Bug did not expire due to assignment.
Fix should have found its way into Ubuntu
Closing as very old and refers to GNOME 2
** Changed in: file-roller (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is
Is this still a problem in recent releases of Ubuntu? You know, upstream
already marked this as FIXED.
** Changed in: file-roller (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
https://
** Changed in: file-roller
Status: Incomplete => Fix Released
--
bad file names (truncated) in iso images
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257531
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desk
** Changed in: file-roller
Status: New => Incomplete
** Changed in: file-roller
Importance: Unknown => Medium
--
bad file names (truncated) in iso images
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257531
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is
** Changed in: fileroller
Status: Unknown => New
--
bad file names (truncated) in iso images
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257531
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@list
Thanks for sent it upstream, linking the report.
** Changed in: file-roller (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Triaged
** Also affects: fileroller via
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=550946
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
bad file names (truncated) in iso image
I have posted at bugzilla.gnome.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=550946
could somebody else try the example and confirm...
--
bad file names (truncated) in iso images
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257531
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop B
because otherwise people never send it. do you have the upstream bug
number?
** Changed in: file-roller (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
bad file names (truncated) in iso images
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257531
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Why incomplete?
the bug exist, is described, and some solutions are proposed.
The confirmed status is more relevant.
I will send to http://bugzilla.gnome.org/browse.cgi?product=file-roller
** Changed in: file-roller (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
bad file names (truncated)
leaving this as incomplete until someone forward it to upstream.
otherwise will close the report.
** Changed in: file-roller (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
bad file names (truncated) in iso images
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257531
You received this bug notification because yo
not sure what would be best, changing to new, maybe somebody who has a
clue about that could bring the discussion to bugzilla.gnome.org so the
upstream hacker can comment on the change
** Changed in: file-roller (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs)
Stat
Because the priority of -R or -J is not specified for isoinfo, it's not
possible to blame it.
Unfortunately, it's -J who wins
It's possible to turn arround that, just with a modification to the
isoinfo.sh file
but if you consider (reasonably) that -R must have priority over -J
the isoinfo.c
not sure if that's really a file-roller issue or an isoinfo one rather
--
bad file names (truncated) in iso images
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257531
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in ubuntu.
--
desktop
not sure if that's really a file-roller issue or an isoinfo one rather
--
bad file names (truncated) in iso images
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257531
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in ubuntu.
--
desktop
I have modified /usr/lib/file-roller/file-roller/isoinfo.sh
in that way:
iso_extensions=""
if test $ROCK_RIDGE = true; then
iso_extensions="-R"
elif test $JOLIET = true; then
iso_extensions="-J"
fi
in order to give priority to -R option,
for my iso, it's working,
now, there is "only" many, ma
thank you for your bug report, does "isoinfo -l -i
ubuntu-8.04.1-server-i386.iso" lists this one correctly?
** Changed in: file-roller (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
Status: New => Incomplete
--
bad file names (truncated) in iso images
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257531
You
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16738396/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16738397/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16738398/ProcStatus.txt
--
bad fi
17 matches
Mail list logo
