[Bug 151863] Re: Shortcuts "[" and "]" for loseless rotation don't work in full-screen mode

Wouter, can you clarify, please: this http://packages.ubuntu.com/intrepid/gthumb says that gthumb in intrepid is still of version 2.10.6 while the fixed upstream version is 2.10.7? -- Shortcuts "[" and "]" for loseless rotation don't work in full-screen mode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/151863

[Bug 151863] Re: Shortcuts "[" and "]" for loseless rotation don't work in full-screen mode

Mike, thanks! I'm not very familiar with Ubuntu's policy on propagating such fixes into a distribution updates. Will the fixed gthumb appear in some Gutsy update soon or it will be deferred until the next release? -- Shortcuts "[" and "]" for loseless rotation don't work in full-screen mode http

[Bug 151863] Shortcuts "[" and "]" for loseless rotation don't work in full-screen mode

Public bug reported: Note that this is not a dupe of #6036 which was fixed and shortcuts were working fine in Feisty. This one has regressed in Gutsy. ** Affects: gthumb (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Shortcuts "[" and "]" for loseless rotation don't work in full-sc

[Bug 71593] Re: glChess has no 3D

Yes, it works in Gutsy Gibbon. Haven't tested it again on Feisty yet. -- glChess has no 3D https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/71593 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.co

[Bug 73023] Re: Round orange emblems have lack usability

I've finally managed to create some mock-ups of what I think would be good emblems (see attachment emblems-mockup.png). They are not in any way for real use, I just used stock icons to show my idea. Some highlights: - emblems have different color (the purpose of the bug) - emblems have mostly dif

[Bug 73023] Re: Round orange emblems have lack usability

I think Karoliina made a good point. Yes, usability and style are often not related. The original point of the bug is that current emblems are stylish but not usable (or not so much usable). That's why I suggested that we can improve usability even by returning old Gnome icons. But sure we all woul

[Bug 73023] Re: Round orange emblems have lack usability

I'm all in favor of placing the emblems on folders, they take less space this way. In fact they used to do this in Breezy but changed it in Dapper. But my main concern is still shape and color of emblems. -- Round orange emblems have lack usability https://launchpad.net/bugs/73023 -- desktop-b

[Bug 73023] Re: Round orange emblems have lack usability

** Attachment added: "Round orange emblems" http://librarian.launchpad.net/5150587/emblems-human.png -- Round orange emblems have lack usability https://launchpad.net/bugs/73023 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 73023] Re: Round orange emblems have lack usability

** Attachment added: "Useful emblems" http://librarian.launchpad.net/5150596/emblems-tangerine.png -- Round orange emblems have lack usability https://launchpad.net/bugs/73023 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 73023] Round orange emblems have lack usability

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: human-icon-theme Some background. I use Gnome in its 'spatial' mode and rely heavily on spatial characteristics: placement of objects, their color, form and texture. Given this I use emblems a lot and before Edgy they played a big and good role in easines

[Bug 70329] Re: Samba and Edgy Eft -> not multimedia

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 68036 *** To me it doesn't look like a dupe of bug 68036 because there described a problem of not seeing a share's content in Nautilus. Here the share is accessible and programs like evince and eog open files just fine. It's rhythmbox and totem that fail when try