I released this as part of today's security update. Marking as fix
released.
** Changed in: xchat-gnome (Ubuntu Wily)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to xchat-gnome in Ubuntu.
** Information type changed from Private to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-disk-utility in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547340
Title:
gnome-disks crashed with SIGSEGV in g_dbus_object_get_in
I'll fix this in Xenial as a security update as it is blocking the
libtasn1-6 security update.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gtk-doc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1575244
Title:
gtkdoc-mkpdf broken ret
)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Confirmed
** Affects: gtk-doc (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur)
Status: Confirmed
** Affects: gtk-doc (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Confirmed
** Affects: gtk-doc
** Changed in: gtk-doc (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gtk-doc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1575244
Title:
gtkdoc-mkpdf broken return code causi
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security
** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.l
There is no way to fix this as long as X11 is still being used. Lock
screen timing issues are usually caused by a few different things:
1- Hardware issues. Certain models of computers have known issues where
they don't generate the proper events when the laptop lid is closed or
the suspend hotkey
That's an excellent suggestion, I'll look into doing that. Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1280300
Title:
Desktop contents displayed on resume, bef
Could someone please test the version in xenial-proposed so I can
release it as a security update? Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to libimobiledevice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1388743
Title:
iO
Oh! That's really cool!
--
Please ignore this report :)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533561
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in ubuntu.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https
@Chris: I can reproduce this at will in a kvm. Lucid's gnome-screensaver
doesn't work _at all_ in kvm, but previous released worked fine.
Attached is the result of running gnome-screensaver --debug --no-daemon
and running gnome-screensaver-command -a in a second terminal.
--
gnome-screensaver cr
** Attachment added: "Result of gnome-screensaver --debug"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40392016/gss-debug.txt
--
gnome-screensaver crashed with signal 5 in _XError()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503961
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, wh
@Robert: As I expected, adding the xorg.conf you specified didn't change
anything as it was already being detected as cirrus.
I tried using the vmvga driver instead of the cirrus driver, and that
made gnome-screensaver work properly. It would appear that the crash is
related to some capability of
oops...I attached the wrong log file, here's the right one.
** Attachment added: "gnome-screensaver --debug log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40392592/gss-log.txt
--
gnome-screensaver crashed with signal 5 in _XError()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503961
You received this bug notification
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thank you for using Ubuntu and taking the time to report a bug. Your
report should contain, at a minimum, the following information so we can
better find the source of the bug and work to resolve it.
Submitting the bug about the proper source package is essential. For
help see https://wiki.ubuntu.
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
--
nautilus mounts partitions without authentication
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/534837
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nau
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thank you for using Ubuntu and taking the time to report a bug. Your
report should contain, at a minimum, the following information so we can
better find the source of the bug and work to resolve it.
Submitting the bug about the proper source package is essential. For
help see https://wiki.ubuntu.
Bryce, what's the contents of your ~/.config/user-dirs.dirs file?
--
Pictures folder: --location requires absolute path
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393727
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in ubuntu.
You can also use --location=$HOME/Pictures as a workaround, but I'm
curious why your pictures directory isn't picked up automatically.
** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu Lucid)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur)
** Changed in: gnome-screensaver
So, you actually have three issues?
1- Default pictures directory as set by XDG_PICTURES_DIR isn't being used by
the screensaver
2- screensaver's --location should accept ~/Pictures
3- screensaver doesn't work with pictures directory specified on an NFS mount
point
--
Pictures folder: --locat
Thank you for using Ubuntu and taking the time to report a bug. Your
report should contain, at a minimum, the following information so we can
better find the source of the bug and work to resolve it.
Submitting the bug about the proper source package is essential. For
help see https://wiki.ubuntu.
Thank you for using Ubuntu and taking the time to report a bug. Your
report should contain, at a minimum, the following information so we can
better find the source of the bug and work to resolve it.
Submitting the bug about the proper source package is essential. For
help see https://wiki.ubuntu.
Thank you for using Ubuntu and taking the time to report a bug. Your
report should contain, at a minimum, the following information so we can
better find the source of the bug and work to resolve it.
Submitting the bug about the proper source package is essential. For
help see https://wiki.ubuntu.
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for your comments. This does not appear to be a bug report and we
are closing it. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but it
would make more sense to raise your question in the support tracker.
Please visit https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+addquestion
** Visibility changed t
gtk-doc 1.13 depends on highlight which is in universe, so it FTBFS.
--
Please sync gtk-doc-tools from debian stable/unstable main
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/526794
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gtk-doc in ubuntu.
