Appeared again today in 14.04 2014-04-06
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201393
Title:
gvfsd-trash crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slice_alloc()
To manage notifications about this bug go
May one ask when this will be done, and by whom? Has this been brought
to the attention of the dropbox developers? Or does the user have to do
this him/herself?
Meanwhile, if it helps anyone sort this out, here is the output in the
terminal after starting nautilus and then trying to open the dropb
Public bug reported:
Trying to open a folder in the Dropbox folder crashes nautilus.
ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10
Package: nautilus 1:3.8.2-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.10.0-2.11-generic 3.10.0
Uname: Linux 3.10.0-2-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.10.2-0ubuntu4
Archit
I reported a related crash in bug#1069163. Checking today I find the
same behavior reported there; no mention of tupledealloc in the
stacktrace.
What is new is a stacktrace reported when I start emesene from a
terminal, which I didn't see before it crashed originally. Now it says:
~$ emesene
Exce
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1024133
Title:
Startup Applications entry removed from menu
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpa
Public bug reported:
The latest update to gnome-session removed the Startup Applications menu
item, apparently as a policy decision.
This leaves a QQ ubuntu session without an entry point to the gnome-
session-properties GUI that allows adding or editing autostart entries,
unless one "just knows"
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/937096
Title:
nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast()
To manage notification
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/931041
Title:
gnome-terminal crashed with signal 5 in g_object_newv()
To manage notification
Confirming this occurs reliably on 64-bit systems too. It is NOT 32-bit
specific.
In addition, if you dismiss the warning message the priority of "pulse-
audio' CAN BE CHANGED by a user with normal privileges, to NOrmal. After
that, the priority cannot be changed back to "Very High" by such a user
Anyone noticed that this seems to have gone away? No updates, no notices
on this bug report, but suddenly it doesn't happen any more
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-games in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
Trying to start aisleriot solitaire in LXTERM gives the following
response:
sc@OOlubu:~$ sol
**
ERROR:window.c:2429:aisleriot_window_init: code should not be reached
Aborted (core dumped)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-games in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/822061
Title:
sol crashed with SIGABRT in raise()
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-games in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816166
Title:
sol crashed with SIGSEGV in gtk_icon_set_render_icon_pixbuf()
To manage notificat
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/814724
Title:
gnome-settings-daemon assert failure: gnome-settings-daemon:
../../src
This is happening again with Oneiric fully-updated from alpha2. It
happens at start-up, but does not prevent system from opening desktop
with Unity-2d.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
ht
Well, I hope that this is now correctly identified as a gvfs problem; it
has been most disheartening to see it pushed aside repeatedly and always
rated as low importance (see the original bug report, #490201 - not a
samba bug, must be nautilus, send it upstream, gnome accepts it as one
of three hun
Thanks garvinrick4; that doesn't help me. I still get the failure
message in trying to open Network in Nautilus;
'Nautilus cannot handle "network" locations'
--
[lucid] Nautilus asks password when accessing workgroup
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/490201
You received this bug notification beca
I am now getting an error when trying to open Nautilus using Places |
Network. The error box claims that Nautilus cannot handle "network"
locations. I have reinstalled Nautilus, nautilus-share and nautilus-
send-to, without success.
Samba, on the other hand, is working as a server, and other machi
OK - running "sudo smbpasswd -n [USER]" does not change the behavior.
The transition from WORKGROUP to the list of connected machines still
requires a password, which is unknown to me.
Yes, I logged out and in again
--
[lucid] Nautilus asks password when accessing workgroup
https://bugs.laun
Hmm - I haven't tried that yet - I'll look at it when I get home
tonight.
Which command does that? I haven't really penetrated beyond the GUI
yet
--
[lucid] Nautilus asks password when accessing workgroup
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/490201
You received this bug notification because you a
Yes, the same error results from "gvfs-mount smb://sc-laptop/Public" -
Repeated requests for a password, and no share is mounted, even after
entering the user's password.
Also, there is the problem that system-config-samba is not accepting
changes in the password, or empty password to remove pas
Sorry to keep asking, but is the "built-in screensaver" in X the same
as/using "xscreensaver?
