Ubuntu Tweak" can be found, quickly, in the Software-Center. Life can be so easy ... ;-) -- [Master] Window Control button

[Bug 123133] Re: mixer_applet2 crashed on logon

2007-06-29 Thread scholli
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 122594 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122594 ** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8262090/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8262091/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added:

[Bug 123133] mixer_applet2 crashed on logon

2007-06-29 Thread scholli
-2.0.so.0 ?? () ?? () ?? () Title: mixer_applet2 crashed with SIGSEGV in gtk_widget_get_toplevel() Uname: Linux scholli-laptop 2.6.22-7-generic #1 SMP Mon Jun 25 17:33:14 GMT 2007 i686 GNU/Linux UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy lpadmin netdev plugdev powerdev scanner video

[Bug 123233] evolution-alarm-notify crashed with signal 5 in g_logv()

2007-06-30 Thread scholli
: cdrom Package: evolution 2.11.4-0ubuntu1 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/evolution/2.12/evolution-alarm-notify ProcCwd: /home/scholli ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=de_DE.UTF-8 PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash

[Bug 123233] Re: evolution-alarm-notify crashed with signal 5 in g_logv()

2007-06-30 Thread scholli
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8267828/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8267829/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8267830/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment

[Bug 123232] evolution-data-server-1.12 crashed with signal 5 in g_logv()

2007-06-30 Thread scholli
/usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 ?? () from /usr/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0 ?? () from /usr/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0 ?? () Title: evolution-data-server-1.12 crashed with signal 5 in g_logv() Uname: Linux scholli-laptop 2.6.22-7-generic #1 SMP Mon Jun 25 17:33:14 GMT 2007 i686 GNU/Linux UserGroups: adm

[Bug 123232] Re: evolution-data-server-1.12 crashed with signal 5 in g_logv()

2007-06-30 Thread scholli
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 123231 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123231 ** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8267819/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8267820/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added:

[Bug 123231] evolution-data-server-1.12 crashed with signal 5 in g_logv()

2007-06-30 Thread scholli
/libgthread-2.0.so.0 ?? () Title: evolution-data-server-1.12 crashed with signal 5 in g_logv() Uname: Linux scholli-laptop 2.6.22-7-generic #1 SMP Mon Jun 25 17:33:14 GMT 2007 i686 GNU/Linux UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy lpadmin netdev plugdev powerdev scanner video

[Bug 123231] Re: evolution-data-server-1.12 crashed with signal 5 in g_logv()

2007-06-30 Thread scholli
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8267801/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8267802/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8267803/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment

[Bug 123237] Re: evolution crashed with SIGSEGV in strchr()

2007-06-30 Thread scholli
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8267887/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8267888/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8267889/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment

[Bug 123237] evolution crashed with SIGSEGV in strchr()

2007-06-30 Thread scholli
15:33:56 2007 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/evolution NonfreeKernelModules: cdrom Package: evolution 2.11.4-0ubuntu1 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcCmdline: evolution --component=mail ProcCwd: /home/scholli ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=de_DE.UTF-8 PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin