d" in German means
"evening".
good Abend! :-)
Markus
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John T (Lists)
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005
10:23 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
Decludeproc abend
I
: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
Upcoming work load
Glad to see that you at least are
taking Christmas off to rest. Best of luck to you on your
installs and upgrades.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: John
T (Lists)
To
> Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And
> Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration,
MRTG
> Integration, and Log Parsers.
>
>
> John T (Lists) writes:
>
> > Any one else ramping up for a heav
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus Gufler
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 3:30 PM
> > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
> > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Decludeproc abend
> >
> >
> >
> > "abend" in
e.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
Decludeproc abend
John T (Lists) wrote:
Is abend some kind of French word?
AbnormalEnding. - circa 1985 - coined with the
introduction of Microsoft products.
-Nicko
;)
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL P
ber 22, 2005 7:14 AM
> To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Upcoming work load
>
> > What little there is after all the necessities.
>
> You mean like software upgrades and new hardware, no?
>
> Food? Whazzat?
>
> :-)
>
>
>
t; wrote:
> > >DC>
> > >DC>
> > >DC> I thought that went further back than that. I remember hearing
> > >DC> it a lot from mainframe types prior to Windows 1.1early
80's...
> > >DC>
> > >
> > >DC> Darin.
> &
OUCH!
Gee, I thought this is the kind of thing
that we were told no way would happen.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Franco-Rocha
Sent: Monday, December 26, 2005
9:29 AM
To: Declude
> Software and hardware breaks. Nothing is bulletproof. Some are just
> better than others.
>
>
> Monday, December 26, 2005, 11:50:20 AM, John T (Lists)
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> JTL>
> JTL>
> JTL>
> JTL> OUCH!
> JTL>
> JTL>
&
There goes Goran again with interesting
words.
;-)>
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran Jovanovic
Sent: Monday,
December 26, 2005 2:26 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [
Are you sure it is not there for every message that is delivered?
John T
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran Jovanovic
> Sent: Monday, December 26, 2005 8:59 PM
> To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.co
t is seeming now that that statement was not true,
though
> I
> > > should withhold judgement until we hear exactly why this had an
impact.
> > > Very glad I've stuck with 1.82 at the moment, though we had a service
> > > agreement that entitled us to upgrade to 3.x.
>
Are there any related D files left over? Could these be confirmation list
messages that has to do with the Declude Confirm problem?
John T
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Green dfn Systems
> S
Uh, that is kind of time critical. Is e-mail moving and being processed?
Again, are they just Q with no D?
Is the Decludeproc server running?
John T
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Green dfn
Yep, alive and well.
John T
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2005 2:25 PM
> To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Alive?
This really belongs on the Virus list.
I finally just got logged into their server and am downloading now.
John T
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew
> Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 20
SNIFFER-TRAVEL external
047 "C:\Imail\Sniffer\yourlicensecode.exe yourverificationcode" 15 0
SNIFFER-INSURANCE external
048 "C:\Imail\Sniffer\yourlicensecode.exe yourverificationcode" 15 0
SNIFFER-AV-PUSH external
How often is this happening?
Are you using Hijack?
Put both the Junkmail and Virus logs
into Debug until a couple of these occur, then extract from the log files ALL
lines pertaining to the files in question into one file in exact time sequence
along with the log lines from Imail SM
Although some may have strong opinions against this, but I use WhatsUp
Professional. (Well, it is sitting there waiting for me to start using it.)
John T
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jerod M. Be
Andrew, do you administer and support
MOM?
If so, please contact me off list.
BTW, what server did DAD stand for? (It
never made it off the design board, of if it did it never became a beta, only
an alpha.)
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From:
[E
- Server Watching.
John T (Lists) wrote:
BTW, what server did DAD stand for? (It
never made it off the design board, of if it did it never became a beta, only
an alpha.)
well with family court so prevalent I would guess MOM
got all of DAD's stuff?
-Nick :)
John T
eSer
And since AT&T now owns SBC, aren't we getting back to Ma Bell?
