[Bug 516023] Re: "Critcally low" shown on unplug at 100% full

2010-05-25 Thread Bolick
The gconftool-2 command also helped with MSI Wind U90. Konstantin, thanks a lot. This issue was a royal pain in ass. -- "Critcally low" shown on unplug at 100% full https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/516023 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is

[Bug 403135] Re: Notification area icon wrongly rendered/uses bg_color as a background (multiple apps)

2010-04-08 Thread Bolick
I have the same problem in up to date Lucid in "gXNeur" with Ambiance/Radiance/Dust themes. -- Notification area icon wrongly rendered/uses bg_color as a background (multiple apps) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403135 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Deskto

[Bug 403135] Re: Notification area icon wrongly rendered/uses bg_color as a background (multiple apps)

2010-04-09 Thread Bolick
This is a screenshot for GxNeur in Lucid ** Attachment added: "Screenshot for GxNeur in Lucid" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43525458/gxneur.png -- Notification area icon wrongly rendered/uses bg_color as a background (multiple apps) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403135 You received this b

[Bug 403135] Re: Notification area icon wrongly rendered/uses bg_color as a background (multiple apps)

2010-05-04 Thread Bolick
betabandido, I guess you use Ambiance Ubuntu Gnome theme and Skype by default uses KDE theme. So, to solve your issue with Skype go to Skype's "Options->General" and select "GTK+" style in "Choose style" dropdown menu. -- Notification area icon wrongly rendered/uses bg_color as a background (m

[Bug 403135] Re: Notification area icon wrongly rendered/uses bg_color as a background (multiple apps)

2010-05-06 Thread Bolick
For me it seems like gXNeur version 0.9.8 appears with proper transparent background in notification area in both Ambiance and Radiance themes. -- Notification area icon wrongly rendered/uses bg_color as a background (multiple apps) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403135 You received this bug no