Bottom line is we were told if the license server was offline we would not
be impacted. It is seeming now that that statement was not true, though I
should withhold judgement until we hear exactly why this had an impact.
Very glad I've stuck with 1.82 at the moment, though we had a service
agreeme
I now paying for a license to "use" the software?
>
> Don
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Darin Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Monday, December 26, 2005 3:03 PM
> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hardware Issue
>
>
> > Bottom line
this subject please feel free to call me
and I will be happy to elucidate (For John T "To make clear or plain,
especially by explanation; clarify.")
Barry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 200
Looks interesting, Sam. Looking through the documentation, it seems that it
would not directly integrate with Declude, but could be used as a Gateway
that only tags the messages, so you could have a Declude filter that looks
for the tag and weights appropriately.
Note that it is *nix only at this
With Declude you can add footers to text messages, and Sandy has an add-in
that can add a footer to HTML messages.
Or you could write a script to run as an external test in Declude (or plug
it directly into the mail handling workflow) to parse the message and put a
statement in the body of the mes
I should amend this by saying that functionality to append within Declude
and Sandy's product append to all messages, so an external script would be
necessary if you want to selectively append.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "Darin Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hmmm... while I agree with the consensus here that Alligate was out of
bounds on this list, and Scott was not on the IMail list ( though it really
doesn't matter since it's Declude's list and Barry has settled the issue),
Babul is correct in that Scott and others were flamed for pushing Declude.
No
Yep. at that price it's time to move to
something else or build our own system.
Declude, come back with something reasonable or
you'll lose customers like IMail did.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Scott
Fisher
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2
tructuring and Declude will see the same thing if this
issue is not addressed.
-Chris Anton
-- Original Message ----------
From: "Darin Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 11:48:41 -0500
>Yep. at
clude is also an annual required payment.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 8:49 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] declude 4 changes ... worried...
Yep. at
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2006 3:24 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0 / 4.0
HI David,
Re: 6. What is the price for the upgrade? And does the upgrade mean we are
on an annual subscription, or continue wi
f you need further clarification I would suggest calling us and we will be
happy to answer all your questions.
PS. You will have to wait till Monday 'cuase it's 11:30 on a Saturday
evening and I am not taking calls at home :)
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [
ail] Declude 3.0 / 4.0
Darin,
The Service Agreement prices have not changed:
JunkMail - $132.00 per year
EVA - $132.00 per year
HiJack - $45.00 per year
Barry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Sunday, February 12,
lished next
week outlining changes and future strategy. As soon as this is available we
will inform our customers.
Barry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2006 10:03 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude
Hi Kevin,
Actually, from what I've heard they haven't decided whether or not previous
customers would "not run version 4 in Subscription mode". Barry just told
me this morning that they have not decided exactly how they will handle
licensing once v3 is no longer being maintained.
However, I agre
Lots . In addtion to our hosting
services, we also serve as an outsourcing provider to others. If
we decide to move, we'll either find another comparable solution that
allows us to migrate our established weighting rules or build our own
solution.
Darin.
- Original Message -
F
s.
Barry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2006 10:03 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0 / 4.0
I misspoke... switch SA for upgrade. Also, please answer the implici
details on a public forum.
We are currently developing some documentation that should be published next
week outlining changes and future strategy. As soon as this is available we
will inform our customers.
Barry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Be
How about implementing a web-based upload/download
site for this. I've done this for a couple of graphic design firms to
allow their customers to upload files, which then sends the intended recipient
an email notification with a link to download.