Because I can prevent the behavior by removing xscreensaver, but not the
-gl and -data packages, which are required for gnome-screensaver.
If there is another layer as well I would like to know so that I
OK, that makes sense, in a way. With gnome-screensaver running (invoked
from the terminal), I got no screensaver after idle for over an hour.
The sudden change still puzzles me; I certainly didn't trigger it by
disabling gnome-screensaver in Startup recently, so maybe the updated
version didn't ge
As far as I know, the only way to stop the screensavers activating
(after a delay) is to uninstall gnome-screensaver.
I don't see gnome-screensaver in the ps aux list, which means it's not
running as a background process, and i am not invoking it knowingly. If
I do invoke it from the terminal it a
Checked settings in gconf2;
apps/gnome-screensaver/idle_activation_enabled is False,
/idle_delay is 10,
/theme is screensavers-ubuntu_theme.
--
screensaver preferences ignores my unchecked box
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/467285
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
Good idea! No sign of gnome-screensaver in the ps aux listing. The
gnome-powermanager might be the culprit - that's there.
Nevertheless, the screensavers appear after 5 minutes, set on Random as
far as I can see, although I have the settings Blank Screen, and
Activate unset. This happens if g
AMD64, Lucid kernel 2.6.32-6, fully updated on 2009-12-02.
--
screensaver preferences ignores my unchecked box
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/467285
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in ubuntu.
--
deskto
This happened to me (screensaver becoming active despite preferences
setting) after update in Lucid on 2009-12-02.
--
screensaver preferences ignores my unchecked box
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/467285
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which i
Thanks for the update, Sebastian. And thanks to the GNOME devs for
fixing this..
@sim909 - Sorry I didn't reveal how I fixed the compiling problem - it
seemed so obvious after a moment, that I had to start in the appropriate
folder. Glad you found the way too.
Anyway, the 2.23 version for
OK - sorted. All compiled and installed (just libglib2.0-0, as you
suggested should work).
It does - symlink positions are correct after a reboot.
--
desktop icon position of symbolic links are not restored
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411322
You received this bug notification because you ar
Thanks Emanuele,
I tried that - first time I've ever tried building a package "at home",
by the way.
The dpkg-buildpackage failed with the error
tail: cannot open `debian/changelog' for reading: No such file or directory
dpkg-buildpackage: error: tail of debian/changelog gave error exit status 1
Fix committed just means that a change has been made that hasn't yet
made it into the repos - when it is the status should change to Fix
released.
What is unclear, in the absence of ANY comment from any devs in the last
several weeks (since Chris Coulson on 10-04-09) is WHY the committed fix
has n
I notice that this is still marked "Fix Committed", rather than Fix
Released.
I am also noticing people reporting the same bug in released Karmic.
I also believe this is the same bug as 401446, which would be the
original report, but was marked "Fixed" erroneously
Is there any chance that th
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 435149 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/435149
That's fine - but I am refused access to the duplicate bug report. Is it
marked as private? Even so, should I not now be marked as a subscriber
through the duplicate?
--
yelp assert failure: Yelp:ERROR:yelp-
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33462393/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33462394/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33462395/Disassembly.txt
** Attachm
Checking in another karmic install (dist-upgrade from jaunty before
alpha1), I found that it DOES have the .nautilus/metafiles folder, with
.xml files holding metadata. But they haven't been updated since July
17th, when nautilus was upgraded to the new version. Maybe the old file
is still over-wri
Stranger and stranger the aberrant behavior just got fixed. I did
some upgrades this morning, and my symlinks are now re-positioned
correctly.
The most likely candidate would seem to be libgnomeui-0, which went from
2.24.1-1 to 2.24.2-1.
I'll test this with another karmic install - just upgra
Jan - that file is not apparently present in my system.
~/.nautilus is empty. There is no file called Desktop.xml anywhere as
far as I can see
Thanks anyway!
