Since it's a race condition, it's hard to reproduce. The most reliable way to
do so is with Flatpak 1.14.x, which isn't part of Jammy.
So, if you're fine with having this potential issue for other tools in the OS,
that apparently isn't triggered by anything currently in Jammy, then this
doesn't
Public bug reported:
[ Impact ]
* Currently, any application that is using modern AppStream metadata
containing / tags in their description, and that is still using the
deprecated appstream-glib will fail to parse this data.
* Unfortunately, this affects some high-visibility applications now,
This debdiff contains a minimal fix to resolve the noisy assertions (and
potential crash) when searching for AppStream data.
It should be suitable for upload to Jammy.
@tintou, sorry for hijacking the SRU report a bit, in hindsight I should
probably have filed a new one. This should address the m
If the package installs a metainfo file into `/usr/share/metainfo` it
should be displayed. Otherwise it will not be displayed, and that is a
design decision by GNOME Software as not enough metadata is available.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs
Not sure what you mean, but a GNOME Software with no PackageKit would mean that
users are completely unable to install or remove any application from the
Ubuntu archive, in addition to flavors not being able to use offline upgrades
anymore.
So this sounds like a suggestion with tons of huge draw
In any case, don't take 0.16.0 without this patch:
https://github.com/ximion/appstream/commit/631303a8d16c2f608428a89bb94511bc28ae5417
- otherwise anything that's using GIR bindings will crash. I will be
making an emergency 0.16.1 release soon, and all previous releases are
perfectly fine and well
You can verify whether this is an issue with GNOME Software or your metadata by
opening a terminal and running this command:
appstreamcli what-provides mediatype application/epub+zip
If that yields results, it means that you have the metadata but GNOME
Software doesn't read ir properly for some r
Is this still an issue in Ubuntu 22.04 (Jammy)? (Pretty much none of the
code used in Xenial exists anymore in its previous form)
** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which
Is this still an issue?
** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1710209
Title:
package libappstream3 0.
This issue does not longer exist in appstream since jammy - so the
quickest fix is to simply upgrade to that release.
** Also affects: appstream (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this b
Very odd... There is nothing special about this config file (it's installed
like every other) and this works absolutely fine on Debian and even my Ubuntu
VM.
So, something very odd and possibly uBUNTU-SPECIFIC is going on here...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Did you manually remove the config file before attempting to restore it?
Because AFAIK `--force-confmiss` will only make the file show up again if it
was modified compared to the previously deleted version, but otherwise leave it
deleted in case the user has removed it.
I think you need the whol
You have a cache bigger than 256MB?? This issue is already fixed with
appstream 0.15.0, but I still would like to know why your cache is so
huge. What's you system locale?
** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
Status: New =>
I still think this is a dumb fix, especially since you loose the feature to
actually mark strings from being untranslatable by dropping the appstream
dependency.
A proper workaround would be to leave that in, possibly backport the ITS patch
for appstream to update the file, and then mark the rel
How does the `project_license` tag in Wesnoths AppStream MetaInfo file
look like? Because that's the thing that is looked at to determine
whether the license is free.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ub
This is not a problem in "appstream", it's usually a package manager issue,
e.g. if there was a power outage during upgrades or install/remove steps. In
this case, it just randomly hit the appstream package.
If the APT installation is fixed, this problem should go away. Please file an
issue agai
Not really fixed, AppStream has an incomplete workaround for the
gobject-introspection bug (which may break at any time for new functions
in either Python or Vala, if we aren't super careful).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscrib
The bug is actually this one, in gobject-introspection:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gobject-introspection/-/issues/305
** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gobject-introspection/-/issues #305
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gobject-introspection/-/issues/305
--
You received this bug
This is kind of to be expected, PPAs - unlike the main Ubuntu
repositories - do not support AppStream.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1881894
Title:
Apps from PPAs wit
Nice :-) Now only the gnome-software patch is missing to fix this issue
completely (at least for the package, according to Launchpad)
** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
--
Yo
** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864307
Title:
Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal
Neat :-) That should do the job for all combinations of snap-store and
gnome-software, once the GS patch is in there as well.
Thanks Ken for doing the integration work :-)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report
On a fresh Ubuntu installation, apt-config-icons isn't installed by
default (at least it wasn't when I installed a fresh Ubuntu yesterday,
until I replaced the snap-store with the packaged gnome-software). So
new users who aren't upgrading from a previous Ubuntu version will still
have much less ic
@nicocarbone: You'll also want to do something that `apt-config-icons`
is installed alongside `appstream` in Ubuntu desktops that use the
gnome-software Snap.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs
On 1): The metainfo/appdata file is only enough if it is complete, so,
contains an icon reference and name/summary/etc. tags. If it doesn't,
then you'll need the .desktop file as well and a launchable entry.
