[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-03-26 Thread Pietro Battiston
Many right things have been said (and scarcely considerated, but that's another story), just one added observation: all comments of the form "they're just buttons", "you can change it", and partially also "you can change distribution" are simply irresponsible. _I_ can change it, and probably will.

Re: [Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-03-26 Thread Pietro Battiston
Il giorno ven, 26/03/2010 alle 10.41 +, Imre Gergely ha scritto: > @Pietro Battiston: I don't think you can be 100% sure that Debian (or > any other distro) won't do something in the future you will dislike... I'm 100% sure it won't do something that the majority di

Re: [Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-03-26 Thread Pietro Battiston
Il giorno ven, 26/03/2010 alle 20.41 +, Pako ha scritto: > Well, the time is running and there is still no particular reason and > argument, why should be the right buttons retained. Please, at this point we are all taking as _obvious_ that right buttons are to be retained _in absence_ of a p

Re: [Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-03-27 Thread Pietro Battiston
The theme-dependent buttons are _bad news_, for two reasons: 1) they make clear that the "experiment" is much more than an experiment 2) the reason for the switch was to put something new (and certainly great - though unfortunately secret, at the moment) on the right side: it means that whatever

[Bug 202861] Re: nautilus hangs after network disconnect

2014-09-11 Thread Pietro Battiston
I am pretty sure the bug most of us are experiencing is https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=735953 which by the way was fixed in git. So I'm reassigning from gvfs to gtk+3.0 . The patch in comment 7: https://bug735953.bugzilla-attachments.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=285251 should really be

[Bug 202861] Re: nautilus hangs after network disconnect

2014-09-12 Thread Pietro Battiston
You are right, sorry for the noise. ** Package changed: gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu) => ubuntu ** Package changed: ubuntu => gvfs (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202861 Title: nautilu

[Bug 456326] Re: Empathy sometimes fails to reconnect to IRC servers

2009-12-04 Thread Pietro Battiston
** Summary changed: - Empathy sometimes fails to connect to an IRC server + Empathy sometimes fails to reconnect to IRC servers -- Empathy sometimes fails to reconnect to IRC servers https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456326 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desk

[Bug 456326] Re: Empathy sometimes fails to reconnect to IRC servers

2009-12-04 Thread Pietro Battiston
Yes, I would say it is the same bug ** Changed in: empathy (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- Empathy sometimes fails to reconnect to IRC servers https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456326 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribe

[Bug 296701] Re: evince crashes on .ps file

2009-12-31 Thread Pietro Battiston
Karmic 64 bit: "disclaimer.pdf.ps" gives me no more problems, output_1.ps never did; however the first time I opened 2009.ps, clicking from Firefox, evince segfaulted, and I got [27306.043901] evince[8793]: segfault at 7fa423d28000 ip 7fa445dc261b sp 7fff2715bb48 error 4 in libc-2.10.1.so[

[Bug 296701] Re: evince crashes on .ps file

2009-12-31 Thread Pietro Battiston
Certainly, if we judge its "fixed" state from the current stable, it's fix _released_ ** Changed in: libcairo (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- evince crashes on .ps file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/296701 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 358502] Re: "glade" package still refers to glade-2

2009-07-07 Thread Pietro Battiston
In Karmic, package "glade" refers to glade 3 (and glade 2 doesn't exist). It's somewhat sad that the command "glade" disappeared (instead than pointing to glade3), but still the bug is solved. ** Changed in: glade (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- "glade" package still refers to gl

[Bug 272316] Re: [regression, intrepid] redraw problems, patches from fedora

2009-01-21 Thread Pietro Battiston
As far as I know, the fact that a SUSE corresponding bug is linked from here doesn't extend the scope of this page to how/which SUSE packages can be patched. Also notice my patch didn't solve the problem for everybody. Anyway, you can find the patch itself in http://launchpadlibrarian.net/193123

[Bug 272316] Re: [regression, intrepid] redraw problems, patches from fedora

2009-01-21 Thread Pietro Battiston
I have absolutely _no_ idea of how a SUSE package must be patched (I don't even know how it must be compiled). I'm not trying to be unpolite, I'm just trying to suggest that _this_ is not the right place to ask what you need. -- [regression, intrepid] redraw problems, patches from fedora https:/

[Bug 272316] Re: [regression, intrepid] redraw problems, patches from fedora

2008-11-20 Thread Pietro Battiston
Here is a patch targeted "intrepid-proposed" (I don't think Jaunty needs it). Notice it does not give credit to Joe Smith only because I went to this bug trought #284530, so didn't see his debdiff (and in fact the resolution is _slightly_ different). I already tested the patch (in xournal) and wo

