I've created a bug-report about to request the same behavior for
tracker-search-tool, since tracker is now being shipped by default on
Gutsy.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-panel/+bug/131964
// Off-Topic -- Reply to Sebastien //
Sebastien.. i think i actually saw a search tool
** Bug 56579 has been marked a duplicate of this bug
--
beagle should replace search tool if installed
https://launchpad.net/bugs/38986
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Maybe my previous was still not clear, but why couldn't the beagle search have
a basic mode like gnome-search-tools too? I doesn't need to index everything
the way it does at the moment, it could have an extra feature using locate and
find (what gnome-system-tools does)...
--
beagle should repl
** Attachment added: "Re: beagle should replace search tool if installed"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/2120443/find-criteria.png
--
beagle should replace search tool if installed
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/38986
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.
Maybe I was not clear. Is there a reason for beagle to not make a simple disk
indexation too (updatedb like) for that usecase? It would allow to have the
beagle magic and no feature regression neither
--
beagle should replace search tool if installed
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/38986
--
d
$ sudo du -h /var/lib/slocate/slocate.db
4,4M/var/lib/slocate/slocate.db
$ du -sh ~/.beagle
290M/home/towolf/.beagle***
***only my $home is indexed, with many excluded dirs, i.e. only data created by
me is in the index, not assorted source files e.g.
Recently, I watched beagle a little,
what do you think than updatedb does if that's not index your disk? Why
couldn't beagle do that too?
--
beagle should replace search tool if installed
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/38986
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desk
Sebastien,
I understand why the change seems to make sense: Beagle seems to be an upgrade
to a simple file finder - or an improved version.
I argued that it is not. How, for instance, do you find all files on your
system that are named xmodmap? Do I have to index my whole hard disk? How do I
f
towolf:
- beagle is not installed by default
- if you don't want to use it don't install it
- you can always run gnome-search-tool, it's installed
- if you think the beagle search is not good enough you can open bugs on beagle
- suse and fedora does the same change
To summarize I'm not going to re
I think it was a bad idea to remap “Search” on the Places menu with
beagle-search.
Simply, how do we access the file finding tool now??
It's not about superiority -I like beagle- but they have entirely different use
cases. Only insane people let beagle index / recursively considering that
memo
I think it was a bad idea to remap “Search” on the Places menu with
beagle-search.
Simply, how do we access the file finding tool now??
It's not about superiority -I like beagle- but they have entirely different use
cases. Only insane people let beagle index / recursively considering that
memo
This upload fixes the issue:
gnome-panel (2.14.1-0ubuntu1) dapper; urgency=low
.
* New upstream version:
Panel:
- Don't show an empty label for local URI that are not file: URI in
the bookmarks (Ubuntu: #31956, #36775)
- Plug leaks
- Always canonicalize URIs in laun
Thanks for your bug. That was planned, I've a patch (from the fedora package)
on my disk for that
** Changed in: gnome-menus (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: gnome-menus => gnome-panel
Binarypackagename: gnome-menus => None
Severity: Normal => Wishlist
Assignee: (unassigned) => Sebastien Bac
13 matches
Mail list logo