--
desktop icon position of symbolic links are not restored
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411322
You received this bug notificati
Thanks Chris - that makes it clearer. I was worried because some folk
were reporting that the behavior was now correct, and mine was still
not.
--
desktop icon position of symbolic links are not restored
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411322
You received this bug notification because you are a
The same problem has been affecting me; it is NOT fixed using gvfs
1.4.0-0ubuntu1 and libgnomevfs* 1:2.24.1-4ubuntu1.
Is there a newer version that fixes it?
--
Gnome lost icons position on the desktop
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401446
You received this bug notification because you are a me
Thanks - I have the same packages and still have the error, so something
else is going on.
Symlinks are STILL being shifted from their original positions on
restart/reboot/relogin. I noticed that the gnome bug report was
addressed by the gvfs maintainer, so here are my current gvfs and glib
packag
Jan - which packages got upgraded for you? As I pointed out in #4 above,
glib2.0 isn't so much a package as a cluster of packages. I seem to only
have libglib2.0-0 installed; libglib2.0-cil is also installed but not
upgraded. There are another half-dozen packages which I don't have
installed, inclu
The gnome-bugs report has a similar observation - the developer reports
the problem as fixed in 2.22.1, but it isn't (as of 10/02/09).
--
desktop icon position of symbolic links are not restored
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411322
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
libglib2.0-0 has been upgraded to 2.22.1, but no effect on the symlinks.
They are still not being restored to the original positions. Is there
another package that needs to be included, such as libglib2.0-data?
--
desktop icon position of symbolic links are not restored
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
Sorry - don't quite follow. As far as I can see, there is no such
package (glib2.0) - the repos contain libglib2.0, etc, but these are
still stuck at 2.22.0-1ubuntu1, not 2.22.1.
--
desktop icon position of symbolic links are not restored
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411322
You received this
I can confirm that the contents of /etc/gdm/custom.conf are IGNORED and
the contents of /etc/gdm/gdm.conf-custom over-ride the settings in
/etc/gdm/gdm.schemas, contrary to the documentation.
** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
gdm 2.26 custom configuration file: wrong
I have checked that an invalid or empty default-display-manager file is
not changed when I run "sudo dpkg-reconfigure gdm" - confirming the
original bug report.
** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
Installing GDM 2.26 doesn't update /etc/X11/default-display-manager
http
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 393051 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393051
Ah, but the previous version of devicekit-disks (004-1) was removed from
the repository five hours ago - can't go and get it anymore!
--
Mounting USB drive fails after devicekit-disks update
https://bugs.lau
Thanks - I understand the position. In retrospect I could have saved the
relevant log files after the crash and been more helpful, but that
didn't happen. From my position, that could have been avoided if the
delay in asking for the files had been shorter - two months (09-01 to
11-12) is a long tim
Sorry, don't have them any more. I haven't used the applet again, and
don't want to. The applet appeared, I tried it, it failed as described
above. Many changes have happened since, and I have a happily running
Intrepid system.
--
configure display applet crashes X in intrepid
https://bugs.launch
All my reports have concerned Intrepid Ibex. I have never had this
problem with Hardy, even with Proposed enabled.
--
Intrepid Ibex: Cannot access samba share "Unable to mount location"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/241139
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
De
This bug seems to be fixed, probably by the gvfs updates today (Sep 16th
2008).
Shares on a Windows Vista server now open correctly in Nautilus.
Thank you all for the fix - whoever it was that finally fixed it!
--
Intrepid Ibex: Cannot access samba share "Unable to mount location"
https://bugs.
My apologies! After some messing around it DOES work for me.
At first running the script gave me the mount, but not the Nautilus
window. I put in two extra lines to 'echo "$SMB"' and 'echo "$DIR"', and
it worked.
Then I commented out (#) the two extra lines and it still worked
Then I removed
Nice try - doesn't work for me. The script runs and leaves me with a
mounted share icon, but doesn't open Nautilus. Trying to open the share
by double-clicking the desktop share icon leads to the original error
message - already mounted.
--
Intrepid Ibex: Cannot access samba share "Unable to moun
I get this on un-secured shares.