Much, much more efficient than SMTP (mail e
ndelijke groet,Bonno Bloksmahoofd systeembeheer
tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme
begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhovent 040 296 28
28 / f 040 237 35 20[EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
- Original Message -----
From:
Darin Cox
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday,
TED] / www.tio.nl
- Original Message -
From:
Darin Cox
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 4:07
PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] large
mail to large number op recips
Certainly not for all mail, just for these
circumstances... but I u
enhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhovent
040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20[EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
-
Original Message -
From:
Darin Cox
To:
Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent:
Tuesday, February 14, 2006 3:31 PM
Hi Kevin,
I think the point Bonno was making was that it was
the combination of file size AND number of recipients that was the
problem. He probably has a file size limit in place, but when a
10MB attachment goes to 100 people, you're suddenly at 1.2-1.4 GB of disk
space used. Yes, he co
Limiting attachment size wouldn't solve the
problem unless the number of recipients is also limited. While I
agree with you on the 10MB limit (that's what we use as a limit), in his case,
it's the combo that's the problem, not the single message. From what I
read, he wants to allow larger
I'd like to vote for a write-in
Declude Mail Security Suite
You can add a 4 in there if you want...as in
Declude Mail Security Suite 4.0
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "Barry Simpson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: ;
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 5:39 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail
Did the reason become a requirement in 2.0 or
3.0? It isn't required in versions prior to 2.0.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Guhl, Markus
(LDS)
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 9:08 AM
Subject: AW: [Declude.JunkMail] blacklist file
hi,
a
Remove the "BLACKLIST FROM " text from the
blacklist.txt file and it should work fine.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Craig
Edmonds
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 5:44 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] blacklist file
Newbie question
here
Gotcha. Just making sure it wasn't a new
requirement. We're hoping to hear 3.0 is stable enough in the near future
to upgrade. From what I hear IMail 2006.03 may be stable enough to
upgrade.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Guhl, Markus
(LDS)
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.co
Title: New server replacing the old one
That will do it. Just copy all of the Declude
files over to the same path on the new machine, use the same OHN in IMail, use
the same IPs for DNS resolution, and you're all set.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Sharyn
Schmidt
To: Declude
I'd like to add another one to this list, if I may...
16. Do not use autoresponders or out-of-office/vacation messages on email
addresses you use to subscribe to the list. If you need to do that on your
email address, set up a separate email address just for the purpose of
subscribing.
Darin.
Hmmm? Why not? If it is a legal license (i.e.
no restrictions on licensing transfer from the manufacturer), then this
generally just voids any warrantees or support contracts. If the software
works and you can support it yourself then again, why not?
The same applies to hardware. We've p
NATting in the firewall is what we do, though I've heard of many using
gdatapipe.
BTW, for searching the archives, the best bet is to google the list... much
better searching than is available at mail-archive.com.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "John Shacklett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
T
use google's search... like...
"site:mail-archive.com SMTP port forwarding"
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "John Olden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 5:22 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Mail archive
Am I the only one having problems with the Declude li
What granularity do you need? Many managed switches can limit in multiples
of 1Mbps. I set up a managed office space early last year that resells
internet access to their tenants. Because they needed more granularity we
went with a combination of a Cisco 2801 router and 3550 switch to get
granul
Title: Restrict all email except internal
With JunkMail Pro you could create a filter to
check the sending domain via ENDSWITH, and create a separate version of
$default$.junkmail for that user to use this filter with an action of
ROUTETO
You could also create an IMail rule, but I've
never
Title: Message
Well I know 1.82 has them. I fairly certain
1.75 did as well. It probably goes back further than that. Filters
and basic actions have been around a while.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Sharyn
Schmidt
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 2
Action=IGNORE is probably due to the weight limits you have set. It is
WARNing as you specified.
What are your hold and/or delete weights? Anything less than those will
IGNORE.
BTW, you don't want to publish your sniffer license code...
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Weise"
I probably spoke too soon about IGNORE... do you have any whitelisting?
Whitelisting could result in IGNORE.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "Darin Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 11:15 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
Action=IGNORE is
You can also run the spoolviewer app on the Declude
tools page, http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=100.
It gives a bit more info.
We run it via batch file every 3 or 4 hours to
watch spool usage, echoing results to a file and using imail1.exe to send the
file as the message body. Wit
Hi Dave,
Sorry I haven't been able to get you a new spamreview app as I had indicated
I would do in January. I injured my back in December and was mostly laid up
for a couple of months, and then snowballed into other health issues. I've
been back at it for a month now, catching up on customer pr
Sure. Make up a test that fails everything,
and hold or delete on it. Then only whitelisted addresses will get
through.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Craig
Edmonds
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 1:51 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Ban all
I don't know what the limit is, but there is definitely degradation in
performance after a few thousand files.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Graveen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 7:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Max number of files in di
e .net program we wrote to archive the files to
another disk.
