Sebastien,
let's say that making a package to require/suggest another package is
taking less time than reading these 6 comments.
If only the package maintainer would be persuaded to DO it.
--
should suggest fortune-mod
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374156
You received this bug notification be
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-power-manager
Installing ubuntu-desktop on Xubuntu brings, as expected, gnome-power-
manager.
The problem is that when you're in an XFCE session, the xfce4-power-
manager settings show as they were prior to install GNOME, but in
reality gnome-power
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-terminal
Both
/usr/share/applications/xfce4-terminal.desktop
and
/usr/share/applications/gnome-terminal.desktop
have the following:
"Name=Terminal"
"Icon=utilities-terminal"
Thus, on a Ubuntu system having both GNOME and XFCE, the menu
Application
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33044601/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "XsessionErrors.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33044602/XsessionErrors.txt
--
Both gnome-terminal and xfce4-terminal show as "Terminal" in GNOME's menu
https://bugs.lau
Pedro, you have no reason.
"GNOME Terminal" has indeed this name AS SHOWN IN THE ABOUT BOX, but
shows in the menu as "Terminal". Changing this to "GNOME Terminal" WOULD
NOT CHANGE ITS NAME!
XFCE's Terminal has the name "Terminal" (AS SHOWN IN THE ABOUT BOX) and
shows as "Terminal" in the menus, w
** Attachment added: "Collated screenshots to explain the bug report"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33122993/power_statistics_nonsense.png
--
Power statistics make no sense, and graph smoothing is buggy/broken
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444578
You received this bug notification because y
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-power-manager
"Charge accuracy" going from 0% to 60%: the user can't possibly
understand anything.
"Charge profile": the "correction factor" is what? Is it to be added,
subtracted, multiplied or divided? Against what? Expressed in what unit?
"Disc
Brasero won't honor speed settings in two situations:
(1) Selecting a non-working speed. For instance, a drive is only able to
burn at 10x, 16x and 24x, and K3b is correctly showing this, BUT Brasero
doesn't know the working speeds, as it *only* tests for the MAXIMUM
speed, then it lists all the "
Both optical units that show this result are by LG:
-- laptop unit: HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GSA-T20N. Capabilities: CD-R: 24x; DVD-R/DVD+R:
6x ZCLV.
-- PC unit: GCE-8526B. Capabilities: CD-R: 52x.
These models are reported in dmesg anyway. I can't run sginfo, but these
units are *very* popular.
I can't
TerryG, you're completely wrong! GNOME bug #507651 is for a completely
different issue: #507651 is about the ESTIMATED speed shown WHILE you
burn, whereas this bug is about the speed you CHOOSE PRIOR to start the
burning!
The correct upstream bug is: Bug 525501 – Brasero displays odd burning speed
10 matches
Mail list logo
