*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 197762 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197762
sbec67:
Have you tried your device with another OS with different performance results?
>From your lsusb output is does not look like your device is listed? Was
it plugged in when you ran lsusb?
If that doesn
RishiRamraj:
You can see https://help.ubuntu.com/community/DiskPerformance for
general advice on testing performance of a disk and reporting your
issue. Your snip from dmesg tells that you plugged in a USB 2.0 device,
but that is about what can be said from that information, so further
performance
søn, 20 12 2009 kl. 20:34 +, skrev Przemysław Kulczycki:
> So it seems that some subsystem invoked by Gnome (hal? udev? gvfs?)
> is responsible for the slowdown.
> Please tell me if this is relevant to this bug or should I file a new one?
Everyone should open new reports, you should too.
Your
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/334914/comments/30
[2] https://help.ubuntu.com/community/DiskPerformance
--
file transfers on USB disk are very slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197762
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug
ons, 10 06 2009 kl. 22:38 +, skrev jamesnmandy:
> Hiding behind a "proper bug request" gets us nowhere.
And you posting useless information in this bug does?
> It's not working like it is supposed to and that's painfully obvious.
And it should be painfully obvious by now that the issue cann
man, 08 06 2009 kl. 20:14 +, skrev epv:
> This isn't normal behavior. Obviously it behaves fine while all writes
> are going to buffer cache, but once it tries to write it out to the
> device, wait times on the partition shoot up to 30sec or more, and all
> processes trying to touch the usb dis
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 9:54 PM, jamesnmandy
> wrote:
>
> > There's no way all these people are seeing this behaviour because they all
> > have vastly different yet commonly "crappy" hardware. The same exact
> > hardware works great under the "other" OS. It's 100% a *nix issue and it's
> > 100
Night64,
flash devices are slow and the only reason the transfer appears to be
fast at the beginning is that data is written to OS memory and then
later to disk. Use dstat to monitor disk performance as explained on
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/DiskPerformance, And open new bug
reports please
MVDHR,
and why should we care? This bug has been open for a year and 50 people
have commented here, so news would be that the problem actually went
away. You give no information that helps further debug the issue, please
read https://help.ubuntu.com/community/DiskPerformance and diagnose your
prob
So, I believe I am the one Theodore refered to as venting how the
useless Ubuntu bug reports are. While they really are, I also really
want to help.
So, following Theodore's suggestion I've started
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/DiskPerformance on the Ubuntu Wiki. It
is pretty basic right now,
10 matches
Mail list logo