Re: [Bug 2061728] Re: Flatpak Apps don't launch from GNOME Software

Yeah, it's disgusting - guess they're using a different system than the one they offer us. Have to fix it yourself - doesn't hurt. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome- software/+bug/2061728/comments/5 RomanB On Tuesday, December 10th, 2024 at 9:20 AM, rerdavies <2061...@bugs.launc

[Bug 2068007] [NEW] Can't lauch diverse installed apps. "ldconfig failed, exit status 256"

Public bug reported: Installed flatpak. Fresh install of Ubuntu 24.04 Also gthumb ** Affects: gnome-software (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in U

[Bug 1448243] [NEW] package totem 3.14.0-0ubuntu1~utopic1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/dbus-1/services/org.gnome.Totem.service', which is also in package totem-common 3.1

Public bug reported: - ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 15.04 Package: totem 3.14.0-0ubuntu1~utopic1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.19.0-15.15-generic 3.19.3 Uname: Linux 3.19.0-15-generic i686 ApportVersion: 2.17.2-0ubuntu1 Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Apr 24 19:22:46 2015 DuplicateSig

[Bug 1448045] [NEW] package adwaita-icon-theme 3.14.0-2ubuntu3~utopic1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/icons/Adwaita/16x16/actions/edit-delete.png', which is also in package

Public bug reported: - ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 15.04 Package: adwaita-icon-theme 3.14.0-2ubuntu3~utopic1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.16.0-34.47-generic 3.16.7-ckt8 Uname: Linux 3.16.0-34-generic i686 ApportVersion: 2.14.7-0ubuntu8.4 Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Apr 24 10:58:

[Bug 1448058] [NEW] package adwaita-icon-theme 3.14.0-2ubuntu3~utopic1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/icons/Adwaita/16x16/actions/edit-delete.png', which is also in package

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1448045 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1448045 Public bug reported: - ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 15.04 Package: adwaita-icon-theme 3.14.0-2ubuntu3~utopic1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.16.0-34.47-generic 3.16.7-ckt8 Uname: Linux 3.16.0

[Bug 1038577] Re: p11-kit: duplicate configured module: gnome-keyring.module: /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/pkcs11/gnome-keyring-pkcs11.so

Web (formerly known as epiphany) has lost all stored passwords. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-keyring in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1038577 Title: p11-kit: duplicate configured module: gnome-keyr

[Bug 590834] Re: Find (ctrl-f) can be used even though the pdf-file has no searchable text.

Agreed. Optimal solution would be a visual cue - images and text with different, very light colored backgrounds (or frames). But that's it for this issue from my side. A similar bug was already filed upstream; I added my stuff. https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=596888 And a patch coveri

[Bug 590834] Re: Find (ctrl-f) can be used even though the pdf-file has no searchable text.

Maybe the search-routine was invoked - that's an internal technical view. If the search function can only be applied to text (which is the case here) then evince should try to be "smart about it" when no object (text) for the function (find) is available. I installed acrobat reader to see if it do

[Bug 590834] Re: Find (ctrl-f) can be used even though the pdf-file has no searchable text.

Just to clarify: my issue is the user interface. I feel I've been mislead when the app say's it didn't find a word, where in reality no search took place. Okay, the example: I printed this bug report page, scanned it with simple-scan, now it's a PDF. Open with Evince, ctrl-f and search for "pedro

[Bug 590834] [NEW] Find (ctrl-f) can be used even though the pdf-file has no searchable text.

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evince PDF Files can be void of any searchable text. For example PDF's created using simple-scan. Enabling the Find function for this type of PDF is misleading. I can enter a string and Evince answers 0 found - although the string/word is actually in the