[Bug 272316] Re: [regression, intrepid] redraw problems, patches from fedora

2008-11-24 Thread Pietro Battiston
I'm - obviously - using it and it works. However there is a small problem - don't know if this is another bug or something that usually happens with libraries backporting and is considered normal: if one has "proposed" enabled, it is impossible to install libgnomecanvas2-dev, because it is still t

[Bug 272316] Re: [regression, intrepid] redraw problems, patches from fedora

2008-11-25 Thread Pietro Battiston
Problem solved. Yes, I think it was a problem with my mirror (it.archive.ubuntu.com), but it disappeared, sorry for not checking before. -- [regression, intrepid] redraw problems, patches from fedora https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272316 You received this bug notification because you are a membe

[Bug 296701] Re: evince crashes on .ps file

2008-12-05 Thread Pietro Battiston
I have exactly the same bug, I can reproduce it reliably but my /var/crash remains empty. If I am given further instructions on how to post useful info, I will do it. ** Changed in: evince (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Confirmed -- evince crashes on .ps file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs

[Bug 296701] Re: evince crashes on .ps file

2008-12-05 Thread Pietro Battiston
I have exactly the same bug, I can reproduce it reliably but my /var/crash remains empty. If I am given further instructions on how to post useful info, I will do it. -- evince crashes on .ps file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/296701 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 296701] Re: evince crashes on .ps file

2008-12-18 Thread Pietro Battiston
Here it is. As far as I can tell, the program crashes every time I zoom in more than 100%. If the last time I saw the file I was zooming more than 100%, it crashes immediately. ** Attachment added: "Backtrace of the crash" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20556768/gdb-evince.txt ** Attachment re

[Bug 296701] Re: evince crashes on .ps file

2008-12-18 Thread Pietro Battiston
Here it is, really ** Attachment added: "Backtrace" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20556837/gdb-evince.txt -- evince crashes on .ps file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/296701 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desk

[Bug 296701] Re: evince crashes on .ps file

2008-12-18 Thread Pietro Battiston
Oopss.. just noticed that the I'm unable to trigger the crash using "output_1.ps" file provided by DragonK, so I can't no more be sure we really are affected by the same bug. I'm attaching the ps file that triggers the bug to me. ** Attachment added: "The file triggering the bug to Toobaz" htt

[Bug 296701] Re: evince crashes on .ps file

2008-12-18 Thread Pietro Battiston
Last precisation: to trigger the bug I have to rotate the file 90° clockwise _and then_ zoom over 100%. I'm also noticing a very strange thing: almost every time I reproduce the crash, Firefox hangs (doesn't even draw the content of its windows) and I have to kill it... it may be a coincidence,

[Bug 296701] Re: evince crashes on .ps file

2008-12-18 Thread Pietro Battiston
OK, firefox just hanged and I wasn't reproducing the bug; forget last part of my last comment. -- evince crashes on .ps file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/296701 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailin

[Bug 272316] Re: [regression, intrepid] redraw problems, patches from fedora

2009-01-01 Thread Pietro Battiston
Actually, the package was tested by many and reported to work; it is true that without the patch the bug is not here, however notice the patch is not intended to solve this bug, but another one (having to do with tearing), so this is not strange. Are you sure you didn't someway take the old versio

[Bug 272316] Re: [regression, intrepid] redraw problems, patches from fedora

2009-01-02 Thread Pietro Battiston
The "ubuntu-compiled package that was installed by default in intrepid" depends on which channels you have enabled, but notice that for instance in http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=libgnomecanvas&searchon=names&suite=intrepid you still get libgnomecanvas_2.20.1.1-1ubuntu2, which yes, ha

[Bug 272316] Re: [regression, intrepid] redraw problems, patches from fedora

2009-01-04 Thread Pietro Battiston
I'm trying to reproduce, and maybe a couple of times was successful, so I'm starting to think to some gcc misbehaviour (or, more realistically, some libgnomecanvas misbehaviour exposed only by some gcc)... does the bug also imply painful slowliness i.e. when resizing? Andcor, do you have i386 too?