The degradation would depend on the application and how you are listing the
files.
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Darin Cox
> Sent: Tuesday, April 1
Hi John,
If you use daily IIS logfiles I would go by filename instead of time stamp.
Our log archival script is scheduled for a few days (5) afterwards to zip up
the previous month's files. You don't need to wait that long, but since IIS
sometimes locks the file for a while, I would wait at least
ek, and ye shall find!"
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
> Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 11:07 AM
> To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Help with WinZip co
Good point. Add to the weekly file daily instead of running just once at
the end of the week... assuming you don't need the files for reporting in
the interim. Then you just need to have a function to determine the zip
file name for the week.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "Nick Ha
Don't do it by time stamp, do it by determining the
filenames and adding them appropriately. That's what we do and it works
perfectly, though we do it monthly instead of weekly.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: John T (Lists)
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, Apr
You might check for uninstall directories for Windows patches as well. If
you're not in the habit of deleting them after the machine has been rebooted
and a week or so has passed (we wait a month) to verify all functionality is
intact and the system is stable, you might want to start.
Also, if th
We still use it, but are developing a replacement. It has trouble parsing
the headers for info at times, but otherwise does what it was intended to
do. It will work fine with 8.22.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "Jonas Fornander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2
Negative weighting instead of true whitelisting
might be recommended. That way if something is really bad, say a user
infected with an email virus, then the message has a chance of still being
caught.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Matt
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sen
Sniffer does a good job of it. I can't think of the last one that has
slipped through.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "Jonas Fornander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 7:47 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] How can I block all the stock spams?
Imail 8.22, Declude
er Optic Internet service throughout
the Continental USA. Speeds start at 5Mbps/2Mbps
Go to www.netwood.net to fill in a qualification request
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
> Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 5:10 PM
Can you clarify why you think MS DNS sucks? We've used it for years and it
has worked perfectly. We also built additional tools to integrate it into
our setup and management processes. The only problem or lack of
functionality we've experienced is the inability to retrieve a list of
subdomains p
to edit an
ip for all the domains, i have to stop the server, edit the zone files, the
start the service.
ms dns works fine if you have no "issues" editing the zone files one by one
while your service is offline.
- Original Message -
From: "Darin Cox" <[EMAIL PROTE
Some spam campaigns recently have started using hacked email account
passwords to authenticate with destination servers. We just saw our first
confirmed instance of this new technique yesterday. You may want to
investigate logs to determine which account password was hacked and have the
user chan
Do you whitelist AUTH?
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 1:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam says it was whitelisted
Kyle Fisher writes:
> 05/26/2006 00:16:57.630 q8f41090ecd10.smd Skipping
Source code activity would be best analyzed with
Visual SourceSafe or another code control system. For watching use of the
sites for testing, etc. just enable logging for the virtual webs and run reports
on the web traffic.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Goran Jovanovic
To:
Yep, yep, yep, and yep.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Goran Jovanovic
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 3:39 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Monitoring/Auditing a Windows
Server
Darin,
My understanding of the
source code development i
Doesn't seem like it. I haven't seen a response from them to the list, and
I also CC'd [EMAIL PROTECTED] with no response.
Anyone had any contact with the company lately?
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "Heimir Eidskrem" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 4:28 P
e very helpful into
> understanding the Declude company and their search of engineers.
>
> -Erik
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin
> Cox
> Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 11:20 PM
> To: declude.junkmail@
Hmmm... do you have an onion server as well? Throw in some raw binary
reads (BRead) and a Synchronous & Asynchronous Logging and Analysis Daemon
(SALAD) and you could turn dinner into a web service...
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin Bilbee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Mond
You can still get defs (for now at least), but
without a valid current license it wouldn't be legal.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Nick
Hayer
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] F-Prot Licensing
Sorry but I ha
You could handle that at the firewall level...
