[Bug 1768178] Re: color scheme Solarized Dark is incorrect

2018-05-02 Thread Egmont Koblinger
> Are you mean new abstraction, third place, preset for background, palette and other? We don't know yet how the user interface would look like. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu. https://bugs.la

[Bug 1768178] Re: color scheme Solarized Dark is incorrect

2018-05-02 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Submitted https://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome- terminal/commit/?id=e8ee9f786 to make it more obvious that we indeed define the Solarized palette correctly. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu. https:

[Bug 1718238] Re: Giant terminal icon is blocking out the Terminal window buttons

2018-05-02 Thread Egmont Koblinger
For those who still see this issue in 18.04: Is the icon really giant (144x144) for you, as attached to this bug; or is it somewhat smaller (48x48), as attached to bug 1765704? Does installing/removing gnome-icon-theme, as per comment 8, do anything for you? If you execute xprop from gnome-termi

[Bug 1718238] Re: Giant terminal icon is blocking out the Terminal window buttons

2018-05-03 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Silly me, instead of asking questions I should have tried it myself. Whereas the previous fix definitely fixed it (at least for me) on 17.10, it's indeed broken (again, in a somewhat different way: it's smaller now, 48x48) for me too on 18.04. I'll try to take yet another look. -- You received

[Bug 1718238] Re: Giant terminal icon is blocking out the Terminal window buttons

2018-05-07 Thread Egmont Koblinger
> There is a patch on gitHub for this about 3 days ago. Where exactly? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1718238 Title: Giant terminal icon is blocking out the Termina

[Bug 1764558] Re: Window buttons icon effect isn't applied to mutter decorations

2018-05-07 Thread Egmont Koblinger
This patch is broken, and is responsible for re-introducing bug 1718238 (comment 17 onwards). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1764558 Title: Window buttons icon effec

[Bug 1718238] Re: Giant terminal icon is blocking out the Terminal window buttons

2018-05-07 Thread Egmont Koblinger
@guido Oh, I guess I found it, I guess you meant this: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/62 I made a comment over there. This patch is buggy, this is the one that breaks my previous fix. The patch is shipped by Ubuntu, named theme-use-gtk_render_icon_suface- to-paint-button-ic

[Bug 1718238] Re: Giant terminal icon is blocking out the Terminal window buttons

2018-05-07 Thread Egmont Koblinger
@guido Nope, that one is irrelevant (that icon title is something completely different, it's a legacy concept: the title of the window whenever it's iconified; plus the change is in gnome-terminal's current development series which won't appear in Bionic). Anyway, I managed to locate the bug, see

[Bug 1770507] [NEW] Oversized appmenu icon not rescaled

2018-05-10 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Public bug reported: The patch from bug 1764558 (https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/62) is broken, and should be reverted (or fixed). The breakage it introduces is noticeably more severe than the tiny shadow it fixes. The broken patch resurrects bug 1718238, which was fixed not

[Bug 1764558] Re: Window buttons icon effect isn't applied to mutter decorations

2018-05-10 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Done: bug 1770507. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1764558 Title: Window buttons icon effect isn't applied to mutter decorations To manage notifications about this b

[Bug 1718238] Re: Giant terminal icon is blocking out the Terminal window buttons

2018-05-10 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Continued in bug 1770507. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1718238 Title: Giant terminal icon is blocking out the Terminal window buttons To manage notifications abou

[Bug 1770494] Re: Does not display VT-100 control codes correctly/consistently

2018-05-11 Thread Egmont Koblinger
What's the version of GNOME Terminal on CentOS that you're referring to, where you don't face these issues? GNOME Terminal (more precisely, the underlying VTE widget) was improved a lot during the last 4 years, tons of emulation (and other) bugs were fixed. The most relevant one is probably https:

[Bug 1747171] Re: "New Tab" disappeared from the GNOME Terminal menu

2018-05-14 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Jeremy, Łukasz, If you're about to release an update for Bionic, could you please backport the trivial https://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-terminal/commit/?h=gnome-3-28&id=1828cb6d5 as well? At one place the strings are accidentally left untranslated on the UI, even though at some other place t

