Looking a bit into the near future:
gnome-terminal 3.27.90, released in a week, is most likely going to
receive a big change to the Preferences dialogs
(https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=722114).
I've already prepared porting the transparency patch, except for this
part. I have no intent
FYI: Forthcoming gnome-terminal 3.27.90 will no longer have an --enable-
distro-packaging config option. Just drop it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1744711
T
Michael, thanks, now I know how to get that fourth button. For me, a
small "terminal" icon appears there as expected.
In your askubuntu post the buttons are on the right, and _assuming_ that
the incorrectly sized icon's top left corner is placed at the desired
location, it _seems_ that the window
So for a second I missed the fact that according to the GNOME bugreport,
this bug is only present in Xorg, not in Wayland. (Michael, can this be
the difference between your two computers?)
For me, the behavior with the "Ubuntu on Xorg" choice when logging in
is:
The terminal icon is shown as the
Yup, it's *their* patch :)
Actually I think gnome-terminal is just a
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1747171
Title:
"New Tab" disappeared from the GNOME Terminal menu
Yup, tried it now. Just compile with
CPPFLAGS=-DDISUNIFY_NEW_TERMINAL_SECTION ./configure --blahblah
and you'll get two separate entries.
I have no idea why the upstream change was made.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed
I can reproduce the problem with plenty of other names taken from the
Humanity theme, such as "clock" or "gnome-panel-force-quit" instead of
gnome-terminal's default "utilities-terminal".
The culprit really seems to be gnome-shell/mutter, or some library used
by them.
So far I could only reproduc
VTE no longer does utmp logging. This was an upstream change made almost
three years ago at https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=747046,
and is clearly not going to get reverted by upstream.
Actually, most other VTE-based emulators (e.g. xfce4-terminal) are also
affected in newer Ubuntu rele
** Also affects: humanity-icon-theme (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1724250
Title:
gnome-terminal graphic artifa
Please see the duplicate bug 1724250 for some hopefully precious
investigation I've done so far.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1718238
Title:
Giant terminal ic
(Daniel, may I please kindly recommend that next time when one of the
bugs contains all the information present in the other plus much-much
more then mark it as duplicate the other way around, even if
chronologically incorrect? IMO that's much more useful for continuing to
work on it and hopefully
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1718238 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1718238
Thanks, it's pretty clear now that the bug is present on X11 only.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bu
Well, the title can be changed :) Anyway, it's not worth further
discussing, rather than working on the actual bug. Let's get back to
business...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1404726 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1404726
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1404726
menu contains two Terminal entries
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gn
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1404726 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1404726
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1570752
Two "terminal" menus with duplicates
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1404726
menu contains two Terminal entries
--
You received this
Upstream gnome-terminal 3.28 (actually 3.27.90) is going to change this
by no longer showing the appmenu (the first "Terminal" menu) on Unity.
Just in time now that Unity is no longer Ubuntu's default... :P
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, wh
As per bug 1745825, I've dropped the code that decides whether to
show/hide the "Use transparency from system theme" checkbox, it is now
always shown.
It shouldn't be that hard to bring it back. It'd need to be done
manually; methods that received an extra parameter by this part of the
patch now t
** Patch added: "gnome-terminal-3.27.90 60_add_lp_handler.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/1744711/+attachment/5049414/+files/60_add_lp_handler.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed
** Patch added: "gnome-terminal-3.27.90 revert-pcre2.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/1744711/+attachment/5049415/+files/revert-pcre2.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-t
I have found that the presence of the counterpart "utilities-
terminal.png" icons under /usr/share/icons/gnome fixes the use of the
Humanity one (even though the ones under the "gnome" folder are unused),
while removing them breaks it.
Could you guys please confirm if this is the same for you?
su
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1718238 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1718238
Investigation continuing in bug #1718238...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
In the buggy case, xprop only reports one icon of size 48.
In the correct case, xprop reports 6 icons of sizes 22, 16, 48, 24, 32
and finally 48 again, all looking like taken from Humanity. (This isn't
what I saw here a couple of days ago in the dup bugreport, I've no idea
about the cause of this
Here's a fix to mutter.
