You are wasting previous time of people working on poppler doing such a
useless comment, please refrain from commenting on the future unless you
can add something useful to the discussion.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed t
** Also affects: indicator-bluetooth (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to indicator-bluetooth in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1630725
Title:
Bluetooth settin
** Changed in: unity8 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Triaged
** Changed in: ubuntu-ux
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to geonames in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159046
Because there's no patch for it. alex has proven he can't provide a
valid patch.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/127732
Title:
Searching Hebrew text works in reverse order
To manage
I'm closing this bug, please try to use a version newer than what
madbiologist suggests and if the problem still happens please reopen the
bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to poppler in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.n
I'm with Adrian, don't think changing this at such low level is a good
idea.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to poppler in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/116453
Title:
evince can not find ü in attached PDF
To
The bug importance doesn't matter, what matters is that if there's
someone with the time to work on this.
I'd say there's not much people (or noone) in the current team with such
amount of time.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subsc
The bug importance doesn't matter, what matters is that if there's
someone with the time to work on this.
I'd say there's not much people (or noone) in the current team with such
amount of time.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subsc
I certainly remember we already did that combination somewhere, either
in okular or in poppler, but i can't find it and of course the document
does not work, so it may be a fake memory :D
I think this may make sense, though then again preserving the old
behaviour via a flag (even if not default) i
** Changed in: unity8 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Andrea Cimitan (cimi) => Albert Astals Cid (aacid)
** Changed in: unity8 (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
** Branch linked: lp:~aacid/unity8/hack_location_data_i18n
--
You received this bug notification because you are a mem
Thomas did you ever get a new poppler version? Is this fixed?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646
Title:
Syntax Error: Invalid encryption key length
To manage no
Public bug reported:
Run
qdbus com.ubuntu.connectivity1 /com/ubuntu/connectivity1/NetworkingStatus
Status
in the phone, indicator-network will crash.
Attaching backtrace
** Affects: dbus-cpp (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Affects: indicator-network (Ubuntu)
I think it looks good as it is.
If noone disagrees i'll commit in a week.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to poppler in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/116453
Title:
evince can not find ü in attached PDF
To ma
Pushed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to poppler in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/116453
Title:
evince can not find ü in attached PDF
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net
Nice work.
Some small things that need fixing.
the cmake way of using pkgconfig is very simple, see
./cmake/modules/FindGTK.cmake for example
You need to free more Objects, every time you do a get object an object
you have to free it, e.g. in countSignatures you need to free fields, f,
type, obj
Nice work.
Some small things that need fixing.
the cmake way of using pkgconfig is very simple, see
./cmake/modules/FindGTK.cmake for example
You need to free more Objects, every time you do a get object an object
you have to free it, e.g. in countSignatures you need to free fields, f,
type, obj
I just realized we never really followed up on the last two patches.
My concern is that they change the pdftotext output.
I though they where for a) speed b) text selection so i'd prefer if they
did not change pdftotext output.
I've checked a few files of the changed ones and the changes can be
I've had look at the code (in poppler/ not glib/ i'll leave that to the
glib/ experts) and have some minor and some major comments.
Minor:
* There's 3 use of malloc i could find, for completion i guess it's better if
you use gmalloc
* SigStatusStruct should be a C++ class
Medium:
* I'm not c
I've had look at the code (in poppler/ not glib/ i'll leave that to the
glib/ experts) and have some minor and some major comments.
Minor:
* There's 3 use of malloc i could find, for completion i guess it's better if
you use gmalloc
* SigStatusStruct should be a C++ class
Medium:
* I'm not c
Another file that aborts
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=12982
Also
+/* Build against libcurl. */
+#cmakedefine ENABLE_OPENSSL 1
+
i guess just sneaked in to the patch and is not needed?
Also please use our own error() function instead of perror
Also one question, does pdfsigv
Another file that aborts
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=12982
Also
+/* Build against libcurl. */
+#cmakedefine ENABLE_OPENSSL 1
+
i guess just sneaked in to the patch and is not needed?
