** Changed in: cups (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
Boot Performance Updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427356
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/udev
--
Boot Performance Updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427356
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/gdm
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/hal
--
Boot Performance Updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427356
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/cryptsetup
--
Boot Performance Updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427356
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/at
--
Boot Performance Updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427356
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ub
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/debhelper
--
Boot Performance Updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427356
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://l
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/dbus
--
Boot Performance Updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427356
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/upstart
--
Boot Performance Updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427356
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lis
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/initramfs-tools
--
Boot Performance Updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427356
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
htt
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/util-linux
--
Boot Performance Updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427356
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/usplash
--
Boot Performance Updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427356
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lis
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/network-manager
--
Boot Performance Updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427356
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
htt
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/acpid
--
Boot Performance Updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427356
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/netbase
--
Boot Performance Updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427356
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lis
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/module-init-tools
--
Boot Performance Updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427356
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
h
@Comment #61 by Steve Langasek:
How about file-system checks? no usplash while fsck analyzes the file-
systems?
I would've thought usplash is still needed in such case. i.e. only
started from initramfs when a file-system check is about to begin.
--
Boot Performance Updates
https://bugs.launchpa
I use cryptsetup only for removable media which isn't connected at
startup, and for filesystems mounted manually as loopback devices. Thus,
can't we avoid using usplash if /etc/crypttab is empty/non-
existant/contains only comments? That'll help a lot.
--
Boot Performance Updates
https://bugs.lau
usplash is currently *only* used if you have the cryptsetup package
installed, which needs it for prompting for passphrases in the
initramfs. If you aren't using encrypted disks, you should remove the
cryptsetup package from your system. If you don't have cryptsetup
installed but you are seeing u
I've got a high-end system and for me usplash also takes up the most
time it seems. Two splashes is a bad thing.
--
Boot Performance Updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427356
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubu
On a side note:
Having both usplash and xsplash, usplash kicks in for most of the boot time
than xsplash does on my test-bed slow (minimal install) system - P3 500mhz,
192mb PC100 RAM.. That is, usplash for about 16 seconds, no *splash for about a
7-8 second gap, then xsplash for 4-5 seconds :(
Well, everyone keeps saying usplash was disabled, I figured I must be
missing something obvious. But it didn't seem as though, because I was
mislead...
On September 2nd, 2008, Scott Remnant wrote, on:
http://www.netsplit.com/2009/09/02/making-a-splash/
>You could also argue that we could load the
See bug #433897 for console-setup issues and bug #433884 for pulseaudio
issues.
--
Boot Performance Updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427356
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu.
--
desktop-bugs mailing li
Also affects console-setup and pulseaudio, both of which are partially
broken since this migration has started.
--
Boot Performance Updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427356
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubun
And bug #433494 about Karmic system fails to boot got to be related as
well!
--
Boot Performance Updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427356
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
Yes, that bug looks like it's probably a regression introduced by this
change.
--
Boot Performance Updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427356
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu.
--
desktop-bugs mailing lis
Sorry I was talking about bug # 432155
--
Boot Performance Updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427356
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://
I don't know what other bug you meant to refer to, but the bug number
you've given is the one for /this/ bug report...
--
Boot Performance Updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427356
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm
Is bug #427356 about a hard freeze after 2 lines of boot in Karmic on
PowerPC related?
--
Boot Performance Updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427356
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu.
--
desktop-bugs mai
This change affected ufw, as seen in bug #431804. Fix is forthcoming.
--
Boot Performance Updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427356
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop
On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 01:46 +, Kamilion wrote:
> > Better methods are planned in future Upstart releases which will find
> > their way into future Ubuntu releases.
>
> Where's the discussion for this type of stuff currently centered?
>
On the upstream Upstart development list.
Scott
--
Sco
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 06:59 +, Kamilion wrote:
>
>> The new networking scripts failed to find my br0 defined in
>> /etc/network/interfaces.
>> (Fortunately this motherboard has IPMI2 KVM-over-dedicated-IP, otherwise I
>> would hav
On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 06:59 +, Kamilion wrote:
> The new networking scripts failed to find my br0 defined in
> /etc/network/interfaces.
> (Fortunately this motherboard has IPMI2 KVM-over-dedicated-IP, otherwise I
> would have been up a creek)
>
You should file a separate bug for this.
> co
On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 00:55 +, Ryan wrote:
> 1. With all the functional package dependency issues, were they not all
> set in the debs? eg - How is it that some packages being available and
> some not allowed it to mangle so many systems in the field? Shouldn't it
> have held off trying to in
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 06:59:43AM -, Kamilion wrote:
> The new networking scripts failed to find my br0 defined in
> /etc/network/interfaces.