[Bug 1747171] Re: "New Tab" disappeared from the GNOME Terminal menu

2018-05-14 Thread Egmont Koblinger
The new menu items are there in mainstream gnome-terminal's source (behind a configure flag; so they aren't added by Ubuntu). Hence they are translated (or not) according to the mainstream GNOME translators' work. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bu

[Bug 1771290] [NEW] Untranslated list of encodings in preferences

2018-05-15 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Public bug reported: The list of encodings in Preferences → Compatibility is in English. The list in the Terminal → Set Character Encoding menu is properly translated, though. Upstream bugreport: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=795358 Upstream trivial fix: https://git.gnome.org/browse

[Bug 1747171] Re: "New Tab" disappeared from the GNOME Terminal menu

2018-05-15 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Well, since it's in "proposed", which I guess means waiting for feedback, and is not an urgent update at all, my feedback was maybe you should hold it off and release along with that other fix to save an update for users :-) Anyway, filed that as bug 1771290, rest is up to you. Thanks a lot! :-) -

[Bug 1772557] Re: FREETYPE_PROPERTIES environment variable is not respected

2018-05-22 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Confirmed. This is related to how gnome-terminal starts up, via dbus / systemd --user. Even if you type "gnome-terminal" in let's say an xterm, it just notifies systemd to fire up the server. During this step, environment variables get lost. As a workaround, you could manually start up the server,

[Bug 1774167] Re: [SRU] 3.28.2 / 0.52.2

2018-05-30 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Yes please :) For both components, there are only very few and tiny changes. vte 0.52.2 (ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/vte/0.52/vte-0.52.2.changes) fixes a crash which I've also filed with further details as LP bug 1772506, hence releasing a fix is highly desirable. > here are fixes rela

[Bug 1775111] Re: gnome-terminal Find ignores "Match case"

2018-06-05 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Confirmed. Thanks for the report, forwarded upstream: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-terminal/issues/4. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1775111 Title: g

[Bug 1775111] Re: gnome-terminal Find ignores "Match case"

2018-06-16 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Fixed upstream in https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome- terminal/commit/6ec754bf. Will be included in gnome-terminal 3.28.3, whenever (if at all) released (there's no schedule for that). Up for Ubuntu to cherry-pick the fix... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu

[Bug 1778824] Re: Terminal starts maximized when using custom font

2018-06-27 Thread Egmont Koblinger
I can reproduce this in a GNOME session, but not in Unity. Sounds like a bug with the window manager (gnome-shell or mutter). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177

[Bug 1247668] Re: NumLock turned off on layout switch

2014-04-27 Thread Egmont Koblinger
** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #78012 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78012 ** Also affects: gnome-settings-daemon via https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78012 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Project changed: gnome-settings-daemon => xor

[Bug 1247668] Re: NumLock turned off on layout switch

2014-04-27 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Felipe, Csaba, Cvetan, Diego: I made some findings upstream at https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78012. Looks it's somehow related to the hardware incorrectly changing the keycode on its own when numlock is switched on. Could you please reveal what hardware you have? At this point I wo

[Bug 1247668] Re: NumLock turned off on layout switch

2014-04-28 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Thanks. Could you please tell us the exact brand/model of your keyboard? Do you have another keyboard somewhere that you could try? It sounds strange I know, but apparently on a few computers the numpad keys start producing different keycodes when numlock is off (namely the keycodes of the standa

[Bug 1247668] Re: NumLock turned off on layout switch

2014-04-28 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Ubuntu 12.04 is irrelevant here. A lot of changes with keyboard layout change went into 13.10 (see bug 1218322) which is the source of many problems. Prior to 13.10 kbd changes were handled differently and it didn't trigger this problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a mem

[Bug 1247668] Re: NumLock turned off on layout switch

2014-04-28 Thread Egmont Koblinger
I attach a patch to xorg-server which seems to fix it for me. Side effects are yet to be discovered :) Rebuild xorg-server with the following series of commands (might not be the best way, but that's what I found, I'm not yet familiar with these): sudo apt-get install build-essential fakeroot dpk

[Bug 1301291] Re: incoherent keyboard binding

2014-05-14 Thread Egmont Koblinger
My 2 cents: Shift+PageUp, Shift+PageDown have historically been the shortcuts for scrolling, hence application don't expect these keypresses to get delivered. Shift+Up, Shift+Down, however, generate escape sequences that are useful for applications (e.g. select text in editor), it would be bad if