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "Goran Jovanovic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 9:56 PM
Subject: RE: Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] Which way to upgrade - SmarterMail or
IMail
Hi Sandy,
That post is for running IMail
e hungry.
But liver, NOT.
Correction liver should have been live.
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Darin Cox
> Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 4:18 PM
> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
> Subject: Re:
Hi David,
In regards to the concern raised by many, and you're response that you need
time to turn everything around...
The problem many of us are having is that all we have seen so far, even in
the recent announcements, is demand for more money with none of the
increased functionality we've been
They were at $264 for combo JunkMail/Virus, which works out to $132/product.
Later they were broken out at $132 apiece. Then the price was raised. Then
the price was evidently lowered back to what it was (I haven't looked to
verify this last, just taking David B's word on it).
Darin.
- Orig
David,
There was quite a discussion about three weeks ago about this, as a number
of critical posts were not making it to the list, but other posts were. It
could be that you were having intermittent problems with the list, but it
certainly appeared to a number of us that the list was being censo
No action should be taken on SoftFail, so this record is fine. Hard fail is
the only result that should be taken action on currently, and the only one
that really protects from abuse by spammers. However, I would advise making
sure all sending IPs are listed to avoid confusion.
Darin.
- Or
Kevin,
It would probably help for you to take a course or read a book on business
accounting. There are cost centers, and revenue-generating centers.
Sometimes it may be a judgement call as to where one item goes, as in spam
filtering, but it is the business's call as to how they structure their
Title: Message
While customers are referred to us for our
spam/virus filtering capabilities, we do operate it as a cost center, as the
labor and other expenses involved are slightly higher than the additional
revenue generated from them.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Glenn \
nters help you retain customers? Which
ones will get you new business? Electricity is also a cost center but
without it you would not have any revenue generating services to offer!
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On B
This is the best use for SPF. If you can control or specify what machines
can send mail for a domain, then you can set an SPF record in DNS and use
SPF FAIL to block forged mail.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck Schick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Declude. JunkMail"
Sent: Friday,
You can do that either in the IIS SMTP
configuration as Craig suggested below, or in the Computer's network identify,
giving it a FQDN for the machine. IIS SMTP will inherit this info if
nothing else is specified.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Craig
Edmonds
To: declude.jun
Nope. Just Pass (Pass or Soft Fail), Fail (Hard Fail), or Unknown (no SPF
record).
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "David Dodell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2006 11:01 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF Hard vs Soft Fail
I couldn't find it in the Declude docs
e UNKNOWN will be returned on a soft fail or no SPF record
present.
So you could use something like this in your global config.
SPFFAIL spf fail x 2 0
SPFPASS spf pass x -2 0
SPFUNKNOWN spf unknown x 0 0
Dean
On 8/21/06, Darin Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nope. Just Pass (Pass or
Attached are two VBS scripts. One lists all users and aliases, the other
will descript the specified account password. You can combine them to get a
dump of all accounts and passwords.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "John Doyle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, August 23,
Ugh...Ok, lets all cross our fingers, turn around three times, and throw a
pinch of salt over our left shoulders so it doesn't happen...
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "Pete McNeil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 9:32 AM
Subject: Re[2]: [
I've been seeing these as well on W2K3 with Declude 1.82 (still haven't
upgraded though I have two valid 4.0 licenses). It's worth noting that I
did not see these at all on W2K with the same IMail and Declude versions.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Beckstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Hi John,
We let them through, but it's really only one main customer that gets email
from them, and it's directly related to their line of business.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "John T (Lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 12:05 PM
Subject: [Declude.J
Check postings on the IMail newsgroup today. It has been reported to be an
issue with KB917953 from June. Most likely something in this weeks patches
in combination with KB917953 triggered this.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, September 15, 200
xperiencing the same issue with the webmail. Any more suggestions?