Please open a separate bug report for this against the ifupdown package, and
provide the contents of your /etc/network/interfaces.
> couldn't find ou
Just some notes...
The new networking scripts failed to find my br0 defined in
/etc/network/interfaces.
(Fortunately this motherboard has IPMI2 KVM-over-dedicated-IP, otherwise I
would have been up a creek)
couldn't find out how to disable upstart services, so I ended up moving
/etc/init/gdm.
Dust have settled, but new mountall still causes regression for
LVM+dm_crypt configuration - seems that cryptsetup was not taken into
account with this updates. See bug 430496
--
Boot Performance Updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427356
You received this bug notification because you are a m
On 09/15/2009 07:55 PM, Ryan wrote:
[snip]>
> 2. With such a large change (touching so many areas) with such risk
> ('average' testers unable to boot/recover without a lot launchpad visits
> after rescue usb/cd)... Was this tested as set via a PPA etc first and
> somehow everyone running via the P
Well, I'm now able to boot again - but this was a pain. I have a couple
questions...
1. With all the functional package dependency issues, were they not all
set in the debs? eg - How is it that some packages being available and
some not allowed it to mangle so many systems in the field? Shouldn'
The only issue I'm currently having with this series is requesting an
upgrade to 'initscripts' is asking for hostname, rsyslog, and ubuntu-
minimal to be removed at the moment. This scared me enough to cancel
synaptic/update-manager and look at the list of packages a bit closer.
Found the link here
The packages in question must all be upgraded as a group, and owing to
these very uploads, the packages are not yet all built (having broken
the buildd chroots for a time). When the dust settles we should look at
making the upgrade path more robust, but until then it's too early to
declare it brok
This series of uploads seriously broke things on this system! I'm
sorry, but I'm gonna have to ask for the above changes to be reverted
immediately and for the Free Exception to be withdrawn. I'll also ask
for these changes to be postponed to karmic+1.
--
Boot Performance Updates
https://bugs.la
This bug was fixed in the package cryptsetup -
2:1.0.6+20090405.svn49-1ubuntu2
---
cryptsetup (2:1.0.6+20090405.svn49-1ubuntu2) karmic; urgency=low
* debian/initramfs/cryptroot-conf: declare that we want usplash included
in the initramfs whenever this package is installed. LP:
This bug was fixed in the package util-linux - 2.16-1ubuntu2
---
util-linux (2.16-1ubuntu2) karmic; urgency=low
FFE LP: #427356.
* Replace hwclock udev rule with an Upstart job. This has never needed
to be a udev rule after all since it doesn't access the hardware!
* Repla
This bug was fixed in the package usplash - 0.5.37
---
usplash (0.5.37) karmic; urgency=low
FFE LP: #427356.
* Make usplash optional in the initramfs, you need to set USPLASH=y
otherwise it will not be included:
- initramfs/scripts/init-top/usplash: script optional
-
This bug was fixed in the package network-manager -
0.8~a~git.20090911t130220.4c77fa0-0ubuntu3
---
network-manager (0.8~a~git.20090911t130220.4c77fa0-0ubuntu3) karmic; urgency=low
FFE LP: #427356.
* Replace init script with Upstart job.
* debian/control:
- Bump build-depend
** Branch linked: lp:~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu/karmic/apport/ubuntu
** Branch linked: lp:~ubuntu-core-dev/hal/ubuntu
** Branch linked: lp:~ubuntu-desktop/gdm/ubuntu
--
Boot Performance Updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427356
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
This bug was fixed in the package udev - 147~-1
---
udev (147~-1) karmic; urgency=low
FFE LP: #427356.
* Update to GIT HEAD (pre 147 release):
- worker signal mask corrected. LP: #407428.
- database format change to avoid path length issues. LP: #377121.
- multiple
This bug was fixed in the package sysvinit - 2.87dsf-4ubuntu3
---
sysvinit (2.87dsf-4ubuntu3) karmic; urgency=low
FFE LP: #427356.
* Various initscripts have been replaced by Upstart jobs shipped in
other packages, the following have been removed:
- hostname.sh
- moun
This bug was fixed in the package sreadahead - 1.0-3
---
sreadahead (1.0-3) karmic; urgency=low
FFE LP: #427356.
* debian/rules, debian/sreadahead.install:
- Install Upstart job using dh_installinit
* debian/control:
- Bump build-dependency on debhelper for Upstart-awar
This bug was fixed in the package rsyslog - 4.2.0-2ubuntu3
---
rsyslog (4.2.0-2ubuntu3) karmic; urgency=low
FFE LP: #427356.