John T
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee
> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 3:56 PM
> To: JunkMail Declude
> Subject: [Dec
5:29 PM
> To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Earthlink/prodigy
>
> I think you've got it backwards, SBC acquired AT&T but is keeping the AT&T
> name.
>
> Bill
> ----- Original Message -
> From: "John T (Lists)" <[E
Sandy, I agree with you.
That fact that I was going to be silent has to do with my perception of the
users on this list, as compared to other lists that I participate on that I
am well know to posts rants.
The fact of the matter is I was one of the ones heavily (to my knowledge)
involved in testi
Plans for a gateway version of Declude are still alive.
John T
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
> Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 6:02 PM
> To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
> Subject: Re: [D
What?
Message, what message?
I did not get the message.
I did not even get the memo.
How come I never get the memos.
Gees, if I had gotten the memo, I could have stayed in bed this morning.
John T
eServices For You
"Seek, and ye shall find!"
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTE
Matt, I agree with you.
It would mean nothing to a major spammer to spend 1/4 cent per message to
have it guaranteed delivered.
For 100K messages, that would be $250 which would actually improve the
spammers' chances for more responses since the recipients would then trust
the sender.
John T
eSe
What do others have about this sender?
John T
eServices For You
"Seek, and ye shall find!"
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "
Wednesday, February 08, 2006 12:14 PM
> To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] elabs3.com
>
> Block by default, whitelist exceptions. They have a lot of spam lists,
> but also do some mailings for legitimate companies.
>
> Matt
>
>
>
I think we need to stop jumping to conclusions and wait for an official
response from Declude (which should have already happened.)
I have a feeling that the $1450 for a new license and not for a renewal SA.
If that is the case, some one from Declude needs to clarify this on the web
site stating t
Previously, under versions 1-3, you purchased each item and version of item
you wanted.
If you purchased EV Pro, JM Pro and Hijack with a 1 year SA, cost would be
as such:
JunkMail Pro - $895.00
EVA Pro - $1,295.00
HiJack - $295.00
That is a total of $2485
A SA for all three is thereafter $309
That file came back in a 3.x version, I do
not remember which one.
John T
eServices For You
"Seek, and ye shall
find!"
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of george kulman
Sent: Monday,
February 13, 2006 1:26 PM
To: Decl
I
need to create a filter for a client that I am gatewaying their Exchange
server.
I
have their server listed in the Global.cfg for whitelisting. (WHITELIST IP yaddayaddayadda)
Now
there is a need to create a filter file so that if the e-mail is from a
broadcast address and to an ad
e.JunkMail]
Filter question
Move the whitelist setting to a custom filter and place an END on the
filter for the condition that you want to track elsewhere:
MAILFROM END IS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
REMOTEIP WHITELIST IS 12.34.56.78
Have a good evening,
Matt
John T (Lists) wrote:
I need t
Yes, EasyRecovery Professional works wonders.
John T
eServices For You
"Seek, and ye shall find!"
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Baranowski
> Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 8:35 PM
> To: Declude.JunkMail@
Since WEIGHTRANGE is designed for final
actions, how and why would you use it in a filter?
John T
eServices For You
"Seek, and ye shall
find!"
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Hayer
Sent: Saturday, February 25
Well, since filters are run in order
listed, the way I do this is I would put this kind of filter at the very end. I
use 6 such filters and have verified that they are indeed run in order listed.
John T
eServices For You
"Seek, and ye shall
find!"
-Original Message--
1. Delete the console.txt file to release the IP.
2. Search for a product called PowerRen 2000. Using that will help rename
the files. The files names are prepended with the IP then dot then a code
then dot then the real Q and D file name. You need to remove everything
before that Q and D and the b
I think the underlying problem as has been discussed on this list is that an
SPF FAIL should not be relied upon as an outright rejection, rather used as
part of a weighting system.
John T
eServices For You
"Seek, and ye shall find!"
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
are perfect etc. The solution is SRS -
otherwise forwarding is dead
-Nick
John T (Lists) wrote:
I think the underlying problem as has been discussed on this list is that anSPF FAIL should not be relied upon as an outright rejection, rather used aspart of a weighting system. John TeServices For
DELETE_RECIPIENT is a ACTION.
John T
eServices For You
"Seek, and ye shall
find!"
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kami Razvan
Sent: Saturday, March
04, 2006 1:03 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Decl
test_name
delete_recipient [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is that correct?
Regards,
- Kami
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists)
Sent: Saturday, March
04, 2006 4:26 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
DELETE
Is this used for only personal stuff, not business stuff?
If so, then I am just going to add a big weight. I am sick of these not
getting deleted.
John T
eServices For You
"Seek, and ye shall find!"
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-ma
Title: Message
Erik, I fail to see any where in David’s
response to you where he is telling you to upgrade to version 4. You post also shows
your lack of understanding on the licensing for version 4.
As for the actual problem, I have seen
this but as David has said every message was sp
Well, although I know nothing about SmarterMail, I believe I remember talk
that AUTOWHITELIST was not working properly and was supposed to be fixed but
then they changed something and possibly Declude then had to change
something for it to work again.
John T
eServices For You
"Seek, and ye shall
I am posting this here to publicly shame them with intent.
Invariant Systems is in the same business as most of us are.
They also happen to sell a couple of apps that work well for Declude.
Today they sent out to the lists that we who have purchased their software
to work with Declude marketing
ered from
> their server. It did have headers consistant with invariants list server
and
> that is why I received it. It seems the email spoofed invariants list
server
> headers.
>
>
>
>
> Kevin Bilbee
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTEC
Matt, my understanding is that is the
server is hosting multiple web sites for multiple clients, and therefore is not
dedicated to any one client, the SPLA does not apply. If a server is dedicated
for one client, whether that server be for web sites, SQL, ACT, Quickbooks,
whatever, then th
#x27;s own reps don't always tell it the same way.
The fact is that anyone hosting "clients" is violating the standard
EULA on Windows since they made that change, and SPLA is required.
Whether or not that is enforceable is an open question.
Matt
John T (Lists) wrote:
Matt, m
Um requesting read receipts of a list is
un-professional.
If you notice in the subject line the
OT: you can then if you desire to create a rule in your Outlook based on that.
John T
eServices For You
"Seek, and ye shall
find!"
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL
point if they tried to press the matter, however,
in the future, things may be different and it is clear that they are laying the
ground work for that.
Matt
John T (Lists) wrote:
That is where the question comes in. I
am not hosting a client or providing a client a service on a server.
I have
What is the OS of the DNS server being used?
John T
eServices For You
"Seek, and ye shall find!"
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Steiner
> Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 7:27 PM
> To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists)
> Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 12:38 AM
> To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ip4r failure
>
> What is the OS of the DNS server being used?
>
> John T
> eSer
provider
has given me.
> I have no control over or way to access the DNS server.
>
> Gary
>
>
> ---- Original Message
> > From: "John T \(Lists\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 2:40 AM
> > To: Declude.JunkMa
tests are being perfomed on the same eml file within a few seconds of
each other.
> Why does Declude fail and SM succeed?
>
> Gary
>
>
> Original Message
> > From: "John T \(Lists\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 15,
he same ip4r tests? It is the same message, and the tests are being perfomed on the same eml file within a few seconds of each other. Why does Declude fail and SM succeed? Gary Original Message
From: "John T \(Lists\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent: Wednesday, March 15,
catch the spam using the same ip4r tests? It is the same
> message, and the tests are being perfomed on the same eml file within a
few
> seconds of each other. Why does Declude fail and SM succeed?
>
> Gary
>
>
> Original Message
> > From: "John
I am calling it quits for the night soon, but I will try.
Have you tried looking at any of the messages in question to see what they
are?
How is the Declude JM log?
John T
eServices For You
"Seek, and ye shall find!"
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkM
There is a scheduled script that I use that was created by another user a
couple years ago.
I will post it to the list later tonight if desired.
John T
eServices For You
"Seek, and ye shall find!"
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTE
What I do is install the MS DNS service on the Imail server, configure it
for cache only allowing recursion, and point Imail and Declude to that. Make
sure your firewall is configured to not allow the world to make DNS queries
against it and you are set.
John T
eServices For You
"Seek, and ye sha
5 AM
> To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] recursion turned off causes higher JM
scores?
