*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 33883 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/33883
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #33883, so it is being marked as such. Please look at
t
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 33883 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/33883
Thank you for your bug report. This bug has been reported to the
developers of the software. You can track it and make comments at:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=329879
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bu
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/730142
Title:
Directory size in properties doesn't count hidden fil
Hi jahvascriptmaniac
I did say that this was my personal opinion and it is up to the
developers of nautilus how to fix this bug.
However after seeing the solution
'Content : 1234 files (2Gb), including 178 hidden elements (15Mb).'
I feel that that would be the best way to present the size.
The r
Hello,
> I personally would expect the second option to be the default and not
the current behaviour.
Actually, I think the first option (always count hidden files) should be
the default.
If that wasn't the case, one might have some space used by hidden files
and wouldn't have even a hint that s
Hi jahvascriptmaniac
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
I can confirm that when using the package nautilus on Ubuntu 10.10 using
the steps provided by jahvascriptmaniac that I can reproduce the bug.
Therefore I have set this bug to confirmed.
To r