On 2): All of these locations are wrong ^^ Metainfo files *must* be installed
into /usr/s
>From looking at this again, I'm pretty sure that my patch from #1864307
will actually fix this issue too :-)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1866134
Title:
Y
Actually, I just realized that Ubuntu has its very own, new flavor of this bug
due to shipping gnome-software as a Snap. The `appstream` package is seeded
with the minimal desktop seed, which is good, but in order for the Snap version
of GS to install any icons, the `apt-config-icons` package al
@stuardo:
The reason for Guake being missing is that the `guake.desktop` file in
`/usr/share/applications` is a symbolic link *and* the application doesn't ship
a metainfo file.
This is forbidden: https://wiki.debian.org/AppStream/Guidelines
The .desktop file being a symlink results in Guake basi
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1864307 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864307
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1864307
Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscri
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1864307 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864307
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1873493
icons missing from main and internal pages
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1864307
Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal
--
Yo
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1872258 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872258
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1872258
GS injects invalid metadata, causing "AppStream cache update completed, but
some metadata was ignored"
--
You received this bug notification becau
Ooooh, sorry... I was coming from duplicate #1864307, which the patch above
solves, but I am not sure if this particular issue is solved as well...
So, I don't think #1864307 is a duplicate bug of this, I think those two are
separate issues (https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/-/issues/
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1866134
Yaru icons are not shown in Gnome-Software
** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/-/issues #918
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/-/issues/918
** Also affects: gnome-software via
https://gitlab.gnome.org/G
Or rather, use the even better (attached) patch :-P
** Patch added:
"0001-appstream-Don-t-solely-add-a-stock-icon-for-an-app-a.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1866134/+attachment/5358966/+files/0001-appstream-Don-t-solely-add-a-stock-icon-for-an-app-a.patc
You will want this patch, unless there are further modifications to it
in the next few days: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-
software/-/commit/d743f920867d8f57beac56191c8912147ef23c8f
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed
Public bug reported:
Hi!
GNOME Software currently injects invalid AppStream metadata in Focal, causing a
complaint message like "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was
ignored due to errors." on every APT update.
This can be fixed by applying this patch from upstream and Debian,
pdate-static-data.patch: Update the license and TLD lists to
validate newer licenses correctly.
* Bump standards version: No changes needed
-- Matthias Klumpp Sat, 14 Mar 2020 16:40:14 +0100
** Affects: appstream (Ubuntu)
Importance: Wishlist
Status: New
** Changed in: appstrea
** Patch added: "appstream_0.12.10-1_to_0.12.10-2.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1867471/+attachment/5337013/+files/appstream_0.12.10-1_to_0.12.10-2.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subsc
@lammert-nijhof: Your locale/keyboard layout is likely messed up - type
your password without sudo, to see which password you are actually
typing for your account (and then adjust to the keyboard layout you
currently have for repair)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
There are two things which could be the cause for this:
1) The appstream-generator used for Focal is old, and there were quite a few
fixes to find more icons and ignore apps without sufficient icon data in more
recent releases. @laney will hopefully update the tool ;-)
2) GNOME Software has a
Technically, PPAs with AppStream data or other repositories with broken data
can trigger this as well.
AppStream could make a guess who is to blame for the breakage and give a more
specific error, but that will require some more extensive code changes.
--
You received this bug notification beca
This error message is shown not to alert users, but rather make users report
these issues to the distributor, as this particular issue means the distributor
has a mistake in their metadata somewhere.
In this case it's not Ubuntu's fault directly, but rather GNOME Software
injecting invalid metad
This is resolved in `appstream >= 0.12.7` (since the code doesn't exist
there anymore). The original issue was likely caused by AppStream not
handling broken metadata correctly, which is an area that has also been
improved greatly.
** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix
This is resolved in appstream >= 0.12.10-1
** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1848387
Title:
At this point, I think it's safe to say that implementing full multiarch
support for AppStream simply isn't going to happen, at least not anytime soon.
It's simply easier for app authors to provide native implementations for amd64
instead of relying on i386 compatibility.
If support was implemen
At this point, I think it's safe to say that implementing full multiarch
support for AppStream simply isn't going to happen. It's simply better for app
authors to provide native implementations for amd64 instead of relying on i386
compatibility.
If support was implemented fully, we would downloa
The specific code that resulted in this issue doesn't exist in newer
AppStream releases, so this sort of is "fixed" that way, as this issue
can't be triggered anymore.
** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a mem
At this point, I think it's safe to say that implementing full multiarch
support for AppStream simply isn't going to happen. It's simply better for app
authors to provide native implementations for amd64 instead of relying on i386
compatibility.
