Perhaps you/others might want to add this url to your toolbox.
http://ws.arin.net/whois/?queryinput=198.145.23.0
Palin Aquisitions Inc. PALIN-198-145 (NET-198-145-0-0-1)
198.145.0.0 - 198.145.255.255
MRC Marketing 198-145-23-0 (NET-198-145-23-0-1)
Might be a sore spot for some, but others of us have done that a while
back. MS SMTP and all of that stuff was painful and the solution you are
going to seems to work flawlessly for us. Has cut the load that we have on
the Imail/Declude Server a bunch.
And I plan to expand the thing to a couple
Using other's mailing lists for support and public documentation, ldap, VBS
scripts. And free vs. free and both IMHO are equal amounts of spam.
Tarpitting, country blocking and native Win service and about five minutes
of my time. Sorry and it wasn't just address validation.
Unix sendmail is fre
> Some folks route spam to an email address that the admin reviews, but that
> is a violation of privacy and not a direction we care to go.
So add this and stop spending so much time worrying.
trailer.txt
---
WARNING: All e-mail sent to or from this address will be received or
otherwise recorde
At 10:29 AM 4/27/2006 -0400, you wrote:
>Marc Catuogno writes:
>
> Anyone have any suggestions short of unplugging one Cat5 cable at a time?
>
> Marc
Why not just scan your network from a XP box using something like
Networkactiv.com PIAFCTM. Just lock down and look for 445 activity on the
ins
One that I used to use was in Men & Mice Tools and the entire thing is very
useful. Still use it at home a lot when I am doing certain things.
Jay
At 02:22 PM 6/1/2006 -0700, you wrote:
A little off topic but I remember seeing a post in the past on a great ping
program on the list but for
Excellent idea, Nick as I also am on 2.x because of the same issues. Frankly, I started to upgrade to 4.x but this doesn't seem like a very good idea for this company.
Not exactly pleased with the solution or lack thereof of progress on resolving basic issues.
Jay
At 01:04 PM 6/19/2006 -0400, y
At 03:31 PM 7/12/2006 -0400, David Barker wrote:
>As far as I know this still works, although majority of customers do not
>send virus notifications.
What gives you this opinion might I inquire?
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail
According to something I read on the Alligate Support forumn at least as
far back as March. Interesting that they have never issued much of a press
release on it to there customer base. Tho I licensed mine in Februrary of
this year so I'm good for a bit.
At 12:59 PM 7/14/2006 -0700, you wrote:
At 07:59 AM 1/2/2005 +1100, you wrote:
>Great way to increase sales due to the need to update service agreements.
Anyone that runs production software without service agreements gets what
they deserve.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E
I don't buy this agrument. I use Eudora and don't fail those tests. Did
this message fail those tests?
At 10:55 AM 1/13/2005 -0500, Dave Doherty wrote:
>Hi Scott-
>
>Len says it's common to all versions of Eudora. Is there a way to make an
>adjustment where the mailer contains "Eudora"? Or is tha
Anyone seeing odd problems with hotmail and msn.com accounts being rejected.
I have a number of valid email's that are being rejected.
1:24 13:00 SMTPD(61d200c101cc4412) [66.162.138.13] connect 65.54.168.114
port 60403
01:24 13:00 SMTPD(61d200c101cc4412) [65.54.168.114] EHLO hotmail.com
01:24 13:
At 02:54 PM 3/1/2005 +0100, Erik wrote:
>After many emails to Declude about this, they confirmed to me this IS a
>problem and one of not a high priority to fix. We've reverted back to 1.82
>until it's fixed.
We have as well. I just tried 2.05 yesterday and spent 1 1/2 hours fixing
stuff this mor
At 11:20 AM 3/1/2005 -0500, Goran Jovanovic wrote:
>I put in the 2.0.5 upgrade on the weekend and so far have no seen any
>problems. I did the manual install and copied the declude.exe over, did
>the -diags and then started the SMTP service.
>
>I have looked in the logs but see nothing unusual. Wha
At 04:40 PM 3/3/2005 -0500, Andy Schmidt wrote:
>I generally agree that the new function is desirable. Now we just need to
>figure out how to implement it "robustly".
>
>E.g., when Declude modifies the "envelope" to the new "route-to" address, it
>may have to "remember" that new recipient so that i
declude so
declude should not know the difference.
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ncl Admin
> Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 2:34 PM
> To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com; Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
>
Or you could just block the IP's in Imail from which the attacks are coming...or in your router.
At 05:18 PM 7/29/2005 -0400, you wrote:
Easy way to find out if it is dictionary attacks: count the number of times "ERR * invalid user" appears in a single day's log. I wouldn't be surprised t
http://www.dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=martek.net
Fix all of your problems.
Your Nameservers aren't working.
At 01:24 PM 8/3/2005 -0500, you wrote:
One of my domains is having trouble sending email to HotMail. I have a reverse record and spf record setup for the offending
I think that the exploit is in imail 7.07 and not in your server do a
google on
imail 7.07 exploit.
So you most likely would need to upgrade to 8.2 series. Tho the exploit
isn't in 8.15 I don't believe. BTW they do seem to have some interesting
pricing going on if you google imail deals depending
If files are not moving from proc to work make sure you downloaded the
right version, I grabbed smartermail version this AM and it does exactly
nada under Imail. Duh. Got the Imail version and of course its running now.
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by F-Prot]
---
This E-mail came from the D
I am having a problem with an authenicated user that has an IP that is
major big-time on the spam lists. Is there anyway to strip off his
originating ip info and not pass it along?
Guess that T-Mobile has finally started at least cleaning up there address
space but this person needs to get his em
At 02:47 PM 10/25/2005 -0500, you wrote:
>Something changed at the time the new architecture came out. Either folks
>started using a lot of new / broken clients, or Declude became more
>sensitive.
In my opinion a lot of broken clients started happening. Whereas I beta
tested the new version on my
I just opened a window and sat there it finally downloaded took a while.
At 05:19 PM 11/28/2005 -0800, Kevin Bilbee wrote:
Same problem here. I get an "Internal Server Error"
Kevin Bilbee
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Richar
At 04:59 PM 12/16/2005 -0500, Barry Simpson wrote:
> Pong
>
>Shhh
Which is a relief :-)it's cold.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
I had that happen after a Microsoft .net update, fixed it by going to the
current version.
At 02:27 PM 2/6/2008 -0500, you wrote:
>
>I know about the old version (blame me) - just haven't found the time to do
>an upgrade to where we can monitor for an hour or so after upgrading to
>ensure t
Now there is a good question.
At 10:13 AM 4/2/2008 -0700, you wrote:
After seeing Mattâs post here about not renewing his JunkMail
subscription. Iâm asking Declude to respond to the group as to why any of
us with perpetual licensing. Our SA expires soon and I would like to know
the v
There is also the question of loss of connectivity from point A to OpenDNS
server #1 which is all that you have if you setup Declude to use a Single
Source DNS server. If anywhere in that path there is an outage you will
have no DNS.
Far better to learn a little about DNS and run your own. Then y
It wouldn't create a folder if Imail is set in the domain control panel to not allow that I believe.
Message & Mailbox Options
Default Maximum Mailbox Size: byte(s) KB MB GB
Max. Outbound Message Size: byte(s) KB MB GB
Single Message Maximum Size: byte(s) KB MB GB
Full Mailbox Notify
I suggest you google.com smtp and ntdll.dll. Seems this is fairly common.
At 10:31 AM 1/26/2009 -0700, Dale McDiarmid wrote:
>That's going to be tricky. The outages are random, sometimes not
>happening for 24 hours or more. We went most the weekend without
>failure then had two this morning.
I suggest you google.com smtp and ntdll.dll. Seems this is fairly common.
At 10:31 AM 1/26/2009 -0700, Dale McDiarmid wrote:
>That's going to be tricky. The outages are random, sometimes not
>happening for 24 hours or more. We went most the weekend without
>failure then had two this morning.
I would add country weight as well. There used to be examples that work. I
actually weight yahoo.com.XX as well.
At 01:20 PM 2/10/2009 -0500, Pete McNeil wrote:
Robert Grosshandler wrote:
Sounds like a spam headline, doesnt it?
Anyway, were getting obvious spam, but wer
Well Alligate should most definitely be in your plan. I run it, cuts
server hits
by over 90%, is cost effective. Cuts Virus by nearly 99% as bots don't get
through
I tried SM as well as microsoft. Best thing I have ever tried was Alligate.
Works well with Declude and they even have something com
Alligate Alligate Alligate
At 12:28 PM 2/10/2010 +0100, you wrote:
Hi,
With the amount of spam I have to throw away each day no reaching consistant levels of over 90%... I can of course get an even faster mailserver but I think I would be better of with an extra smtp server in front of my
33 matches
Mail list logo