I am puzzled that samba has been updated today (August 18th) without any
apparent change in the situation. It seems that this is not a samba bug,
at any rate.
Is this a gvfs bug? Is it a seahorse bug (as suggested above by fishor)?
Or is it something else? It is c
Trying to use the mixer-applet to reset volume, it crashed with a GPF.
Here is the syslog entry for this crash.
** Attachment added: "syslog.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16659701/syslog.txt
--
mixer_applet2 crashed with SIGSEGV in g_datalist_id_set_data_full()
https://bugs.launchpad.net
I get the error during start-up of the gnome-session. There are several
errors in the .xsession-errors, but nothing that appears to relate to
mixer-applet2 explicitly. The error occurs each time I start a session.
I haven't used the mixer-applet deliberately.
--
mixer_applet2 crashed with SIGSEGV
since the recent updates to gvfs (Intrepid, 64-bit) the Windows shares
are now shown in Nautilus, but attempting to open them in Nautilus
apparently fails, bringing up the password dialog twice; clicking OK the
second time gives the dbus error message as above.
gvfs-ls smb://server/ lists the shar
As the original submitter I can confirm that the memory problems are no
longer apparent in Intrepid - evince 2.23.5, libpoppler 0.8.4 (cairo).
Large page-scanned documents open and page fine, as far as I can see,
without eating memory to any noticeable extent.
Thanks everyone for getting this fixe
Since Intrepid alpha3 (at least) none of the three methods works to
mount a windows share: Nautilus sees the server, but no shares;
smbclient sees no shares; gvfs-ls sees no shares. gvfs-mount says that
"volume doesn't implement mount".
smbtree sees the Windows server, but times out waiting for de
There is a duplicate bug #249733, which I have marked as a dup of this
one. The error seems to be independent of nautilus, as it occurs when
using gvfs-mount and not invoking nautilus at all.
The use of gvfs-mount smb://server/share appears to mount the share - it
appears in the nautilus mount lis
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 241139 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/241139
Thanks, Gianfranco - you're right. It is the same bug. I'll mark as a
duplicate..
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 241139
Intrepid Ibex: Cannot access samba share "Unable to mount location"
More testing with gvfs-ls:
I can browse the server using gvfs-ls smb://server
That shows the expected list of shares, including Public, which the one
I have been trying to connect to, and another one called Amazon. Amazon
has not been "touched" - I haven't tried to connect using nautilus OR
gvfs,
Thanks. There is an error message using gvfs-ls, saying the specified
location is not mounted.
I began with the share icon on the desktop; gvfs-ls gave the error
message.
I right-clicked the icon and chose Unmount to remove it from the
desktop.
gvfs-ls gave the same error message.
I used gvfs-
You're right, of course - double click an icon on the desktop probably
does invoke nautilus.
How do I use gvfs-ls - never used it before, and there is no man
entry?
BTW, don't know about mattismyname, but I'm running 64-bit on an AMD
cpu.
--
can't open windows share icon
https://bugs.launch
Now I have gvfs-mount available: fails the first time, saying that the
Mountpoint is already registered (that's the one on the desktop, set up
through Nautilus).
Unmounting that (Right-click, Unmount) allows me to re-mount it using
gvfs-mount. The desktop icon reappears. BUT trying to open it give
Thanks for getting onto this, Sebastian!
Yes, smbtree sees the share, and smbclient browses it - dir then lists
the contents correctly.
I am told I don't have gvfs-mount installed - will fix that and get back
to you.
--
can't open windows share icon
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249733
You re
Yes, this is an Intrepid bug. There was a conversation on the Intrepid
testing forum, and the bug report came out of that, as I understand.
I am running Intrepid up-to-date on an HP laptop, with a Windows Vista
machine on the same network. Samba connection is fine using Hardy, shows
the symptoms s
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 216104 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216104
As a user, I would challenge the Duplicate status as reported by
Sebastian. I have read the comments on the so-called duplicate (#216104)
and do not see any reason to call this a duplicate. It may well derive
Thanks Michael - quick work!