Also please use our own error() function instead of perror
Also one question, does pdfsigv
I've pushed your patch with some fixlets from my side to
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/poppler/poppler/log/?h=signatureHandling
I have three questions we need to answer before i merge it to master:
* Do we really want to make NSS mandatory?
* Do we want to provide a way for frontends to give their
I've pushed your patch with some fixlets from my side to
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/poppler/poppler/log/?h=signatureHandling
I have three questions we need to answer before i merge it to master:
* Do we really want to make NSS mandatory?
* Do we want to provide a way for frontends to give their
I've commited the overflow patch, please Adrian's check if it makes you
happy.
I also like the pdfsig idea.
What do we think it's missing before we cna merge this to the mainline?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evinc
Andre*2, answers to the comments from Adam, Adrian and Mantas?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1085526
Title:
ubuntu pdf doc viewer will not let me sign a document
T
I've commited the overflow patch, please Adrian's check if it makes you
happy.
I also like the pdfsig idea.
What do we think it's missing before we cna merge this to the mainline?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to poppl
Andre*2, answers to the comments from Adam, Adrian and Mantas?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to poppler in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740506
Title:
verify digital signatures
To manage notifications about
So we have two things missing, right?
* Enabling the use of other keystores
* The name of the pdfsigverify tool
I think the enabling the use of other keystores is important but maybe not
critical for the first release.
For the pdfsigverify it seems we kind of agreeed on the compromise to
call
(In reply to Andre Guerreiro from comment #66)
> Created attachment 118446 [details] [review]
> NSS conditional build
>
> This patch makes the NSS dependency optional in the CMake and Autotools
> build systems.
Commited too to the signatureHandling branch with some minor changes on
my side to hav
(In reply to Adrian Johnson from comment #73)
> (In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #72)
> > > Large file support.
> >
> > Do you think this should be a blocker for the initial release or something
> > we can improve later?
>
> I think it should be
(In reply to Adrian Johnson from comment #71)
> (In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #70)
> > So we have two things missing, right?
> > * Enabling the use of other keystores
> > * The name of the pdfsigverify tool
> >
> >
> > I think the enabling
(In reply to Andre Guerreiro from comment #67)
> Created attachment 118449 [details] [review]
> Support for adbe.pkcs7.sha1 signatures
>
> This patch, to be applied over the previous one, adds support for
> adbe.pkcs7.sha1 signatures so now we should have a more complete coverage of
> actual signe
(In reply to Andre Guerreiro from comment #67)
> Created attachment 118449 [details] [review]
> Support for adbe.pkcs7.sha1 signatures
>
> This patch, to be applied over the previous one, adds support for
> adbe.pkcs7.sha1 signatures so now we should have a more complete coverage of
> actual signe
(In reply to Andre Guerreiro from comment #66)
> Created attachment 118446 [details] [review]
> NSS conditional build
>
> This patch makes the NSS dependency optional in the CMake and Autotools
> build systems.
Commited too to the signatureHandling branch with some minor changes on
my side to hav
So we have two things missing, right?
* Enabling the use of other keystores
* The name of the pdfsigverify tool
I think the enabling the use of other keystores is important but maybe not
critical for the first release.
For the pdfsigverify it seems we kind of agreeed on the compromise to
call
(In reply to Adrian Johnson from comment #71)
> (In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #70)
> > So we have two things missing, right?
> > * Enabling the use of other keystores
> > * The name of the pdfsigverify tool
> >
> >
> > I think the enabling
(In reply to Adrian Johnson from comment #73)
> (In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #72)
> > > Large file support.
> >
> > Do you think this should be a blocker for the initial release or something
> > we can improve later?
>
> I think it should be
(In reply to Adrian Johnson from comment #80)
> (In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #70)
> > For the pdfsigverify it seems we kind of agreeed on the compromise to call
> > it pdfsig that only does verification right now but in the future may
> > suppport signing?
