Package: xserver-xorg-video-mga
Version: 1:1.4.7.dfsg.1-3
Severity: normal
Trying to use my configuration from the previous version in unstable
(1.4.6) caused complete failure -- the second head is never even
considered, so I only get single headed operation. Attempting to do
"what xorg 7.3 wants
> kls wrote:
> > Trying to use my configuration from the previous version in unstable
> > (1.4.6) caused complete failure -- the second head is never even
> > considered, so I only get single headed operation. Attempting to do
> > "what xorg 7.3 wants you to do"
With the update to libpixman, I can now run 1.9.99. It mostly works,
except 2d performance is abysmal -- full-screen windows (1152x900 for
me) take about a second to redraw. (however, 3d performance is as
good, or maybe slightly better, than it ever was)
Is this useful for me to report now, or sh
Package: xserver-xorg-video-mga
Version: 1:1.9.99.dfsg.1-1
Severity: normal
The previously observed abysmal 2d performance seems to be triggered
by WindowMaker. This does not seem to be a compositing problem,
because it is identical regardless of whether I have DRI enabled or
not. It also appears
> > > The problem could related to the acceleration architecture. You're using
> > > the default right now (XAA). Does it help if you add:
[...]
> > > Or maybe the new architecture EXA would be better (I don't know how good
> > > it is in the mga driver so far). Does it help if you add
> > > O
> kls wrote:
> > The previously observed abysmal 2d performance seems to be triggered
> > by WindowMaker. This does not seem to be a compositing problem,
> > because it is identical regardless of whether I have DRI enabled or
> > not. It also appears independent
> kls wrote:
> > I finally got around to upgrading my laptop (ATI M6LY)'s install of
> > sid, and found that this is *not* a problem in the mga driver. It's a
> > problem in some other random xorg component, presumably
> > libxcomposite1.
> >
> &
> On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 11:32 -0400, kls wrote:
> >
> > EXA on ATI is usable ( although I think it's barely perceptably slower
> > than composite-less XAA ) but compositing/aiglx(?) still has the other
> > non-speed related bugs:
> >
> > * wmnet
8 matches
Mail list logo
