It's just a warning: the rsyslog package ships
/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/00rsyslog.conf which also ships a config for
/var/log, so the one in var.conf is ignored.
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desk
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: gconf (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gconf in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/14681
attente -
Your PPA works great. I'm using alt+left Shift with no problems.
Thank you very much.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1226962
Title:
Hotkeys
You have been subscribed to a public bug:
Xubuntu 14.04.3 with latest sec. Updates.
The only way to empty trash is to use terminal.
** Affects: gvfs (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Impossible to empty trash with 5 files inside
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1500
** Package changed: xfdesktop4 (Ubuntu) => gvfs (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1500600
Title:
Impossible to empty trash with 5 files inside
To manage not
** Changed in: gedit (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => Triaged
** Changed in: gedit (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
https://bugs.launchpad.n
Upstream states it's fixed in newest versions
** Changed in: gedit (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gedit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1335613
Title:
Bad
See http://www.whizzy.org/2015/09/big-bug-bonanza-16-04-lts/ for a sprint
to fix issues in Ubuntu (targeting 16.04).
Since there are patches for this and these patches work, it is important to
get the issue fixed during the sprint.
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 10:49 AM, OrDuek <1226...@bugs.launchpad.n
GPS is still a bit "iffy" and now worse
since upgrading to current build number: 23
I can no longer seem to get GPS from Nokia HERE service
Nokia's GPS location service - System Settings > Security & Privacy > Location
access > " Using GPS, anonymised Wi-Fi and mobile network info." is no longer
So we have two things missing, right?
* Enabling the use of other keystores
* The name of the pdfsigverify tool
I think the enabling the use of other keystores is important but maybe not
critical for the first release.
For the pdfsigverify it seems we kind of agreeed on the compromise to
call
(In reply to Andre Guerreiro from comment #66)
> Created attachment 118446 [details] [review]
> NSS conditional build
>
> This patch makes the NSS dependency optional in the CMake and Autotools
> build systems.
Commited too to the signatureHandling branch with some minor changes on
my side to hav
(In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #70)
> So we have two things missing, right?
> * Enabling the use of other keystores
> * The name of the pdfsigverify tool
>
>
> I think the enabling the use of other keystores is important but maybe not
> critical for the first release.
>
> For the
(In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #74)
> (In reply to Adrian Johnson from comment #73)
> > (In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #72)
> > > > Large file support.
> > >
> > > Do you think this should be a blocker for the initial release or something
> > > we can improve later?
> >
(In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #72)
> > Large file support.
>
> Do you think this should be a blocker for the initial release or something
> we can improve later?
I think it should be included.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, w
(In reply to Adam Reichold from comment #77)
> Some minor suggestions:
>
> * The naming of BLOCK_SIZE and block_len in hashSignedDataBlock seems
> misleading to me, maybe CHUNK_SIZE and block_len?
>
> * The method hashSignedDataBlock could probably be replaced by a static
> function taking the st
(In reply to Adrian Johnson from comment #73)
> (In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #72)
> > > Large file support.
> >
> > Do you think this should be a blocker for the initial release or something
> > we can improve later?
>
> I think it should be included.
Do you have any file like tha
(In reply to Adrian Johnson from comment #78)
> I agree that the two calls to doGetChars and updateHash should be merged but
> I don't think a for loop is the best way to process loops where the
> increment is not exactly the same on each iteration. Maybe something like
> this:
>
> void FormFiel
(In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #70)
> For the pdfsigverify it seems we kind of agreeed on the compromise to call
> it pdfsig that only does verification right now but in the future may
> suppport signing?
This is the only thing left that I think needs fixing before the initial
release
(In reply to Adrian Johnson from comment #71)
> (In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #70)
> > So we have two things missing, right?
> > * Enabling the use of other keystores
> > * The name of the pdfsigverify tool
> >
> >
> > I think the enabling the use of other keystores is important b
+ r_values[0] = r2.isInt64() ? r2.getInt64() : r2.getInt();
+ r_values[1] = r3.isInt64() ? r3.getInt64() : r3.getInt();
+ r_values[2] = r4.isInt64() ? r4.getInt64() : r4.getInt();
According the PDF Reference, the ByteRange array contains pairs of
(offset,length).
Why do we ignore the first o
(In reply to Andre Guerreiro from comment #76)
> Created attachment 118745 [details] [review]
> Incremental hashing + large file support
>
> With this patch I've implemented the incremental hashing plus the large file
> support.
>
> This is still untested with files larger than 2GB but is correct
Created attachment 118745
Incremental hashing + large file support
With this patch I've implemented the incremental hashing plus the large
file support.
This is still untested with files larger than 2GB but is correct for all
the regular test cases I gathered before.
--
You received this bug no
(In reply to Andre Guerreiro from comment #67)
> Created attachment 118449 [details] [review]
> Support for adbe.pkcs7.sha1 signatures
>
> This patch, to be applied over the previous one, adds support for
> adbe.pkcs7.sha1 signatures so now we should have a more complete coverage of
> actual signe
(In reply to Andre Guerreiro from comment #67)
> Created attachment 118449 [details] [review]
> Support for adbe.pkcs7.sha1 signatures
>
> This patch, to be applied over the previous one, adds support for
> adbe.pkcs7.sha1 signatures so now we should have a more complete coverage of
> actual signe
(In reply to Andre Guerreiro from comment #66)
> Created attachment 118446 [details] [review]
> NSS conditional build
>
> This patch makes the NSS dependency optional in the CMake and Autotools
> build systems.
Commited too to the signatureHandling branch with some minor changes on
my side to hav
So we have two things missing, right?
* Enabling the use of other keystores
* The name of the pdfsigverify tool
I think the enabling the use of other keystores is important but maybe not
critical for the first release.