[Bug 1297051] Re: gnome-terminal doesn't recognise C1 controls

2014-05-14 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Could you provide concrete escape sequences (like an echo command, or a short text file to cat)? I can't figure out how to test this. CSI is traditionally ESC + [. This is used e.g. to change the foreground color: echo -e '\x1B[31mred\x1B[0m' The CSI you're referring to seems to be an alternate

[Bug 1319864] [NEW] Backport rewrap UI setting

2014-05-15 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Public bug reported: Currently Utopic has vte-0.36 (from Gnome 3.12) and gnome-terminal-3.6 (from Gnome 3.6). Should you decide not to upgrade gnome-terminal (which would be a really bad idea because these two components are so strongly related – bug 1261619), please at least backport the rewrap

[Bug 1261619] Re: Update GNOME Terminal to 3.12

2014-05-15 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Bumped the version in the title – now that 3.12 is out, it wouldn't make much sense to update to 3.8 or 3.10. There's at least one more reason to update to at least 3.12, namely the "rewrap on resize" UI setting, see bug 1319864. ** Summary changed: - Update GNOME Terminal to 3.10.2 + Update GNO

[Bug 925541] Re: gnome-terminal gets stuck until another key is pressed

2014-05-15 Thread Egmont Koblinger
This is perhaps the same as https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=730220 (patch available there). ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #730220 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=730220 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which i

[Bug 878739] Re: terminal scrolls up when resized taller

2014-05-15 Thread Egmont Koblinger
This should be fixed in vte-0.34.9 (shipped by Trusty). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/878739 Title: terminal scrolls up when resized taller To manage notif

[Bug 1320157] Re: user space gnome-terminal overflows / file system

2014-05-19 Thread Egmont Koblinger
> The question is this: why does it overflow the / rather than the /home partition? gnome-terminal stores the scrollback content in a temporary file, opened at the standard location which is /tmp by default, overridable with the standard TMPDIR environment variable. > May be "unlimited" should be

[Bug 1321091] Re: readdir function returns inconsistent d_type

2014-05-21 Thread Egmont Koblinger
"man readdir" also says: Currently, only some filesystems (among them: Btrfs, ext2, ext3, and ext4) have full support for returning the file type in d_type. All applications must properly handle a return of DT_UNKNOWN. You need to do an lstat in this case, as you said

[Bug 1320157] Re: user space gnome-terminal overflows / file system

2014-05-31 Thread Egmont Koblinger
> this default/standard location /tmp is certainly inadmissible If it is, then I guess you're arguing that /tmp shouldn't exist at all. It exists, it has its purpose, and g-t uses that for that purpose. If /tmp is inadmissible, what would be a better location? The user's home, which potentially

[Bug 1320648] Re: Randomly ignored keystrokes in terminal

2014-05-31 Thread Egmont Koblinger
> I had to boot to a terminal instead of the usual Unity GUI. Could you please be more specific here? What do you type or choose and where? Is it some grub boot option? Or you choose something different in the graphical login screen? What shall I do to try to reproduce this bug? -- You recei

[Bug 1007855] Re: U+2329 and U+232A characters rendered too wide

2014-06-01 Thread Egmont Koblinger
These characters seem to be defined double width by the Unicode standard. http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr11/ "ED4. East Asian Wide (W): All other characters that are always wide. These characters occur only in the context of East Asian typography where they are wide characters (such as the Unif

[Bug 1099028] Re: Ctrl-modifier not applied to some keys

2014-06-01 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Upstream: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=730157 ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #730157 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=730157 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu. h

[Bug 890784] Re: Gnome-terminal continues to show outline cursor after getting focus

2014-06-10 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Upstream bug report: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=677329 ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #677329 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=677329 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal i

[Bug 1331864] [NEW] [Patch] CRASH when dragging a tab and later changing its title

2014-06-18 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Public bug reported: Gnome-terminal can crash if a tab is dragged across windows, and later the title of the tab is changed. Since gnome-terminal is one single process for all your terminal windows and tabs, upon a crash all the gnome-terminal windows disappear, easily causing loss of precious un