If support was implemented fully, we would downloa
IDLE has no icon, and apparently never had one:
http://appstream.ubuntu.com/bionic/universe/issues/idle-python3.6.html
The very best way to fix this permanently in the future would be to ask
Python upstream to add a metainfo file for IDLE as described in
https://www.freedesktop.org/software/appstr
You can expect to find an app in GNOME Software if it is a GUI
application (== has a .desktop file in /usr/share/applications/ that
isn't NoDisplay and of Type=Application). For anything else (that likely
includes phpMyAdmin) GNOME Software isn't the right tool and wasn't
designed for.
Apps will a
It's worth mentioning that while PackageKit will likely not receive much
feature development unless someone steps up to do that, it is in solid
maintenance mode and likely will remain like that for quite some time.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop B
GNOME Software might be the wrong package, the MATE Software Boutique is
a different app. A quick search suggests that it might be part of the
MATE welcome center, but a look into the package couldn't confirm that.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop B
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1792537 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1792537
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1792537
/usr/bin/appstreamcli:5:g_variant_new_parsed_va:g_variant_builder_add_parsed:as_content_rating_to_variant:as_component_to_variant:as_cache_file_save
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1785498 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1785498
While the actual bug is fixed in cosmic already, it might make sense to
backport it to ensure upgrades run smoothly.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1785498
g_atomic_ref_count_dec: asserti
** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1785498
Title:
g_atomic_ref_count_dec: assertion 'g_at
The widelands package/metadata needs fixing for it to appear. See
http://appstream.ubuntu.com/cosmic/universe/issues/widelands.html
** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Also affects: widelands (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You receive
** Package changed: gnome-software (Ubuntu) => mypaint (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1788923
Title:
MyPaint website button goes to wrong website
T
This is not an issue in appstream, but likely the Ubuntu archive.
But it could also be snapcraft doing something weird (that cache path is odd!).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchp
@jbicha: Those changes will *never* affect a released Debian or Ubuntu version,
only in-development stuff.
The earliest point I actually would consider making such a change is after the
Debian Buster release and at least one release before the next Ubuntu LTS.
Also, the amount of packages with i
It would be neat though if font-manager fixed at least the issues listed
at https://appstream.debian.org/sid/main/issues/font-manager.html with
its metadata.
I do actually plan to not have ancient metadata processed anymore at
some point in the future (ancient data is really rare in the archive
no
This is a bug in fwupd/the LVFS data that AFAIK was already fixed there.
** Package changed: appstream (Ubuntu) => fwupd (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1785498 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1785498
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1785498
g_atomic_ref_count_dec: assertion 'g_atomic_int_get (arc) > 0' failed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desk
** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Matthias Klumpp (ximion)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in
This is fixed in Debian now, in package appstream/0.12.2-2.
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #906538
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=906538
** Also affects: appstream (Debian) via
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=906538
Importance: Unknown
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1785498 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1785498
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1785498
g_atomic_ref_count_dec: assertion 'g_atomic_int_get (arc) > 0' failed
** Information type changed from Private to Public
--
You received this bug
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1785498 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1785498
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of private bug 1787774
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1785498
g_atomic_ref_count_dec: assertion 'g_atomic_int_get (arc) > 0' failed
--
You received t
This issue was actually fixed in AppStream ages ago - definitely
resolved in Bionic+.
** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bu
See the linked upstream issue for details - this will be fixed soon.
** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
** Bug watch added: github.com/ximion/appstream/issues #198
https://github.com/ximion/appstream/issues/198
** Also affects: appstream via
https://github.
** Package changed: appstream (Ubuntu) => libreoffice (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1773825
Title:
Libre Impress 'Recently Used' list does not have Impr
** Package changed: appstream (Ubuntu) => firefox (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1773535
Title:
Delicate failure with Ubuntu when using Firebox email
To
** Package changed: appstream (Ubuntu) => apt (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1716900
Title:
apt-get: order of the dependencies ends in a diffrent result
** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Matthias Klumpp (ximion) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1720552
Title:
appstreamcli crashed w
Nice, thank you all! :-)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1762292
Title:
FFE: Sync appstream 0.12.0-3 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
To manage notifications ab
It is built now in
https://launchpad.net/~ximion/+archive/ubuntu/appstream/+packages (it appears
like enabling more architectures either needs approval or doesn't cause package
already in the archive not to be built on these...)
Let me know if there is anything more I can do to help!
--
You re
and SPDX 3.0 support and
that updating this package allows for a more recent appstream-generator package
to be included make it reasonable to update the package.
Changelog entries since current bionic version 0.11.8-3:
appstream (0.12.0-3) unstable; urgency=medium
* load-desktop-data.patch: Loa
@donkult: The downloads for all architectures are not allowed at time,
because doing so would lead to AppStream-ID collisions, and AppStream
itself has no notion of architectures (yet - I played around with that a
bit, but there is no definitive good solution yet).