(In reply to Andre Guerreiro from comment #76)
> Created attachment 118745 [details] [review]
> Incremental hashing + large file support
>
> With this patch I've implemented the incremental hashing plus the large file
> support.
>
> This is still untested with files larger than 2GB but is correct
(In reply to Adam Reichold from comment #81)
> (In reply to Adrian Johnson from comment #78)
> > I agree that the two calls to doGetChars and updateHash should be merged but
> > I don't think a for loop is the best way to process loops where the
> > increment is not exactly the same on each iterati
(In reply to Andre Guerreiro from comment #76)
> Created attachment 118745 [details] [review]
> Incremental hashing + large file support
>
> With this patch I've implemented the incremental hashing plus the large file
> support.
>
> This is still untested with files larger than 2GB but is correct
(In reply to Adrian Johnson from comment #80)
> (In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #70)
> > For the pdfsigverify it seems we kind of agreeed on the compromise to call
> > it pdfsig that only does verification right now but in the future may
> > suppport signing?
(In reply to Adam Reichold from comment #81)
> (In reply to Adrian Johnson from comment #78)
> > I agree that the two calls to doGetChars and updateHash should be merged but
> > I don't think a for loop is the best way to process loops where the
> > increment is not exactly the same on each iterati
(In reply to Adrian Johnson from comment #94)
> I suggest we change the pdfsig "-c" switch to "-nocert". We can easily add a
> single character option if we find it is needed. But we can't get rid of it
> if we later regret it.
>
> I'm still waiting for an answer to comment 79.
As said please let
(In reply to Adrian Johnson from comment #94)
> I suggest we change the pdfsig "-c" switch to "-nocert". We can easily add a
> single character option if we find it is needed. But we can't get rid of it
> if we later regret it.
>
> I'm still waiting for an answer to comment 79.
As said please let
(In reply to Markus Kilås from comment #93)
> Created attachment 119174 [details]
> Handle SEC_ERROR_UNTRUSTED_ISSUER
I pushed this and also some code to differentiate between an unknown and
an untrusted issuer (no idea what's the difference but if nss has this
difference i feel we also have to)
(In reply to Markus Kilås from comment #93)
> Created attachment 119174 [details]
> Handle SEC_ERROR_UNTRUSTED_ISSUER
I pushed this and also some code to differentiate between an unknown and
an untrusted issuer (no idea what's the difference but if nss has this
difference i feel we also have to)
So we're stuck on "need to use the offset" part, right?
Could someone try to do make the code use it even if we don't have any
pdf that needs it?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad
So we're stuck on "need to use the offset" part, right?
Could someone try to do make the code use it even if we don't have any
pdf that needs it?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to poppler in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpa
** Also affects: dbus-cpp (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to dbus-cpp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1524130
Title:
/usr/bin/unity8:11:__memcpy_neon:std:
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu is not packaging poppler 0.24.4 because it carries Source and
Binary incompatible changes and thus upstream increased the soversion.
