[Bug 922551] Re: Baobab reports extension size bigger than it is

2012-01-27 Thread d❤vid seaward
Thanks. Under "Preferences" I can see that in fact /dev/sda1 is reported as 486 GB. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-utils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922551 Title: Baobab reports extension size b

[Bug 922551] Re: Baobab reports extension size bigger than it is

2012-01-27 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: gnome-utils Status: Unknown => Invalid ** Changed in: gnome-utils Importance: Unknown => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-utils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922551 Ti

[Bug 922551] Re: Baobab reports extension size bigger than it is

2012-01-27 Thread Fabio Marzocca
** Changed in: gnome-utils (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-utils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922551 Title: Baobab reports extension size bigger than it is

[Bug 922551] Re: Baobab reports extension size bigger than it is

2012-01-27 Thread Fabio Marzocca
What I see in your screenshot is that you have a Total Filesystem capacity of 2TB. This includes every mount you may have in your system (including remote mounts) and not disabled from Baobab preferences. GParted reports only local disks (and in the screenshot you are showing just /dev/sda). -

[Bug 922551] Re: Baobab reports extension size bigger than it is

2012-01-27 Thread d❤vid seaward
** Attachment added: "screenshot showing gparted versus baobab" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922551/+attachment/2696281/+files/gparted-verus-baobab.png ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #668827 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=668827 ** Also affects: gnome-utils via htt