_NET_WM_ICON is read into mini_icon unscaled (so its documentation is
incorrect), preferably at size 16, but if that's not available (as in
the buggy case) then in whichever size is available (48 in our case).
Then when scaling is due to happen (the icon gets painted), the
Daniel (or anyone else),
Could you please take care of applying this fix for Bionic?
The bug is X11 only which will be the default of Bionic, plus it's LTS,
so it'll affect magnitudes more users than on Artful. And it's a big fat
look-n-usability no-go.
Thanks in advance!
--
You received this
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1718238 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1718238
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1718238
Giant terminal icon is blocking out the Terminal window buttons
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bu
Upstream report: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/23
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1718238
Title:
Giant terminal icon is blocking out the Terminal
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1718238 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1718238
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1718238
Giant terminal icon is blocking out the Terminal window buttons
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bu
Most likely the same as bug 1718238 /
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/23 .
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1734513
Title:
Terminal button is brea
Good idea, thanks! I've opened an upstream gnome-terminal bugreport about it:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=793521
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #793521
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=793521
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
So glib 2.54 -> 2.55 upgrade has problems, and as a consequence, vte
upgrade (which requires glib >= 2.40) is held back?? I don't understand
it :D Nevermind, I'm sure it'll all be polished out for the final 18.04
+ 3.28, so it's okay.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
byobu sets up the LS_COLORS environment variable based on
/usr/share/byobu/profiles/dircolors which contains "LINK 4;5;37".
4 stands for underlined, 5 for blinking and 37 for white foreground, so
the terminal emulator does what it is asked to do. I'm pretty sure this
is not what byobu authors mean
** Also affects: byobu
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1752352
Title:
symbolic links are blinking with byobu
To m
Using the color 30 or 37 (black or white foreground) without setting the
background, or similarly, 40 or 47 (black or white background) without
setting the foreground is a pretty bad idea, since, without knowing the
terminal's color scheme (which is often white on black, or black on
white), it migh
But maybe the key problem is: What makes byobu think that overriding the
behavior of my apps is a good idea? Shouldn't it just leave LS_COLORS
alone?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bug
** Also affects: vte2.91 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1752769
Title:
gnome-terminal displaying boldfac
Indeed, thanks for the report.
Forwarded upstream: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=793987.
I'll take a look.
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #793987
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=793987
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
De
It has been fixed upstream, the fix should appear in mutter 3.27.92 /
3.28.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1718238
Title:
Giant terminal icon is blocking out th
Will be fixed in vte2.91 version 0.51.92.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1752769
Title:
gnome-terminal displaying boldface even when set to disallow
To mana
Reassigning, there's no way gnome-terminal could ask gtk to do this.
Must be a gtk bug.
** Package changed: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) => gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://
Also reproducible in xterm and various other terminal emulators, at
least sometimes (not always). So not a gnome-terminal issue.
This is a pretty common phenomenon if a utility doesn't properly restore
the terminal (stty?) settings. Blindly typing and executing "reset"
should fix it. Not sure what
Guys, honestly I can't believe no one's paying attention to this bug.
I mean... it's the most basic input device and it's been working
correctly for decades, and now it can't emit the freaking desired
symbol?!? I find no words to describe how much frustration this bug
keeps causing to me even af
Public bug reported:
A child of bug 1218322 (aka keyboard layout switch being a complete
disaster since 13.10).
When switching layout using a hotkey (e.g. Alt+Shift), the currently
active application loses focus for a short period. Depending on the
application, it causes all sorts of misbehavior,
I've found one more highly annoying issue regarding layout switch. The
active application loses the focus for a short time, causing all sorts
of misbehavior depending on the application. See bug 1289495 for
details.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop
** Description changed:
***
The old PPA, ppa:attente/1218322 is superceded by the following one. You can
remove the old repository using ppa-purge.
***
A PPA which should provide some relief for this issue is available at
https://launchpad.net/~attente/+archive/modifier-only-input-sw
vte 0.36 (gnome 3.12) is going to fix this.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/342436
Title:
Ctrl-End and End are indistinguishable on gnome-terminal
To manage notifications about this
vte 0.36 (gnome 3.12) changes the function keys to be compatible with
Xterm.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96676
Title:
function keys don't work in gnome-terminal
To manage notifi
Yes, please do upgrade! There's been many changes-fixes-improvements to
gnome-terminal. If you don't upgrade, Trusty LTS's default terminal
emulator will lag behind by 3 major Gnome releases, this just doesn't
sound right.
Vte ships the /etc/profile.d/vte.sh script, to be sourced by bash/zsh.
On
It's already fixed in forthcoming vte-0.36 (gnome 3.12).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705985
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #705985
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705985
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, whi
See also bug 1132700.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1261619
Title:
Update GNOME Terminal to 3.10.2
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bu
I've reported upstream:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=726438
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #726438
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=726438
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-termina
vte-0.36 will include the fix.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/932940
Title:
gnome-terminal intercepts ctrl-f1 making it unusable for applications
running w
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 423825 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423825
vte-0.36 fixes this painfully slow speed.
The one-line fix (if you want to backport it to an older version) is at
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=721944#c4
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #7
vte-0.36 fixes this painfully slow speed.
The one-line fix (if you want to backport it to an older version) is at
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=721944#c4
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #721944
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=721944
--
You received this bug not
Rationale: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=727379
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #727379
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=727379
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
Note: the bug report is about Ubuntu's (or Debian's?) custom wrapper
script, not mainstream gnome-terminal.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1535169
Title:
spe
See https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=747046
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #747046
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=747046
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https:
** Package changed: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) => nam (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1553981
Title:
terminl shows "Segmentation fault(core dumped)" whi
Public bug reported:
Currently Xenial (beta) contains Gtk+ 3.18.8, whereas 3.18.9 has already
arrived to Debian Unstable.
Could you please sync 3.18.9 from Debian?
It fixes Gnome #677329 (missing focus in/out events) which badly effects
multiple apps, including at least gnome-terminal and evince
This patch has nothing to do with the current bugreport.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1399734
Title:
Current tab is not highlighted
To manage notification
** Changed in: gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gtk+3.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1556552
Title:
Sync 3.18.9 from Debian
To manage notifications ab
Should be fixed in Xenial by the libgtk-3-0_3.18.9-1ubuntu1 package.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890784
Title:
Gnome-terminal continues to show outline cu
This was fixed in vte-0.40 (upstream bug:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=731205)
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #731205
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=731205
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug as
FYI: Newer versions of vte/gnome-terminal set TERM=xterm-256color
(hardcoded; no config option available).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to vte in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/778801
Title:
TERM uncondition
This was caused by https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=677329,
which is fixed in Xenial (Gtk+ 3.18.9).
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #677329
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=677329
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs,
Fixed in Xenial (gnome-terminal 3.18.3).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/360810
Title:
gnome-terminal does not handle unicode HTTP links properly
To manage notifications about this
Newer versions of gnome-terminal (e.g. the one in Xenial) have a hidden
setting called "tab-policy" (search for it in dconf-editor) which allows
you to always display the tab bar, even if only a single tab is opened.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1551401 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1551401
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1551401
Cannot unmaximize gnome-terminal
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnom
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1551401 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1551401
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1551401
Cannot unmaximize gnome-terminal
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnom
Go to Profile Preferences -> Colors. Do you have "Bold color" set to
black by any chance?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1561284
Title:
man pages are not dis
This should be fixed in Xenial 16.04, see
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=725342
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=677329
(although we haven't verified with focus-follows-mouse mode).
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #725342
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=
The behavior you describe happens when the terminal switches to the so-
called "alternate screen" upon encountering a certain escape sequence
that is printed by your application. Usually fullscreen applications
(such as the "mc" file manager, "less" pager, text editors etc.) use
this mode.
If it g
(I cannot reproduce this on Xenial.)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1565283
Title:
Output to gnome-terminal prevents scrolling other windows when always
on
This is an issue with the default Gtk+ theme, not with gnome-terminal.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1568451
Title:
Current Tab in Gnome-terminal does not g
See also https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=743395
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #743395
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=743395
** Summary changed:
- Terminal hieght shrinking when it losses focus
+ Terminal height shrinking when it loses focus
--
You received thi
Any chance you're facing bug 1532226?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1570502
Title:
Menu not getting shown for gnome-terminal alone
To manage notifications
The character width (single vs. double cell) is not defined by the font.
Instead, it is defined by the Unicode database and the matching locale
definitions.
Some characters are of ambiguous width. They occupy a single cell by
default, but gnome-terminal can be configured so that they occupy two
ce
> The terminal shouldn't rely on applications exiting cleanly.
You misunderstand the very basics of terminals.
A terminals just obeys the instructions it receives in a single stream,
it doesn't even have the notion of "shell", "application" (started from
that shell), "exit" (of that shell), "clea
... "exit" (of that *application*) ...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1566437
Title:
Scrolling randomly stops working
To manage notifications about this bug
That's right.
By convention, the expected behavior is that vim restores the terminal's
settings. If it exits uncleanly, it might leave the terminal in a
nondefault state, to which usually typing "reset", or closing the
terminal and opening a new one might be an easy workaround.
I've always wonder
Upstream vte bug report:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=403130
In the mean time, why does aptsh print these characters?
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #403130
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=403130
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
** Package changed: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) => gedit (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gedit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1575484
Title:
"Set document metadata failed"
To manage notifications ab
** Package changed: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) => unity-tweak-tool (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1575485
Title:
"PyGIWarning: Gtk was imported without
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1532226 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1532226
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1532226
No menu bar in gtk apps on fresh boot
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to
Reported upstream: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766081
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #766081
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766081
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in
There's no UI, but a hidden setting is available. See above for the
link.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1401207
Title:
No 'Select-by-word characters' proper
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1521302 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1521302
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1521302
gnome-terminal maximize than un-maximize behaves odd
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which i
See my comment in bug 1580021.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1580015
Title:
Update to 3.20
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launc
aptsh has a color prompt, and uses readline. Readline requires that in
the prompt, all non-printable characters (e.g. color changing escape
sequences) are enclosed between \001 (^A) and \002 (^B).
I suspect it's a bug in aptsh that its prompt doesn't have a balanced
pair of \001 and \002 bytes, he
Re Diego:
You are basically right. I'd like to add a couple of points.
As for complex apps such as mc, your approach (2) cannot work. This is
because the BiDi algorithm would not just need to shuffle around
characters that are visible in the terminal; it might need to pull
offscreen chars onscree
A few other issues:
In implicit BiDi mode, how should BiDi control characters
(LRE/RLE/LRO/RLO/PDF; LRM/RLM) be handled? We need to remember them.
Which cell should they belong to? How to later override the displayed
string to remove any of these, or insert new ones?
In explicit BiDi mode, copy-p
You can go to Edit -> Profile Preferences and set your preferred initial
size.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1587953
Title:
gnome terminal 3.18.3 doesn't re
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1521302 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1521302
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1521302
gnome-terminal maximize than un-maximize behaves odd
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which i
Upstream bugreport: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=748144
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #748144
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=748144
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in
** Package changed: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) => sudo (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1590715
Title:
Wrong spelling of "password" in catalan
To manage
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1521302 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1521302
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1521302
gnome-terminal maximize than un-maximize behaves odd
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which i
Clarified the bug title. ("minimize" is the action triggered by the
second icon of the title bar, the one with a "-" sign on it, between
"close" ("x") and "maximize" (big square). This is not what happens
here.)
** Summary changed:
- gnome-terminal terminal minimizes when mouse is moved across th
Sounds like dup of #1722121, fixed in Bionic.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1760887
Title:
Copy not working
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
h
18.04 Bionic, to be released tomorrow, ships bash-4.4.19. So if Kieran's
guess is correct then it should no longer crash there; Simon could you
please check this once you upgrade your system?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribe
> Here is built-in palette collected with gsettings get:
> ['#2E3436',
> '#CC',
> [...]
Could you please elaborate, what are the exact steps you took that gave
this result? What steps did you perform in gnome-terminal's Preferences
dialog, what additional scripts did you run (if any, e.g. Anth
> I missed that background color scheme and palette scheme are dedicated
and selected only first scheme, but not palette scheme (was selected
Tango).
This is indeed misleading and we're thinking about changing the
behavior. Ideally you'd just select "Solarized dark" at one place, and
this would se
301 - 400 of 509 matches
Mail list logo