>
> That's what I was thinking. How do you configure the cache-only?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ben
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "John T
>From the readme.html:
"Parent paths must be enabled."
Sorry, no they will not be enabled. That is a security risk I am not going
to open up on my server.
John T
eServices For You
"Seek, and ye shall find!"
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EM
I use Sawmill. They use their own proprietary DB that is file based. You can
schedule DB updates on what ever schedule you want, either daily or hourly
or by minutes.
John T
eServices For You
"Seek, and ye shall find!"
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkM
I would consider that a virus, although
the payload is not in the e-mail but on a web site.
John T
eServices For You
"Seek, and ye shall
find!"
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Richard Farris
Sent: Thursday, April
http://support.declude.com/Customer/KBArticle.aspx?articleid=55
Also, if some one has e-mail forwarded from another system, it will fail
this test.
John T
eServices For You
"Seek, and ye shall find!"
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTE
http://support.declude.com/Customer/KBArticle.aspx?articleid=54
Question, if a message is 1 MB and there are 3 tests as in the example, does
that message get a negative weight of 3 or 6?
To actually score a message of 1 MB the third column would actually be 1024,
correct?
Is this checking the si
No, that site is owned and maintained by R. Scott Perry.
John T
eServices For You
"Seek, and ye shall find!"
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of IMail Admin
> Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 10:46 PM
> To: Declude.Junk
Yes, I believe the space would cause
that.
John T
eServices For You
"Seek, and ye shall
find!"
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Craig Edmonds
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 1:56
AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Su
; So you mean that when Scott sold Declude, he didn't sell this site too?
The
> last email address for Scott that I have is [EMAIL PROTECTED] I
wonder
> if this would still work? Otherwise, where would I contact someone about
> this?
>
> Ben
>
> - Original Message
> Declude is an incomplete product without a solution to identifying false
> positives in the spam folders.
> That leaves a requirement for something like spamreview as the only
> legitimate option available - but we have been unsuccessful in getting
> Declude to update it to work with smartermail
> Actually, your understanding of the history of Declude is what is lacking.
> I have had direct dialogue with the new owners of Declude and I was asked
> not to share information on this list. So before you start suggesting
that
> I'm speaking out of turn you should know that you don't have all t
> Nobody gives a damn about the history of a software product. What they do
> care about is whether Declude is fully functional or not.
The Declude line of products do what they are intended to do quite well and
at this point with a low bug count. As more people such as yourself demand
an all-inc
I am trying to create a batch file that will zip up a weeks worth of logs
and then move that zip file.
The problem I am having is that I want to zip the previous 7 days, but
sometimes the last log is time stamped say 04/16/06 11:59 PM and sometimes
say 04/17/06 12:00 AM. Because of that, if I run
occassional need to
do
> additional reporting for the previous month.
>
> In your case, running the script on Monday evening or Tuesday morning for
> the previous Monday through Sunday filenames should work fine.
>
> Darin.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From:
> C:
> CD "C:\WINNT\system32\LogFiles\"
> FOR /R %%f in (ex*.log) do "C:\Program Files\WinZip\WZzip.exe" -m -ex
-Td01
> %%~dpnf.zip %%f
But isn't the problem that the -T switch looks at the file modified date and
if the final line is at 12:00 AM then it will have one date but if the final
line is
using delete instead of wzzip. Both of these
commands are in a simple bat file that I call from windows scheduler.
Hope it helps,
Dean
On 4/17/06, John T (Lists) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I am trying to create a batch file that will zip up a weeks worth
> how about this. Always zip up the logs after midnight. Then for sure the
> prev day is complete and you need to ignore todays.
> [I am presuming you will only have the 7 days in the dir to be zipped]
> # set archive filename file name
> for /f "Tokens=2-4 Delims=/ " %%i in ('date /t') do set
> ar
> Or likewise, tell the script to do the previous 8 days and you'll always
> get the full list.
Problem is I will then have 2 zip files with the same log, one incomplete
and when I have Sawmill update its database that will cause an issue.
I am trying to fully automate this process.