[Bug 1340067] Re: Drop 20_add_alt_screen_toggle_ui.patch - it does nothing with vte3 >= 0.34.9

2014-07-16 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Indeed, this patch should be dropped. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1340067 Title: Drop 20_add_alt_screen_toggle_ui.patch - it does nothing with vte3 >= 0

[Bug 1341667] Re: Ctrl+Backspace should send ^W instead of doing the same thing as Backspace

2014-07-16 Thread Egmont Koblinger
See https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733246 . Gnome-terminal should do whatever xterm does. "In normal Gtk+ applications this key combination deletes the previous word (Ctrl+W) in Bash" -- what do you mean by normal Gtk+ applications that run bash? Note that by default Alt+Backspace in

[Bug 1341667] Re: Ctrl+Backspace should send ^W instead of doing the same thing as Backspace

2014-07-16 Thread Egmont Koblinger
I see. I assume you misplaced the closing parenthesis and meant this: In normal Gtk+ applications this key combination deletes the previous word (Ctrl+W in Bash). Terminals and apps running inside terminals (e.g. bash) are quite a different world from Gtk+ and it's hopeless to aim for the same C

[Bug 1348257] Re: Gnome terminal overlay scrollbar dissapears when changing tabs

2014-07-25 Thread Egmont Koblinger
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 827380 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/827380 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 827380 scroll bar disappears when switching tabs -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed t

[Bug 1350334] Re: copy/paste garbage while using mc, due to lack of support of bracketed paste mode

2014-08-01 Thread Egmont Koblinger
The mentioned terminals do support bracketed paste mode - but do it incorrectly. If they didn't support it all, you wouldn't see the bug. The *real* problem here is Terminator using a 3 year old unmaintained version of vte (bug 1030562). The bracketed paste issue is just a manifestation of this

[Bug 1350334] Re: copy/paste garbage while using mc, due to lack of support of bracketed paste mode

2014-08-01 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Gnome-terminal (actually vte) has fixed this issue and this fix will appear in Utopic. If Terminator finally updated their code to Gtk3 (which apparently nobody is working on), it would also automatically get the fix. In my experiences, it's very hard to get Ubuntu folks pay attention to bugs lik

[Bug 1353354] Re: gnome terminal swallows tabs

2014-08-09 Thread Egmont Koblinger
I'm sure this behavior won't change. TAB is not a regular character, it is a control character, just like let's say escape sequences that move the cursor; copy-pasting doesn't include those either. It's a bonus that gnome-terminal tries to remember when a tab was emitted, most terminal emulators

[Bug 1350334] Re: copy/paste garbage while using mc, due to lack of support of bracketed paste mode

2014-08-13 Thread Egmont Koblinger
You might want to check the progress I made in bug 1030562 porting terminator to gtk3. It would be cool if you could step up and finish that work, or find someone to do that. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to vte in Ubun

[Bug 1353354] Re: gnome terminal swallows tab characters

2014-08-13 Thread Egmont Koblinger
** Summary changed: - gnome terminal swallows tabs + gnome terminal swallows tab characters -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1353354 Title: gnome terminal swa

[Bug 1356433] Re: detached tabs can not be reattached

2014-08-15 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Yup, there's nowhere to drag that tab because the tab bar is not shown. I don't know what a proper solution could be. As a workaround, you can open a temporary second tab (next to the one you wish to drag), then you can drag the desired one and finally close the temporary one. -- You received th

[Bug 1356433] Re: detached tabs can not be reattached

2014-08-15 Thread Egmont Koblinger
(to clarify: there's nowhere to _grab_ that tab for dragging) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1356433 Title: detached tabs can not be reattached To manag

[Bug 1360419] Re: Buffer containing russian Unicode charecters is not cleaning after pressing Backspace

2014-08-25 Thread Egmont Koblinger
If you're using UTF-8 character set, you need to execute "stty iutf8", so that a "stty -a" reports back "iutf8". For non-UTF-8, the command to be executed is "stty -iutf8" and accordingly "stty -a" should report "-iutf8". Gnome-terminal sets this according to the initial character set of the ter

