Currently we have our inv-URIBL config set to only scan if a message is
still below a certain weight when it reaches INV.
I'll go thru thru config again just to see if there's anything I may have
missed in that last time.
---
Randy A.
Technical Support Director
Global Web Solutions, Inc
Newer versions have additional features built in to help lessen the
processor load: skip weights, message sizes, max and min weights, etc.
These features can really make a difference if your server is seeing
performance impacts.
Darrell
Randy Armbrecht wrote:
That's the first thing I checked
In addition to what Pete suggests with Weightgate (which I also use on
some servers with older hardware). You will want to set inside your
invuribl.exe.config file values for max and min skipweights to skip any
unnecessary processing of messages.
Darrell
--
Che
I had that happen after a Microsoft .net update, fixed it by going to the
current version.
At 02:27 PM 2/6/2008 -0500, you wrote:
>
>I know about the old version (blame me) - just haven't found the time to do
>an upgrade to where we can monitor for an hour or so after upgrading to
>ensure t
That's the first thing I checked - all is well there
---
Randy A.
Technical Support Director
Global Web Solutions, Inc.
804-442-5300
http://globalweb.net
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Bilbee
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 2:26 P
Peter,
Thanks for the response. Darrell had pointed us to WeightGate about a year ago
- that helped clean up a few CPU issues we were having at that time.
---
Randy A.
Technical Support Director
Global Web Solutions, Inc.
804-442-5300
http://globalweb.net
- Original Message -
I know about the old version (blame me) - just haven't found the time to do
an upgrade to where we can monitor for an hour or so after upgrading to
ensure the success. Will try and move this to the forefront of our to-do
list.
Thanks for the response!
---
Randy A.
Technical Support Dir
On Wednesday, February 6, 2008, 2:09:23 PM, Herb wrote:
>
Hi Randy;
We have seen that often, in fact what we do is swap that test in on nights and weekends and out during weekdays (by just renaming the declude conf files with a schedule). It is a nice tool but will bog things down.
Check the DNS server InvURIBL is using to see if it is responding in a timely
manner to all the queries your config is using. There may be a DNS time out
issue.
Kevin Bilbee
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Randy Armbrecht
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 200
Chuck you have several options:
MAILFROM5 STARTSWITH Viagra
MAILFROM5 CONTAINSViagra
MAILFROM5 PCRE (?i:.*viagra.*@)
David Barker
VP Operations Declude
Your Email security is our business
978.499.2933 x 7007 office
978.988.1311 fax
[EMAIL P
Spam email is sent and the from line is
"vigara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Now the declude sender is [EMAIL PROTECTED] but I want to filter the sender name
of "vigara". Seems like it should be simple but it is eluding me.
Chuck Schick
Warp 8, Inc.
(303)-421-5140
www.warp8.com
---
This E-mail came
Hi Randy;
We have seen that often, in fact what we do is swap that test in on
nights and weekends and out during weekdays (by just renaming the
declude conf files with a schedule). It is a nice tool but will bog
things down.
Herb
Randy Armbrecht wrote:
We're seeing a backup today on mulitp
Randy,
None that I am aware of. It's processing fine on all of my servers.
Also, version 1.x is very old (several years). We are now on version 3.1.1.
Darrell
--
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude,
Imail, mxGuard, and ORF. IM
We're seeing a backup today on mulitple occasions now in the Declude Proc
folder. Proc folder has grown to as many as 6000+ items in it; once we turn
off our Inv-URIBL filter, messages start processing again. .
Any known issues that would cause this?
We're still running an older version of In
Hi,
Of course I knew it was AVAFTERJM. Seems I made a consistent typo. ;-)
And then of course we would want AVAFTERJM NODELETE, we do not need to scan
deleted mails anymore. :-)
Met vriendelijke groet,
Bonno Bloksma
hoofd systeembeheer
tio hogeschool hospitality en toerisme
begijnenhof 8-
hi,
we handle it for years like bonno described. it works fine. but we modified the
system a little bit. we gather all held mail in a directory where we use the
%DATE% - funtionality - so all held mails of one day are caught in a separated
directory. each night (when there is little work for o
The directive is AVAFTERJM
We can look at setting an option for DELETE only.
David B
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bonno
Bloksma
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 9:28 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] AFTERJM
Hi,
Fo
Hi,
For years we have had AFTERJM as a way to first delete al spam mail and then
scan the remainder for virusses.
Lots of us have not used it because a mail that was held or something like it
would not be scanned. If after that it was put back in the queue it would never
have been scanned.
A f
18 matches
Mail list logo