Meanwhile Ubuntu has decided to apply pdftops-origpagesizes-fixes.diff
that is Source and Binary incompatible without caring if it break
ok, if adobe does the same maybe it makes sense. Are you making the qt-
ps-converters do the same too?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to poppler in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1243484
Title:
Incorrect handl
While running pdftops -f 30 -l 30 over
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=9910 the patched version
segfaults while the old one does not. Can you have a look?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to poppler in Ubunt
Not a biggie since it's a "broken" file, but when running pdftops on
page 30 of https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=9910 the
unpatched version creates something that gs can read (even if ends up
beign empty) while the patched version creates something that makes gs
unhappy. Can you have
Ok, regtest finished, all looks good, please commit!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to poppler in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1243484
Title:
Incorrect handling of orientation when printing PDF files
To man
Public bug reported:
Because of https://launchpadlibrarian.net/169426095/gnome-
session_3.9.90-0ubuntu11_3.9.90-0ubuntu12.diff.gz i can't log in into an
Unity session from kdm
** Affects: gnome-session (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notificatio
Is there anything in a spec somewhere that says kdm is at wrong here and
that it should indeed define XDG_CURRENT_DESKTOP ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129362
It works fine here without the DM setting it. Note that the variable is
set, probably by something else.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1293629
Title:
[Regres
Ok, feel free to mark this as invalid if you don't care that Unity fails
to start from other DM than lightdm.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1293629
Title:
[R
Does pdftops produce a file with boxes you can print?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1300659
Title:
printed pdf file lacks item boxes
To manage notifications about
looks like a cairo backend bug to me then
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1300659
Title:
printed pdf file lacks item boxes
To manage notifications about this bug go
(In reply to Markus Kilås from comment #108)
> Created attachment 120760 [details] [review]
> Considering offset 0 and signature only covering part of PDF
>
> Note that this patch has not been tested with a non-zero first offset
> document.
Adrian what do you think of this patch?
--
You receive
(In reply to Markus Kilås from comment #106)
> Created attachment 120758 [details] [review]
> Fix printf for unsigned int
>
> In pdfsig.cc the NetBeans IDE gave warning:
> Mismatching the argument type "unsigned int" and conversion specifier "d"
>
> The attached patch changes from %d to %u in the
(In reply to Adrian Johnson from comment #112)
> Created attachment 120889 [details] [review]
> Check in ranges in ByteRange array
>
> This is an alternative to the patch in comment 108. It checks all ranges in
> the ByteRange array.
I'm not very convinced by the naming of
GBool isInteger() {
(In reply to Markus Kilås from comment #108)
> Created attachment 120760 [details] [review]
> Considering offset 0 and signature only covering part of PDF
>
> Note that this patch has not been tested with a non-zero first offset
> document.
Adrian what do you think of this patch?
--
You receive
(In reply to Markus Kilås from comment #106)
> Created attachment 120758 [details] [review]
> Fix printf for unsigned int
>
> In pdfsig.cc the NetBeans IDE gave warning:
> Mismatching the argument type "unsigned int" and conversion specifier "d"
>
> The attached patch changes from %d to %u in the
(In reply to Adrian Johnson from comment #112)
> Created attachment 120889 [details] [review]
> Check in ranges in ByteRange array
>
> This is an alternative to the patch in comment 108. It checks all ranges in
> the ByteRange array.
I'm not very convinced by the naming of
GBool isInteger() {
This doesn't seem like it's getting any traction after 2 years and kdm
is not even shipped anymore so as reporter i'm closing this bug to have
a cleaner "reported bugs" view in launchpad.
** Changed in: gnome-session (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notific
Andre and Andre what do you think of Adrian's patch?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to poppler in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740506
Title:
verify digital signatures
To manage notifications about this bug
Ok, good, so Adrian can you commit your patch?
After that we have attachment 120992 "Load NSS root certs module" that
honestly I don't understand at all but some googleing seems to confirm
it's needed.
And that would be it to try to merge it into master?
--
You received this bug notification be
Ok, good, so Adrian can you commit your patch?
After that we have attachment 120992 "Load NSS root certs module" that
honestly I don't understand at all but some googleing seems to confirm
it's needed.
And that would be it to try to merge it into master?
--
You received this bug notification be
Andre and Andre what do you think of Adrian's patch?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1085526
Title:
ubuntu pdf doc viewer will not let me sign a document
To manage n
Anyone against merging attachment 120992 and then merging the branch to
master?
I'll do it next week if noone complains.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1085526
Title:
Anyone against merging attachment 120992 and then merging the branch to
master?
I'll do it next week if noone complains.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to poppler in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740506
Title:
Pushed \o/
Now, this is not "all the work".
