[Bug 1575248] Re: "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." on "sudo apt-get update"

2016-05-05 Thread Orzech
Just for the record: running "sudo apt update" gave me the same error, even though original askubuntu post suggested otherwise. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/157524

[Bug 44082] Re: GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations

2010-01-01 Thread Orzech
As for me, placing separators between all applets (those on the right) seems to prevent them from switching positions. -- GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44082 You received this bug notification becaus

[Bug 313327] [NEW] Window list applet freezes vertical gnome panel when more than 7 windows are opened at once.

2009-01-02 Thread Orzech
Public bug reported: Window list applet freezes vertical gnome panel when more than 7 windows are opened at once. repro: 1. Make gnome-panel vertical. 2. Have window list applet on it. 3. Open more than 7 windows. result: Whole panel freezes and eats processor. expected result: Window list appl

[Bug 313327] Re: Window list applet freezes vertical gnome panel when more than 7 windows are opened at once.

2009-01-02 Thread Orzech
** Description changed: Window list applet freezes vertical gnome panel when more than 7 windows - are opened at once. + are opened at once. Currently I have package version + 1:2.24.1-0ubuntu2.1, but AFAIK it happened on earlier versions too. repro: 1. Make gnome-panel vertical. 2. Hav

[Bug 313327] Re: Window list applet freezes vertical gnome panel when more than 7 windows are opened at once.

2009-01-02 Thread Orzech
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 187540 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187540 ** Description changed: Window list applet freezes vertical gnome panel when more than 7 windows are opened at once. Ubuntu version: 8.10 Package version: 1:2.24.1-0ubuntu2.1 (AFAIK, problem existe

[Bug 187540] Re: Gnome-panel freeze when 8 windows are open when the panel is vertical

2009-01-07 Thread Orzech
FYI mike wrote on 2009-01-03: (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source /gnome-panel/+bug/313327/comments/2) a person have posted a perfect patch here, and we tested it already: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=968901 would you please consider to just add it to the standard version so

[Bug 575324] [NEW] Applications go foreground when not needed

2010-05-04 Thread Orzech
Public bug reported: Ubuntu version: 9.10 and 10.04, most probably others too. Applications go foreground immediately when something happens in them, eg. when dialog is shown or when they're started. It happens even if user is busy with another app and thus produces a very bad user experience. R

[Bug 187540] Re: Gnome-panel freeze when 8 windows are open when the panel is vertical

2009-03-20 Thread Orzech
It is better not to involve God into this issue. ;) Sad thing is that users having notebooks with widescreen will still suffer from this bug. Of course as long as they won't waste their vertical space with horizontal-oriented panels or run too many GUI applications. :/ -- Gnome-panel freeze when

Re: [Bug 187540] Re: Gnome-panel freeze when 8 windows are open whenthe panel is vertical

2009-03-20 Thread Orzech
No, it takes the fun out of using Gnome on widescreen laptops. On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Chris B wrote: > Takes the fun out of life, doesn't it? > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 6:42 AM, Orzech wrote: > > It is better not to involve God into this issue. ;) Sad thing is t

Re: [Bug 187540] Re: Gnome-panel freeze when 8 windows are open when thepanel is vertical

2009-03-27 Thread Orzech
Thanks for advice Luca. Hrimhari, as far as I understand, you just need to place a separator on panel somewhere below window list applet not allowing it to expand too much ("to a maximum of 7 rows of buttons"). Hrimhari wrote: > Could you give more information about your workaround? I'm sure that