For the pdfsigverify it seems we kind of agreeed on the compromise to
call
(In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #70)
> For the pdfsigverify it seems we kind of agreeed on the compromise to call
> it pdfsig that only does verification right now but in the future may
> suppport signing?
This is the only thing left that I think needs fixing before the initial
release
(In reply to Adrian Johnson from comment #71)
> (In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #70)
> > So we have two things missing, right?
> > * Enabling the use of other keystores
> > * The name of the pdfsigverify tool
> >
> >
> > I think the enabling the use of other keystores is important b
(In reply to Adrian Johnson from comment #78)
> I agree that the two calls to doGetChars and updateHash should be merged but
> I don't think a for loop is the best way to process loops where the
> increment is not exactly the same on each iteration. Maybe something like
> this:
>
> void FormFiel
(In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #70)
> So we have two things missing, right?
> * Enabling the use of other keystores
> * The name of the pdfsigverify tool
>
>
> I think the enabling the use of other keystores is important but maybe not
> critical for the first release.
>
> For the
(In reply to Andre Guerreiro from comment #76)
> Created attachment 118745 [details] [review]
> Incremental hashing + large file support
>
> With this patch I've implemented the incremental hashing plus the large file
> support.
>
> This is still untested with files larger than 2GB but is correct
Created attachment 118745
Incremental hashing + large file support
With this patch I've implemented the incremental hashing plus the large
file support.
This is still untested with files larger than 2GB but is correct for all
the regular test cases I gathered before.
--
You received this bug no
+ r_values[0] = r2.isInt64() ? r2.getInt64() : r2.getInt();
+ r_values[1] = r3.isInt64() ? r3.getInt64() : r3.getInt();
+ r_values[2] = r4.isInt64() ? r4.getInt64() : r4.getInt();
According the PDF Reference, the ByteRange array contains pairs of
(offset,length).
Why do we ignore the first o
(In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #72)
> > Large file support.
>
> Do you think this should be a blocker for the initial release or something
> we can improve later?
I think it should be included.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, w
(In reply to Adam Reichold from comment #77)
> Some minor suggestions:
>
> * The naming of BLOCK_SIZE and block_len in hashSignedDataBlock seems
> misleading to me, maybe CHUNK_SIZE and block_len?
>
> * The method hashSignedDataBlock could probably be replaced by a static
> function taking the st
(In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #74)
> (In reply to Adrian Johnson from comment #73)
> > (In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #72)
> > > > Large file support.
> > >
> > > Do you think this should be a blocker for the initial release or something
> > > we can improve later?
> >
(In reply to Adrian Johnson from comment #73)
> (In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #72)
> > > Large file support.
> >
> > Do you think this should be a blocker for the initial release or something
> > we can improve later?
>
> I think it should be included.
Do you have any file like tha
I understand it is a warning-- my point is that the default system
shouldn't have this warning so I don't think Invalid is a proper status
for this bug. Marking back to New. If after reconsidering you choose to
not fix it, feel free to mark it as Won't Fix.
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
S
Bump.
Same thing, still not fixed 5 years later.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-keyring in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/771272
Title:
ssh-add does not handle ECDSA keys until ssh-agent exports are
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: gnome-system-monitor (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-system-monitor in Ubuntu.
https:/
** Description changed:
- I think that it would be really good if the System Monitor displayed
- disk utilization among the things it already displays. This would be
- really useful in a line graph. And I have heard and seen many people
- wanting a feature like this so I think that it would be a r
This was actually a duplicate of bug #1381232.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1502570
Title:
gnome-panel indirectly installs evolution
To manage notifications
I'm having a simmilar problem with yomvi player (silverlight activated
with pipelight). I'm using devel repos. I'm having this problem since
ubuntu 14.04 and in the end I have to disable screensaver and energy
saving.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Deskto
I can only reach the `systemd` debug shell randomly, i.e. the system
freezes either before I can press Ctrl+Alt+F9, right after it so that I
can't run `journalctl -ab > /root/journal.txt` or right after running
the command so that data isn't written to `/root/journal.txt` because
the system can app
The Bug exist since 5 years... no fix? Ubuntu 14.04 the same. When i'am
installing the gnome-codec-install i have this error
Die Parameter für die Anwendung hatten ein ungültiges Format. Bitte berichten
sie den Fehler!
Die Parameter waren:
--transient-for=117440527
gstreamer|1.0|totem|Teletext de
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: gedit (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gedit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/14896
I was wondering about this as well, but I figured that it doesn't seem
to be a bug at all. The reason why it looks for some of you "correct" in
Gimp is, because you don't have color management for your monitor
enabled in the preferences (either set a specific monitor profile there,
or tick the fall
** Tags added: wily
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1284308
Title:
Can't copy files from a bluetooth device: Another operation in
progress
To manage notifications ab
Public bug reported:
error
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: libpam-systemd:amd64 204-5ubuntu20.14
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.19.0-30.34~14.04.1-generic 3.19.8-ckt6
Uname: Linux 3.19.0-30-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.15
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sat Oc
** Tags added: wily
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/676401
Title:
PDF Links not working in evince
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpa
** Summary changed:
- ssh-add does not handle ECDSA keys until ssh-agent exports are manually
launched
+ gnome-keyring doesn't support ecdsa or ed25519 keys
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-keyring in Ubuntu.
htt
** Tags added: wily
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1315705
Title:
[Acer Aspire 5750-9668] touchpad doesn't scroll with one finger on
extreme right in GNOME Fl
[Expired for systemd (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launch
Actually @attente 's patch has issue with layout switching and hotkeys
as well. On vivid sometimes after login all hotkeys don't work and you
can't even switch layout. After relog it usually works again.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which
54 matches
Mail list logo