* Replace init script with multiple Upstart jobs.
* debian/control:
- Bump build-dependency on debhelper for Upstart-aware dh_installinit
-- Scott
This bug was fixed in the package procps - 1:3.2.8-1ubuntu3
---
procps (1:3.2.8-1ubuntu3) karmic; urgency=low
FFE LP: #427356.
* Replace init script with Upstart job.
- Do not start after upgrade.
* debian/control:
- Add missing ${misc:Depends}
- Bump build-dependen
This bug was fixed in the package netbase - 4.35ubuntu2
---
netbase (4.35ubuntu2) karmic; urgency=low
FFE LP: #427356.
* debian/netbase.init:
- Replace the "start" command with a call to upstart-job
* debian/control:
- Depend on upstart-job
* debian/netbase.postinst:
This bug was fixed in the package module-init-tools - 3.10-3
---
module-init-tools (3.10-3) karmic; urgency=low
FFE LP: #427356.
* Replace init script with Upstart job.
- This drops support for the long deprecated (and never documented)
/etc/modules-2.6 and /etc/modules
This bug was fixed in the package initramfs-tools - 0.92bubuntu46
---
initramfs-tools (0.92bubuntu46) karmic; urgency=low
FFE LP: #427356.
* mkinitramfs: Allow scripts to specify OPTION=VAR, and unless VAR is
set to something other than "n", the script will not be included.
This bug was fixed in the package ifupdown - 0.6.8ubuntu20
---
ifupdown (0.6.8ubuntu20) karmic; urgency=low
FFE LP: #427356.
* Replace the udev rule with a per-interface Upstart job.
* Add a "networking" job that partially replaces the networking init
script from netbase.
This bug was fixed in the package hostname - 2.95ubuntu1
---
hostname (2.95ubuntu1) karmic; urgency=low
FFE LP: #427356.
* Add -b option that allows the file specified by -F to be non-existant
or empty, in which case the default hostname of "localhost" will be set
if none
This bug was fixed in the package hal - 0.5.13-1ubuntu3
---
hal (0.5.13-1ubuntu3) karmic; urgency=low
FFE LP: #427356.
* Replace init script with Upstart job.
* debian/control:
- Bump build-dependency on debhelper for Upstart-aware dh_installinit
-- Scott James Remnant
This bug was fixed in the package gdm - 2.27.90-0ubuntu5
---
gdm (2.27.90-0ubuntu5) karmic; urgency=low
FFE LP: #427356.
* Replace init script with Upstart job.
* debian/control:
- Bump build-dependency on debhelper for Upstart-aware dh_installinit
* debian/patches/20_ups
This bug was fixed in the package debhelper - 7.3.15ubuntu2
---
debhelper (7.3.15ubuntu2) karmic; urgency=low
FFE LP: #427356.
* dh_installinit: handle upstart job files in preference over init
scripts, supplying appropriate maintainer scripts to stop, start or
restart th
This bug was fixed in the package dbus - 1.2.16-0ubuntu3
---
dbus (1.2.16-0ubuntu3) karmic; urgency=low
FFE LP: #427356.
* Replace init script with Upstart job.
* debian/control:
- Bump build-dependency on debhelper for Upstart-aware dh_installinit
-- Scott James Remnant
This bug was fixed in the package cron - 3.0pl1-106ubuntu3
---
cron (3.0pl1-106ubuntu3) karmic; urgency=low
FFE LP: #427356.
* Replace init script with Upstart job.
* debian/control:
- Add missing ${misc:Depends}
- Bump build-dependency on debhelper for Upstart-aware dh
This bug was fixed in the package avahi - 0.6.25-1ubuntu3
---
avahi (0.6.25-1ubuntu3) karmic; urgency=low
FFE LP: #427356.
* Replace init scripts with Upstart jobs.
* debian/control:
- Bump build-dependency on debhelper for Upstart-aware dh_installinit
-- Scott James Remn
This bug was fixed in the package at - 3.1.11-1ubuntu4
---
at (3.1.11-1ubuntu4) karmic; urgency=low
FFE LP: #427356.
* Replace init script with Upstart job.
* debian/control:
- Add missing ${misc:Depends}
- Bump build-dependency on debhelper for Upstart-aware dh_install
This bug was fixed in the package apport - 1.9-0ubuntu4
---
apport (1.9-0ubuntu4) karmic; urgency=low
FFE LP: #427356.
* Replace init script with Upstart job.
