[Bug 426267] Re: nautilus cannot mount location but samba_client can

2010-12-03 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for gvfs (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.] ** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/b

[Bug 426267] Re: nautilus cannot mount location but samba_client can

2010-04-25 Thread Thomas Wailersbacher
Yes, the problem persists in Karmic. I checked with three machines: Karmic 64bit over ethernet works fine Karmic 64bit wireless connection not installed Karmic 32bit over ethernet works fine Karmic 32bit wireless connection does not work in nautilus, but works in terminal with smbclient If t

[Bug 426267] Re: nautilus cannot mount location but samba_client can

2010-04-22 Thread Sebastien Bacher
could you try if that's still an issue in karmic or lucid? ** Package changed: nautilus (Ubuntu) => gvfs (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu) Assignee: Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs) => (unassigned) -- nautilus cannot mount location but samba_client can https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs

[Bug 426267] Re: nautilus cannot mount location but samba_client can

2010-02-05 Thread Bane
** Summary changed: - nautilis cannot mount location but samba_client can + nautilus cannot mount location but samba_client can -- nautilus cannot mount location but samba_client can https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426267 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desk