We still need to do the glib/qt/cpp frontend work, and that will
probably mean some changes to the new code, but getting this merged is
an important step.
Wonder how to proceed, this bug has 122 comments.
Should we close this one and open different on
Pushed \o/
Now, this is not "all the work".
We still need to do the glib/qt/cpp frontend work, and that will
probably mean some changes to the new code, but getting this merged is
an important step.
Wonder how to proceed, this bug has 122 comments.
Should we close this one and open different on
I've opened these bugs
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94376
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94377
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94378
Closing this one
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscr
I've opened these bugs
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94376
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94377
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94378
Closing this one
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscr
If you're speaking about Google Summer of Code, that's not how it works,
the application period is not even started.
If you're speaking about answering questions you may have. There's a
poppler development mailing list.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Des
Will be fixed in next release.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1404645
Title:
Evince opens attached PDF file as locked
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Great, work on it!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1404645
Title:
Evince opens attached PDF file as locked
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs
** Changed in: dbus-cpp (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to dbus-cpp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1524131
Title:
/usr/bin/mediaplayer-
app:11:__memcpy_
** Also affects: dbus-cpp (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to dbus-cpp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1582936
Title:
/usr/bin/unity8:11:malloc_consolidate
Actaully I think we should close this bug.
We already export the Javascript from the poppler side and for example
Okular supports it partially https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-zmHc3WUhs
I don't think we could actually do that from within the core of poppler
since it needs to know things as edit/
gt; Invalid
** Changed in: accountsservice (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: accountsservice (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Albert Astals Cid (aacid)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed
Diff over the existing 0007-add-lightdm-support.patch
You can create almost any dbus proxy and it will be non null even if
there is nothing there, that's why i added the check that there is an
owner
** Attachment added: "DIFF"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/accountsservice/+bug/104
Whole new 0007-add-lightdm-support.patch (result of applying the patch
in the previous comment to the existing 0007-add-lightdm-support.patch)
** Patch added: "0007-add-lightdm-support.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/accountsservice/+bug/1043349/+attachment/3394479/+files/000
New partial diff, old one is wrong
** Attachment added: "DIFF"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/accountsservice/+bug/1043349/+attachment/3394689/+files/DIFF
** Patch removed: "DIFF"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/accountsservice/+bug/1043349/+attachment/3394478/+files/
New full diff, the old one was wrong
** Patch added: "0007-add-lightdm-support.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/accountsservice/+bug/1043349/+attachment/3394690/+files/0007-add-lightdm-support.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desk
ned) => Albert Astals Cid (aacid)
** Changed in: unity
Assignee: Albert Astals Cid (aacid) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: unity
Status: In Progress => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gtk+3.0 in U
** Changed in: dbusmenu
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1053670
Title:
nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_in
weibo?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to poppler in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740506
Title:
verify digital signatures
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug
*** Bug 56913 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to poppler in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/321720
Title:
PDF v1.7 asks to upgrade Adobe Reader
To manage notifica
Will be fixed in poppler 0.22
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to poppler in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1020162
Title:
some characters not displayed in a PDF file
To manage notifications about this bug go t
So should we close this one?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to poppler in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/710137
Title:
evince badly mis-renders gradients in pdf
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
h
Adding the depends for the current patch dependency, the bug itself is
not dependent but current solution by alex is.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/127732
Title:
Searching Hebrew t
Adrian do you think this needs to go in? What about the comments by
Germán?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/667752
Title:
Non-embedded standard fonts in PDF files are
Marking fixed, if you still have a pdf file that has a huge cpu use
please open a new bug and attach the pdf file there
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12613
Title:
Xpdf renders real
That's been fixed upstream, we can probably close this bug and just hope
distros patch their stuff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1159931
Title:
Evince not rendering
** Branch linked: lp:~aacid/unity-2d/unity-2d_hud_configuration_key
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/969256
Title:
Keyboard shortcuts - The HUD keyboard
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