[Bug 846550] Re: Address book is empty when composing new email

2013-01-06 Thread Pietro Battiston
Please forget my last comment- I just saw bug #1072442, which concerns the new issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution-data-server in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/846550 Title: Address book is emp

[Bug 846550] Re: Address book is empty when composing new email

2013-01-06 Thread Pietro Battiston
I just linked a question which concerns the same bug, and I'm also experiencing it with evolution 3.6.0-0ubuntu3. So I would like to reopen, for Quantal, but it's not clear to me if I'm missing the permissions to do so (or I'm just plain stupid). -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1072442] Re: Adressbook entries not visible after selection "To:" email field

2013-01-06 Thread Pietro Battiston
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #660870 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=660870 ** Changed in: evolution Importance: Undecided => Unknown ** Changed in: evolution Status: New => Unknown ** Changed in: evolution Remote watch: None => GNOME Bug Tracker #660870 -- Yo

[Bug 473821] Re: evolution-data-server-2.28 crashed with SIGSEGV in __nptl_deallocate_tsd()

2009-11-03 Thread Pietro Battiston
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35079985/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35079986/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35079987/ProcMaps.txt ** Attac

[Bug 473821] [NEW] evolution-data-server-2.28 crashed with SIGSEGV in __nptl_deallocate_tsd()

2009-11-03 Thread Pietro Battiston
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution-data-server Apport started automatically, I have no particular info to add. ProblemType: Crash Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Nov 4 07:31:21 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/evolution/evolution-data-server-2.28 NonfreeKe

Re: [Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-03-31 Thread Pietro Battiston
This is not a forum, guys. I humbly suggest opening a thread on Ubuntu forums and stop spamming here. -- [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is su

Re: [Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-04-05 Thread Pietro Battiston
Brainstorm is just a technicality. The point is that - many users thought of Ubuntu's organization as a "democracy without burocracy": when you have a nice mission ("Linux for human beings"), a nice codebase to start from (Debian), a nice group of people and a nice capital to start, who cares abou

[Bug 681578] [NEW] no man page for gdialog

2010-11-25 Thread Pietro Battiston
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: zenity Binary package hint: zenity straightforward See bug #50349 more more info. ** Affects: zenity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- no man page for gdialog https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681578 You received this bug noti

[Bug 681578] Re: no man page for gdialog

2010-11-25 Thread Pietro Battiston
** Description changed: - Binary package hint: zenity - Binary package hint: zenity straightforward See bug #50349 more more info. -- no man page for gdialog https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681578 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, wh

[Bug 50349] Re: no man page for gdialog

2010-11-25 Thread Pietro Battiston
I would sincerely like to know the rationale, or the guideline, for which closed bugs must not be re-opened. But anyway: see bug #681578 -- no man page for gdialog https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/50349 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is s

Re: [Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-04-25 Thread Pietro Battiston
Il giorno dom, 25/04/2010 alle 14.04 +, scholli ha scritto: > I did updates since Beta1 and I don't have this feature what is shown in > the attached screenshot. But now I see that it exists and probably I > have to do a fresh install with the final release for get it working > finally. But see

Re: [Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-04-30 Thread Pietro Battiston
Il giorno sab, 01/05/2010 alle 00.50 +, Avetik Topchyan ha scritto: > @soundpartner, firstly, thanks for the script! > > My hope is that some bright mind would not suddenly decide > tomorrow to move these buttons to the bottom of the screen by default. > > Eureka! what a great innovation w

[Bug 358467] Re: glade-3 crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()

2009-04-09 Thread Pietro Battiston
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25111601/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25111602/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25111603/Disassembly.txt ** Attachm

[Bug 358502] [NEW] "glade" package still refers to glade-2

2009-04-09 Thread Pietro Battiston
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: glade glade-3 is out since a lot of time now, but the package "glade" gives still glade-2, very obsolete and unsupported Though some people still use glade-2, they certainly know they need it. Instead a newbie wanting to try glade may not know it's obso

[Bug 358502] Re: "glade" package still refers to glade-2

2009-04-09 Thread Pietro Battiston
Notice Debian seems to have finally solved that (though a sync of their "glade" - which is glade-3 - is not recommended, since they have an older version than us... and the same is valid for glade-2) -- "glade" package still refers to glade-2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/358502 You received th

[Bug 358502] Re: "glade" package still refers to glade-2

2009-04-09 Thread Pietro Battiston
"sudo apt-get install glade" installing glade-2 is a bug, not a wish (personally, I know perfectly the difference between 2 and 3, and install the one I need), exactly as "sudo apt-get install firefox" installing firefox 2 would be. I'd like jaunty not to have bugs. That's all I have to say as a mo

[Bug 50349] Re: no man page for gdialog

2009-11-15 Thread Pietro Battiston
I don't know at what time the link disappeared, but in Karmic "man gdialog" again gives "No manual entry for gdialog.". ** Changed in: zenity (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Confirmed -- no man page for gdialog https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/50349 You received this bug notification beca