John T
eServ
> I just use the winzip command line tool every day to turn the 1 day old
> "log" file into a "zip" file by the SAME name in the SAME location. This
> way, you can simply move anything *.zip to a different drive, while *.log
> are "current" log files.
>
> Here is the content of my Compress2DayOld
find!"
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists)
> Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 3:09 PM
> To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Help with WinZip comman
; for each of youu log files in all of your subfolders.
>
>
> Best Regards
> Andy Schmidt
>
> Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
> Fax:+1 201 934-9206
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John
tion. This is about as simple as it gets.
You could do the entire task in one line of code.
The only caveat is that I am not sure whether or not Windows 2000 comes with
forfiles, but I'm sure that you could always copy the executable over from
Windows 2003 if needed.
Matt
John T (Lists)
Meaning move to a new user or a different location all together?
John T
eServices For You
"Seek, and ye shall find!"
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Serge
> Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 10:29 PM
> To: Declude.Ju
> Plus, i think the registry sometime contains "aliases",ie
> >> %userprofile%\documents and settings\user so searching for
> >> c:\documents...\user may not find all occurences.
> >> Can't believe MSFT didn't provide a utility to do this, even
> &g
ile settings
>
> several reasons
> first, i am almost out of space on c:,
> but i also find easier to maintain, and i do not like having my files on
the
> system partition, in case i need to reformat or something
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: &
To those that are reporting this issue, are you running Hijack?
John T
eServices For You
"Seek, and ye shall find!"
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin
> Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 2:09 PM
> To: Declude.JunkMa
Do you have a hijack.cfg file in your Declude folder by chance?
John T
eServices For You
"Seek, and ye shall find!"
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin
> Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 3:20 PM
> To: Declude.JunkM
POONGGG!
John T
eServices For You
"Seek, and ye shall
find!"
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker
Sent: Wednesday,
April 26, 200
FYI, I have not got back to you Jonas as I have been quite busy.
I will see what I can do to send you the instructions by Saturday.
John T
eServices For You
"Seek, and ye shall find!"
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
o fill in a qualification request
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John
> > T (Lists)
> > Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 4:59 PM
> > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
> > Subject: RE
> Because the is no "fix". I can follow this newsgroup and see no reason to
> upgrade. Why upgrade and cause more issues/problems. Upgrading (and the
> list will show) that things that were once working got broke. And then
> later corrected back to the version we are running. And things that a
> I want to make a correction to the list. The version we are running is
> 2.0.6 (not 1.82).
>
> David, my point is; why upgrade when the problem exists in Decludes'
latest
> release as well. And why deny support. I can post your reply to this
list
> if you want. Basically it was blunt in sayi
Have you checked the logs?
John T
eServices For You
"Seek, and ye shall find!"
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 12:24 PM
> To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
> Subject:
invURIBL checks the body for URLs.
John T
eServices For You
"Seek, and ye shall find!"
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom
> Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 11:31 AM
> To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
> Subj
Any one have any opinions/experience with Loftmail.com?
I have seen a couple of eBay Phishing spam with webhosting.loftmail.com as
hosting the actual Phishing site.
John T
eServices For You
"Seek, and ye shall find!"
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe,
Yes, that looks to be what I have been seeing get through.
John T
eServices For You
"Seek, and ye shall find!"
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
> Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 12:41 PM
> To: Rick Baranowski
> Do not know why they would want to rewrite the message. They should add a
> test name for the condition and say it failed the test.
I believe it fails a Declude Virus Vulnerability test.
John T
eServices For You
"Seek, and ye shall find!"
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailin
Wow, what an idea of adding a text
string the in registry to record information.
Thanks Andrew.
John T
eServices For You
"Seek, and ye shall
find!"
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew
Sent: Tuesda
Attached are the headers to an e-mail I am suspecting as a clever phising
that has me worried.
It looks like a legit message sent on behalf of Paypal, however, it is sent
from an IP address not owned by Paypal BUT which has a REVDNS that ends in
paypal.com.
The message is full of links to images.
Is this option still available in the Global.CFG?
John T
eServices For You
"Seek, and ye shall find!"
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at ht
1 - 100 of 350 matches
Mail list logo