BUT - the latest update to apt is not installable. It requires removal
of a whole mess of apps, including aptitude and synaptic, plus various
other stuff..
I don't know if you can fix this as fast - but it would sure be nice.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
St
I have at last tracked down the glitch. It seems that yet another
package designed to work with evolution, nautilus-sendto, has evolution
as a recommends, and evolution has spamassassin and gnome-pilot as
recommends, so the update-manager sees the 2-step connection and keeps
flagging spamassassin a
Hoping this change back to New status will ensure someone reads my last
comment I'm still not convinced that there is no problem.
** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => New
--
evolution requires spamassassin
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236360
You received this bug no
Sebastian,
Thanks for the explanation - glad to know that it was an intentional
change between Hardy and Intrepid.
However, I am afraid there is still a problem. Having been using the
package system for over a year now, I do expect it itself to remain
stable and reliable, and I have found out var
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: evolution
Evolution (which I don't use) is installed as part of the Intrepid
package; it now requires spamassassin and gnome-pilot. These were NOT
required in 8.04. Can this change of policy be re-considered, please? I
don't want un-necessary daemons (spa
(furthur to my report that it is no longer apparent in Hardy 64-bit)
but in Hardy 32-bit, upgrading Firefox to Firefox 3 beta 3 still gives
me the incorrect rendering on the msnbc news page. The libcairo2 version
is the new one, updated and re-installed today. The major difference is
that this ins
I checked after re-booting - not sure what you mean by "using a new
account". The Network window opened up correctly, but showed no
networks.
I do have a working network, with a workgroup called WORKGROUP,
connected to another computer, as confirmed by "nmblookup -S workgroup"
No crash, as you sa
as of March 3rd firefox 3.0 beta 3 on Hardy 64-bit no longer shows this
bug.
Don't know if it was a libcairo2 update that fixed it - I have
1.5.8-0ubuntu1, I believe.
I have checked with the msnbc news page and several of the pages others
have reported as showing errors. Still using fglrx and an
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gvfs
after the 03/03/2008 update to nautilus in Hardy 32-bit, trying to open
$HOME and Desktop from Places menu was successful, but trying to open
Network from Places menu crashed gvfsd-network.
ProblemType: Crash
Architecture: i386
Date: Mon Mar 3 14:4
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12372941/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12372942/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12372943/Disassembly.txt
** Attachm
for me it occurs in Hardy 32-bit or Hardy 64-bit with Firefox 3.0 beta
3, but not in Gutsy 32-bit with Firefox 3.0 b3pre. It's interesting that
Paul mentions Compiz - I have Compiz enabled in Gutsy 32-bit, using
fglrx and xgl, but not in hardy. Compiz won't run for me in Hardy either
with open-sour
This bug makes it difficult for me (and others, I'm sure) to use Firefox
3.0 beta 3 in Hardy. But there seems to be no acknowledgment that it
affects Firefox 3 - can that be added to the list of affected packages?
I confirmed a report of the bug as affecting Firefox, but it was marked
a duplicate o
XAANoOffscreenPixmaps? Yes, I did. It seemed to help a little, but the huge
swings in memory usage were still there, the cpu utilization was still going
very high. The major difference was that the memory usage came down more
quickly, so the freezing behavior was not so persistent. There is sti
OK, following Sebastian's question about the video card and driver I checked
with the Mesa driver for my ATI Radeon Express 200M card. The glitch continues
in evince with very large pdf files, even without the proprietary fglrx driver.
Stephen Cr
Thanks for the response. I have an ATI Radeon Express 200M 5955 card, and I'm
using the latest fglrx driver in Gutsy. Restricted Drivers Manager downloaded
and installed it automatically for me after the last kernel upgrade - much less
hassle than in Feisty. I use the restricted driver because
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: evince
I'm running Gutsy, all up to date, and finding evince very slow and
erratic with large (100s of pages, 30-50MB) PDF files.
Machine triple-boots Feisty/Gutsy/WinXP; HP Pavilion with 512 MB RAM,
Athlon 64 3200+ single processor.
In Feisty evince lo
85 matches
Mail list logo
