[Bug 177710] Re: GEdit deletes files rather than saves (on samba share)

2008-02-13 Thread High_Yield
Jorge, I will try using a live CD but I will need appropriate security to access my NAS and I don't recall if I can do that from a live CD. Will keep you posted. BTW - Jorge, were any development changes made to gedit or am I simply "trying" something ? Thanks - B -- GEdit deletes files rathe

[Bug 184592] Re: Password visibly displayed in Nautilus navigation

2008-02-18 Thread High_Yield
I cannot properly test as: A) I do not have a second 64 bit machine B) Booting from the LiveCD does not appear to give me proper user permission to access my network. Also, I'm using Gutsy - have you simply bypassed Gutsy and are working only on Hardy ? - B -- Password visibly displayed in Nau

[Bug 177710] Re: GEdit deletes files rather than saves (on samba share)

2008-02-18 Thread High_Yield
I cannot properly test as: A) I do not have a second 64 bit machine B) Booting from the LiveCD does not appear to give me proper user permission to access my network. Also, I'm using Gutsy - have you simply bypassed Gutsy and are working only on Hardy ? - B -- GEdit deletes files rather than s

[Bug 177710] Re: GEdit deletes files rather than saves (on samba share)

2008-04-27 Thread High_Yield
I just installed (full clean install) Hardy 4/27/2008 and STILL have exactly the same problems. No fixes were made. -- GEdit deletes files rather than saves (on samba share) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177710 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs,

[Bug 184592] Re: Password visibly displayed in Nautilus navigation

2008-04-27 Thread High_Yield
I just installed Hardy full release version and the problem is SOLVED. Of my handful of issues, this is the only one to be fixed - good job whomever fixed it ;) -- Password visibly displayed in Nautilus navigation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184592 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 34813] Re: gedit fails to save files over smbfs/cifs

2008-04-28 Thread High_Yield
I'm back... I've posted my latest related Hardy results here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gedit/+bug/177710 The issue STILL exists in Hardy - just like it occured in Gutsy. - B -- gedit fails to save files over smbfs/cifs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/34813 You received this bu

[Bug 177710] GEdit deletes files rather than saves - NASTY !

2007-12-20 Thread High_Yield
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gedit Local PC: Using Ubuntu Gutsy with full updates run ~12/16/2007. NAS: QNap TS-101 running Linux and Samba Problem App: gedit 2.20.3 Steps to reproduce: - Open mounted share folder - Double Click to open a text file (opens using the default GEdit pro

[Bug 177710] Re: GEdit deletes files rather than saves - NASTY !

2007-12-20 Thread High_Yield
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 34813 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/34813 Daniel - your duplicate assessment is incorrect. In my case gedit is "deleting the source file" whereas in 34813 it is simply "disallowing a save" for the first try or two. There is a BIG DIFFERENCE between th

[Bug 34813] Re: gedit fails to save files over smbfs/cifs

2007-12-20 Thread High_Yield
A similar but worse bug here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gedit/+bug/177710 The gedit saving process IMO needs a full review - not a "run around" - this thread is eerily familiar to some of my old M$ support chains. - There is(are multiple) a problem - It is a commonly used, not ker

[Bug 34813] Re: gedit fails to save files over smbfs/cifs

2007-12-21 Thread High_Yield
Bro - first and foremost a text editor needs to "correctly save" files after editing them. If it cannot do that properly then perhaps a "sweeping assessment" is in order don't you think? If your new hard disk supported SATA4/UDMA8, quintuple buffering, had a 2 gig cache but when you tried to use

[Bug 34813] Re: gedit fails to save files over smbfs/cifs

2008-01-13 Thread High_Yield
This is not low priority guys... ReWrite your "save" code. OpenOffice saves to my Samba drive fine, so does Kate, etc... The problem is not w/ Samba - it is your code. Please own up to that, drop the attitude, and fix the software. Sadly I can hear you chuckle as you read this - but, the sad r

[Bug 43830] Re: Remove evolution-exchange from ubuntu-desktop

2008-01-21 Thread High_Yield
Um... Since "ubuntu" packages it, YOU(ubuntu) guys should raise the issue with the Evolution people. I cannot figure out a simple way to diable the [EMAIL PROTECTED] process from running at startup. A) It should be available to those who need it B) It should NOT be enabled and running by defau