[Bug 1360005] Re: Cyrillic symbols looks strange when using autocompletion

2014-08-25 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Is this specific to gnome-terminal, does it work as expected in other terminals (e.g. xterm, konsole, urvxt)? If it's buggy in all of them then it's probably a problem with bash or bash-completion. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is su

[Bug 1360419] Re: Buffer containing russian Unicode charecters is not cleaning after pressing Backspace

2014-08-26 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Hi Ivan, The feature of setting iutf8 was implemented in gnome-terminal 10 years ago and I've been happily using it ever since. There might be a bug of course, it would be nice to investigate further why it's not set for you. (At this moment I have no idea how it could be wrong for you.) Your a

[Bug 1360005] Re: Cyrillic symbols looks strange when using autocompletion

2014-09-01 Thread Egmont Koblinger
guake builds on the same codebase as gnome-terminal (namely vte), so it might not be relevant. Could you please try with xterm, konsole, rxvt-unicode and/or pterm? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubun

[Bug 1360005] Re: Cyrillic symbols looks strange when using autocompletion

2014-09-06 Thread Egmont Koblinger
So it is a bash or bash-completion problem (not sure which), but not gnome-terminal. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1360005 Title: Cyrillic symbols looks str

[Bug 1376152] Re: scp remote fail when exists "echo" command in the .bashrc script

2014-10-04 Thread Egmont Koblinger
This is not a gnome-terminal bug, but due to the design of ssh/scp. In your .bashrc/.profile, make the echo happen only if it's output to a terminal, e.g. if [ -t 1 ]; then echo whatever you wish to see on login fi -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Deskt

[Bug 1244090] Re: Pressing any global keyboard shortcut causes temporary loss of focus

2014-10-05 Thread Egmont Koblinger
It's the same issue – the whole app (Firefox) loses the focus temporarily, whch in turn might cause a permanent focus loss of one particular component inside Firefox. The core problem is that Firefox itself shouldn't lose the focus at the first place. -- You received this bug notification becau

[Bug 1132700] Re: gnome-terminal requires sourcing of vte.sh login script

2014-10-07 Thread Egmont Koblinger
I (a recent vte/gnome-terminal developer) firmly disagree with the previous comment's proposal in multiple levels, please see https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=697475#c43 - #c44 for my response. Sourcing vte.sh from .bashrc or /etc/bash.bashrc, as per the original ticket, is the right way

[Bug 1132700] Re: gnome-terminal >= 3.7 requires sourcing of vte.sh login script -- go back to reading /proc/pid/cwd

2014-10-07 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Sorry, I missed the fact that you're not a random single user, but Ubuntu's developer finally updating gnome-terminal. I'm grateful you're doing it and supportive of your work! You *don't* need to modify any user's existing settings! You need/should modify some global files under /etc, such as pr

[Bug 1132700] Re: gnome-terminal >= 3.7 requires sourcing of vte.sh login script -- go back to reading /proc/pid/cwd

2014-10-07 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Also, if you really hate to touch configs and love to patch binaries, how about patching bash/zsh to automatically emit OSC 7 without any configs or env vars? :) I know it sounds crazy first, but if you think about it for a while, it's probably not such a brain-damaged idea after all, is it? -- Y

[Bug 1132700] Re: gnome-terminal >= 3.7 requires sourcing of vte.sh login script

2014-10-07 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Indeed it could be crucial to know if PROMPT_COMMAND was ever present in /etc/skel. I think it's fair game if users who have once touched their configs will need to touch that again. And it's not that they'll live with something fundamentally broken until then - it's one convenience feature that

[Bug 1132700] Re: gnome-terminal >= 3.7 requires sourcing of vte.sh login script

2014-10-07 Thread Egmont Koblinger
One more thing to consider with the "fallback" approach: If you do this, users who've manually set PROMPT_COMMAND will remain with the old method of figuring out the cwd, including all its bugs and limitations (not remembering symlink components, not working after sudo, etc.) They would probably

[Bug 1132700] Re: gnome-terminal >= 3.7 requires sourcing of vte.sh login script

2014-10-08 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Looking at http://old-releases.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/b/bash/, it seems that up to bash_3.2-0 (which was shipped by Hardy 08.04 LTS) bash's /etc/skel/.bashrc defined PROMPT_COMMAND='echo -ne "\033]0;${USER}@${HOSTNAME}: ${PWD/$HOME/~}\007"' Beginning with bash_3.2-4 (Intrepid 08.10) PROMPT_