- Original Message -
From: "Darin Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 11:26 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] More info on Imail Webmail Problem
> Check postings on the IMail ne
>
>
> Linda Pagillo writes:
>
> > Thanks Darin. I did install the KB917953 patch from June. I also
installed 4
> > more Windows updates yesterday and that's about when the problem
started. I
> > removed those patches today and did a reboot of my server. I'
D]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2006 2:22 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] More info on Imail Webmail Problem
My mail server is running on Windows XP Pro.
- Original Message -
From: "Darin Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 4:41 PM
Su
Windows XP Pro.
- Original Message -
From: "Darin Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 4:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] More info on Imail Webmail Problem
He means the server. What server OS are you running? Windows 2000 or
Windo
More info on Imail Webmail Problem
My mail server is running on Windows XP Pro.
- Original Message -
From: "Darin Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 4:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] More info on Imail Webmail Problem
He means t
Main things I'm seeing with IMail/Declude on 2003 are
1. Messages that get corrupted by putting the headers in the body during
processing by Declude (1.82), and then a new set gets put in halfway through
the process. The message ends up with half of the tests displayed in the
body and the other h
Everything but the topmost received from header can
be forged, so I think that's what your looking at here. So look at that
top line, and compare with the Declude REVDNS variable to see where it's really
coming from.
Note also that the X-Mailer header could be forged
too, so it may or may
Sniffer catches most of these. What do the headers look like?
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Beckstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 11:42 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Blocking these?
How are you guys blocking something like the spam below?
T
ore.
I thought perhaps someone had an idea on how to block these that didn't
require sniffer. Just as a temporary solution until I purchase the renewal
in a week or two.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin
Cox
>
SPFUNKNOWN [1], Filter_Country [3]
X-Note: ========
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin
Cox
> Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 9:32 AM
> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
> Subject: Re:
Prices went up a few months ago. I don't believe it's still $30/month, or
if they still offer monthly subscriptions. Best bet is to contact them.
Pete would probably work with you on it.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Beckstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, Octobe
No, they changed their prices a few months
ago. It used to be $325/yr or $30/month, now it's $495/yr. They
don't have a monthly listed on the website that I could find, but they may still
allow monthly subscriptions.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Heimir Eidskrem
To: declud
If the address doesn't exist, then the message will bounce before it gets to
Declude. Unless of course you have nobody aliases, which is an extremely
bad practice these days. In that case you should remove the nobody alias,
and viola, problem solved.
If the attempts to deliver to nonexistent add
and so on down the line...in Imail
Imail Rules
IPs blocks
Declude
invURLB
Sortmonster
FProt
I have all these going on...
Richard Farris
Ethixs Online
1.270.247. Office
1.800.548.3877 Tech Support
"Crossroads to a Cleaner Internet"
- Original Message -
From: "Darin Cox&q
ess
Thank you..I will do more leg work to see what I can do...your help is
appreciated..
Richard Farris
Ethixs Online
1.270.247. Office
1.800.548.3877 Tech Support
"Crossroads to a Cleaner Internet"
----- Original Message -
From: "Darin Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You should note that this doesn't just catch image
spam, but all email with images. So, the weight should be extremely low,
if used at all, due to the large % of false positives seen by this
filter.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: chris
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent
You're making an assumption that everyone uses
Commtouch.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: chris
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 9:15 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] picture spam
Guys, Commtouch hasnt
missed any, stop making things hard
We don't use Commtouch, and do not intend to
license it. However, we do not have trouble with image spam leaking
through our system (still on Declude 1.82, though we do have a valid license and
SA for 4.x). Across all hosted domains we get on average two or
three leakage reports a week. O
I really don't adjust weights or create new filters
very often, just when there's an outbreak that needs special attention.
Sniffer is definitely our best tool for catching these. Occasionally some
slips through, but Pete's pretty quick on the draw to add rules to handle
them. Even with w
For most of us, the cost of CommTouch with the
Declude Gateway puts email hosting in the red. That's not good
business for us or Declude. Thus, not an option...
But nevermind that, Sniffer is better than
CommTouch, and there's an awful lot of overlap between the
two.
Darin.
- Ori
1 - 100 of 805 matches
Mail list logo