* debian/control:
- Bump build-dependency on debhelper for Upstart-aware dh_installinit
-- Scott James Remnant
This bug was fixed in the package anacron - 2.3-13.1ubuntu9
---
anacron (2.3-13.1ubuntu9) karmic; urgency=low
FFE LP: #427356.
* Replace init script with Upstart job.
- Do not start the job on installation, since anacron is run from
cron or on boot to catch up.
* debi
This bug was fixed in the package acpid - 1.0.6-9ubuntu6
---
acpid (1.0.6-9ubuntu6) karmic; urgency=low
FFE LP: #427356.
* Replace init script with Upstart job.
- This does not load modules, unlike the init script, since these are
all loaded by ACPI:* modaliases now (an
This bug was fixed in the package upstart - 0.6.3-2
---
upstart (0.6.3-2) karmic; urgency=low
FFE LP: #427356.
* debian/upstart-job:
- Remove trailing "s" from file
- Support direct invocation better.
* udev/upstart-udev-bridge.c:
- New tool to capture events from t
** Also affects: util-linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Boot Performance Updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427356
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu.
--
desktop-bugs mailing l
** Changed in: acpid (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: avahi (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: dbus (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: hal (Ubuntu)
Status: New
** Also affects: cryptsetup (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Boot Performance Updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427356
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu.
--
desktop-bugs mailing l
** Also affects: ifupdown (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: netbase (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Boot Performance Updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427356
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
De
** Changed in: usplash (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
Boot Performance Updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427356
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
deskto
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 07:51:11PM -, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> I don't think it's a bad thing. If you have cryptsetup installed, one
> file system or another is bound to be encrypted so you're getting
> usplash anyway.
Crypted filesystems can be decrypted using an on-disk key instead of a
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 17:57 +, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > - There are a number of packages not on this list which have init scripts
> > > whose lsb headers reference packages that are being converted, e.g.:
> > > /etc/init.d/libvirt-bin:# Should-Start: hal avahi
> > > /etc/init.d/sa
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 17:49 +, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Oh, fair point - so we can start usplash from the root filesystem if
> needed for fsck prompting? Does this work already today, and if not, is
> this converging on schedule for release?
>
It's on schedule for release.
> In some cases, c
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 03:02:23PM -, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> I'm ready to upload them today, so they'll be before alpha 6. The tasks
> are a single set though, so they have to go in together or not at all.
Ok, please go ahead.
> > - There are a number of packages not on this list which
Oh, fair point - so we can start usplash from the root filesystem if
needed for fsck prompting? Does this work already today, and if not, is
this converging on schedule for release?
In some cases, cryptsetup will be installed on systems that aren't using
crypted root; so having cryptsetup ship a
On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 17:56 +, Steve Langasek wrote:
> What does it mean for usplash to be optional in the initramfs? How is
> initramfs-tools supposed to know at initramfs generation time whether
> usplash is needed - aren't we still supposed to be using usplash for
> opportunistic prompts i
On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 19:10 +, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Before approving the bulk of these, I have a few questions:
>
> - If approved, how soon can these be uploaded? (I think we want the
> bulk of this to land before alpha-6; if you're ready to go on these,
> feel free to grab me on IRC so t
Robbie, in that case why are changes to initramfs-tools required to
implement this? The initramfs hook itself should figure out whether to
run - initramfs-tools can't know, when building the initramfs, whether a
filesystem check will be required since that's decided at boot.
The encrypted fs use
Before approving the bulk of these, I have a few questions:
- If approved, how soon can these be uploaded? (I think we want the bulk of
this to land before alpha-6; if you're ready to go on these, feel free to grab
me on IRC so that we can get this on its way.)
- Do we have a rollback plan in t
@Steve By "optional" we mean that it does not show by default, only for
specific cases where xsplash cannot be started, i.e. file system check
required, encrypted filesystem requiring passwords, etc.
--
Boot Performance Updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427356
You received this bug notific
actually, doesn't sound like the initramfs-tools change itself should be
a problem, so confirming that one.
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
** Changed in: usplash (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
** Changed in: upstart (Ubuntu)
Statu
What does it mean for usplash to be optional in the initramfs? How is
initramfs-tools supposed to know at initramfs generation time whether
usplash is needed - aren't we still supposed to be using usplash for
opportunistic prompts in the initramfs (such as for fsck)?
** Changed in: initramfs-tool
** Changed in: debhelper (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: debhelper (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
Boot Performance Updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427356
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is sub
** Also affects: acpid (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: apport (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: cups (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Boot Performance Updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427356
86 matches
Mail list logo