[Bug 1378151] Re: Commands not saved to .bash_history when a leading space is present

2014-10-08 Thread Egmont Koblinger
This is a feature of bash, see "man bash" -> HISTCONTROL -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1378151 Title: Commands not saved to .bash_history when a leading spa

[Bug 680340] Re: Rewrap lines when resizing the terminal

2013-09-10 Thread Egmont Koblinger
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 298385 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/298385 I'm making great progress in implementing this. Please see the upstream bug at https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336238 , feel free to try my patch if you're a hacker kind. In case of any feedback, pl

[Bug 342965] Re: text in terminal won't resize & there's no word wrap

2013-09-10 Thread Egmont Koblinger
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 298385 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/298385 I'm making great progress in implementing this. Please see the upstream bug at https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336238 , feel free to try my patch if you're a hacker kind. In case of any feedback, pl

[Bug 298385] Re: Reflow terminal contents when resizing the window

2013-09-10 Thread Egmont Koblinger
I'm making great progress in implementing this. Please see the upstream bug at https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336238 , feel free to try my patch if you're a hacker kind. In case of any feedback, please comment in that upstream bug, thanks! -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 847911] Re: Scrollbars disappear when opening a new tab in the gnome-terminal window

2013-10-02 Thread Egmont Koblinger
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 827380 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/827380 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 827380 scroll bar disappears when switching tabs -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed t

[Bug 827380] Re: scroll bar disappears when switching tabs

2013-10-02 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Please see https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=709089#c6 for another use case when the overlay scrollbar is buggy. I suspect that it draws itself incorrectly initially when it hooks up to a GtkAdjustment. Then after modifications to the adjustment it works correctly. ** Bug watch added: GNO

[Bug 827380] Re: scroll bar disappears when switching tabs

2013-10-02 Thread Egmont Koblinger
This is indeed a bug in overlay-scrollbar. When the adjustment changes, the OS_STATE_FULLSIZE flag is updated accordingly and os_bar_show() or os_bar_hide() is invoked as necessary. However... - the flag is not computed initially, nor when mapping the window; - the flag is set when unmapping the

[Bug 802412] Re: No more scrollbar when set to be on the left-side

2013-10-03 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Seems to me that mainstream gnome-terminal 3.8 removed this option of scrollbar on the left. (Unfortunately Saucy will still ship g-t 3.6.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpa

[Bug 865082] Re: gnome-terminal writes to /tmp on every line of output

2013-10-03 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Fyi: vte-0.34.9 will add caching (https://git.gnome.org/browse/vte/commit/?h=vte-0-34&id=b959b86). The amount of data written is still the same, but batched up in larger chunks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to vte in Ub

[Bug 1218322] Re: Can't set keyboard layout change to ctrl+shift

2013-10-12 Thread Egmont Koblinger
I've upgraded from previous versions where I had Alt+Shift as the shortcut toggling between English and Hungarian. Now, not being to specify this, I chose Ctrl+Space. The current behavior is: - If I select English in the indicator or via Ctrl+Space then the layout is English, and Alt+Shift does

[Bug 1218322] Re: Can't set keyboard layout change to alt+shift, ctrl+shift, etc.

2013-10-16 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Hi William, I've installed your updates, and logged out and in just to be sure. Here's what I get (continuing comment 35): The order in which I release the keys still matters. This makes it pretty much unusable for me, since the combo I'm used to (rolling my hand from right to left: press Alt, p

[Bug 1218322] Re: Can't set keyboard layout change to alt+shift, ctrl+shift, etc.

2013-10-17 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Baekkevold: Could you please tell me whether the press and the release order of the keys matter for you? If not (i.e. if the four possible press/release sequences all change the layout) then I'll try find and clean up those dconf settings. -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1218322] Re: Can't set keyboard layout change to alt+shift, ctrl+shift, etc.

