[Bug 111280] Re: Epiphany should depend on libxul instead of Firefox

2007-05-01 Thread Sebastien Bacher
That's not that we don't agree that using xulrunner would be nice, technically it's not easy to do though. Firefox is well known by linux and windows users and most users want to use it so it's going to be used. Building it with xulrunner would be lot of extra work and divert from upstream which me

[Bug 111280] Re: Epiphany should depend on libxul instead of Firefox

2007-04-30 Thread pulp
Yes, I know, what you want to tell me, but wouldn't the maintenance efforts of you developers just be exchanged from firefox to xul? I don't know if the bugs are happening in FF or Gecko, so for now I just have to believe you, that changing the dependency for Epiphany would be unreasonable but as t

[Bug 111280] Re: Epiphany should depend on libxul instead of Firefox

2007-04-30 Thread Sebastien Bacher
The default browser is firefox at the moment so it has to be on the CD. To build GNOME with xulrunner we would have to add it to the CD which means having to remove something else. I think users like better to have extra applications available rather than firefox and xulrunner. You would have t

[Bug 111280] Re: Epiphany should depend on libxul instead of Firefox

2007-04-30 Thread pulp
I'm sure they could, but thats not an fair argument, as the reason for filing this bug was to get rid of th firefox dependency. But be that as it may, let's assume, that this http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=93219 is a representative sample and let's assume mr. Shuttleworth was right, wh

[Bug 111280] Re: Epiphany should depend on libxul instead of Firefox

2007-04-30 Thread Sebastien Bacher
those programs could use firefox also, no? -- Epiphany should depend on libxul instead of Firefox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111280 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.u

[Bug 111280] Re: Epiphany should depend on libxul instead of Firefox

2007-04-30 Thread pulp
Well, considering some emerging programs like for example Joost, Democracy & Songbird, xulrunner will be an integral part of the forthcoming multimedia portion of the desktop, so it would streamline the base of a consistent desktop system, when Epiphany and FF were being built against xulrunner (al

[Bug 111280] Re: Epiphany should depend on libxul instead of Firefox

2007-04-30 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Epiphany is an official GNOME module and supported officially so it's available to main. Why do you think that a xulrunner build would be better? -- Epiphany should depend on libxul instead of Firefox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111280 You received this bug notification because you are a memb

[Bug 111280] Re: Epiphany should depend on libxul instead of Firefox

2007-04-30 Thread pulp
Then why not just move Epiphany to universe? -- Epiphany should depend on libxul instead of Firefox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111280 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists

[Bug 111280] Re: Epiphany should depend on libxul instead of Firefox

2007-04-30 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Thank you for your bug. The default browser on Ubuntu is firefox which is actively maintained, xulrunner is to universe. To build epiphany with xulrunner we would have to promote it to main which would mean lot of extra work. Since building with firefox or xulrunner makes almost no difference for t