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
--
gnome-settings-daemon
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/546182
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in ubuntu
** Tags added: karmic
--
GStreamer encountered a general supporting library error.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539595
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gstreamer0.10 in ubuntu.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs
Is there anything left to land here? I just installed the 2018-04-13
desktop iso, and while ~/.config has correct permissions, ~/.local does
not.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
Here's another:
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/tree/hw/xfree86/common/xf86Helper.c#n1136
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1735929
Title:
security pr
** Also affects: xorg-server (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu Bionic)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur)
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu Bionic)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: xorg-server (
Hi daniel,
I wasn't able to reproduce with 16.04. Did you install the regular
Ubuntu desktop, or a specific flavour?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1735929
Tit
I tested the 2018-04-21 daily image, and the permissions on ~/.config
and ~/.local are OK now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1735929
Title:
security problems
Public bug reported:
accountsservice doesn't honour the UID_MAX settings in /etc/login.defs,
resulting in system users being displayed at the login screen and in the
users control panel.
See attached screenshot to see that the "libvirt-qemu" user is being
displayed when it shouldn't.
ProblemType
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Which desktop environment are you using? Could you get a picture of the
issue? Thanks!
** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in Ubu
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security
** Changed in: librsvg (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to librsvg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/17
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security
** Changed in: librsvg (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to librsvg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/17
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1777848
Title:
screen never locks
To manage notifications abou
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security
** Package changed: xorg (Ubuntu) => gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscr
** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1304231
Title:
right screen occasionally shown in d
** Package changed: udev (Ubuntu) => systemd (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1315218
Title:
persistant network naming and devbiosname concurrency issue
To
Oneiric has been dead a while. RIP.
** Changed in: seahorse (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to seahorse in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/925474
Title:
Fi
This was fixed a long long time ago in a galaxy far far away. Closing.
** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubunt
** Changed in: evolution-data-server (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution-data-server in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/906872
Title:
Address book
This was fixed a long time ago. Closing.
** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014763
Title:
evolu
This is an ancient bug. Closing as it may have been fixed, but I no
longer use evolution.
** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu.
https
I can no longer reproduce this ancient bug. Closing.
** Changed in: cairo (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/457485
Title:
Attached PDF fil
Ubuntu 12.10 is now end of life. Closing this bug.
** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
enigmail doesn't use gcr under the hood, it uses whatever GPG agent is
listening on the socket pointed to by the GPG_AGENT_INFO environment
variable. By default, in Ubuntu, it's gnome-keyring-daemon, and not gpg-
agent.
If you want documentation besides what is in the dconf schema
description, ple
** Also affects: gnome-keyring via
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733032
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-keyring in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
CVE-2014-1949 was assigned to cinnamon-screensaver.
The fix for this issue actually lies in gtk+3.0, in the following
commit:
https://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk+/commit/?id=1691bb741d50c90ee938f0b73fe81b0ca9bfd6d4
gtk+3.0 is already fixed in utopic, and we only have connamon-
screensaver in utopic
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #609029
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=609029
** Also affects: gnome-screensaver via
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=609029
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
gnome-screensaver does not install a DBUS service defini
Thanks for reporting this issue. Since you cannot reproduce it anymore,
I am closing this bug. Please reopen if you can give specific steps to
reproduce.
** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
Lock Screen by-pass
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484072
Y
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. This is not a bug, but rather expected behavior:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/Policies#Permissive%20Home%20Directory%20Access
Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find.
** Visibility changed to
Thanks for reporting this issue. Since you don't seem to be able to
reproduce the issue, I am closing the bug for now. Feel free to reopen
this bug once you get specific steps to reproduce the issue, or a stack
trace.
** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
Thanks for reporting this. This issue should be fixed in Ubuntu 9.10. I
am closing this bug. Feel free to reopen this issue if it can be
reproduced with the latest release.
** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
Screen briefly appears after suspend de
Yes, you need to have gnome-screensaver running for screen locking to
work. By default, the daemon is automatically started with the user
session. I am closing this bug. If you can reproduce it on a default
install without disabling gnome-screensaver, feel free to re-open it.
** Changed in: gdm (
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
** Changed in: policykit-1 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
--
User Privileges ignored
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326135
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: brasero
When burning a DVD with brasero, once it completes, I get a dialog box
stating "Please eject the disc...the disc could not be ejected". The
dialog has only one button, marked "Cancel". See attached screenshot.
- Why can't it eject the disc?
- Do
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39017247/Dependencies.txt
--
Confusing "eject disc" error message when burning dvd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/519935
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscrib
** Attachment added: "screenshot of error dialog"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39017273/Screenshot-Brasero.png
--
Confusing "eject disc" error message when burning dvd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/519935
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, w
** Also affects: hundredpapercuts
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Confusing "eject disc" error message when burning dvd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/519935
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubunt
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
** Visibility changed to: Public
** Package changed: ubuntu => gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu)
--
Password ain't asked when waking up after hibernate
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521565
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 49579 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/49579
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 49579
screen doesn't lock when panel menu is open
--
Screensaver doesn't lock screen when Volume Icon expanded to change volume
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 49579 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/49579
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 49579
screen doesn't lock when panel menu is open
--
Screen does not lock on resume if a context menu is open when suspending
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/3
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 49579 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/49579
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 49579
screen doesn't lock when panel menu is open
--
the gnome keyring dialogs block the screen locking
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338057
You received thi
Thanks for this bug report. Does this problem still occur in a recent
Ubuntu release like Karmic?
** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Christopher Barrington-Leigh (cpbl)
--
rev
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 49579 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/49579
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 49579
screen doesn't lock when panel menu is open
--
No password prompt after suspending to RAM
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/371388
You received this bug no
Thanks for the bug report.
Does this happen to you every time?
Is the gnome-screensaver daemon running after you login?
If you lock the screen manually with Ctrl-Alt-L, does it lock properly?
Could you please take a look at the following debugging page and include
here the relevant information?
Thanks for reporting this issue.
Could you please take a look at the following debugging page and add the
required information to this bug?
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingScreenLocking
** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
** Changed in: gnome-scree
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 385102 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/385102
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 385102
Desktop is exposed from under screen lock after an Update Manager popup
--
update-manager pop-under while screensaver in operation shows desktop
https
Has this happened again with the screensaver set to "blank"?
--
sometimes resume from suspend doesn't ask for password, instead goes to
straight to the desktop instead.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/498694
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, whic
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-screensaver
Since a recent lucid gnome-screensaver upload, my screen no longer fades
out when gnome-screensaver comes up. It simply waits a couple of seconds
and then switches the screen black.
Steps to reproduce:
1- Hit Ctrl-Alt-L
2- Wait a coupl
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39276722/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "GconfGnomeLockdown.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39276723/GconfGnomeLockdown.txt
** Attachment added: "GconfGnomeScreensaver.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/3927
** Attachment added: "debug log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39277212/gss-debug.txt
--
gnome-screensaver no longer fades screen out
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522806
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screens
** Attachment added: "xtrace"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39277867/xtrace-gss.txt.gz
--
gnome-screensaver no longer fades screen out
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522806
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screen
If you don't start firefox, does it work properly?
What do you do to trigger hibernation?
--
Resuming from hibernate does not initiate authorisation process
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/369359
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscri
What happens if you select "Hibernate" from the fast user switching
applet, instead of closing the lid?
--
Resuming from hibernate does not initiate authorisation process
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/369359
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, whi
Thanks for the bug report.
Does this happen to you every time?
Is the gnome-screensaver daemon running after you login?
If you lock the screen manually with Ctrl-Alt-L, does it lock properly?
Could you please take a look at the following debugging page and include
here the relevant information?
Could you try killing gnome-power-manager and starting it the following
way:
gnome-power-manager --no-daemon --debug > ~/gpm-log.txt 2>&1
Once that's running in a terminal, try hibernating and resuming and
attach the generated log file to this bug.
Thanks.
** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubun
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
--
facebook account revealed private email address as alias
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/523633
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed
Could you please do the following:
$ gconftool-2 --dump /apps/gnome-screensaver /apps/gnome-power-manager
/desktop/gnome/session /desktop/gnome/lockdown > screen-locking-
debug.xml
Also, could you try killing gnome-power-manager once more and starting
it the following way:
gnome-power-manager --
I am having the same problem with xchat since updating gtk+2.0 to
2.19.5-1ubuntu3. xchat and xorg use up 100% of the CPU. Downgrading to
gtk+2.0 2.19.5-1ubuntu1 solves the problem.
If this is a different issue, please let me know and I'll open a new
bug.
--
after upgrade to 2.19.5-1ubuntu3 rhyth
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 49579 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/49579
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 49579
screen doesn't lock when panel menu is open
--
Active/open Gnome panel menu item inhibits screensaver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524236
You received
** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) => Alexey Anufriev
(alexey-a-anufriev)
--
Resuming from hibernate does not initiate authorisation process
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/369359
You received this bug notification because you are a member
This is your problem:
lock_enabled
/schemas/apps/gnome-screensaver/lock_enabled
false
Please open System/Preferences/Screensaver and check the "Lock screen
when screensaver is active" checkbox.
--
Resuming from hibernate does not initiate authorisatio
As per your last comment, I am closing this bug.
Thanks!
** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
Resuming from hibernate does not initiate authorisation process
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/369359
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
gnome-screensaver never activated after inhibiting
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524816
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in ubuntu.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desk
Thanks for the bug report.
Could you please take a look at the following debugging page and include
here the relevant information, especially the "Getting GConf values"
part?
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingScreenLocking
** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplet
Thanks for the bug report.
Could you please take a look at the following debugging page and include
here the relevant information, especially the "Getting GConf values"
part?
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingScreenLocking
** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplet
I confirmed this on Karmic. Once the inhibit is removed, if no
keyboard/mouse activity resets the idle timer, the screensaver never
comes back up.
Uninhibiting should probably reset the idle timer.
** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
gnome-screensaver ne
Those settings look okay.
When the screensaver doesn't come up, is the "gnome-screensaver" process
still running? Can you start it by hitting Ctrl-Alt-L?
When this happens, do you have a context menu open, or an application
such as VNC or Virtualbox?
** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu)
301 - 400 of 1530 matches
Mail list logo