2013-10-18 Thread Egmont Koblinger
@Sebastien: I can only share my opinion here, but maybe it's not uncommon. I've been regularly (=sometimes multiple times per minute) using Alt+Shift as the switcher for more than a decade, I'm so used to it that I'm not even willing to try to change this habit. Any attempt in getting used to a ne

[Bug 1218322] Re: Can't set keyboard layout change to alt+shift, ctrl+shift, etc.

2013-10-19 Thread Egmont Koblinger
My hardware layout is Hungarian (I'm not sure why it's interesting). The software layouts I've always been toggling between are "us" and "hu 101_qwerty_dot_dead", using "grp:alt_shift_toggle" as the hotkey. Recursively grepping for "101_qwerty" in my home finds two files: ./.gconf/desktop/gnome/pe

[Bug 1218322] Re: Can't set keyboard layout change to alt+shift, ctrl+shift, etc.

2013-10-22 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Hi, I've updated from proposed: gnome-control-center 1:3.6.3-0ubuntu45 and gnome-settings-daemon 3.8.5-0ubuntu10. Then logged out and in. 1. Leftovers from the old xkb setup still interfere with the new system in ways I described in comment 46, making it an unusable chaos. Manually removing the o

[Bug 1218322] Re: Can't set keyboard layout change to alt+shift, ctrl+shift, etc.

2013-10-23 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Is it important to clear /etc/default/keyboard? For me it contains only one of the layouts, and no hotkey to change. I didn't alter that file, I only had to remove the gnome-tweak-tool stuff and it works reasonably well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Des

[Bug 1161941] Re: git-diff losing lines

2013-10-24 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Hi Shahbaz, Many relevant fixes went into vte-0.34.9, and many others are pending (patches waiting to get accepted by developers) and will hopefully make it to 0.36. Could you please test 0.34.9, or even better, my git tree at https://github.com/egmontkob/vte-0-36-egmont containing these fixes? A

[Bug 1218322] Re: Can't set keyboard layout change to alt+shift, ctrl+shift, etc.

2013-10-24 Thread Egmont Koblinger
I'd like to second Sergio's problem with the NumLock. Switching layouts turns numlock off (kind of). More precisely: The digits except 5 work as arrow/home/etc. keys, but 5 inserts a literal 5. This is a weird mixture I've never seen before and I can't see any rationale whatsoever. Pressing Nu

[Bug 1244548] Re: Keyboard shortcut for changing keyboard layout does not work on lock screen

2013-10-27 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Confirmed. Moreover: - I can't see any rationale behind not showing the switcher if it's at English. Definitely looks like buggy behavior rather than good design, leaving the user clueless why it's sometimes shown and sometimes not. For starter, I'd like to see confirmation that the layout is En

[Bug 1247668] [NEW] NumLock turned off on layout switch

2013-11-03 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Public bug reported: Extracting from bug 1218322, confirmed there by multiple users: When switching the keyboard layout using a shortcut (such as Alt+Shift), NumLock functionality is (mostly) turned off. More precisely: it goes into an inconsistent state where pressing numpad 5 inserts the digit

[Bug 1218322] Re: Can't set keyboard layout change to alt+shift, ctrl+shift, etc.

2013-11-03 Thread Egmont Koblinger
** Description changed: A PPA which should provide some relief for this issue is available at https://launchpad.net/~attente/+archive/1218322. There still remain issues regarding keyboard shortcuts though. To install: sudo add-apt-repository ppa:attente/1218322 sudo apt-get update s

[Bug 1247668] Re: NumLock turned off on layout switch

2013-11-03 Thread Egmont Koblinger
It seems the bug lies somewhere deeper under, probably in xorg. Turn on NumLock. Switch layout either using the indicator, or by executing "setxkbmap us" or something alike. Try the numpad keys: they work as expected (they insert digits). Press and release any of the modifier keys. Try the numpad

[Bug 1218322] Re: Can't set keyboard layout change to alt+shift, ctrl+shift, etc.

