Do you have considered inclusion of the compiz-manager
(http://releases.compiz-fusion.org/0.6.0/compiz-manager-0.6.0.tar.gz)
in the compiz package, or as a new separate package?
Emilio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECT
Hi Sean, Antonio De Luci worked on a fusion icon package. I'm ccing
him so he could pass you what he did, so you can use it as a starting
point.
He already asked me to find a sponsor for this package, and I think he
would be happy to contribute.
Bye,
Emilio
2008/2/7, sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED
As compiz 0.7.0 is out, I'm trying to update the package and help you
to get it quickly...
This is my first attempt:
http://download.tuxfamily.org/emiscabpo/tmp/compiz_0.7.0-0~emiscabpo%2b1.diff.gz
http://download.tuxfamily.org/emiscabpo/tmp/compiz_0.7.0-0~emiscabpo%2b1.dsc
I tried to produce a n
I'm trying to update the compiz package, and it now includes in
addition to the kde-windows-decorator (kde3..) a new
kde4-windows-decorator.
Now I have problems adding the build deps necessary. If I install
kdebase-dev, I cannot install kdelibs5-dev, and kdebase5-dev.
How I can manage to have bot
Hi Sean, here is what I think about compiz packages reorganization:
Pros:
- small number of packages
- single uploads and queues
Cons:
- versioning not aligned to upstream, they often release modifications
to each of these packages in a separate way.
- compiz-fusion-plugins: those plugins are cla
So what we can do about this?
Any advice?
2008/2/11, Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 2008-02-11, emisca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm trying to update the compiz package, and it now includes in
> > addition to the kde-windows-decorator (kde3..)
In order to push compiz fusion 0.6.0 and compiz 0.6.2 in the official
debian repository I would like if someone could review the packages I
made in order to improve them.
I used ubuntu's packages for compiz fusion packages and Shame
(shame.tuxfamily.org) for compiz as starting point.
On my blog t
So there are no plans to build the 0.4 branch?
2007/4/21, Brice Goglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
emisca wrote:
> Where is it?
> Do the compiz 0.4 (stable) version will be built? I would like to
> backport it to debian Etch...
Right now, compiz is in our git repo, with 0.3.6 in the
Can you please explain me what is the situation..?
I'm trying to backport to etch xorg 1.3.0-5 compiling it against mesa
6.5.3 using pbuilder.
The build stops saying that it cannot found the mesa tree.
Compiling it against mesa 6.5.2 works.
If I install and compile mesa 6.5.3 later than xserver-x
I've found on X mailing list, the needed patches...
http://svn.mandriva.com/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/packages?view=rev&revision=22174
the post is called "problem with xorg-server 1.3 and mesa 6.5.3".
I'll try to patch the deb sources, and I'll tell you if it works.
tags 470266 patch
thanks
I've made a patch that fixes the version number in the configure and
the configure.ac file.
Package now builds correctly with pbuilder.
Bye,
Emilio
--- xserver-xorg-video-i810.orig/configure.ac2008-03-14 14:09:35.0 +0100
+++ xserver-xorg-video-i810/configure
I would like to backport using pbuilder the new 2.0rc intel driver
that it's present in the experimental branch of debian.
Could anyone explain me which is the correct chain of dependencies to
have a well compiled xorg 1.2.99 server + mesa 6.5.2 +
xserver-xorg-video-intel 1.9.94?
I think it shoul
Thanks, I'll try to build it, and I'll report if it works...
2007/4/10, Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 00:20:53 +0200, emisca wrote:
> I would like to backport using pbuilder the new 2.0rc intel driver
> that it's present in the experime
But if I want to do a complete Xorg 7.3 backport.. is there any
compilation order in addition to what we said?
2007/4/10, emisca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Thanks, I'll try to build it, and I'll report if it works...
2007/4/10, Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On T
ow, compared to XAA.
In conclusion I've seen many and many improvements in xorg development
in the last year, thanks to everybody who contributed, good job!!
Bye,
Emilio
2007/4/10, emisca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
But if I want to do a complete Xorg 7.3 backport.. is there any
compilation
nfirm that the monitor doesn't power on when it's powered off
by dpms, like with 1.7.2 driver version, and that's good!
2007/4/10, Brice Goglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
emisca wrote:
> xrandr 1.2 is really a dream that become true... but perhaps there is
> no applicati
You should only run:
sudo /usr/share/bug/xserver-xorg-core/script
or instead:
sudo /usr/share/bug/xserver-xorg-core/script > nomefile
if you want to save the output on a file...
2007/4/21, Joshua Dunamis - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Excuse me, I don't know how to run it. If I try with sh this is the
Where is it?
Do the compiz 0.4 (stable) version will be built? I would like to
backport it to debian Etch...
Thanks
2007/4/19, Thierry Reding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
debian/changelog|6 --
debian/compiz.links |1 +
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
New commits:
com
This problem is fixed by a simple patch included in version 1.7.4 of the
driver.
Look at
http://gitweb.freedesktop.org/?p=xorg/driver/xf86-video-intel.git;a=commit;h=33c0fac6d63d9a509a24c7a5e5a46a0d6ee4dc5d
and bug #8536 in freedesktop bugzilla.
Please include this and if it's right, merge thes
19 matches
Mail list logo
