Confirming my take on the situation, Kevin just posted this to
IMail_Forum:
> Thanks for your feedback and yes, Safari is a bit cantankerous.
> Firefox/Mac has been okay but not Safari.
>
> It turns out we just fixed (in the last few business days) the last known
> issue with Safari.
> My reading of Kevin Gills' message on 9/11 was that most everything but
> rich text editing now works, and that rich text support will be in the
> next release.
Not my reading...
>>Yes, we have added Safari support (all but the rich text editor) in
>>the last sprint. This will be available in
My reading of Kevin Gills' message on 9/11 was that most everything but
rich text editing now works, and that rich text support will be in the
next release. Naturally I haven't tested it, and it definitely needs
testing before committing Mac users to this interface. See below:
Hi All,
Ye
> The SMTP engine is largely unchanged since 8.0 was released.
Geez, man, that is completely untrue. If that's your premise, sorry,
that debate is on your planet, I'm not going there
> Safari support is in 2001.1 for the first time.
Then it's pretty strange how there's not a single post t
The SMTP engine is largely unchanged since 8.0 was released. 2006
deals primarily with webmail thus far, and these other services have
only been tweaked and not rewritten. I assume that all of 8.x is
vulnerable regardless of the source of the information on the list
which was not disputed. I
The proof-of-concepts which have been tested on multiple versions also list
a "not vulnerable" category if other versions have been tested.
I get the feeling that Ipswitch has washed its hands of the previous
version that is more than 90 days old. They take a passive approach to
security;
> On the IMail list they indicated that IMail 8.x is also affected and
> possibly older versions as well.
A non-Ipswitch poster said that an anonymous tech indicated so. We all
know that if that was a first-level tech... their word is not exactly
gold. True, the IMail product manager chimed in to
ndrew.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gans,
Günter (LDS)
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 4:23 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Buffer overflow in Ipswitch
products
Hello,
at the Heise news t
] On Behalf Of Gans, Günter
(LDS)Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 4:23 AMTo:
declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: [Declude.JunkMail] Buffer
overflow in Ipswitch products
Hello,
at the Heise news ticker
http://www.heise-security.co.uk/news/77889
an IMail-security-problem was
Hello,
at the Heise news ticker
http://www.heise-security.co.uk/news/77889
an IMail-security-problem was posted. Just new
versions seem to be involved. We are wondering whether the old IMail
version we use (7.15) is affected by this problem, too.
Best regards,
Guenter Gans
LDS NRW - German
10 matches
Mail list logo