2013-11-04 Thread Egmont Koblinger
@Sebastien: I tried to refrain from commenting on this aspect, but it indeed made me think a lot. On one hand, I totally agree with you (myself also being a developer/contributor to open source). On the other hand, I share the frustration of many users, and I'm also quite disappointed on how such

[Bug 1247668] Re: NumLock turned off on layout switch

2013-11-04 Thread Egmont Koblinger
@Sebastian: I firmly disagree with setting "Importance: Low". Sure you might say that geez if pressing a key did something else, you can just undo that action, press some magic sequence of keys, and you're okay. No security problem, no data loss (actually I'm not even sure about these)... But fo

[Bug 1247668] Re: NumLock turned off on layout switch

2013-11-27 Thread Egmont Koblinger
@Sebastien: Are the steps described in the original report, as well as comment 2 not exact enough to trigger the bug reliably? It is buggy for me all the time, and so far nobody said he couldn't reproduce. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, whic

[Bug 298385] Re: Reflow terminal contents when resizing the window

2013-11-28 Thread Egmont Koblinger
vte 0.35 implements this feature. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/298385 Title: Reflow terminal contents when resizing the window To manage notifications about this bug go to: https

[Bug 1247668] Re: NumLock turned off on layout switch

2013-11-28 Thread Egmont Koblinger
The bug is also observable under IceWM, when manually executing "setxkbmap us". So it's unrelated to Gnome, is probably a bug in X.Org/Xkb. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu. https://bugs.l

[Bug 1040885] Re: gnome-terminal auto-restores its size

2012-11-23 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Reported upstream, with more findings and a workaround patch, at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=688959 ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #688959 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=688959 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bu

[Bug 1040885] Re: gnome-terminal auto-restores its size

2013-01-17 Thread Egmont Koblinger
The official mainstream fix is at http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-terminal/commit/?id=611e93f2f8c0c18ed8d365ecb850258e8d5c9c12 Given how annoying this bug is (and how small and trivial the patch is), could you guys please consider backporting the fix to Quantal? -- You received this bug notifi

[Bug 445084] Re: click-to-focus window is too sensitive

2010-08-06 Thread Egmont Koblinger
@nomike: Many people can reproduce this bug, while many other (incl. me) cannot. You mention that the bug only occurs when the window is given focus, not when it already has it. Just wondering: is it possible that you're using a theme where the window itself moves when getting focus? (I mean the i

[Bug 445084] Re: click-to-focus window is too sensitive

2010-08-09 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Another debugging idea that might be useful: What happens if you replace gnome-terminal with xev? That is, give focus to an xev window by clicking inside it (using accessibility keyboard-driven fake mouse). Does it print any event regarding mouse movement or anything unusual? -- click-to-focus

[Bug 2073881] Re: gnome-terminal stopped accepting arguments: # Failed to parse arguments: Too many arguments

2024-10-18 Thread Egmont Koblinger
I guess this patch should work. I tried to remain as close to the existing code as possible, just remove that erroneous parameter which comes from self.args[0]. (No idea how to properly format the patch here, anyway, you get the point and can apply manually.) --- gnome-terminal +++ gnome-terminal

[Bug 2073881] Re: gnome-terminal stopped accepting arguments: # Failed to parse arguments: Too many arguments

2024-10-21 Thread Egmont Koblinger
> generally the [0] argument can also be -- How? Can you please give an example? The upstream GNOME Terminal change that we're affected by is https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-terminal/-/issues/8074. GNOME Terminal used to silently ignore non-option parameters (before the "--" if such a parame

[Bug 2089835] Re: gnome-terminal crashes when detaching window

2024-11-28 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Duplicate of bug 2049923? ** Summary changed: - gnome-terinal crashes when detaching window + gnome-terminal crashes when detaching window -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchp

[Bug 2073881] Re: gnome-terminal stopped accepting arguments: # Failed to parse arguments: Too many arguments

2025-04-06 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Ubuntu 25.04 removes the gnome-terminal.real wrapper, and thereby (maybe accidentally) fixes this bug. The only affected distro is 24.10 which will EOL in 3-4 months from now, so I guess it won't see a fix. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, wh

[Bug 2097620] Re: anomal blinking of a cursor in terminal

2025-04-05 Thread Egmont Koblinger
So, the rectangle text insertion cursor is where it is supposed to be, but is blinking much faster than it should; do I understand you correctly now? When this happens, how long does it last? If you move the mouse pointer away, does the blinking go back to its regular pace? If you move the mouse p

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >