[Bug 1793571] [NEW] wodim fails to burn CD as user (not root)

2018-09-20 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg
Public bug reported: my user is in the cdrom group still I can not burn a CD calling wodim -dummy tmp.iso results in the following error output: wodim: No write mode specified. wodim: Assuming -tao mode. wodim: Future versions of wodim may have different drive dependent defaults. wo

[Bug 525012] [NEW] brasero depends on wodim which has lots of problems

2010-02-20 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: brasero wodim / cdrkit has lots of open "new" bugs which are quite old. It seems to be in a bad state, with no cure in sight (same Version 9:1.1.9 in intrepid, jaunty, karmic maybe the dependency should be switched to cdrskin or something else ** Affec

[Bug 283935] [NEW] gconf2-common post installation script error 139

2008-10-15 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gconf2-common during the upgrade from hardy to intrepid beta this message was output by the upgrade tool with the caption "gconf2-common could not be installed" "Unterprozess post-installation script gab den Fehlerwert 139 zurück" ** Affects: gconf (Ubu

[Bug 283935] Re: gconf2-common post installation script error 139

2008-10-15 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 283942 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283942 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 283942 crashed during installing packages on upgrade vom hardy to intrepid beta (after about half of the packages had been upgraded) -- gconf2-common post i

[Bug 863834] Re: [regression] Suspend on lid close broken on Oneiric

2012-04-15 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg
** Also affects: upower (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/863834 Title: [regression] Suspend on lid cl

[Bug 561806] Re: gdm is not (re)started on transition from runlevel 1 to runlevel 2

2011-05-19 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg
this problem is still present in natty ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561806 Title: gdm is not (re)s

[Bug 560132] [NEW] switching from runlevel 5 to runlevel 1 locks up system

2010-04-10 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gdm steps to reproduce: - boot the system normally - either: log in graphically and open a console window - or: switch to vt1 and log into the console - issue the command: telinit 1 Processes will be stopped and so on, but the procedure ends in a state w

[Bug 560132] Re: switching from runlevel 5 to runlevel 1 locks up system

2010-04-10 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43698036/Dependencies.txt ** Description changed: Binary package hint: gdm steps to reproduce: - boot the system normally - either: log in graphically and open a console window - - or: switch to vt1 an log into t

[Bug 560132] Re: switching from runlevel 5 to runlevel 1 locks up system

2010-04-10 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg
additional note: if ESC is pressed while the splash screen is still moving, I get to a console where I can log in -- switching from runlevel 5 to runlevel 1 locks up system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560132 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs,

[Bug 560132] Re: switching from runlevel 5 to runlevel 1 locks up system

2010-04-10 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg
this is not a gdm problem -> invalid I will post a new report elsewhere ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- switching from runlevel 5 to runlevel 1 locks up system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560132 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt

[Bug 436936] Re: gdm upstart job checks /proc/cmdline for single user mode, won't start on post-boot runlevel change

2010-04-10 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg
** Summary changed: - gdm upstart job checks /proc/cmdline for single user mode, won't dtrt on post-boot runlevel change + gdm upstart job checks /proc/cmdline for single user mode, won't start on post-boot runlevel change -- gdm upstart job checks /proc/cmdline for single user mode, won't sta

[Bug 561806] [NEW] gdm is not (re)started on transition from runlevel 1 to runlevel 2

2010-04-12 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gdm The error occurs with these steps: - (freshly install lucid beta) - boot the system normally - switch to runlevel 1 with 'telinit 1', gdm is stopped properly. - log in as root - switch to runlevel 2 with 'telinit 2' Now gdm is not started. Because /e

[Bug 561806] Re: gdm is not (re)started on transition from runlevel 1 to runlevel 2

2010-04-12 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43961094/Dependencies.txt -- gdm is not (re)started on transition from runlevel 1 to runlevel 2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561806 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, whic