For downloading Components-all,
** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1745029
Title:
plasma-workspace FTBFS with appstream 0.1
Wrong project, this is not in AppStream, but appstream-glib (thanks for
the patch though! :-) )
** Package changed: appstream (Ubuntu) => appstream-glib (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
htt
Okay, then this is a new issue... Meh.
Verbose output would definitely help:
`killall gnome-software ; gnome-software --verbose`
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
I bet this is because GNOME Software is built with fwupd support, but the fwupd
daemon is not installed.
Can you please check if the fwupd package is installed on your system?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-soft
This doesn't look like it is a bug in appstreamcli... I am not sure what
exactly went wrong there, because the GLib side looks fine as well.
** Information type changed from Private to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscrib
Indeed, I can reproduce this. This issue affects Debian as well, and I wonder
why nobody noticed it so far.
I have an idea on how to fix it.
** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ma
Are you on a real i386 system, or on an amd64 system with i386 as
foreign architecture? The latter case is not supported, which is a known
issue (affects Steam and Skype).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to appstream in Ub
It is there though, on i386:
http://appstream.ubuntu.com/artful/multiverse/metainfo/steam.html
Maybe the multiverse sources aren't active here?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpa
Did you restart GNOME Software after installing the plugin? And with
that I mean kill it completely, even its background process.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
The GNOME Software Flatpak plugin is not installed by default.
Does installing the `gnome-software-plugin-flatpak` package fix this for you?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchp
In that case, just propose the patches upstream ;-) That will help everyone.
I can maybe help with that and do a proper review later.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpa
FTR, this is also resolved upstream now :-)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to xdg-user-dirs in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1708569
Title:
1st. login fails to create a complete $HOME directory in a ubuntu-
Relevant patch:
https://github.com/ximion/appstream/commit/28f90c3fd1926fa684370e550861a6704eb5498c
I forgot that Ubuntu was using a version that is affected by this -
interestingly, it only started to manifest now.
I think applying the whole refactoring patch is the recommended thing to
do, ins
> 0x1142540~AsStore:store-from-file (gnome-software:26325): Gs-WARNING
**: failed to call gs_plugin_refine on appstream: Error opening file:
Permission denied
This doesn't look right.
What does `stat
/var/lib/app-info/yaml/in.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_xenial_universe_dep11_Components-amd64.
ni (nistra) wrote 6 hours ago:
> ...
> I tried to report it opening an ticket by Foxit now.
Yes, thank you! Please link it here when you have a public ticket (I don't know
if Foxit handles these bugs in public).
This bug will break other software wanting to place .desktop files in
~/.local/shar
> FoxitReader creates the file /home/nis/.local/share/applications
Are you sure it creates a *file* with that name? If so, that's a pretty
huge bug in FoxitReader's install process, and we should report it to
them.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop
This is a bug in appstream-glib, I reported it upstream at
https://github.com/hughsie/appstream-glib/issues/175
** Bug watch added: github.com/hughsie/appstream-glib/issues #175
https://github.com/hughsie/appstream-glib/issues/175
** Also affects: gnome-software via
https://github.com/hugh
Amazing, just last week I added this to my todo list, since I'd need it in
gnome-initial-setup.
I can test the patches, but ideally these should go upstream in the end.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-cen
Thank you for your work on this!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1699216
Title:
Encrypted home support
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
ht
Looks like a compulsory_for_desktop tag is missing then:
https://www.freedesktop.org/software/appstream/docs/chap-CollectionData.html#tag-ct-compulsory_for_desktop
Or it's set incorrectly.
In any case, this tag should be in effect now that Ubuntu is running the full
GNOME, so I don't know why GS
Regarding GStreamer:
Iain has made a patch for that: https://github.com/hughsie/PackageKit/pull/193
- looks good to me, and will definitely be in the next PK release / the Debian
packaging.
To the second point: Couldn't the PK plugin be extended to support live
updates by default if set as a com
@jbicha: That was for Ubuntu's aptd GNOME Software backend, using Debconf with
PackageKit is a little different (shouldn't be too hard to add, and I am rather
confident that hughsie would even allow this feature upstream).
So, in Debian we'd need the PK version, as aptd is dead and removed from
Oh, with "essential" I mean RC-worthy or important-for-the-release. Long
term, we likely do want Debconf to work (I haven't had time to look into
it yet though, that's why I like that Robert apparently looks into it
now).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
De
Richard hates stuff asking questions during installation ;-) - that's *the*
longest discussion we had, since PackageKit's inception:
```
What is Hughsie's law?
A joke that started on IRC late one night in '07. Put formally it is:
Authentication or license prompts can only be done before the tra
1 - 100 of 305 matches
Mail list logo
