According to what is stated in upstream bug, brasero handles /tmp use
differently now, which basically means that this bug report can be
resolved / closed.
Is this the right way to deal with this ? Shall we close this bug report
according to what upstream did ?
Thanks.
--
You received this bug
According to what Pedro said on #3 comment, this has been fixed.
Looking into the corresponding commit in upstream git repository, and
comparing that fix with the current version, it seems that it is fixed
in current version.
Shall we close this bug ?
Thanks.
--
You received this bug notificati
Just a newbie question, looking at the upstream bug, it says that this
issue is caused by a bug in gtksourceview, and not in this application.
Shouldn't the bug report be submitted in the aforementioned library,
instead of gedit ?
Sorry if I am totally wrong, just trying to understand what the ri
Looking at the upstream bug, it appears that this is really a bug in
package gvfs.
Looking at the change made upstream on that package, and comparing with
the package gvfs that was released with natty, it appears that this
change has already been made.
Beside that, I repeat the steps outlined to
** Changed in: gedit (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250540
Title:
gedit cannot save to sftp location
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
d
