Thanks Daniele, I think you're right: in the last 12 hours I performed
long tests with smartctl on Linux and HDDScan on Windows and got the
exact same results. It's a real bummer though, I bought the drive 10
months ago...
Sorry for wasting your time guys.
--
palimpsest bad sectors false positiv
@p4man: thanks for the clarification. I'd love to help, but I'm not sure
how. As I said above I ran SeaTools for Windows' "Long Generic Test" and
it didn't report any problems (you can find the log file in my previous
post) while palimpsest reports 466 bad sectors (see attached
screenshot). I don't
@p4man: thanks for the clarification. I'd love to help, but I'm not sure
how. As I said above I ran SeaTools for Windows' "Long Generic Test" and
it didn't report any problems (you can find the log file in my previous
post) while palimpsest reports 466 bad sectors (see attached
screenshot). I don't
Still present in Karmic final too. Is it still a bug when you're so used
to it that it feels like this is the way it's supposed to work? ;-)
Seriously, would this qualify as a "papercut"?
--
gnome-panel autohides inconsistently
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/82504
You received this bug notifica
Same here on my fresh Karmic installation (x86_64), using a Seagate
Barracuda ST31500341AS. I also tried the 32 bit version of Karmic and
got the the same results.
I ran SeaTools for Windows' Long Generic test' to confirm that the drive
was OK and it passed the test (see attached log file) so I gu
